
It's time to rethink boredom, procrastination and regret
It's no use being told by self-help books to formulate my top priorities when I already have core goals that define who I am or want to become. Or to be urged to break up tasks into bite-sized steps, with a deadline for each step, because how does that work when it's a relationship or a vocation that I'm avoiding? Conventional advice says I should forgive myself my paralysis rather than beating myself up about it but, soothing as this is, it doesn't magically give me either the focus or the energy I need to fulfil those prized goals. I can remove external distractions, especially online access, but what am I to do about distractions inside my head: fantasising, say, about a holiday or a romance as an escape from the task in hand?
When the philosopher Augustine (354–430 AD) begged God to grant him 'chastity and self-control, but not yet,' he, too, wouldn't have been helped by, say, Cal Newport's core recommendations in Slow Productivity: 'Do fewer things', 'Work at a natural pace', and 'Obsess over quality'. Augustine knew exactly what his top priority was: to abandon sensual pleasures for a life of total devotion to God. His problem wasn't doing too many things, a manic work schedule or poor quality. Rather it was that he couldn't unleash his inner motivation to live his best life. And so he was putting it off, helped by procrastination's crucial illusions: that deferral is always temporary and that nothing decisive will be lost by it.
When it comes to avoiding, resisting, even sabotaging our highest priorities, we need a very different approach to conquering procrastination. First off, let's realise that a priority's very significance – it is our ticket to a meaningful life and self-esteem – can paralyse and overwhelm us. So why not imaginatively lower its stakes and think of it instead as our favoured displacement activity, there to sneak off and have fun with while we sideline everything else?
Then let's reimagine our priority not as grim slavery to a maximally successful life, as if we're machines to be optimised for efficient productivity, but rather as play. By play I mean an explorative, joyful mindset by which to loosen those paralysed cogs of our mind, releasing it from servitude to the managerial dullness of the to-do list mentality and allowing it to move nimbly. Play is a way of becoming open to new ways forward, new ideas, surprise. It's entirely consistent with clear goals, tight focus, hard work and ambition. Which is surely why, historically, the spirit of play has catalysed so many innovations, from 9th-century Baghdad, where far-sighted engineering breakthroughs were developed that, centuries later, fuelled the west's industrial revolutions, right up to today's digital and AI revolutions. It's why corporations such as Google and Nvidia cultivate an environment of free-wheeling exploration. When dull, dutiful routine is bogging us down, the spirit of play can be just what's needed to break the logjam.
But if neither the spirit of play nor lowering the stakes of our priorities suffices, then it's time to harness the creative power of regret and boredom – two emotions abundantly created by procrastination and often, wrongly, seen as entirely negative. Yes, they can further paralyse us procrastinators, corroding our self-esteem and wasting our one shot at living. But sometimes the message they're sending us isn't to try again and try harder. Rather it's that our ambitions are unsuited to us, even when they're strongly held. Or that how we're pursuing them is unthinking and ossified by routine. Or that we're not yet ready for them; for it can be perilous to come too early to, say, our vocation or an important relationship. In other words, regret and boredom can turn procrastination into a blessing: a rebellion against stale priorities and soulless routines; a life-giving refusal, arising deep within us, to go on as before.
The 19th-century philosopher Søren Kierkegaard describes how regret fuelled, but was eventually key to resolving, the greatest dilemma of his life: whether or not to marry Regine Olsen, whom he loved. One of history's great amorous procrastinators, Kierkegaard discovered he would regret it if he married Regine and regret it if he didn't. No sooner had she accepted his proposal, after a three-year courtship, than he panicked. Gradually, however, his regret afforded him deeper insight into who he was, propelling him to the wrenching decision to forgo the woman he loved for his vocation as a writer – a vocation he came to believe was incompatible with the duties and responsibilities of marriage. He learned how regret's clarifying pain – its tremendous power to make vivid to the mind's eye what is lost by pursuing one life priority over another – can impel us to choose and then to live our choice authentically and to the full.
