New Zealand government is leaking info and finding a culprit in media
New Zealand Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche addresses internal leaks amid ongoing investigations across government departments
Synopsis The New Zealand government continues to struggle with unauthorized leaks from public servants, prompting investigations and internal warnings. Recent disclosures highlight ongoing concerns about information security, with the Education Ministry launching an external probe and the Public Service Commissioner reinforcing measures to prevent further leaks Government email leak reveals crackdown on public servants
ADVERTISEMENT Such is the state of affairs within the New Zealand government that an email to ensure sensitive information is not leaked to the media also finds its way to news outlets. The leaked internal email revealed a new crackdown by the New Zealand government aimed at stopping unauthorized disclosures by public servants. The message, attributed to Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche, urged employees to cease leaking sensitive information, emphasizing that such actions violate the core values of the public service.
The email was circulated on May 22, hours after RNZ reported on a court injunction blocking its publication of confidential pre-Budget documents. Roche instructed agency heads to investigate leaks thoroughly and remove responsible employees where appropriate. He highlighted that leaking information undermines the government of the day and breaches the public service code of conduct.
Also read: New Zealand Finance Minister Nicola Willis' budget 2025 full speech: Trump's tariffs, slow growth, economic challenges
Education Ministry initiates external leak investigationIn response to continued leaks, the Education Ministry announced an independent investigation led by Michael Heron KC. The ministry's acting deputy secretary, Rob Campbell, sent an email to staff expressing concern over recent unauthorized disclosures damaging organizational trust and professionalism.The ministry invited RNZ to discuss potential information shared with the outlet, an invitation RNZ declined to protect confidential sources. Campbell's message noted that breaches compromise the integrity of the public service and confirmed plans to review information-sharing protocols and internal policies, including the ministry's Speak Up policy and protected disclosure guidelines.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ongoing leak incidents across public service agenciesRecent months have seen multiple leak incidents within New Zealand's public service. RNZ reported documents indicating planned cuts to the $118 million Kahui Ako education program and internal feedback on health data team reductions. Leaked reports from the Interislanders ferries advisory group and material relating to the Treaty Principles Bill also surfaced.
ADVERTISEMENT Also read: New Zealand sees surge in golden visa applications following policy reforms, wealthy Americans lead the wayThe government's inability to control these leaks points to systemic issues in managing sensitive information. Public Service Commissioner Roche reiterated the need for chief executives to uphold confidentiality and maintain public trust, reinforcing consequences for those responsible for leaks.
ADVERTISEMENT Opposition voices highlight culture of frustration among public servantsCritics argue that the prevalence of leaks reflects deeper dissatisfaction within the public service. Green Party public service spokesperson Francisco Hernandez linked the issue to ministers allegedly ignoring or censoring evidence-based advice, fostering frustration among officials. Hernandez acknowledged that while leaks are not condoned, they are symptomatic of an unhealthy culture and diminishing respect for democratic principles.Hernandez called for a balanced approach, urging the Public Service Commissioner to ensure ministers respect the neutrality and integrity of the public service alongside cracking down on leaks.What actions has the New Zealand government taken to address leaks by public servants?
ADVERTISEMENT The government has issued internal warnings through emails from Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche, emphasizing that leaks violate public service values. Additionally, agencies are instructed to investigate leaks thoroughly and take disciplinary actions, including termination when appropriate. The Education Ministry has also launched an independent external investigation led by Michael Heron KC.
Why did RNZ decline to participate in the Education Ministry's leak investigation?
RNZ declined the invitation to meet with the Education Ministry's investigator to protect the confidentiality of its sources. Protecting anonymous sources is a core journalistic principle and is key to maintaining trust and information flow.
What kinds of information have been leaked recently within New Zealand's public service?
Recent leaks have included confidential pre-Budget documents, plans to cut the $118 million Kahui Ako education program, internal feedback on health data team reductions, reports from the Interislanders ferries advisory group, and material related to the Treaty Principles Bill.
