Canada election sparks hopes for revived Indian student interest amid declining enrolments
With Canada set to hold federal election on Monday, study abroad consultants are pinning hopes that the incoming government will be more supportive of Indian students already enrolled or weighing study options in Canada.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India stares at a 'water bomb' threat as it freezes Indus Treaty
India readies short, mid & long-term Indus River plans
Shehbaz Sharif calls India's stand "worn-out narrative"
Hit by a real estate crisis, stricter immigration policies, and tensions in New Delhi-Ottawa diplomatic ties, Indian student flow to Canada plunged more than 40% between 2023 and 2024, according to ICEF Monitor, a market intelligence resource for the international education industry. However, with US President Donald Trump taking a stricter stance on international students, Canada may again start attracting more Indian students, experts said.
'The 2025 federal election presents an important opportunity to reflect on Canada's future and the vital role international education plays,' said Anuj Gupta, head-client relations, Canada & Germany at AECC, a study abroad consultant.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
People In Maharashtra Say Goodbye To Mosquitoes With This Revolutionary Solution
Mosquito Eliminator
Read More
Undo
The election is expected to be a close contest between Liberal party leader and current Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative party leader Pierre Poilievre.
(Join our
ETNRI WhatsApp channel
for all the latest updates)
The Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE) has meanwhile called on the next federal government to set up a Pan-Canadian International Education Council.
Live Events
Indian students mostly pursue courses in STEM, agriculture & agriculture food, healthcare, trade & transport, etc in Canada. Most of the skilled professional programmes have a co-op or internship programme allowing students to learn through real-world experiences.
Moreover, recent trends on immigration in Canada have been very positive—the North American nation approved more than 30,000 Permanent Residency (PR) invitations in the first quarter of 2025, said experts.
Canada is among the top four overseas education destinations for Indian students—the others are the US, UK and Australia.
'We have seen the bottom of the ocean, and I feel whoever is the winner will create some positive vibes, especially for 'Study in Canada',' said Arvind Manduva, cofounder, I20 Fever, a study abroad consultancy. 'Many of whom were on H1B (visas) applied for PR in Canada in Trump's 1st term. This is likely to happen now as well.'
If the Trump administration removes the Optional Practical Training (OPT) benefit, then Canada is likely to become the biggest destination for Indian students heading overseas, experts said.
Also, top-ranked US universities charge around $70,000 (about Rs 60 lakh) for a single course per year, sharply higher than CAD60,000 in Canada (about Rs 36 lakh).
Vaibhav Gupta, chief marketing officer at iSchoolConnect, a study abroad platform, said however that Indian students will start considering Canada again only if there is a major policy change to attract foreign students.
According to the education ministry, the number of students heading to Canada fell sharply to 137,608 in 2024 from 233,532 the year before.
'We are witnessing the same at iSchoolConnect. Our inquiries regarding Canada are almost negligible,' said Gupta.
According to Career Mosaic, student enrolments declined by 70% between 2021 and Fall 2024, with a further 33% drop projected in 2025 for Canada.
'With sustained policy focus and the upcoming elections, Canada could recalibrate its international student framework and become a top destination for Indian students,' said Manisha Zaveri, joint managing director, Career Mosaic, a study abroad firm.
Aditya Shanker Raghuwanshi, chief executive, Masterclass Space, however, has a cautious stance on the polls and Canadian government policies.
'Indian students should not consider too much a shift from the immigration policy of liberals,' he said, referring to the ruling Liberal party in Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC rejects plea on deportation drive in Assam, asks petitioner to move HC
A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the petitioner to approach the Gauhati High Court in the matter The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea which alleged that the Assam government has reportedly launched a "sweeping" drive to detain and deport persons suspected to be foreigners without nationality verification or exhaustion of legal remedies. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the petitioner to approach the Gauhati High Court in the matter. "Why are you not going to the Gauhati High Court?" the bench asked senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, who appeared for petitioner All BTC Minority Students Union. Hegde said the plea was based on an order passed by the apex court earlier. "Please go to the Gauhati High Court," the bench observed. Hegde said the petitioner would withdraw the plea to take appropriate recourse before the high court. The bench allowed him to withdraw the plea. The plea, filed through advocate Adeel Ahmed, referred to a February 4 order of the top court which, while dealing with a separate petition, had directed Assam to initiate the process of deportation of 63 declared foreign nationals, whose nationality was known, within two weeks. "Pursuant to the said order (of February 4)... the state of Assam has reportedly launched a sweeping and indiscriminate drive to detain and deport individuals suspected to be foreigners, even in the absence of foreigners tribunal declarations, nationality verification, or exhaustion of legal remedies," the plea claimed. It referred to news reports, including one about a retired school teacher who was allegedly "pushed back" into Bangladesh. "These instances reflect a growing pattern of deportations conducted by the Assam Police and administrative machinery through informal 'push back' mechanisms, without any judicial oversight or adherence to the safeguards envisaged by the Constitution of India or this court," it claimed. "The 'push back' policy, as implemented, violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution by deporting individuals without due process, thereby denying them the opportunity to contest their deportation and infringing upon their right to life and personal liberty," the plea claimed. It alleged that the indiscriminate application of deportation directives, coupled with absence of proper identification, verification and notice mechanisms, has resulted in a situation where Indian citizens were being wrongfully incarcerated and threatened with removal to foreign territories without lawful basis. The plea sought a direction that no person shall be deported pursuant to the February 4 order without a prior reasoned declaration by the foreigners tribunal, without adequate opportunity of appeal or review and verification of nationality by the Ministry of External Affairs. It also sought a declaration that the "push back" policy adopted by Assam was violative of Articles 14 (equality before law) and 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) of the Constitution and contrary to binding judicial precedents. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Even China, Turkey Unwilling To Pay Us': Pak PM Sharif's Candid 'Begging Bowl' Admission
