logo
Laura Robson names the Wimbledon rule that should never change despite backlash

Laura Robson names the Wimbledon rule that should never change despite backlash

Daily Mirror8 hours ago
Wimbledon organisers have attracted some criticism from players and spectators this year over the tournament's strict curfew, but Laura Robson believes it's spot on
Former British No.1 Laura Robson has come out in support of Wimbledon's 11pm curfew after it drew criticism from players and tennis fans. Wimbledon is unlike the other Grand Slams, which often continue late into the night, because it has a strict rule that it will not budge on.
American star Taylor Fritz needed five sets to see off the big-serving Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard in a first-round match that left him fuming at Wimbledon's curfew. Fritz was taken off the court before the curfew, despite believing he had enough time to complete his match – and he nearly fell foul of the rule in the next round too.

Late finishes are ingrained in the culture of the US Open, Australian Open and French Open, but Wimbledon works differently. Play only starts at 11am on the outside courts and at 1.30pm on Centre Court and the 11pm curfew isn't about to be changed, despite moans every year from players who want to finish their matches and fans who are enjoying the action.

It came into effect in 2009 when the All England Club put a roof on Centre Court, with Merton Council keen to reduce the potential impact on local residents. That is quite right, according to Robson, who is now working as a pundit and commentator at Wimbledon.
'No. Wimbledon follows [Merton Council's] rules and it is what it is,' Robson told Metro when asked whether the 11pm curfew should be changed. 'Honestly, I think tennis has become way too much of a late night sport. Why are we playing at 2am? Why are we playing at 3am?
'It's not normal and no other sport does it. Sure, you want to have the opportunity to finish the match. If it's 10.30pm and you're going to be 15 minutes over, of course that makes sense.
'In general I think the sort of backlash of playing at 1am is a nightmare for all of the players involved, all of the staff involved, all of the ball kids involved. So yeah, I'd like to see less of that rather than getting rid of the curfew.'
Fritz was dragged off the court well before 11pm against Perricard and was bemused by the umpire's decision. 'It was more just like I felt like we had the time to play. I was mentally in the head space of, like, we are finishing this match tonight,' he said.

His US compatriot Ben Shelton was also irritated last week when bad light forced him off right at the end of his match against Rinky Hijikata. That was due to the darkness impacting the electronic line calling system, rather than the curfew.
"He had match point, didn't he?" tournament director Jamie Baker admitted the next day. "I would be pretty unhappy as well.'
Shelton himself understands the curfew. "I mean, it's tradition, I understand," he said. 'It's also in a neighbourhood. If it was in my neighbourhood and they're playing till 2 a.m. every single night and going completely ballistic, I'd be like, 'I probably don't really want to live here.' I completely understand the curfew, for sure."

The curfew is basically set in stone, although there is a little wiggle room for common sense. Back in 2012, when Andy Murray was 5-1 up against Marcos Baghdatis in the fourth set at 11pm, he was allowed to serve out the final game to wrap things up at 11:02.
'The 11pm curfew is a planning condition applied to balance the consideration of the local residents with the scale of an international tennis event that takes place in a residential area,' Merton Council have explained. 'The challenge of transport connectivity and getting visitors home safely is also a key consideration.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jannik Sinner vs Grigor Dimitrov: Score and latest Wimbledon updates
Jannik Sinner vs Grigor Dimitrov: Score and latest Wimbledon updates

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Jannik Sinner vs Grigor Dimitrov: Score and latest Wimbledon updates

Good afternoon and welcome to day eight coverage from Wimbledon as Jannik Sinner resumes his bid for a maiden title. The Italian takes on Bulgarian veteran Grigor Dimitrov on Centre Court for a place in the quarter-finals. The 23-year-old showed why he is one of the favourites to win with a ruthless 6-1, 6-3, 6-1 victory over Spain's Pedro Martinez. Sinner has dropped just 17 games on his way to the fourth round but insists he is taking nothing for granted. 'I just try to watch more my side of the net, trying to keep my level as high as I can,' he said. 'Never taking things for granted in any case. Especially on grass when you are mentally not 100% or maybe you're a bit slow at times, it's easily dropped one set. One break is easily done, as we saw today in the second set. He had couple of break points. If I don't serve well there, things can go complicated. 'I'm happy, of course. In the other way, now let's see what's coming because the opponents, obviously whoever is in the fourth round, they deserve to be there. It means that they play a very high level of tennis. Let's see what's coming.' Dimitrov is aiming to reach the last eight at Wimbledon for the 2nd time, 11 years after his first appearance here and says he is feeling good going into the match. 'After three matches to be where I'm at physically, really gives me a good, yeah, positive and upbeat way to get out there and play my game,' he said. 'That's all I want is to put myself in those type of positions, to, yeah, get out there and play against these guys right now. This is in a way the most important thing for me. 'I've put a lot of work prior to the tournament. I had to make some decisions that, you know, it put me in a very good spot, I think. Yeah, will it be an easy match? No. If you are asking me that, definitely not. I don't expect that either. But, yeah, I'm just looking forward to it.'

