
Over 1.6 lakh self-declaration certificates filed for food and health ads: I&B
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
More than 1.62 lakh self-declaration certificates (SDCs) have been filed by advertisers on the Broadcast Seva and Press Council of India portals since June 2024, as part of a Supreme Court-mandated initiative to curb misleading advertisements in the food and health sectors According to data shared in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday by Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Dr. L. Murugan , 1,45,288 SDCs were submitted through the Press Council of India portal, and another 16,869 via the Broadcast Seva portal . This brings the total number of filings to 1,62,157 as of July 25, 2025.The SDC requirement stems from a Supreme Court order dated May 7, 2024, in WP(C) No. 645 of 2022 – Indian Medical Association & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors., which directed advertisers to certify that their content, particularly in health-related sectors, is not misleading and complies with applicable regulations.In response, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting enabled SDC uploads through dedicated features on both portals.To facilitate implementation, the ministry issued an advisory on July 3, 2024, making SDCs mandatory only for advertisements related to food and health products and services. This revised the earlier notification issued on June 3, which had mandated SDCs for all categories of advertisements.'In light of the directions of the Supreme Court of India, and in supersession of previous advisories dated June 3 and June 5, advertisers and advertising agencies issuing advertisements for products and services related to the food and health sectors are advised to upload an annual self-declaration certificate and make available the proof of uploading to the concerned media stakeholders,' the ministry said in its updated advisory last year.The government clarified that while SDCs are required only for food and health categories, advertisers remain fully responsible for ensuring that every advertisement complies with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations.Dr. Murugan also reiterated that all advertisements aired on private satellite TV channels must adhere to the Advertising Code prescribed under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995. The SDC mechanism, he said, adds an additional layer of consumer protection and accountability across platforms.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
India's 1st mobile phone call was between Sukh Ram and Jyoti Basu
New Delhi: It was exactly 30 years ago on 31st July 1995, when India's first mobile call was made, marking a new chapter in the country's communication history. The first call on 31 July 1995 was made between then Union Telecom minister Sukh Ram in Delhi to then Chief Minister of West Bengal Jyoti Basu in Kolkata. Since then, over the last three decades, this journey has not only revolutionised communication but also redefined the country's economic and social landscape. It all started in 1991, when Dr Manmohan Singh, then Finance Minister, dismantled the government monopoly in the sector and invited private investments. The National Telecom Policy of 1994 was followed, and the Government issued tenders for mobile licences. This became the game changer for India's telecom sector, which later became the poster boy of India's economic reforms. In 1997, following the Supreme Court directive, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was constituted for dispute resolution and regulations of the Industry. Previously, the sector was regulated by the Department of Telecom, which was also a policy-maker, with conflicting interests for private players.


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Does Britain face another multi-billion-pound consumer finance scandal?
Britain's Supreme Court will make a landmark ruling on Friday on car finance commissions that could lead to consumer claims of billions of pounds in compensation from banks and other finance firms. The judgment is expected after financial markets close in London on Friday. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Others Operations Management Product Management MBA Public Policy Design Thinking Data Science MCA Cybersecurity others Leadership Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Project Management Management Digital Marketing Data Science PGDM Finance Healthcare healthcare CXO Degree Technology Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT-ISB Transforming HR with Analytics & AI India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 28 Weeks MICA CERT-MICA SBMPR Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 months IIM Lucknow SEPO - IIML CHRO India Starts on undefined Get Details The Supreme Court has been reviewing an earlier Court of Appeal ruling that found it was unlawful for lenders to pay commissions to motor dealers without a customer's informed consent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bhopal: 1 Trick to Reduce Belly Fat? Home Fitness Hack Shop Now Undo Lenders, including Lloyds Banking Group , Close Brothers , Barclays and the UK arms of Santander and Bank of Ireland, have already set aside nearly 2 billion pounds ($2.7 billion) between them to cover potential compensation claims. Some analysts say the banks may face the most significant payouts since the almost 40 billion pounds in compensation to customers for mis-selling payment protection insurance, which was largely paid out by a 2019 regulatory deadline for doing so. Live Events WHAT WILL THE SUPREME COURT CONSIDER? Reviewing three earlier claims - two against South African lender FirstRand and one against Britain's Close Brothers - the Supreme Court will decide the extent of car dealers' legal responsibility to provide appropriate information to consumers when also acting as credit brokers. The court is also expected to rule on whether commissions paid by lenders to car dealers were secret and whether lenders acted unfairly. WHO MIGHT BE AFFECTED? The Financial Conduct Authority banned the payment of discretionary motor finance commissions in 2021. But some customers say they were treated unfairly before the ban came into effect, prompting the FCA to launch an investigation in January 2024 into historic potential misconduct. If the Supreme Court rules that lenders and brokers should have been more transparent about commissions, the regulator has said it will consult on the structure of a compensation scheme within six weeks. More than 2 million people a year rely on the motor finance market to buy a car, FCA data shows. HOW MUCH COULD BANKS HAVE TO PAY? Only a handful of UK lenders have motor finance businesses large enough to be materially affected by the ruling. These include Lloyds, Close Brothers and Santander UK, which have already made provisions of 1.15 billion pounds, 295 million pounds and 165 million pounds respectively. Bank of Ireland Group's UK arm and Barclays have made smaller provisions. But analysts say other types of commissions paid by banks to credit brokers could face scrutiny if the court decides customers must consent to such payments. Total "worst case" industry costs could reach 30 billion pounds, ratings agency Moody's said in November. RBC Capital analysts estimated the impact on banks and non-banks could be around 11 billion pounds in a revised estimate this week. COULD THE GOVERNMENT STEP IN? Press reports have suggested that Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves is considering changing the law to shield lenders from the worst of the potential fallout, potentially to supersede any Supreme Court judgment. A Treasury spokesperson said the ministry did not comment on speculation and wanted to see a balanced judgment. "It is now appropriate to let the appeals process run its course," the spokesperson said. The government expressed reservations in January about the earlier Court of Appeal ruling, adding it wanted to see a "fair and proportionate judgment" on motor finance that balanced claims with ensuring lenders could continue to provide finance.


New Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Karnataka labour department seeks report on planned layoffs from TCS
BENGALURU: The state government has sought details from Tata Consultancy Service (TCS), one of India's biggest IT service providers, that is planning to lay off over 12,000 staff worldwide. Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Labour Minister Santosh Lad said they have learnt about TCS planning to remove its employees. 'As per law, any company which is planning to remove its employees from work has to inform the labour department. But there is no intimation from them to us. Therefore, we have sought the details,'' he said. On July 27, TCS announced they would release 2 per cent of its global workforce which comes over 12,000 employees. Following this, Karnataka State IT/ITeS Employees Union had written to the state labour department pointing out that according to the Industrial Disputes Act, companies employing more than 100 workers are required to obtain prior approval from the government before carrying out any layoffs or retrenchments. 'Such retrenchments are permitted only for specific reasons and under conditions clearly defined in the Act,' it stated, adding that TCS violated this act. On the state government's proposal to increase minimum working hours to 10, Lad said they had discussed it with various labour organisations. 'Our officials will discuss with the companies and if they agree, this rule will be approved,' he said, adding that the issue will be discussed in the Cabinet.