'Even China, Turkey Unwilling To Pay Us': Pak PM Sharif's Candid 'Begging Bowl' Admission Source: Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has issued a blunt call for national self-reliance, declaring that the era of approaching allies with a "begging bowl" must end. Speaking to military officers in Quetta, Sharif acknowledged that nations like China, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey now expect partnerships built on trade and innovation, not aid. Stressing economic reform and resource development, he vowed—alongside Field Marshal Asim Munir—to stop carrying the weight of past dependencies. Despite decades of financial struggle, Sharif expressed hope in Pakistan's strategic ties and future potential.#pakistan #shehbazsharif #china #imf #pakistanarmy
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Framing the narrative war against Pakistan
Nobody ever really wins the war of narratives. Each side tells its own story — shaped by perceived triumphs, real or imagined — and believes in the glory of its version. No one cares what the other side claims, unless one side was materially and visibly vanquished in a physical fight. That rarely happens. Sample this: As India began striking terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7, Pakistan claimed it had shot down six Indian aircraft. India denied it. In fact, New Delhi refused to confirm any losses until last week, when the Chief of Defence Staff tacitly acknowledged that a jet (maybe more, unspecified) had been downed, but that 'the tactical mistake was remedied, and the plan reimplemented' — an implicit way of saying: 'It matters not what we lost, as long as we ultimately won.' The standoff ended in a ceasefire, with each side walking away convinced it had the better of the exchange. India believes it called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff; Pakistan insists it gave as good as it got — claims that remain unverifiable in the fog of war. Meanwhile, Pakistan says little about the pounding its airbases received in the Indian response. So steeped in denial is the country's military establishment that its Army Chief has assumed the rank of Field Marshal — an honorific that reveals more about narrative vanity than battlefield reality. For its part, Delhi is convinced it humbled Pakistan. Islamabad, however, couldn't disagree more. 'We have shattered India's illusion of superiority,' says Pakistan's PM. 'New Delhi has been taught a lesson in respecting the sovereignty of its neighbours.' Even Washington had its version of events. President Trump triumphantly claimed that he convinced both countries to back off. 'I talked trade with them,' he said. India denies it. Pakistan agrees. Who's telling the truth? Hard to say. Perhaps none of them care. Each sticks to its own version. Last week, seven multi-party Indian delegations visited global capitals to explain Delhi's position. Many in the West are sympathetic to India's position — its long-standing concerns about cross-border terrorism and Pakistan's duplicity in dealing with extremist groups. They recognise the provocations India faces and the public pressure on Delhi to respond. Even so, some take India's account with a pinch of salt. Yes, Pakistan was complicit in the Pahalgam terror attack — but why didn't India go after the real perpetrators? Why not share intelligence? Why the secrecy, the social media bans, the coyness in accepting losses, and the reluctance to engage with the international media? Back home, a few seem interested. Most people are content with the version of events presented to them. Perhaps that's the point of a good narrative — to remove the burden of inquiry, so the prevailing storyline is accepted, repeated, and quietly folded into national pride. And therein lies the rub. Narratives are, by their very nature, misleading. They mix fact, half-truth, and convenient fiction to produce a favourable picture. In the end, they mostly convince only the teller. You can believe deterrence has been restored — but it means little if your adversary doesn't agree. The deeper challenge lies in coming to terms with Pakistan's strategic culture. As Christine Fair, Professor at Georgetown University and a keen Pakistan watcher, has long argued, the Pakistan Army operates with an insurgent mindset. It wins simply by not losing. It thrives on confrontation and political relevance. That makes it almost immune to traditional deterrence logic. This is what India must keep in mind. The next time there's a provocation from Pakistan — and there might well be another — New Delhi would do well to resist the urge for political signalling. It's this compulsive need to cater to public opinion and control the narrative that often gets us into trouble. Showing resolve is tricky because it casts restraint as weakness and risks turning action into theatre. The smarter course is to hold fire, stay alert, and choose response over optics. For that, it's important to retain the element of surprise. In the days following the start of the operation, Pakistan's military claimed it had anticipated an Indian strike and was lying in wait. While the details remain unclear, Islamabad suggested it had adopted a restrained posture until Indian aircraft reportedly struck what it described as civilian targets, after which Pakistani forces retaliated by targeting Indian jets. Whether this sequence played out exactly as claimed is open to question. It's also unclear if not targeting the Pakistan military in the opening salvo was a strategic misstep. Yet the broader point stands: Military action, meant more as political messaging, is a risky undertaking. Combat aimed mainly at signalling, not effect, is almost always a mistake. It's worth bearing in mind that in conflicts like the four-day engagement in May, narrative dominance is an illusion. The real contest is not about who speaks loudest, but who adapts, who endures, and who denies the adversary what it wants most: Relevance. The writer is a retired naval officer and strategic affairs commentator based in New Delhi