What, however, if we successfully choose a course in life, or accomplish a long-cherished priority, yet we soon feel empty, unfulfilled? We're besieged by that fatal little question, 'So what?' – fatal for procrastination because it leeches all motivation, as the great Russian writer Leo Tolstoy discovered at age 50, already world-famous and with timeless novels like Anna Karenina and War and Peace under his belt. 'Well, fine,' the question whispered to him, 'so you will be more famous than Gogol, Pushkin, Shakespeare, Molière, more famous than all the writers in the world, and so what?' In the face of inevitable death, Tolstoy agonised, what is the greatest success worth?
If that question can paralyse a driven superachiever like Tolstoy, it can paralyse any of us. How then can we recover our motivation?
To start with, by abandoning our expectation of stable fulfilment. The reality is that fulfilment – like most pleasure – is temporary. Our memory is remarkably poor at retaining the experience of it. Nor can we ever know – as the 'So what?' question assumes we can – what exactly our achievements add up to or how and whether they'll endure. Like Tolstoy, none of us can sum the net value of the meanings, delights, fulfilled desires and other outcomes we've secured on just one of our top priorities, say being a writer, a parent or a charity worker. Let alone across all of our top priorities.We can't even know to what extent we've fulfilled our potential, because the very idea that we each have a fixed potential waiting to be fulfilled (or, even if we do, that we could know when we've attained it) is probably an illusion.
What really matters are the delights of the journey. Shakespeare's Cressida surely expresses this when she says: 'Things won are done; joy's soul lies in the doing'; as does a remark attributed to Confucius: 'Roads are made for journeys, not destinations.' A well-lived life is one where we richly employ our energies and talents in the activity of pursuing those ends we most cherish.
What then of death annulling all our achievements, which was at the heart of Tolstoy's paralysing nightmare? How do we stop that thought from miring us in procrastination? The answer, ironically, is by diving deeper into death's reality. Here we need to learn from the experience of so many of the incurably ill who, alongside fearful uncertainty, discover thrillingly fresh vitality, clarity of purpose and joy in life, whether in its most routine moments or its largest priorities. These brave people teach us that nothing can commit us more powerfully and meaningfully to the people and projects we love than truly experiencing ourselves as mortal.
But this requires us to go far beyond 'mere acceptance that we'll eventually die', transience, or the shocking brevity of even a long lifespan – acceptance that remains too abstract to motivate us more than sporadically. Instead we need to attain a deep awareness that death can arrive at any moment. To achieve this awareness, those of us who have no experience of a terrible diagnosis will need to use that most powerful of all motivators: our imagination. For the most vivid possible relationship to our mortality is the key to rediscovering the living force of our hopes and commitments, and so to conquering procrastination.
High time, therefore, for me to get back to the piano. To reimagine it as my favoured displacement activity. To enjoy it as disciplined, goal-driven free play. To learn from my boredom with my own playing. To delight in the beauty of sound right now. And above all, to realise that life could be over in just a minute.
