Eye of the legislative storm: Lawmakers enjoy low-key week before crunch time
Annapolis has its own way of marking time. In the frantic weeks before Monday's 'crossover' date, hearings are often long and tempers are short. After crossover, hearings are short. Tempers – what are they?
Things will heat up soon enough, with the House and Senate and governor's office all fighting for their part of legislation, big and small, with just under three weeks left to get it all done.
But for now, legislators this week are in that sweet spot. It didn't hurt that spring was starting to make its presence felt, too.
Crossover was Monday, the deadline by which a bill has to move out of one chamber if it's to be guaranteed a hearing in the other. A bill has to be approved by both chambers before it can be signed into law.
After crossover, many of the bills are familiar to lawmakers, who may have heard testimony on their own chamber's bill on the same topic before. Instead of hearing rooms full of potential witnesses, many bills now have only a handful of people testifying — often just the sponsor.
Crossover day brings a flurry of action on bills rushing to beat deadline, stay alive
In some cases, legislators send their staff, or even interns, to present bills and say a few words on behalf of their bosses.
Not everybody's a fan.
Del. Mark Fisher (R-Calvert) said the fact that a bill has been heard in one chamber shouldn't limit testimony.
'People want to have their voices heard,' said Fisher, noting that some people aren't always able to travel to Annapolis for testimony. 'We should have everybody that's want to testify be able to testify.'
But with the final day of the session less than three weeks off, it's hard to argue with efficiency.
Case in point: It took less than 15 minutes for the House Ways and Means Committee to review nine bills. Pre-crossover, it might take the committee twice as long to hear just one bill.
A light moment occurred when Azra Ozturk, the chief of staff for Sen. Alonzo Washington (D-Prince George's), showed up at Ways and Means to testify on Washington's bill, Senate Bill 378, which proposes to establish a family literacy pilot program.
The bill would let incarcerated individuals record themselves reading books for their children, with the book and the recording sent to the children. The House already heard and passed its version of the bill, sponsored by Del. Julie Palakovich Carr (D-Montgomery), that will be heard by the Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Committee.
'He [Washington] apologizes for not being here,' Ozturk told the House committee Wednesday. 'He wanted me to specifically mention that he dearly misses the Ways and Means Committee, and it stands as the best committee in Annapolis.'
Del. Vanessa Atterbeary (D-Howard), chair of the committee, quickly interjected.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Tell him if he did, he would be over here right now to say that to our faces,' Atterbeary said with a smile, to some laughter in the committee room.
Even the criticisms are gentler post-crossover.
The senators who showed up to summarize their bills for the committee were Sens. Benjamin Brooks (D-Baltimore County), Cheryl Kagan (D-Montgomery) and Dawn Gile (D-Anne Arundel).
Sen. Brian Feldman (D-Montgomery), whose bill was first up, entrusted the job of presenting it to an intern, Gifty Okrah, 20, a senior at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Okrah spoke for about 40 seconds on Senate Bill 293, which would require that school board members complete antibias training at least once during their term in office. According to the bill, the training must be offered in a peer-to-peer setting, take a half-day or less and incorporate lessons learned from incidents of bullying, harassment, or intimidation in the county.
