Arrivals may need better English as part of migration crackdown, suggests No 10
The Government will crack down on record high levels of migration in a forthcoming document, No 10 has suggested, amid reports migrants will need a higher standard of English to work in the UK.
The immigration White Paper is expected to be published next week and is likely to include measures aimed at reducing net migration into the UK, which stood at 728,000 in 2024.
Sir Keir Starmer is aiming to counter the rise of Reform UK with a tougher approach to migration in the wake of his party's local election losses.
Migrants may have to learn a higher standard of English to work in the UK and wait for longer before they can settle permanently as part of the White Paper's reforms, newspaper reports have suggested.
Downing Street would not directly comment on the reports, but insisted ministers were 'focused on bringing down the last government's record high levels of migration and tackling the causes behind it'.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman added: 'Our upcoming immigration White Paper will set out a package of measures to do exactly that.
'I am not to speculate on the details of the White Paper in this stage, obviously, but proficiency and language and being able to communicate are of course essential parts of integration.'
Elsewhere, Antonia Romeo, the chief civil servant at the Home Office, would not speculate on what was in the White Paper as she appeared before a committee of MPs.
Speaking at the Public Accounts Committee, the Home Office permanent secretary said: 'I would like to say that the immigration White Paper, which aims to join up skills, immigration and the labour market requirements – so a very important way of thinking about immigration in the context of what is needed in the labour market – is going to be published shortly.
'So at that point, it might be better to have to give more detail on what you have just mentioned, should it be in the paper.'
Among the strict new measures under consideration is raising English language proficiency required by migrants applying for a UK work visa, according to The Times.
They would in future be required to have the equivalent of a foreign language A-level standard of English, rather than the GCSE standard currently required, the newspaper said.
Elsewhere, the Financial Times (FT) reported that migrants will be required to wait as long as 10 years before they can apply for indefinite leave to remain in the UK.
Most migrants who come to Britain on time-limited work visas can currently make an application for indefinite leave to remain after five years.
This paves the way for them to apply for benefits and the path towards UK citizenship.
The wait could be extended to 10 years if migrants have spent too much time outside the UK since arriving or if there are questions about their financial status, the FT said.
Similar plans to extend the waiting period for indefinite leave to remain were set out by the Conservatives on Tuesday.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp claimed the Government had 'resorted to trying to rip off parts of Conservative migration policy'.
The Government has 'realised the Conservatives were right all along – but apparently haven't had the courage to bring forward our plans in full', he claimed.
Mr Philp added: 'We will always work to put the national interest first. If Labour were serious about doing the same, they would back our other proposals such as dis-applying the Human Rights Act and deporting all foreign criminals.'
The Tories' 'Deportation Bill' and Labour's plans to toughen its migration response come as both parties aim to win back voters from Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
The party, which has positioned itself as tough on migration, won hundreds of local council seats and wrested control of the Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary constituency from Labour on May 1.
Official figures show net migration has soared since the UK left the EU in January 2020, reaching a record high of 903,000 in the year to June 2023 before falling back slightly to 728,000 in the following year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
British and Spanish PMs agree Gibraltar deal unlocks 'huge opportunity'
LONDON (Reuters) -British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a phone call with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, agreed that a deal on the status of Gibraltar unlocked the opportunity for both countries to advance bilateral relationship, Starmer's office said on Wednesday. "Prime Minister Sánchez congratulated the Prime Minister on his leadership," a Downing Street spokesperson said. "Both leaders also agreed that this development unlocks huge opportunity to advance the bilateral relationship between the UK and Spain, on behalf of the British and Spanish people." Starmer also spoke to Chief Minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo, the spokesperson said, adding that they both agreed the agreement would allow them to "plan for the long-term while protecting British sovereignty."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The charts that show why Reeves's spending plans are a fantasy