Jump! A New Philosophy for Conquering Procrastination by Simon May is published by Basic Books at £16.99 on 25 February. Buy a copy for £15.29 from guardianbookshop.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
4 days ago
- Telegraph
Belief in God doubles among young people
A belief in God has doubled among young people in the past four years. More than one third of 18 to 24-year-olds now believe in a supernatural deity, up from just 16 per cent in 2021. The YouGov survey findings also reveal that atheism – the belief of no God – has fallen in the same age group from 49 per cent in August 2021 to 32 per cent. The poll, which did not break down the respondents by religion, appeared to support claims of increased belief in Britain amid a 'quiet revival' in churches and the growing Muslim population. 'Spiritual awakening' The Rt Rev Jill Duff, the Bishop of Lancaster, told The Telegraph that Britain was undergoing a 'spiritual awakening'. 'I'm not surprised by this,' she said. 'It is very much what we are seeing on the ground in our churches. 'There has been a trend in this direction – that the younger you are, the more spiritually open you are – for quite a number of years, and we are seeing a real openness to God and Christianity and especially to the supernatural in the younger age-group. 'I think there is a spiritual awakening. Covid led to a big increase in prayer – for example, there is a global week of '24/7 Prayer' coming up in September. 'The data is that as people pray, the nation spiritually awakens. That has been the case for generations.' The research also identified smaller increases in belief in other age groups during the same period. Among those aged 25 to 49, belief in God has increased from 21 to 25 per cent between 2021 and 2025, with atheism declining from 45 to 42 per cent. In the 50 to 64 age bracket, belief in God has remained consistent at 27 per cent, but atheism has declined from 41 to 36 per cent. But for those aged 65 and above, belief in God has decreased from 35 to 32 per cent and atheism has increased from 30 to 35 per cent. The figures indicate that the long-term decline of faith in Britain could be beginning to change. Church attendance has declined significantly since the middle of the 20th century, with those going to a Church of England service estimated to have fallen by 1.5 per cent every year since the 1950s. The 2021 census also revealed that Christians now account for less than half of the population of England and Wales for the first time in recorded history. 'Quiet revival' of Christians Other recent research also indicates that this decline in religious observance may be slowing amid mass immigration and a claimed 'quiet revival' of Christians. The Bible Society found earlier this year that 16 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds were monthly churchgoers, up from just four per cent in 2018. The research identified particular increases in attendance at Roman Catholic and Pentecostal churches. Bible sales in the UK have also almost doubled in the last five years. In 2019, sales totalled £2.69 million, but in 2024 they stood at £5.02 million, according to figures from Nielsen BookScan. Census data also shows Britain's Muslim population has increased in the past decade, rising from 2.7 million in 2011 to 3.9 million in 2021 – almost 50 per cent of whom were under 24. There was also a 5.7 per cent increase in the Jewish population between 2011 and 2021, up from 271,904 to 287,360.


Spectator
7 days ago
- Spectator
The spiritual journey of St Augustine
When I lived in south London, my Algerian barber used to tell me that he came from Souk Ahras, 'the home town of Augustine'. I found it strange to hear a forbidding doctor of the early church described as a local boy made good, but Catherine Conybeare shows me that I should not have done. Algerians have remembered what the Church has often overlooked: that Augustine's thinking owes everything to his birth in 354 in what was then Roman North Africa. Although five million of his words survive, they come to us from the hands of medieval copyists who were more interested in setting out his doctrines than in recording his life. They cut up his sermons and letters, removing irrelevant or cryptic local allusions. Conybeare resurrects Augustine the African by sifting this heap of words for surviving references to people and places. Although wryly describing herself as a philologist, she is also a perceptive traveller, enlivening her textual work with vivid descriptions of Augustine's cities in their prime and as they survive today. These literary devices are hardly new. They have defined the study of late antiquity ever since the 1960s, when Peter Brown first composed a satisfying biography of Augustine of Hippo by reading his theology against the grain. They also bring diminishing returns. Augustine was too intent on spiritual realities to notice the material and urban world around him much. Even the most evocative descriptions of temples or amphitheatres he must have seen may not bring him much closer. Nor are his local observations always revelatory. It is true that his description of humans as caught in God's olive press must have