'It is a privilege to know that it's possible for students like myself to be in that position to be talking about policies that directly affect them,' Okrah, who majors in public policy, said hours after her brief testimony. 'So just knowing that it's required for board members and teachers as well, that's really good.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump's ‘chilling effect' is coming for museums, historians warn
Historians and researchers are expressing 'grave concern' about President Trump's push to purge museums of information he dislikes. 'Such political interference stands to impose a single and flawed view of American history onto the Smithsonian, placing at risk the integrity and accuracy of historical interpretation,' Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, told CNN Wednesday. 'Such actions diminish our shared past and threaten to erode the public's trust in our shared institutions.' Weicksel said she has been fielding messages of concern not just from fellow historians, but also from people with no professional affiliations. 'Many of them are parents who are concerned about the Smithsonian's future,' she said. 'Others are frequent museum visitors.' On Tuesday, Trump called museums 'the last remaining segment of 'WOKE'' and said, 'We are not going to allow this to happen.' He was seemingly following up on last week's letter from the White House informing the Smithsonian Institution of a content 'review' that would aim to 'ensure alignment with the president's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' That announcement prompted the American Alliance of Museums, which represents 35,000 professionals in the sector, to speak out against 'growing threats of censorship against US museums.' 'This is not just a concern for select institutions,' like the Smithsonian, the group said. 'These pressures can create a chilling effect across the entire museum sector.' The American Association for State and Local History argued in a statement that the Trump administration's broader goal is to 'delegitimize the work of the history field and to rob the public of its ability to learn from the past.' 'Censoring and manipulating content to fit a predetermined, triumphalist narrative is the antithesis of historical practice and a disservice to us all,' the association said. The ultimate danger 'is that you get an incomplete picture of what happened in the country,' Annette Gordon-Reed, the Pulitzer-winning Harvard historian, said on CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360.' 'If you can't learn from history, if you don't know what actually happened,' Gordon-Reed said. 'So, it's a way of keeping people ignorant of the past.' Trump's follow-up message on Truth Social said, 'We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.' The president said he had directed attorneys to 'go through the Museums' and 'start the exact same process that has been done with colleges and universities where tremendous progress has been made.' In some ways, his rhetoric is a continuation of a fight that liberals and conservatives have been having for decades about how much to emphasize America's sins versus its strengths. 'America's national museums have been captured by a niche ideological faction that believes that Western civilization, and, indeed, our nation, is irredeemable,' the editors of the conservative publication National Review wrote last week. 'If the White House gets this review right, it can help make the Smithsonian a cultural gem that all Americans can once again take pride in.' Weicksel and other leaders in the field argue that Americans already have a great deal of trust in museums and historical sites, and MAGA-style ideological meddling will diminish that trust. 'Across numerous surveys, a majority of Americans consistently say they want a full, honest, and unvarnished presentation of our nation's history,' the Organization of American Historians said in a statement last week. The organization predicted that the administration's review would 'undoubtedly be in service of authoritarian control over the national narrative, collective memory, and national collections.' The Smithsonian is not part of the executive branch, but it is federally funded, and it has a Board of Regents that includes the vice president. The institution began a review of its own in June, and last week it said that it would 'continue to collaborate constructively' with the White House. Dozens of groups representing historians came to the Smithsonian's defense back in March when a Trump executive order disparaged the institution, presaging this month's actions. 'Our goal is neither criticism nor celebration; it is to understand — to increase our knowledge of — the past in ways that can help Americans to shape the future,' the groups said in an open letter. 'The stories that have shaped our past include not only elements that make us proud but also aspects that make us acutely aware of tragedies in our nation's history,' the letter continued. 'No person, no nation, is perfect, and we should all — as individuals and as nations — learn from our imperfections.'
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge tosses defamation lawsuit against Nancy Mace
A federal judge on Wednesday tossed a defamation lawsuit against Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) filed after she took to the House floor to accuse a man of being a predator. U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel ruled that even if the lawsuit could proceed, federal law entitles the Justice Department to step in and largely make Mace immune from damages. Gergel did not address whether Mace actually defamed the man, Brian Musgrave, and acknowledged the ruling means he may have no ability to recover damages even if the congresswoman falsely destroyed his reputation, as Musgrave claims. 'Congress has weighed the risks and benefits….and concluded that libel and related claims against federal officials acting within the scope of their employment are barred under federal law. It is this Court's duty to uphold the rule of law,' the judge wrote. Gergel was nominated to the bench by former President Obama. Musgrave sued Mace in March after she gave a stunning speech on the House floor that included a series of allegations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. Mace, who is now running for governor of South Carolina, celebrated the ruling. 'Today the court proved the US Constitution is the LAW OF THE LAND,' Mace said in a statement. 