Government greenlights nationwide hunt to cut apex predator population in half: 'We are concerned'
As Mongabay detailed, the Swedish government permitted a hunt in January that allowed for the killing of 30 endangered wolves. According to the Guardian, there were 375 recorded individuals before the hunt. Despite records that the population dropped around 20% in 2022-23, the government announced the intention to reduce numbers further.
The new "favorable conservation status" population number has been set at 170, down from the previous minimum of 300.
Bern Convention members also ruled recently that the wolves' status be moved from "strictly protected" to "protected," with this coming into force in March. This will enable more wolves to be legally culled in European nations. The ruling has been made to protect farmers' livestock and stop the wolf population from getting out of control.
However, according to the Guardian, environmental experts believe the ruling would not only be devastating for the wolves but for the wider ecosystem across the European continent as well.
For nearly 20 years and until 1983, Sweden had no wolf breeding population. With lax regulations and a hunting quota, the wolves are just barely getting by, the news outlet reported.
Ecosystems have a fragile balance. Without a top predator, prey species can over-populate, and the entire habitat can pay the price.
Unfortunately, the government gave the go-ahead and handed out permits to hunters, but this hasn't stopped protection efforts. Conservationists continue to speak out against the unnecessary killing of wolves.
A decade ago, similar outcry from conservationists, including the European Environmental Bureau and WWF, kept 44 wolves from being culled, showing action can yield results.
Should we be actively working to kill invasive species?
Absolutely
It depends on the species
I don't know
No — leave nature alone
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
If you're concerned about animal conservation where you live, you can donate to climate causes, or you can write to your local representative about the importance of healthy ecosystems.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Slovenia becomes first EU nation to ban weapons to Israel
1 of 3 | On Friday, the government of Slovenia's Prime Minister Dr. Robert Golob (pictured Sept. 2024 at the UN in New York CIty) signed-off on its decision to prohibit the "export and transit of military weapons and equipment from or through the Republic of Slovenia to Israel, as well as the import of such goods from Israel into the Republic of Slovenia." Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 1 (UPI) -- Slovenia on Friday imposed a ban on all weapons trading with Israel becoming the first European country to do so over the growing humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave in Israel's ongoing war. Its government said in a statement that at the initiative of Prime Minister Robert Golob, Slovenia signed off on its decision that prohibits "the export and transit of military weapons and equipment from or through the Republic of Slovenia to Israel, as well as the import of such goods from Israel into the Republic of Slovenia." It added that Israel's actions had constituted "serious violations of international humanitarian law" and that Slovenia would prepare "some more national measures" in the "coming weeks," according to the statement. The prime minister's decision, according to the Slovenian government, stems from a promise to "act independent" if the EU "failed to adopt concrete measures" by July. "Due to internal disagreements and lack of unity, the European Union is currently unable to fulfil this task," the statement said in part. On Monday, a European Commission proposal to partly suspend EU weaponry aid to Israel was blocked as Sweden became the most recent to apply pressure over trade. Nearly 70% of Israel's arsenal is imported from the United States with Germany its second-biggest supplier and Italy at third. Slovenian officials have repeatedly called for a cease-fire and its government increased aid delivery to the war-torn territory. On Friday, it said people in Gaza are dying "because humanitarian aid is systematically denied to them. They are dying under the rubble, without access to drinking water, food and basic healthcare." Slovenia's government called it a "complete denial of humanitarian access" and a "conscious prevention of basic conditions for survival." Last year in June, Slovenia became one of the first in Europe to recognize Palestine as a state. Israel has exported more than $560 million in weaponry since October 2023 when Iran's terror syndicate attacked and took Israeli hostages. Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands have since either restricted or halted exports. This week, the Dutch government banned Israel's national security minister and finance chief from its borders. The foreign ministers of Britain and 28 other nations including Canada, France, Italy and Australia recently issued a joint statement saying Israel's ongoing war with Hamas in Gaza had "reached new depths" and "must end now." Qatar in March called on international leaders to bring Israel's nuclear facilities under the watch of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Chile's president has sharply criticized Israel's military actions in Gaza as the South American nation seeks to replace Israel as Chile's primary arms supplier. Golob visited the United States last year prior in October prior to November's presidential election. "It is the duty of every responsible state to act," the Slovenian leader's statement continued. "Even if this means taking a step ahead of others."