What concerns have been raised about the culture within New Zealand's public service related to leaks? Critics suggest leaks are a symptom of frustration among public servants who feel their evidence-based advice is ignored or censored by ministers. This dissatisfaction is seen as contributing to an unhealthy culture and declining respect for democratic processes.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
NEXT STORY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's mixed signals on Russia cloud European strategy
European countries, aiming for deeper economic sanctions to push Russia into a ceasefire in Ukraine, struggle with US President Donald Trump's ambivalent attitude on the issue, analysts say. Trump has expressed impatience accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of "playing with fire" and made threats, but does not seem to follow them up with action, they say. Diplomatic efforts to end the war, now in its fourth year, have intensified in recent weeks, with Putin being accused of stalling on peace talks. The Wall Street Journal and CNN both reported that Trump was now considering fresh sanctions against Russia, while stressing that he could still change his mind. On Wednesday, Trump expressed his frustration with Moscow, but also appeared to kick the can down the road by saying he would determine within "about two weeks" whether Putin was serious about ending the fighting. As the EU prepares a fresh package of sanctions against Moscow, the bloc's 18th, the chances of coordinated international sanctions, flagged by French President Emmanuel Macron during a visit to Kyiv with the German, British, and Polish leaders on May 10, seem increasingly remote. German media reported Tuesday that recent discussions between Europeans and Americans about Russia's evasion of sanctions had failed. "It seems that European hopes for joint action with the Americans... will once again be disappointed," said the Sueddeutsche Zeitung daily, citing an internal German foreign ministry document about an EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Brussels last week. The document cites EU sanctions envoy David O'Sullivan as saying that transatlantic coordination on Russian sanctions had collapsed. Even G7 cooperation had "lost momentum," the newspaper said in its report based on the document. Led by Paris, Berlin and London, Europeans are pitting their proactive stance against Washington's apparent passivity, said Sven Biscop, an expert at the Egmont Institute, a Belgian think tank. When Trump announced direct negotiations with Putin without Kyiv or Brussels, and when Ukraine's future NATO entry was ruled out, "the EU indicated it would continue its process of Ukraine's accession, arm it even after a hypothetical ceasefire, maintain sanctions, and deploy reassurance forces," he noted. "We deploy our levers but cannot force Trump to use his, or compel Putin to give up the war. We do not have that power," he said. Phillips O'Brien, strategy expert at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, suspects that European leaders have become victims of "maybe the greatest example of political gaslighting in US foreign policy history". Despite all Trump's posturing on imposing sanctions on Russia, "he clearly has no intention of doing so", O'Brien said. Europeans, meanwhile, are in favour of a plan by US Senator Lindsey Graham, who has called for a "secondary" sanctions plan, including a 500-percent tariff on countries importing Russian fossil fuels and raw materials. They hope that a US constitutional provision for a "discharge petition" wins the day, which would allow the sanctions bill to be adopted independently of the executive branch. This would put Trump at arm's length from any sanctions move, allowing him to remain in a non-committal "mediation position", said a European diplomat who declined to be identified. This stance confirms a new reality that Europeans are having to navigate: Washington now positions itself halfway between its traditional western European allies and Russia. This could, down the road, allow Trump to wash his hands of the conflict altogether if negotiations go nowhere just like he did on the North Korea issue in 2019, during his first term. "The question is no longer whether the United States will go rogue but what kind of rogue it will become," said Michael Beckley, a political scientist at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, an American think tank. "Will it be a reckless, hypernationalist power that lashes out, cuts ties, and pursues limited gain at great long-term cost? Or can it channel its strength into a more strategic posture?", he asked. On Friday, Macron said that Washington faces a "credibility test" over its response to Russia dragging its feet on a Ukraine ceasefire. burs-dt-dla/jh/as
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Meet Anjali Sud, Sanjay Seth, two Indian-Americans elected to top Harvard boards amid row with Trump