'They came after me because I stood up for victims and demanded crime be prosecuted. Today's court decision proves their lies and attacks won't break me. I've put my career on the line to fight crime and drafted legislation to strengthen our laws. And I'll never stop fighting for law and order.' Musgrave was one of four men whom Mace singled out in a stunning speech on the House floor in February, in which she lobbed accusations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. In addition to Musgrave, Mace had accused her ex-fiancé and two other men of wrongdoing. Eric Bland, Musgrave's attorney, said the decision allows politicians to 'say and do anything they want' but vowed to 'keep fighting' to clear his client's name. 'It seems patently unfair that a United States citizen who lives a law-abiding life can be grouped and called a rapist and a predator without any proof, and it can be done over and over again with immunity (and impunity),' Bland said in a statement. Mace in the speech claimed to have found a hidden camera on a property that Musgrave owns with Mace's ex-fiancé that had intimate photos of women taken without their knowledge or consent. Musgrave's suit said he didn't place the camera and never had knowledge of it. While he was not the subject of Mace's more serious allegations in the speech, such as her belief she was raped after being 'purposefully incapacitated,' Mace labeled Musgrave along with the three other men as a 'predator.' The lawsuit took aim at the speech, Mace's social media posts and a poster displayed outside her congressional office titled 'PREDATORS' with images of the four men. The case also included claims against some of Mace's congressional staff. Last month, the Justice Department sought to step in and largely replace Mace and the staffers as the defendant by certifying they were acting in the scope of their jobs, making them immune and leaving taxpayers on the hook for damages. Gergel, the judge, agreed that the government could do so on all but one claim: that Mace owes Musgrave damages for violating his constitutional rights, known as a Bivens action. But the judge went on to dismiss that claim, too, finding it isn't permitted in defamation cases and that Mace was protected anyway by the U.S. Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause. Mace has made her accusations against the men a central part of her political identity in recent months. In a May subcommittee hearing she led on private spaces, she showed a blurry screenshot of what her 'naked silhouette' that she said was recorded on a hidden camera on the property that was mentioned in her speech. She launched a bid for governor of South Carolina this month. Among her primary opponents is South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), who she accused of not adequately investigating her allegations. Wilson's office at the time said that Mace 'either does not understand or is purposefully mischaracterizing' Wilson's role.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Obama applauds Newsom's California redistricting plan as 'responsible' as Texas GOP pushes new maps
Former President Barack Obama has waded into states' efforts at rare mid-decade redistricting efforts, saying he agrees with California Gov. Gavin Newsom's response to alter his state's congressional maps, in the way of Texas redistricting efforts promoted by President Donald Trump aimed at shoring up Republicans' position in next year's elections. 'I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach. He said this is going to be responsible. We're not going to try to completely maximize it,' Obama said at a Tuesday fundraiser on Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, according to excerpts obtained by The Associated Press. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect.' While noting that 'political gerrymandering' is not his 'preference,' Obama said that, if Democrats 'don't respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy.' According to organizers, the event raised $2 million for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates, one of which has filed and supported litigation in several states over GOP-drawn districts. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Eric Holder, who served as Obama's attorney general and heads up the group, also appeared. The former president's comments come as Texas lawmakers return to Austin this week, renewing a heated debate over a new congressional map creating five new potential GOP seats. The plan is the result of prodding by President Donald Trump, eager to stave off a midterm defeat that would deprive his party of control of the House of Representatives. Texas Democratic lawmakers delayed a vote for 15 days by leaving the state in protest, depriving the House of enough members to do business. Spurred on by the Texas situation, Democratic governors including Newsom have pondered ways to possibly strengthen their party's position by way of redrawing U.S. House district lines, five years out from the Census count that typically leads into such procedures. In California — where voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional maps to an independent commission, with the goal of making the process less partisan — Democrats have unveiled a proposal that could give that state's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control of Congress next year. If approved by voters in November, the blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state, with Democrats intending to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43. A hearing over that measure devolved into a shouting match Tuesday as a Republican lawmaker clashed with Democrats, and a committee voted along party lines to advance the new congressional map. California Democrats do not need any Republican votes to move ahead, and legislators are expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday to get required voter approval. Newsom and Democratic leaders say they'll ask voters to approve their new maps only for the next few elections, returning map-drawing power to the commission following the 2030 census — and only if a Republican state moves forward with new maps. Obama applauded that temporary timeline. 'And we're going to do it in a temporary basis because we're keeping our eye on where we want to be long term,' Obama said, referencing Newsom's take on the California plan. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time.'