British Wimbledon champ handed biggest fine of 2025 BEFORE tournament started as full list of punishments revealed
British Wimbledon champ handed biggest fine of 2025 BEFORE tournament started as full list of punishments revealed

Scottish Sun

time26 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

British Wimbledon champ handed biggest fine of 2025 BEFORE tournament started as full list of punishments revealed

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A BRITISH tennis ace has been fined more than £9,000 for "verbally abusing staff" in an explosive training row at Wimbledon. Doubles sensation Henry Patten, 29, was handed the highest penalty of the Championships so far for allegedly kicking off when his practice session was cut short BEFORE the tournament began. 3 Henry Patten, right, won the Wimbledon doubles title in 2024 but he was handed a big fine before this year's Championships Credit: Getty The left-hander - who won last year's doubles title at SW19 - is appealing the sanction. He said he is 'disappointed' in the All England Club for disclosing the fines but not his denial. He said: 'I do not believe that there has been a full or proper investigation, nor has Wimbledon acted reasonably or fairly with due process. "I am disappointed that as the defending male's doubles champion that I am having to address this matter at this point rather than concentrating on playing tennis.' READ MORE ON WIMBLEDON SHEL DO Daughter of 'one of greatest sportsmen ever' stuns at Wimbledon cheering on Shelton The Australian Open winner, 29, who sailed through to the quarter final alongside Finland's Harri Heliovaara after a walkover on Monday, refused to comment on the nature of the incident. He is one of 12 players slapped with a total of £37,000 worth of fines in SW19 so far this year. French star Theo Arribage, 24, has been ordered to pay over £5,500 for 'unsportsmanlike conduct' in his second-round doubles clash. World No123 Adrian Mannarino, 37, landed himself a £4,400 penalty and Russian-born Elena Pridankina, 19, has been charged £3,600 for the same offence. CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS Belgium player Zizou Bergs, 26, and American Hailey Baptiste, 23, will both have to cough up £2,900 after being punished for 'audible obscenities', while French ace Varvara Gracheva, 24, was handed the same fine for 'abuse of racquets or equipment'. The biggest Wimbledon penalty on record was in 2019 when Bernard Tomic had his full prize money of £45,000 taken away for failing to meet the 'required professional standard' during his 58-minute first-round defeat by Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. Brits' opponent forced to retire from Wimbledon after suffering freak injury when he tried to catch the ball 3 Wimbledon 2025 LIVE - follow all the latest scores and updates from a thrilling fortnight at SW19 The dismal match - the shortest at SW19 in 15 years - was slammed as 'embarrassing'. And ex-doubles star Jeff Tarango was famously given an £11,000 fine after a fiery spat in 1995 which saw him accuse the umpire of being corrupt and tell the crowd to "shut up" when they jeered him. His wife then stormed a press conference to reveal she'd slapped the match official in the face. Following an investigation, the Grand Slam Committee fined the ace an additional £21,000 and banned him from two tournaments. The AELTC has been approached for comment.

Marin Cilic hits out at Wimbledon over two decisions after 'bitter' exit
Marin Cilic hits out at Wimbledon over two decisions after 'bitter' exit