Rachel Reeves claims she is investing in the country's Chancellor was cheered on by her front benches as she announced more money for the NHS, defence and schools in a move she boasted would lead to 'a national renewal'. In some senses, there were few surprises on Wednesday. We already knew how much Reeves had to dole out in her maiden spending review. The NHS gobbled up most of the money, with day-to-day spending on the Department of Health and Social Care growing by an average of 2.8pc a year over the forecast period. Defence spending has also received a significant boost as pressure from Nato mounts. Other departments, notably the Home Office, were squeezed as Reeves sought to make the sums add up. But while the numbers may tally on paper, economists are already questioning whether they will work in reality as pressures build from a more dangerous world and an older population. There are also fears that Reeves's announcement will pave the way for massive increases in council tax to keep Britain's streets safe. Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), says that while health and defence are big winners 'in pounds and pence, even here, one has to wonder whether this will be enough'. There are other pressures elsewhere. The Chancellor once vowed to never make an unfunded spending commitment but this week announced she will restore winter fuel payments to most pensioners with no clues as to how it will be paid for. She has also announced a Fair Pay Agreement for social care, which will set minimum terms across the sector without any clarity on how the proposals will be funded. Welfare spending, which sits outside Whitehall budgets, is poised to keep ballooning over the next five years as the Government prepares another about-turn to planned cuts to disability benefits. And unresolved questions over levies such as fuel duty will also pile more pressure on the Chancellor. While Reeves's statement is meant to set in stone government spending plans for at least the next three years, her £40bn tax raid last year may not be enough to foot the eventual bill. The tax burden is already on course to reach a peacetime high, but JP Morgan and Capital Economics both believe that Reeves will have to raise taxes by more than £20bn in the Budget this autumn to cover her increased spending plans and fend off increasing pressure from Reform. 'The spending review contains few surprises,' says Elliott Jordan-Doak, at Pantheon Macroeconomics. 'The question is only how big tax hikes will be in October.' The Government hinted on Wednesday that council tax would rise sharply to pay for policing after Reeves cut the Home Office budget by 2.2pc. Reeves claimed 'police spending power' would increase by 2.3pc in the coming years, which documents suggest could include more money from council tax. The Liberal Democrats said families in typical Band D households now faced a £395 increase in council tax by the next election. While the NHS is clearly a winner, there are already questions over whether the money will be enough to keep the health service running. Analysis by the IFS shows there have been just two occasions – in 1991 and 2004 – where health spending grew more slowly than envisaged in the spending review. More often, governments have been forced to top up health budgets to boost day-to-day health spending, which is on course to rise from a 26pc share of Whitehall budgets in 1999 to more than 40pc by the end of the decade. Reeves has set out plans to increase the NHS day-to-day budget more slowly than its historical average – by 3pc in real terms compared to 3.6pc – despite growing pressures on the health service. The plan set out by the previous Conservative government assumed real-terms funding increases of around 3.6pc per year. Johnson says: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18 week target for hospital waiting times within this parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up.' The plans also revealed the front-loaded nature of many of the settlements, with NHS capital spending set to remain flat in real terms for the rest of the decade after this year. The Office for Budget Responsibility, the Government's tax and spending watchdog, believes pressures from an older and sicker population will increase demand for NHS services by 1.1pc per year alone. 'The pressure to spend more on the NHS will still be great even after today's announcement,' says Jordan-Doak. Economists also questioned whether the health department's pledge to find £9bn in efficiency savings by the end of the decade was credible. Labour will unveil a refreshed NHS 10-year plan in the coming months, which is expected to demand more spending on staff and equipment to deal with Britain's demographic challenge. Another winner from Wednesday's spending review was defence, with spending in this area on track to rise to 2.6pc of GDP by 2027. But there was no mention of a 3pc target which Sir Keir Starmer has committed to, let alone the 3.5pc goal Nato is piling pressure on countries to reach. Increasing defence spending from 2.5pc of GDP to 3pc represents an increase of £17bn by the end of the decade. That's the equivalent of an extra 2p on income tax. Johnson says: 'On defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6pc of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' There are also doubts about whether Reeves will be able to force through the cuts envisioned for the departments that lost out in Wednesday's announcement – including the Home Office, transport, Foreign Office and environment departments, which will suffer cuts in real terms. Even schools will get a real-terms freeze if you strip out the cost of expanding free school meals. In fact, departmental spending to 2028 will on average grow more slowly than under plans Rishi Sunak set out in the Conservatives' last spending review in 2021. 'We think that these real-terms spending cuts will be impossible to deliver given the pressure on public services and voters' demands for increased spending,' says Jordan-Doak. Then there are the Chancellor's investment plans. Capital spending is set to rise by £113bn over this parliament, with money going on everything from transport to green energy, new prisons and housing. Reeves is gambling that this investment blitz can kick-start growth. But as with any gamble, there is a risk it could go wrong. 'If the Government insists on accumulating the extra spending it's planning over the full parliament, it seems only fair to also draw attention to the £140bn of extra borrowing we're forecast to do over the same period,' says Johnson, at the IFS. Extra borrowing will keep Britain's debt pile rising every year until the end of the decade. 