
BBC accused of using Hamas official's son in documentary about ‘ordinary Palestinians'
The BBC has been accused of focusing a documentary about ordinary Palestinians on the son of a Hamas government minister without disclosing the connection.
The documentary, Gaza: How To Survive a War Zone, was broadcast on Monday evening as an account of the conflict through the eyes of three children whose lives have been devastated by Israel's military campaign against Hamas.
The hour-long film was narrated by a 14-year-old English -speaking boy named Abdullah, who is listed in the film's credits under his full name, Abdullah Al-Yazouri.
It has since been claimed that Abdullah's father Ayman Alyazouri is a senior figure who currently holds the position of deputy minister of agriculture in the Hamas-run government.
Critics have said the BBC has allowed itself to be used as a propaganda platform for Hamas by giving airtime to the child of one of its senior figures.
The child's alleged family background was not revealed to viewers and it is not clear if the film crew were aware of the Hamas links.
The campaign group Labour Against Antisemitism has lodged a formal complaint to the BBC about the broadcast, claiming that the team failed to properly vet the documentary's subjects.
Alex Hearn, from Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'This documentary appears to have been a failure of due diligence by the BBC, with Hamas propaganda promoted as reliable fact at the taxpayers' expense.
'There needs to be an urgent investigation into how this happened once again.
'Misinformation is the story of the Israel-Hamas conflict, and this is not an isolated case. There has been a failure of news platforms to adequately scrutinise sources and a willingness to regurgitate Hamas disinformation repeatedly.'
The BBC has defended the hour-long film, stating it had full editorial control over the content and that the children's parents had no editorial input.
When asked by The Telegraph about Abdullah's alleged links to Hamas, the corporation did not provide comment.
Questions about the film were first raised by David Collier, an investigative journalist.
Abdullah, who attended the British school in Gaza before the war, has previously appeared in a Channel 4 news item, broadcast in November 2023, speaking about devastation wrought by Israeli bombing.
In the Channel 4 piece Abdullah was accompanied during his tour of the ruins near his home by a man presented to viewers as his father.
However, the man accompanying Abdullah is understood to be his uncle, Khalil Abu Shamala, who in a Facebook post from 2022 appears to refer Abdullah as 'my nephew'.
Mr Shamala is understood to be the former director of an non-governmental organisation called Al Dameer, which campaigns on behalf of Palestinian fighters jailed by Israel.
Al Dameer is accused of links to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a designated terrorist organisation by the US, the EU, Canada, and Israel.
Mr Alyazouri's own social media timelines appears to contain a number of references to his son Abdullah or 'Aboud'.
In one post, from January last year, Mr Alyazouri wrote: 'Aboud… May God protect him' next a photograph of a young boy who appears to be Abdullah.
Mr Alyazouri previously appeared to praise two Hamas 'martyrs' who were said to have been involved in the murder of four Israelis in 2023.
Status and influence
Questions have been raised over whether considering their status and influence, Abdullah's family should have been well known to the production team behind the documentary, particularly the two local Palestinian cameramen who filmed the three children.
Writing on X, Mr Collier said: 'The two photographers followed these children around for months. They absolutely knew who he was. Did either of the producers?
'How did the BBC let a son of a Hamas minister walk around looking for sympathy and demonising Israel for an hour in a BBC documentary?'
The row comes only a few days after Danny Cohen, the former director of BBC Television, warned that the broadcaster risks becoming a mouthpiece for Hamas.
Mr Cohen told The Telegraph that the latest revelations confirmed his fears.
He said: 'This appears to be another appalling example of journalistic failure and anti-Israel bias. The BBC appears to have given an hour of prime-time coverage to the son of a senior member of the Hamas terrorist group.
'Questions must be asked as to whether the BBC carried out the most basic journalistic checks.'
Mr Cohen added: 'Licence fee payers across the UK are being repeatedly conned into paying for Hamas PR. There can be no doubt now that the BBC has a very serious problem with the quality of its journalism and anti-Israel bias.'
How To Survive A War Zone was produced for BBC2 by Jamie Roberts, whose previous work includes ' Ukraine: Enemy in the Woods ', and 'This Is Gaza' which followed filmmaker Yousef Hammash, a Palestinian currently living in the UK.