Metro

time30 minutes ago

  • Metro

Marin Cilic hits out at Wimbledon over two decisions after 'bitter' exit

Marin Cilic hit out at Wimbledon over two decisions following his fourth-round defeat to an inspired Flavio Cobolli. Former US Open champion Cilic rolled back the years in the first week of Wimbledon, beating British number one Jack Draper on his way to the fourth round. Cilic became the first player to take a set off Cobolli on Court Two but had no answer to the Italian's powerful hitting and impressive movement. The former Wimbledon finalist won a third-set tie-break as he threatened to mount a comeback after going 2-0 behind but Cobolli emerged triumphant from the next tie break to reach a quarter-final of a Grand Slam for the first time. Cilic insisted world number 24 Cobolli played at a 'great level' in the match but fumed at Wimbledon's decision to schedule the clash for an 11am start. The 36-year-old said the early start – necessary in the first week of slams due to the number of matches – prevented him from practicing outside before the fourth-round meeting. 'Honestly, Flavio played a great level,' Cilic said in his press conference after exiting SW19. 'The first two and a half sets, even three sets he played great level. Not many things that he did wrong. 'He was doing lots of things very clean, served well, and then was definitely putting me in a lot of tough positions. Then, you know, just unfortunate with the tiebreaks, they're always tough a bit of a lottery. 'It's disappointing to go out. I felt that there was possibly a good chance to come back in the fourth and to have some good energy in the fifth.' Turning his attention to the scheduling, Cilic added: 'I was even talking with the tournament about the scheduling. I don't like to speak about the conditions. 'You know, okay, I lost and everything. I have to accept it. Flavio played fantastically and obviously great for him, first time in the quarter-finals. 'But, you know, I feel bitter because why is there a need to play at 11am when even the practice courts don't open until 9:30am? 'This morning I was warming up indoors. You wake up at 6am. It's okay for the matches in the earlier rounds, okay but we have a last-16 [match]. 'It's raining overnight, and the court was quite soft. I mean, I don't know if you watched the match. It was really difficult to play on. 'You just push the ball in the middle of the court, and the ball just stays super low. It was just a struggle. 'Once you start the match you can't really do anything. So, yeah, it is was it is.' Cilic, who turned pro in 2005, also criticised Wimbledon's decision to ditch line judges in favour of electronic line calling. Most players have welcomed the introduction of ELC at all ATP events but there have been complaints about its accuracy at the All England Club. Cilic says he experienced some 'weird' calls and has questioned if it was 'necessary' for Wimbledon to become the third Grand Slam to move to automated line calling. 'Even in my match with [Jaume] Munar on Court 18 there was some weird [calls],' he said. 'Even today there was one weird. 'I felt like I missed a serve by this much [gestures with his hands] and it was called in. Some was out. 'I don't think there is a necessity. I don't know if it's easier, you know, for the tournament. Okay, you just put the electronic line calling. I have no idea. 'For years the line judges were doing great. Maybe there is a mistake. And you know, that's okay. You have still a challenge which you can use. 'The decision to introduce Live Electronic Line Calling at The Championships was made following a significant period of consideration and consultation,' Wimbledon chief executive Sally Bolton said. 'Having reviewed the results of the testing undertaken at The Championships this year, we consider the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating. 'For the players, it will offer them the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour. 'We take our responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon very seriously. 'Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at The Championships for many decades and we recognise their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.' 'But, you know, I see no reason just to have no line judges because also for them, if you look at years in the past, all the chair umpires that are now, they were at one moment line judges finals of Wimbledon, finals of US Open, you know, big tournaments. 'Then, okay, they have this experience. They come to the chair. What happens now? 'If all the tour does electronic line calling, how do you get to become a chair umpire? Where is your experience? 'On the other side, I felt like I missed by this much. Okay, the ball is in. Did I see wrong or what? I mean, I have no idea. 'Then on the other side he sort of hit some balls quite long, and then hawk-eye says it's good. Then the chair umpire can't do anything because it's only electronic line calling.' Despite feeling 'bitter' over his Wimbledon exit, Cilic insisted he could take plenty of positives from his encouraging week at the All England Club. More Trending 'Absolutely, I have great, you know, encouragement, happiness, positive attitude, and positive outcomes out of the tournament,' he said. 'In a while I haven't played some Grand Slams on this kind of level. So I found great form, played some fantastic tennis. Even today was quite close. 'It is a little bit bitter knowing that, okay, if this, if that, maybe could have been different, but it is what it is. We go forward.' Cobolli's reward for knocking out Cilic is a Wimbledon quarter-final against seven-time champion Novak Djokovic, who recovered from losing the first set 6-1 to beat Alex de Minaur in four. For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: 'Do better' – Maria Sharapova hits out at Aryna Sabalenka Wimbledon headline MORE: Roger Federer blamed for 'shocking' Novak Djokovic scare at Wimbledon MORE: Why was Jannik Sinner banned from tennis? Doping suspension explained

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store