'That borrowing incurs a cost in the form of additional debt interest – and one that's bigger than it was a year ago,' says Johnson. The question was always whether the extra investment would bring sufficient benefits to make that worthwhile.' Government borrowing costs rose in the immediate aftermath of Reeves's announcement. Andrew Goodwin, at Oxford Economics, calculates that the Chancellor's already wafer-thin £9.9bn headroom to meet her borrowing rules has already been eroded by £2.5bn as a result of higher gilt yields. And while Reeves boasts about all the extra investment being pumped into the economy, another key question is: will she be able to get all of that money out the door? Previous analysis by the Resolution Foundation shows that successive governments of all stripes have struggled to spend all the money they wanted. Just £1 in every £6 in planned investment spending over the past seven spending reviews since 1998 actually went out the door. Why? Governments are often too optimistic about when projects become shovel-ready. There may be planning hold-ups, and the construction sector may not be able to cope with all that extra demand for engineers, project managers and construction workers to deliver these projects. 'We now know more about what sorts of projects the Government plans to invest in,' Johnson says. 'The focus must now shift to delivery and avoiding the all-too-common project over-runs.' Governments have in the past raided capital budgets in order to make their day-to-day spending budgets add up. New safeguards have been introduced to in theory prevent this from happening again. But this may simply make it harder for Labour to meet spending demands if plans go awry without putting up tax. Ben Ramanauskas, at Policy Exchange, casts doubt on Labour's ability to live within its means. He says: 'While the uplift to the defence and criminal justice budgets are welcome, this is unlikely to go far enough. Instead the Chancellor has chosen to prioritise the NHS by giving it even more money, without insisting on productivity improvements.' All this is expected to keep the size of the state permanently bigger than its pre-lockdown size. Ramanauskas says: 'The Government is yet to set out how it will fund its largesse to the public sector. However, it will almost certainly have to place even greater strain on the public finances by increasing borrowing or adding extra burdens to households and businesses by raising taxes.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Term Sheet Next: Steven Lee, an SV Angel alum, launches Seven Stars with $40 million VC fund for seed and pre-seed AI startups
In 1993, Steven Lee's parents opened Seven Star Fashion, a textile shop in L.A.'s Koreatown, after immigrating from South Korea to build a new life. 'They were the first entrepreneurs I knew,' said Lee. 'They worked long hours, a classic immigrant story. They came here with basically nothing, and didn't know how to speak English. They didn't have a network—and they're a very big influence for what I do today.' Today, a very different Seven Star launches. Steven Lee has left his role as a partner at SV Angel to start his own firm, Seven Stars, which is debuting with an oversubscribed $40 million fund. Raised in just five weeks, the fund focuses on pre-seed and seed-stage investments in AI applications across both consumer and enterprise categories. Lee plans to back 35 to 45 companies per year. Limited partners include a university endowment and a pension fund—both undisclosed—as well as StepStone Group and Sapphire Partners. Nate Leung, Sapphire partner and OpenLP cofounder, said part of Lee's pitch was refreshingly simple: 'an outstanding track record from a highly respected firm.' SV Angel—founded by legendary VC Ron Conway—has a long history of early bets on companies like Google, Facebook, and Airbnb. Lee built his own reputation within that legacy, focusing on AI, and was involved in backing startups like ElevenLabs, Mercor, Captions, Reflection AI, and Skild AI, as well as personally investing in OpenAI. These early partnerships helped lay the foundation for his new firm. Hunter Somerville, partner at StepStone Group, pointed to Lee's 'extensive relationships and trusted reputation with leading AI companies' as another key strength. 'I've started to build this unique network, really understanding what these visionary AI founders need from their early investors,' Lee told Fortune. 'I really believe that AI is the equalizer for the 90%, and it's already transforming lives at a global scale. And it really starts with motivated founders who are building enduring companies, empowering individuals and other companies to thrive. And while AI's already benefiting 1 billion knowledge workers today—we're already seeing it in finance, law, marketing—I'm most excited about AI's impact on the next 8 billion people.' He's already invested in five companies since launching the fund, though he declined to name them. Lee's value-add strategy is highly focused: offering hands-on fundraising support, access to a curated advisory network, and help with hiring across all levels. 'It's not just helping with hiring early, with entry-level engineers, but helping and closing and sourcing for mid-level to senior-level executives,' said Lee. 'When you put those three things together, that's kind of the investor that I want to be. And I think that's very unique in this moment of time, especially as a lot of these first-time AI founders are navigating this really complex technology for the first time as well.' Influenced by his parents, Lee had always imagined starting something of his own one day. Despite working in AI (or perhaps because he works in AI), he believes success isn't just about the technology—it's also about the people behind it and the life experiences they bring. 'Building a company, or any kind of business is incredibly difficult,' said Lee. 'It takes a lot of courage, lots of sacrifices. Quite frankly, it takes a bit of luck as well. I always want to make sure I remember that, especially as I work with these next-generation AI founders. Because I also want this firm to be enduring, for it to outlive me … In good times and bad times, I want to remember that's what we're striving for. That it's generational. That Seven Star Fashion was the first generation.' And the new generation begins now. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