The film – which was nine months in the making – also looks at the plight of Zakaria, 11, and 10-year-old Renad.
Zakaria volunteers at the al-Aqsa hospital, transporting the dead and wounded and cleaning ambulances, while Renad is shown cooking with her sister while bombing continues nearby.
At one point Zakaria is asked: 'Do you like Hamas?'. He replies: 'No, because they started the war… They caused all this misery.'
In the documentary's opening scene Abdullah, whose surname in the film's credits is spelled in a different style by the BBC to that of his father, is filmed walking through the ruins of a district devastated by bombing, as he asks: 'Have you ever wondered what you'd do if your world is destroyed? Most important, could you stay alive? After all this, you could say we're experts.'
A BBC spokesman said: 'Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone, a documentary showing the conflict through the eyes of three children in Gaza, was produced in line with BBC editorial guidelines and the BBC had full editorial control.
'The film told the children's own stories, showing viewers their direct experiences of living through a war, and the children's parents did not have any editorial input.
'As the BBC has previously explained, the film was edited and directed from London, as independent international journalists are not allowed into Gaza. The film gives audiences a rare glimpse of Gaza during the war, as well as an insight into the children's lives. It hears the voices of other Gazan civilians, several of whom voice anti-Hamas sentiments.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court set to rule in dispute over LGBT storybooks in school classes
WASHINGTON, June 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on Friday in a bid by Christian and Muslim parents in Maryland to keep their elementary school children out of certain classes when storybooks with LGBT characters are read in the latest case involving the intersection of religion and LGBT rights. Parents with children in public schools in Montgomery County, located just outside of Washington, appealed after lower courts declined to order the local school district to let children opt out when these books are read. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has expanded the rights of religious people in several cases in recent years, including in cases involving LGBT people. For instance, the court in 2023 ruled that certain businesses have a right under the First Amendment's free speech protections to refuse to provide services for same-sex weddings. The school board in Montgomery County approved in 2022 a handful of storybooks that feature LGBT characters as part of its English language-arts curriculum in order to better represent the diversity of families living in the county. The storybooks are available for teachers to use "alongside the many books already in the curriculum that feature heterosexual characters in traditional gender roles," the district said in a filing. The district said it ended the opt-outs in 2023 when the mounting number of requests to excuse students from these classes became logistically unworkable and raised concerns of "social stigma and isolation" among students who believe the books represent them and their families. Opt-outs are still allowed by the district for sex education units of health classes. The plaintiffs - who are Muslim, Roman Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox - said in their lawsuit that the storybooks "promote one-sided transgender ideology, encourage gender transitioning and focus excessively on romantic infatuation - with no parental notification or opportunity to opt out." They said the First Amendment protects their right to instill religious beliefs and practices in their children, including on gender and sexuality that are "crucial for their children's ability to fulfill religious aspirations concerning marriage and family." Represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty conservative legal group, the parents who sued included Tamer Mahmoud, Enas Barakat, Chris Persak, Melissa Persak, Jeff Roman and Svitlana Roman, along with an organization called Kids First that seeks opt-out rights in Montgomery County. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2024 denied a request by the plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction. The 4th Circuit said that there was no evidence that the storybooks are "being implemented in a way that directly or indirectly coerces the parents or their children to believe or act contrary to their religious faith." The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court that the 4th Circuit's decision undermined the right of parents to "protect their children's innocence and direct their religious upbringing." The school board emphasized in a brief to the court that mere exposure to content that parents find religiously objectionable does not violate the First Amendment. The Freedom From Religion Foundation secularism advocacy group in a filing to the Supreme Court supporting the school board said parents should not have the constitutional right "to ensure that all secular education materials conform with their personal religious beliefs." Such a rule would be boundless because "almost any book or idea - however commonplace or innocent - likely contradicts some religious ideals," the group said. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case on April 22. The court's three liberal justices raised concerns about how far opt-outs for students could go beyond storybooks in public schools, offering examples of subjects such as evolution, interracial marriage or women working outside the home that might come up in classes. During the arguments, conservative Justice Samuel Alito cited one of the disputed storybooks that portrays a same-sex wedding and emphasized that the material promotes a moral message "that a lot of people who hold on to traditional religious beliefs don't agree with." In another religious rights case involving education, the Supreme Court in a 4-4 ruling on May 22 blocked a bid led by two Catholic dioceses to establish in Oklahoma the first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in the United States.