resonated with African farmers who lived for the olive harvest, but the example seems as slight as an English vicar describing the Christian life as a difficult wicket or a game of two halves. The test of Conybeare's book is not whether it generates new information but whether it refreshens and deepens appreciation of Augustine's thought. Here it succeeds brilliantly, convincingly relating his greatest achievements to his sense of being caught between Rome and North Africa. Although he had viewed his education in Thagaste (now Souk Ahras) and Carthage as just a means of escape to Rome, the city disappointed him. It struck him as London might an ambitious young writer today – filled with politicians trading off past imperial glories and a public that prized cultural polish but refused to pay for it. He preferred Milan, the seat of the powerful bishop Ambrose. But even here he ended up mainly hanging around with people he knew from home. Conybeare neatly points out that what initiated the conversion to Christianity, described in his Confessions, was a conversation with his hometown friend Alypius and an African acquaintance about the impressive piety of Antony – an African monk. Augustine was always conscious of an inferiority when dealing with Romans, who made fun not of his race but of his tongue: he tended to mispronounce Latin. When they turned really nasty, they mocked him as a 'Punic pamphleteer' who gabbled in the native language of his country. When he returned to Africa, though, becoming a priest, then a bishop, in the coastal town of Hippo (now Annaba), he was impatient with its narrow mental horizons. His new largeness of view explains the cryptic and violent controversy he waged for decades against the Donatists, who ran a rival church in Africa. He had come back home as a proud member of a universal institution, writing that 'we are the good fragrance of Christ in every place'. Yet the Donatists said that a church's rites were only powerful if enacted by priests whose purity they had judged themselves – a principle that Augustine mocked as African self-satisfaction run mad. Caught between two places, he now had no real home. When posh refugees from Rome turned up in North Africa after Alaric sacked the city in 410, he began The City of God to quieten their unsettling whingeing about its collapse. Augustine did not care about the looting or destruction of buildings – a city was its people. But as his giant work slowly progressed, he shifted gear, coming to argue that all Christians should consider themselves peregrini. We now often render that word as the quaint 'pilgrims', but it began as a technical term for legalised aliens. Augustine's life on the outskirts of a disintegrating empire taught him that we are all citizens of nowhere. Italy ultimately claimed Augustine. Centuries after his death in 430, his body ended up in Pavia, under a pompous monument that makes no reference to Africa. Perhaps he would not have minded. The lesson of this book is also his teaching: even if our origins explain us, they should not limit who we become.


Telegraph
07-08-2025
- Telegraph
‘God exists whether you have doubts or not': Five religious leaders on Kemi Badenoch's crisis of faith
At one stage in her life, Kemi Badenoch believed in God. 'I would have defined myself as a Christian apologist, always arguing with people about why there was a God,' she told the BBC on Thursday. But then news of Josef Fritzl, who'd locked his daughter in a cellar for 24 years, broke. 'That killed it', said Badenoch. It's a story familiar to religious leaders across the country, who are often asked how God can exist and still allow evil and awful personal tragedy to take place. Indeed, vicars, priests, rabbis and imams often experience their own trials, which can be all the more tortuous given their responsibility to project confidence and stability in the face of adversity. Here, five religious leaders describe how they address doubts that are raised with them about the existence of God, even in cases where they have privately wrestled with similar concerns. 'I don't have the answer' Yitzchak Schochet, 60, rabbi of Mill Hill Synagogue, north London At the beginning of April, there was a crazy car accident that happened in New York. A car jumped a kerb on Saturday morning when a mother and her daughters were walking home from synagogue, killing her and two of the children. I flew to the funeral in Israel, and I will never forget how, in the midst of it all, the grandfather who lost his daughter and two granddaughters yelled out to me, 'Rabbi. Why does God allow this to happen?' All I could do in that moment was give him a hug. I wasn't there to even attempt an answer, because I don't have the answer, and I have to be honest enough to know that. I know that there are things that are well beyond human comprehension. To believe in God means that you believe there are things that are beyond your own understanding. But the inevitable tension is always going to be there: knowing that I will not be able to provide the answer for the question that they're asking, but at the same time, wanting to encourage them to hold on to their faith, because that's the only thing that will walk them through whatever turmoil they're undergoing. 