Anjali Sud and Sanjay Seth, two Indian-Americans, have recently been elected to Harvard University's Board of Overseers and Harvard Alumni Association, respectively. The Board of Overseers, which Anjali Sud will be joining for a two-year-term, was established in 1642. It is Harvard's second-highest governing body, which advises the school on academic programmes and policy, according to Also Read: Google paid $100 million to retain this Indian-American executive. No, not Sundar Pichai Anjali Sud will be replacing Canadian prime minister and Bank of England former governor Mark Carney, who resigned after assuming leadership of Canada's Liberal Party. The HAA Board, where Sanjay Seth will serve, focuses on enhancing alumni engagement, community-building, and volunteer leadership across Harvard's global alumni network. Also Read: Do Indian-Americans play major leadership roles at Harvard University? Here's what we know The appointments come amid Harvard University and US President Donald Trump clashing over the school's foreign student enrollments, after the administration threatened to revoke their SEVP certification. Anjali Sud was born in Detroit, Michigan, in 1983 to Punjabi immigrant parents and raised in Flint. She earned her undergraduate degree in finance and management from the University of Pennsylvania and went on to receive her MBA from Harvard Business School in 2011. Sud has worked for Amazon, Time Warner and was the Vice President of Global Marketing for Vimeo in 2012. She eventually became the CEO of the company as well. Also Read: Indian-American student Megha Vemuri calls out Gaza genocide in graduation speech: 'MIT wants a free Palestine' In 2023, she took over as CEO of Tubi, a new free streaming service with nearly 100 million monthly active users. Apart from her business interests, she also serves as the board chair for an online petitioning platform. She told Harvard's website, 'My parents came to this country to give me a shot at the American Dream. I achieved that dream through the power of a transformative education, and I want to pay it forward for the next generation." She added, "Harvard has both the opportunity and imperative to define the future of higher education at a time of existential change. I would be honored to help Harvard navigate that change and enable creative transformation.' Sanjay Seth, is an Indian-American climate and sustainability expert, who has been elected as one of the new directors of the Harvard Alumni Association (HAA). His three-year term will commence on 1 July 2025. Seth was born in Australia and holds dual master's degrees from Harvard - an MPA from the Kennedy School of Government and a Master's in Urban Planning from the Graduate School of Design, both earned in 2019. Sanjay Seth completed his undergraduate studies at Goldsmiths, University of London. Seth has served as Chief of Staff and Senior Advisor for Climate and Equity at the US Environmental Protection Agency's New England office. Prior to that, he worked as Climate Resilience Program Manager for Boston city and contributed to climate resilience efforts in New York City. At Harvard, he also co-founded the Harvard Alumni for Climate and the Environment group and was a fellow with the Bloomberg Harvard City Leadership Initiative.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
US lawmaker question top US universities over Chinese nationals in sensitive STEM research
Chairman John Moolenaar of the House Select Committee on China has sent a letter to the leaders of Carnegie Mellon, Purdue University, Stanford University, the University of Illinois, the University of Maryland, and the University of Southern California, asking for details about their policies and practices related to the enrollment of Chinese national students in advanced STEM programs and their engagement in federally funded research, as reported by the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (SCCCP). The letter underscores the growing dangers associated with China's deliberate attempts to leverage American universities for technological and military gains. Intelligence officials have indicated that American campuses are vulnerable targets for espionage and intellectual property theft; however, prestigious universities continue to enroll significant numbers of Chinese nationals in crucial research programs, prioritising financial gain over the long-term national security and education of American students in vital fields, as stated in the SCCCP release. Also Read: Turbulence ahead: Elon Musk exits from DOGE, but now trouble awaits him at Tesla, SpaceX, and X "The Chinese Communist Party has established a well-documented, systematic pipeline to embed researchers in leading US institutions, providing them direct exposure to sensitive technologies with dual-use military applications," said Chairman Moolenaar. Live Events "America's student visa system has become a Trojan horse for Beijing, providing unrestricted access to our top research institutions and posing a direct threat to our national security. If left unaddressed, this trend will continue to displace American talent, compromise research integrity, and fuel China's technological ambitions at our expense," as quoted by the SCCCP release. "The United States is at a dangerous crossroads where the pursuit of short-term financial gains by academic institutions jeopardises long-term global technological leadership and national security. Our nation's universities, long regarded as the global standard for excellence and innovation, are increasingly used as conduits for foreign adversaries to illegally gain access to critical research and advanced technology. Nonetheless, too many US universities continue to prioritise financial incentives over the education of American students, domestic workforce development and national security," he said. Also read: TACO Trump: Jimmy Kimmel brutally trolls President on his show, asks 'How does it feel?' "They do so by admitting large numbers of Chinese nationals into advanced STEM programs, potentially at the expense of qualified Americans. Accordingly, we write to request information regarding your university's policies and oversight mechanisms concerning the enrollment of Chinese national undergraduate, graduate, and PhD students, their involvement in federally funded research, and the security of sensitive technologies developed on campus," the release said. The House Select Committee on the CCP will persist in examining how US educational institutions might be aiding the CCP's worldwide objectives and will seek policy measures to protect American technological supremacy, the announcement stated. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