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Chaos and gunfire after month of Gaza aid plan
A month after the start of a controversial US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution system in Gaza, BBC Verify analysis of dozens of videos shows repeated incidents of gunfire near people travelling to collect aid, as well as other moments of chaos and several of the videos analysed, gunfire can be heard and there are a number showing dead or injured to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, in the past month more than 500 people on their way to get aid have been killed and 4,000 injured - the vast majority blamed on Israeli fire by Gazan officials and medics as well as Verify has not found videos which allow a definitive assessment of who is responsible for the wave of killings, but the overall picture is one of confusion and constant statements over the past month, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have several times said they fired "warning shots" at individuals who they described as "suspects" or said posed a IDF has told BBC Verify that Hamas does "everything in its power to prevent the success of food distribution in Gaza, tries to disrupt aid, and directly harms the citizens of the Gaza Strip".On 18 May Israel announced it was partially easing its 11-week long blockade of aid into Gaza, which it had said was aimed at putting pressure on Hamas to release IDF built four aid distribution sites - three in the far south-west of Gaza and one in central Gaza by an Israel security zone known as the Netzarim Corridor - which began operations on 26 sites in IDF-controlled areas - known as SDS 1, 2, 3 and 4 - are operated by security contractors working for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), with the Israeli military securing the routes to them and the perimeters. On Thursday the US State Department announced $30m (£22m; 26m euros) in funding for the GHF - the first known direct contribution to the the start the UN condemned the plan, saying it would "militarise" aid, bypass the existing distribution network and force Gazans to make long journeys through dangerous territory to get days of the plan starting, dozens of Palestinians were killed in separate incidents on 1 and 3 June, sparking international condemnation. Since then there have been near-daily reports of killings of people travelling to collect aid. The IDF said that its "forces conduct systematic learning processes aimed at improving the operational response in the area and minimizing possible friction between the population and the IDF forces".Israeli government spokesman David Mencer called reports of people killed while getting aid "another untruth". "There have not been hundreds of people dying."The GHF denied there had been any "incident or fatalities at or near" any of its distribution Tuesday, the Red Cross said its field hospital in Rafah had had to activate its mass casualty procedures 20 times since 27 May, with the vast majority of patients suffering gunshot wounds and saying they had been on the way to an aid UN and its World Food Programme as well as other aid providers are continuing to try to distribute aid in Gaza, but they say they are reliant on the Israeli authorities to facilitate their UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said the killing of Palestinians trying to access aid was a "likely war crime". International human rights lawyer Sara Elizabeth Dill told BBC Verify that if there had been any intentional targeting of civilians, it could constitute a serious violation of international law."Mass shootings during civilian relief access violate core rules against targeting civilians and using starvation against them, potentially rising to war crimes," she said. Chaos on the coast Three videos, the first of which was published on 9 June, showed hundreds of people, some holding what appear to be empty flour sacks, scrambling over mounds of rubble and hiding in ditches. Several bursts of automatic gunfire can be that day, the Hamas-run health ministry reported six people had been killed that morning while seeking aid and more than 99 injured. The next day, it reported 36 aid-related deaths and more than 208 injuries. It's not possible to verify whether any of these casualties were a result of the gunfire that could be heard in the were able to confirm the videos were filmed from about 4km (2.5 miles) north-west of SDS4, on the way to the site in central analysis of the gunfire from Steve Beck, a former FBI consultant who now runs Beck Audio Forensics, said one of the guns sounded like and fired at rates consistent with the FN Minimi machine gun and the M4 assault rifle. The second gun, Mr Beck said, fired at a rate that was "compatible" with the sound of an AK-47. We cannot establish whose weapons were firing but FN Minimis and M4s are commonly used by the IDF, while AK-47s are typically used by Hamas and other groups in footage published the next day, on 10 June, and filmed nearby, more crowds were seen running in panic as the sound of gunfire, followed by what sounds like an explosion, was heard in the distance. Injured and bloodied people, including children, were then seen being carried has maps showing "safe passages" to its sites and communicates opening times via WhatsApp and social media. Each passage has a "start point" and a ''stop point" with Palestinians warned that they must not cross the latter until instructed. The GHF has said these corridors are secured by the IDF and warned