INBS inquiry finds litany of regulatory breaches by collapsed lender
Irish Nationwide Building Society
(INBS), published on Wednesday, concludes a litany of regulatory breaches occurred in the run up to the 2008 property crash – as the lender repeatedly issued large sums to developers without proper paperwork, security and internal approvals.
The inquiry panel decided that 27 of the 42 so-called suspected prescribed contraventions (SPC) – or regulatory breaches – INBS was alleged to have committed between 2004 and 2008 were proven.
Its former finance director John Stanley Purcell, alone among five former INBS figures originally subject to inquiry not to have settled or had proceedings dropped by the time case had concluded, participated in 13 of these, it found.
One example case in the report related to a £155 million (€184 million) loan to a borrower (whose name is redacted) to purchase a 7.8-acre site in London in 2007 with planning for 948 flats and commercial and retail outlets and follow-up £26.3 million facility early construction loan.
READ MORE
These breached the lender's own policies because three-year audited accounts were not sought from the borrower, which was incorporated in 1997, and loans were advanced prior to a quorate credit committee meeting. There was also no evidence personal guarantees, required by INBS when the borrower was a private company, were sought.
The loans would ultimately be transferred to the National Asset Management Agency (Nama).
[
EY, Arthur Cox and Mason Hayes main winners from €24.3m INBS inquiry
Opens in new window
]
INBS also failed to set a formal policy on profit-sharing lending, in spite of warnings from regulators from 2004 that its commercial lending should be 'conducted in a prudent and responsible way', according to the report.
Profit-share lending, where INBS would take a cut of gains from a development project, eventually represented 65 per cent of INBS's €8.18 billion commercial loan book by the time of the 2008 crash.
[
Irish Nationwide Building Society inquiry cost reaches €24.3m
Opens in new window
]
The inquiry concluded that rapid growth of profit-share lending between 2004 and 2008 meant the board could not have properly considered individual loans.
For example, in July 2006 board minutes showed that 40 loans were approved at a single board meeting involving in excess of €450 million. In October of the same year 38 loans totalling more than €500 million were given the nod.
'It is clear that the sheer volume of loans that were presented to the board for approval made it virtually impossible for the board to apply appropriate oversight and rigour in approving these loans,' the report said, adding that the profit-share deals were particularly complicated as they often included repayment moratoriums, up to 100 per cent funding, the use of special purpose vehicles, and very large sums of money. This made them very vulnerable in a property market downturn.
While the inquiry accepted Mr Purcell was not directly involved with day-to-day commercial lending, it said he was a board member and was aware of regulators' concerns 'that commercial lenders were, in some cases, not obtaining the required information from borrowers in order to properly assess their capacity to repay the loan being provided.'
Between 2008 and 2010, INBS suffered financial losses in excess of €6 billion, leading to a €5.4 billion taxpayer bailout. It ultimately collapsed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Transport firm loses VAT battle with Revenue
A transport firm that owns a 100-strong fleet of taxis has lost a €112,509 VAT battle with the Revenue Commissioners. The Tax Appeals Commission (TAC) has upheld a combined €112,509 VAT assessment issued to the firm by the Revenue Commissioners for the years 2018 and 2019. Revenue issued the assessment in December 2022 after concluding that the company was not, as it had maintained, providing services constituting the provision of passenger transport which is exempt from the charging of VAT. TAC commissioner, Conor O'Higgins, found that the company was in fact providing a taxi rental service to drivers and this was not exempt from VAT. READ MORE Over the 2018/19 period, the company did not charge VAT in respect of its supplies and the persons to whom the appellant provided its taxis were self-employed. A director of the company who was a taxi driver for 20 years described himself as an expert in the taxi industry and gave evidence at the hearing on behalf of the firm which was set up in 2016. Why is Ireland not considered a truly rich country? Listen | 39:28 At the hearing, counsel for Revenue put it to the witness that the purpose of the business of the taxi firm was the leasing or renting out of taxis and the witness did not agree. He said that the taxi firm was involved in 'cosying' and asked what he meant by that, he replied 'cosying is a joint venture between me and the driver. I supply the vehicle, I supply the meter, I supply the printer, I supply work, I supply everything.' Asked if he had any written evidence that he had entered into a joint venture with taxi drivers, the director stated: 'Yes. The evidence is of a successful business. I have 100 taxis on the road, where I started out with two. So obviously the joint venture is working out quite