'I'm not some kind of saviour figure' Fr Ben Bell, 50, rector of St George the Martyr, south London My church is on Borough High Street. It's really busy, just down the road from London Bridge. We've got Guy's Hospital around the corner from us so it's not uncommon for people to come into the church on their way to an appointment. They come in with all sorts of crises: relationships, work-related, homelessness. Sometimes people come and ask: 'Am I cursed?' And I can give some concrete answers to that and say, 'No, I don't believe that is the case.' But very often, my role is to be an accommodating presence for people who are going through the s--- of life. We can all be tempted, from time to time, to think that we might be able to help. I'm not some kind of saviour figure, so that's not my business. I'm also a human who is a representative of the church. The place of the church is to hold people, or to provide a space for people who are wrestling with these questions: that is exactly what the church exists for, not for people who are full of certainty. As vicars, we're certainly not superheroes, we're certainly not fixers. We're certainly not spiritual paramedics. Our role is of accompaniment and prayer. Doubt and questioning how faith breathes are all part of this thing we call 'faith'. One of the great curses of modernity is that it's taught us that faith is an individual activity, and is all about certainty. I think that faith is communal and about mystery. It's not about certainty. And I think that we've been betrayed by modernist thinking in that respect. 'My son died on his honeymoon, but I don't believe it was the will of God' Rabbi Jonathan Romain, 70, Convener of Reform Judaism's Beit Din One of my sons drowned on his honeymoon two years ago: it was devastating for me, but it was not the will of God or part of some unfathomable divine plan, but sheer bad luck. Being religious means not being derailed by it and still living life to the full. People like to have a reason for why things happen. Why did my son drown? Why did my father die of cancer? Why did my wife get killed in a car accident? Sometimes there is no good explanation. People don't like question marks, they like answers. They much prefer to have an exclamation mark to a question mark. But Judaism is very much about saying life happens, bad things happen, but let's try and make a positive change. The trouble is that sometimes there's a difference between a person's emotional response and their intellectual response. Intellectually, a lot of people will say, 'You're right: my wife's cancer was just just bad luck', but emotionally they still feel there ought to be a reason. My message is: that's not always possible, but what is possible is change. So go out and do something positive for change in your wife's memory. 'My own faith is challenged' Glynn Harrison, 75, former diocesan lay minister, Christian speaker and retired psychiatrist I've wrestled with many of the same doubts and questions that Kemi talks about. You can't be a follower of Christ and not be sensitive to suffering. But I'm now much more comfortable with the fact that not knowing the answer to something doesn't mean an answer doesn't exist. And that's the way I cope with this question of suffering and the violent clash there is between the realities of the world and the conviction that God is good. I see the terrible toll of mental illness on some people and that really challenges my own faith, because you are watching a disintegration of the self at the most profound level of who we are. That's really hard, but even so, I come back to this idea that I think I can trust that God is good. Everything else about my faith tells me that God is good. We may not know the answer, but if he's good, there's reason for trusting him. I can think of a man who could not accept the tragic death of his wife and it finished his faith. At that point, you don't come in with arguments. You sit with them. It's a time for showing the love of God rather than talking about it. Being present, listening, supporting and grieving with the person. Later, after they've seen love in action, there's the opportunity to ask where this love comes from. Does it come from blind, material forces in a cruel universe? Or, does it come from the reality that we bear the image of God himself, and therefore from him who's the author of love? 'Doubt comes from my emotional reaction to something' Fergus Butler-Gallie, 30, vicar of Charlbury with Shorthampton, Oxfordshire I don't think anyone is immune to doubt, but I think there's an arrogance to think that my doubts matter. I think God exists, whether I doubt him or not, and doubt almost certainly comes from my emotional reaction to something rather than what's actually the case. That's my attitude to my own doubts. And then, invariably, something happens to reaffirm things and makes me realise how silly those doubts are. I don't really take them intellectually seriously, I view them as an emotional response, because God is there whether I like it or not. And one morning I might not like it, but that doesn't change it from being the case.