'CIA called JFK assassination a Covert Op…': Dan Hardway stuns House Committee on JFK files - The Economic Times Video
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court lets Trump administration cut $783 million in medical research grants
A divided US Supreme Court let the Trump administration at least temporarily cut off millions of dollars in medical research grants that government officials say don't align with the president's policies. The administration told the Supreme Court the NIH was being forced to keep paying out $783 million, though the challengers questioned that figure.(AFP) The justices partially put on hold a federal trial judge's decision that the National Institutes of Health acted in an 'arbitrary and capricious' manner when it terminated thousands of grants as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion. The decision wasn't a total win for Trump. The justices kept in place a block on NIH guidance documents that bar funding for research connected to DEI, gender-identity, vaccine hesitancy, Covid or climate change. But the court indicated on a 5-4 vote that US District Judge William Young in Boston lacked jurisdiction to order reinstatement of specific grants. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court's three liberals in dissent on that issue. The challengers, which include research organizations and states whose universities rely on NIH funding, said the cutoff would set back crucial research by years, if not decades. 'A stay would abruptly, and in many cases permanently, halt lifesaving biomedical research that Congress has directed the NIH to fund, with irreparable consequences for scientific progress,' the groups, led by the American Public Health Organization, argued in court papers. The administration told the Supreme Court the NIH was being forced to keep paying out $783 million, though the challengers questioned that figure. 'The government is irreparably harmed when forced to pay out millions of dollars on discretionary grants, with no guarantee of recouping the money,' US Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in court papers. Sauer is the administration's top Supreme Court lawyer. The case is National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Association, 25A103.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Interesting times ahead: Trump slams Biden, says Ukraine must fight back
US President Donald Trump argued that Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia if it is only allowed to defend, sharply criticising Joe Biden for limiting Kyiv's response to Moscow's invasion.'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invader's country,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, likening Ukraine's struggle to a sports team forced to play only defense. There is no chance of winning! Crooked and grossly incompetent Joe Biden would not let Ukraine FIGHT BACK, only DEFEND. How did that work out?'advertisement The comments came after Russia launched its biggest missile and drone assault in more than a month, killing nine civilians in strikes and shelling, according to Ukrainian officials cited by met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, but the talks produced no breakthrough on a ceasefire. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has insisted that security guarantees must be in place before he considers any the setback, Trump signalled he may push for a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelenskyy. 'Regardless, this is a war that would have NEVER happened if I were President – ZERO CHANCE,' he wrote, promising 'interesting times ahead!!!'Zelenskyy dismissed any suggestion that Moscow is serious about peace, saying the latest strikes prove Russia is 'trying to wriggle out of the need to hold a meeting. They do not want to end this war. They are continuing their massive attacks against Ukraine and very fierce assaults on the front lines.'- EndsMust Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Who is Joe Gebbia? Airbnb co-founder to lead Trump's digital services revamp
US President Donald Trump has picked Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia to lead a sweeping redesign of the federal government's digital services, according to two officials familiar with the on Thursday signed an executive order creating a new National Design Studio, a White House-backed unit charged with improving the look, feel and usability of government websites and digital tools. Gebbia will serve as the administration's first chief design officer, reporting directly to White House Chief of Staff Susie services should be simple, usable and designed for the people, not for bureaucrats,' Trump said in remarks before signing the order. 'This is about efficiency and design — about making government work better and cost less.' Gebbia, who joined the administration earlier this year, is now positioned to play a central role in Trump's broader effort to remake the federal bureaucracy. 'We're going to apply the same principles of usability and aesthetics that transformed Airbnb to the public sector,' Gebbia said, according to the officials. 'The goal is to make government digital services as intuitive as booking a place to stay.'The appointment builds on Trump's earlier restructuring drive, spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, a former adviser who led a first-wave initiative known as DOGE — short for Department of Government Efficiency. That program involved deep cuts, department closures and funding rollbacks aimed at reshaping Washington in line with Trump's political President Joe Biden had also pursued similar goals in 2021, directing agencies to modernize websites and services. But several projects were shelved after Trump returned to office, including the IRS's free online tax filing tool. 'That program is done,' former IRS Commissioner Billy Long said in July, before stepping down a month Trump's order, the National Design Studio will operate for three years before winding down. Its mission will be to help agencies reduce duplicative design costs and standardize the user experience across government platforms where citizens interact with federal services.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