well.' He said that the cosy agreement was 'a gentleman's agreement'. Counsel for the Revenue showed to the hearing an advert for the firm which described the business as a 'rental company. Our aim is to provide our drivers with quality rental vehicles and a professional, no-hassle service'. A second witness for the tax company stated that the company was the owner of the largest single fleet of Wheelchair Accessible Vehicles (WAV) taxis in the country. In his findings, Mr O'Higgins noted that there was little evidence on which to conclude that the appellant was sharing in the income earned by the drivers of its vehicles. On the issue of cosying, Mr O'Higgins found that what the appellant was doing was supplying a taxi rental service to drivers who could not, or would struggle to, afford to purchase their own taxi.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Teen charged in connection with killing of Irish Rail employee in Co Tipperary
A teenager questioned in connection with the killing of Iarnród Éireann employee Ian Walsh in Co Tipperary has been charged. Gardaí say the young adult male is due to appear before a special sitting of Clonmel District Court this afternoon. The teenager was arrested by officers in Carrick-on-Suir early on Wednesday. He was taken to Clonmel Garda station for questioning. He was detained under section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act, which allows gardaí to hold suspects for up to 24 hours before they must be charged or released. READ MORE Mr Walsh (49), a single man who lived alone, was found dead at his home in Carrick-on-Suir at about 3.30am on August 4th. Gardaí were carrying out a welfare check at his two-storey property. They had been contacted by Ms Walsh's family who were concerned for his welfare.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland will be relieved at Trump's tariff cap on vital pharma sector
The publication of a joint agreed statement between the EU and US on the recent trade deal agreed in Scotland will be greeted with some relief in Dublin. It ties down some details of what was a woolly, political agreement – and for Ireland it gives a firm commitment to cap pharma tariffs at 15 per cent, while some parts of the sector may be excluded altogether. This removes the risk, for now at least, that US president Donald Trump would impose higher tariffs on pharma in the weeks ahead, or threaten them in future. This statement had been expected to issue a few days after the handshake between Trump and Ursula von der Leyen more than three weeks ago. The delay had led to fears of disagreement and details not being tied down. Now both sides have at least put things down on paper, even if there will be many months of negotiations ahead on various issues. The paragraphs on the pharma sector are important for Ireland, as it is a big employer, taxpayer and exporter. The EU had said after the deal was struck that its understanding was that pharma tariffs would be capped at 15 per cent, and that this included any that would be applied as part of a separate study being conducted by the US administration. READ MORE This is the so-called Section 232 study looking at national security issues in relation to pharma and also semiconductors. But comments by Trump that this study could lead to much higher tariffs on pharma in time raised fears that everyone was not on the one page. [ US agrees to cap tariffs on pharmaceuticals imports from EU at 15% Opens in new window ] Now the joint statement says that, taking into account this study, tariffs on pharma – and semiconductors – will not 'exceed 15 per cent'. At the moment pharma tariffs are zero and we will have to see when he publishes his Section 232 report whether Trump intends to apply the full 15 per cent rate to pharma coming from the EU immediately, or at some time in the future. A 15 per cent tariff is still high enough, if that is what emerges – but it is one which industry sources believe the sector can work with, albeit at a cost, given the high margin nature of much of its production. It will cause problems but not chaos. There is also another hopeful mention in the statement that generic drugs and their inputs and some chemicals may stay at a zero tariff – which would be a boost for parts of the industry here. The details of this have not been laid out in full and will be important. Beyond that, the section 232 process and Trump's attempts to push down drug prices in the US and persuade firms to move plans back to the US all have other potential implications for the sector here and for Ireland's efforts to attract pharma. The goal will be to remain as a trusted and safe supplier in US supply chains. In other sectors, the statement confirms the 15 per cent tariffs now in place and said the two sides will continue to talk about possible 'carveouts' – areas that will be excluded. Lobbies in sectors like spirits will continue to make their case. Tariffs at this levels will be a burden in general on exporters, though at least they know what they are dealing with. Whether the deal can now bed down remains a question – as does whether Trump will stick to it in the longer term. He has already torn up or ignored some previous deals in his trail of tariffs. But a joint agreed statement is a step in the right direction.