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Italy Can Fast-Track Deportation of Illegal Immigrants but Must Allow Legal Review: EU Court
People disembark from the Italian navy ship Libra that arrived in Albania as part of a deal with Italy to process thousands of asylum-seekers stopped near Italian waters, in Shengjin, Albania, on Oct. 16, 2024. People disembark from the Italian navy ship Libra that arrived in Albania as part of a deal with Italy to process thousands of asylum-seekers stopped near Italian waters, in Shengjin, Albania, on Oct. 16, 2024. Florion Goga/Reuters The European Union's top court ruled on Friday that Italy can fast-track the deportation of illegal immigrants to countries it designates as safe, but said those designations must be subject to judicial scrutiny to ensure asylum decisions can be challenged. The ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) came in response to a case involving two Bangladeshi nationals who were rescued at sea by Italian authorities last year. Italy rejected their asylum applications, citing Bangladesh's designation as a safe country of origin under a legislative act passed by the Italian government in October 2024. The two men were later transferred to a detention facility in Albania under a 2023 bilateral agreement between Rome and Tirana. The deal allows up to 3,000 migrants intercepted at sea each month to be relocated to Albania, where their asylum claims are processed by Italian officials. Those not granted protection may be returned to their countries of origin. Story continues below advertisement The fast-track system, along with the relocation of asylum seekers to Albania, was introduced by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government as part of broader efforts to curb illegal immigration. Meloni considers the protocol central to her administration's immigration policy. A previous CJEU ruling in an unrelated case had already limited how countries could interpret the 'safe country' concept, ruling that a nation cannot be considered safe if even part of its territory poses danger to certain individuals. In the current case, the two Bangladeshi men appealed to a Rome court, which asked the CJEU to clarify how countries are designated safe and what legal checks are required. The referring court said Italy's 2024 law doesn't explain how it chose which countries are safe, making it hard for those seeking asylum or judges to question those decisions. The CJEU said that the information used to decide whether a country is safe must be available to both asylum seekers and judges, so they can fully review the decision. Courts can also use their own reliable sources, as long as both sides are allowed to respond. Story continues below advertisement Responding to the CJEU ruling on X, Meloni said it weakens policies aimed at countering mass illegal immigration and defending national borders. 'The decision of the EU Court of Justice regarding the designation of safe countries of origin for illegal migrants is surprising,' she said. 'Once again, the judiciary, this time at the European level, claims authority over areas that do not belong to it, in the face of responsibilities that are political in nature.' Meloni said that the ruling prioritizes the decisions made by national judges over decisions made by parliament. 'Thus, for example, when it comes to identifying so-called safe countries, it gives precedence to the decision of the national judge—even if based on private sources—over the outcome of complex investigations carried out by the competent ministries and evaluated by the sovereign Parliament,' she said. Story continues below advertisement Ilaria Salis, a European Parliament deputy from Italy's Greens and Left Alliance party, criticized the Meloni government on Friday. 'There was no need for a ruling from the European Court to understand that the Meloni government's colonial-style Albanian venture is an abuse of power,' she said. She said the government overstepped its powers in what she described as a 'stubborn crusade' against judicial authority. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni speaks in London on March 2, continues below advertisement EU Migration Pact The CJEU ruling was issued just months before the The CJEU ruling was issued just months before the EU's Pact on Migration and Asylum comes into full effect. It will allow member states to strike agreements with non-EU states to handle asylum claims extraterritorially, potentially setting up processing centers in North Africa or beyond. 'It is noteworthy that this is happening just a few months before the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum comes into force, a Pact that introduces stricter rules, including with regard to the criteria for identifying such countries,' Meloni said. 'For the ten months remaining before the European Pact becomes operational, the Italian government will continue to seek every possible solution, technical or regulatory, to protect the safety of its citizens.' In April, the EU announced that nationals from seven countries, including Bangladesh, Colombia, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, India, and Kosovo, are unlikely to gain asylum status in Europe, as these countries have been designated 'safe third countries.' Illegal immigrants from those countries will be fast-tracked for quicker deportation, the EU said. Since the start of 2025, 36,557 illegal immigrants have entered Italy, up from 33,781 during the same period last year, but down from 89,165 in 2023, according to Italy's Interior Ministry. Most of the arrivals in 2025 have been from Bangladesh, Eritrea, Egypt, Pakistan, and Ethiopia.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Internet Is Completely Stunned By THAT "Whites-Only" Community Going Viral In Arkansas
I'm not sure if you've heard, but there's a "whites-only" community tucked into a remote part of the Ozarks in Arkansas that has been gaining quite a bit of attention for their expansion efforts. TikTok: nbcnews / The group, which refers to itself as a private membership association called Return to the Land, includes about 40 inhabitants who live on 150 acres of land. The community has cabins, roads, wells, a community center, and a schoolhouse, the Independent reports. And now, they're looking to expand to Missouri. TikTok: nbcnews / You must be white, not apart of the LGBTQ+ community, and Christian to join. Jewish people are not allowed. Related: In a video about the group's expansion desires, Return to the Land leader Eric Orwoll said, 'You want a white nation? Build a white town... It can be done. We're doing it.' TikTok: nbcnews / Over 10.2 million people watched NBC News's interview with several group members, which spawned reactions from nearly 80,000 commenters. Related: Commonly, people were flabbergasted by the group's name... ...especially considering that US land originally belonged to Indigenous people. Related: "'Return to the Land' yet they're basing it on EUROPEAN ancestry," one commenter wrote. "So are they at least admitting their ancestors were immigrants? Maybe 'return to the land' should be them leaving to go back to Europe." Others can't believe how vocally the group supports discrimination. Beliefs like this sound vaguely familiar, some suggest: Related: Overall, viewers widely agreed the community "should not be allowed to happen!" According to NBC News, the Arkansas attorney general is currently reviewing the legality of the group. In the meantime, what are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