people that crossing these stop points, unless told to, may be at SDS4 there was no safe passage planned for people coming from the north. Deaths by the truck There have also been killings close to non-GHF related aid footage from 17 June showed at least 21 bodies and several injured people on a road in which several vehicles, including a heavily damaged flatbed truck, were told the BBC that IDF drones and a tank fired at the crowd as they were waiting to collect aid. An IDF statement acknowledged that it had identified a "gathering" of people "adjacent to an aid distribution truck that got stuck in the area of Khan Yunis, and in proximity to IDF troops operating in the area".It said: "The IDF is aware of reports regarding a number of injured individuals from IDF fire following the crowd's approach." It expressed regret for "any harm to uninvolved individuals" and said the details of the incident were under review.A spokesman for Gaza's Hamas-run civil defence agency said at least 50 people were killed at the video shows a number of the dead around scorch marks on the ground, including one person with their legs blown Cancian, from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, noted the lack of obvious impact crater but told us the extent of damage was likely the result of "a lot of direct fire". Bodies being moved Another video posted on 16 June, which we've verified, shows bodies pulled on a cart by a horse along al-Rashid street in northern Gaza, the main coastal road and often used by aid caption alongside the video claims that these Palestinians were killed while waiting for aid. The next day, several photos and videos we verified were posted on social media located nearby showing a body carried by several men on a wooden pallet along the same GHF claimed many of the alleged incidents were linked to convoys and distribution sites for other groups, including the UN. It said those aid supplies were "being looted by criminals and bad actors".A GHF spokesperson said it has overall been "pleased" with its first month of operations, with 46 million meals distributed to two million Gazans, but was aiming to scale up its IDF has said that among other changes it is installing fences and signs and opening additional routes."We have raised concern [with the IDF] about maintaining safe passage for aid seekers but unfortunately some have attempted to take dangerous short cuts or travel during restricted times," the GHF spokesperson said."Ultimately the solution is more aid, which will create more certainty and less urgency among the population."Additional reporting and verification by Paul Brown, Emma Pengelly, Lamees Altalebi, Richard Irvine-Brown, Benedict Garman, Alex Murray, Kumar Malhotra, and Thomas Spencer. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?

The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer suggests he didn't check 'island of strangers' speech
Speaking to the Observer, the Prime Minister said he should have held the speech "up to the light a bit more" before delivering it to the nation. Starmer was widely compared to Enoch Powell after he said Britain risked becoming an "island of strangers" if measures were not implemented to curb migration. It was criticised for echoing Powell's 1968 declaration that Brits had "found themselves made strangers in their own country". The CEO of Scottish Care, Donald MacAskill, told The National the speech had "echoes of Powell at his worst". Starmer said he "deeply regrets" using the phrase, telling the paper that he was not "in the best state to make a big speech" after his family home had been targeted in a firebomb attack days before. 'It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech,' he said. READ MORE: Scotland reacts as Labour announce 'two-tier' benefits U-turn 'I was really, really worried. I almost said: 'I won't do the bloody press conference.' Vic [Starmer's wife] was really shaken up as, in truth, was I. "It was just a case of reading the words out and getting through it somehow." He went on: "I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell. 'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either. "I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.' He then said he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more'. The Prime Minister also admitted there were 'problems with the language' in his foreword to the policy document that said the record high numbers of immigrants entering the UK under the last government had done 'incalculable damage' to the country. At the time of the speech, Starmer said he "completely rejected" any comparison to Powell. READ MORE: Question Time called out as Reform councillor on St Andrews panel Powell (below) was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making his 1968 speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time. In the speech, Starmer also said the Labour Government would 'take back control of our borders' and close the book on a 'squalid chapter' for politics and the economy. The UK Government is set to close the care worker visa route as part of new restrictions which aim to cut the number of low-skilled foreign workers by about 50,000 this year. Under white paper proposals, migrants will have to spend 10 years in the UK before being able to apply for citizenship, but so-called 'high-contributing' individuals such as doctors and nurses could be fast-tracked through the system. Language requirements will be increased for all immigration routes to ensure a higher level of English.