
Cities' Immigration Approach Is a Model of Multiracial Democracy
The American flag is pictured.
The American flag is pictured.
Robbie Jay Barratt - AMA/Getty Images
Data shows that cities that don't participate in ICE raids report lower poverty, crime, and unemployment rates than those that preemptively enforce immigration regulations. It isn't just about not cooperating with ICE, however. Cities across the country—run by Democrats and Republicans alike—are prioritizing holistic policies that build trust with immigrant communities. These efforts aim to ensure that residents do not fear local police, enabling them to report crimes and engage with civic life without fear of deportation. Programs under the Welcoming Cities Initiative—adopted in Fargo, Gainesville, Huntsville, Akron, and others—focus on integrating immigrants through local action plans that often include improving relationships with law enforcement. On the other hand, evidence shows that police forces that work with ICE to hunt down undocumented immigrants, even if they haven't committed a local crime, drive down a whole community's rates of reporting crimes when they do occur.
Other cities, including Boise and Chattanooga, have joined the Strong Cities Network, working to counter violence against groups like immigrants and promote social cohesion across their city—a key vision of inclusive and pluralist democracy. These community-based initiatives stand in stark contrast to the top-down directives from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Cities like New York, Trenton, Washington, D.C., and Dayton have implemented municipal ID programs, useful for connecting utilities and establishing identity with law enforcement or doctors regardless of immigration status, all without conferring federal voting rights or privileges. From Gainesville, Fla., to the border town of San Diego, local police have served as an important part of the cities' "Immigrant Inclusion Blueprints," creating plans to boost the cultural competence of police, educate immigrants on their constitutional rights, and make victim rights information available in several languages. Such policies reflect cities' practical, nonpartisan approach to complex national issues that tend to become overly polarized in Washington, D.C.
Immigrants, regardless of immigration status, are not the moochers and dangerous "vermin" that some would paint them as. Local economies in inclusive and welcoming cities are thriving. Fargo's immigrant population contributed $542.8 million to the metro GDP while paying $13.8 million in state and local taxes and $28.3 million in federal taxes. Dayton's immigrant population contributed $74 million to Social Security and more than $19 million to Medicare in 2019. The Gainesville, Fla., action plan on inclusive public safety shows results too. As the immigrant population continues to rise, the city has seen a historic drop in the crime rate. Increasing representation, honoring various perspectives, and promoting deliberative engagement produce outcomes that make communities stronger.
Cities do not—and should not—provide sanctuary for criminals against federal enforcement. Instead, they are creating a sanctuary where everyone, regardless of country of origin, race, or ethnicity can flourish. These policies show that treating all people with human dignity both improves everyone's bottom line and keeps communities safe. Pluralist, multiracial democracy means that regardless of background or blood, residents can coexist and flourish because it is America's civic institutions that bind "We the People" together. Our democratic identity is forged as we work together to make our communities safer, more prosperous, and welcoming. In these policies and programs toward immigrants, America's cities are fundamentally fulfilling the founding pledge to form "a more perfect union."
Joel Day, Ph.D., is the managing director of the University of Notre Dame's Democracy Initiative and a former administrator for the city of San Diego, where he led local immigration initiatives and oversaw several public safety programs.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
Speaker Mike Johnson touts passing of spending bill as Dems lament
Speaker Mike Johnson touts passing of spending bill as Dems lament After Republicans' sweeping spending bill passed out of Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson said it'll be "a great thing" for every American.


San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
MAGA faithful cheer Trump for pausing Ukraine weapons after bristling at Iran strikes
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is getting praise from his most ardent supporters for withholding some weapons from Ukraine after they recently questioned the Republican leader's commitment to keeping the U.S. out of foreign conflicts. This week's announcement pausing deliveries of key air defense missiles, precision-guided artillery and other equipment to Ukraine comes just a few weeks after Trump ordered the U.S. military to carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Bombing those sites in Iran had some hardcore supporters of the "Make America Great Again" movement openly questioning whether Trump was betraying his vow to keep America out of 'stupid wars" as he inserted the U.S. military into Israel's conflict with Tehran. With the Ukraine pause, which affects a crucial resupply of Patriot missiles, Trump is sending the message to his most enthusiastic backers that he is committed to following through on his campaign pledge to wind down American support for Ukraine's efforts to repel Russia, a conflict he has repeatedly described as a costly boondoggle for U.S. taxpayers. 'The choice was this: either prioritize equipping our own troops with a munition in short supply (and which was used to defend U.S. troops last week) or provide them to a country where there are limited U.S. interests,' Dan Caldwell, who was ousted as a senior adviser to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, posted on X. Caldwell publicly worried before the Iran strikes that U.S. involvement could incite a major war and ultimately cost American lives. Far-right influencer Jack Posobiec, another ardent MAGA backer, warned as Trump weighed whether to carry out strikes on Iran last month that such a move 'would disastrously split the Trump coalition." Both the White House and the Pentagon have justified the move as being consistent with Trump's campaign pledge to limit U.S. involvement in foreign wars. 'The president was elected on an America first platform to put America first,' Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said. At the same time, the decision is stirring anxiety among those in the more hawkish wing of the Republican Party. Many are flummoxed by Trump's halting the flow of U.S. arms just as Russia accelerates its unrelenting assault on Ukraine. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican who hails from a district that former Vice President Kamala Harris won in 2024, wrote to Trump and the Pentagon on Wednesday expressing 'serious concern' about the decision and requesting an emergency briefing. 'We can't let (Russian President Vladimir) Putin prevail now. President Trump knows that too and it's why he's been advocating for peace,' Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican, wrote on X. 'Now is the time to show Putin we mean business. And that starts with ensuring Ukraine has the weapons Congress authorized to pressure Putin to the negotiating table.' Trump spoke by phone with Putin on Thursday, the sixth call between the leaders since Trump's return to office. The leaders discussed Iran, Ukraine and other issues but did not specifically address the suspension of some U.S. weapons shipments to Ukraine, according to Yuri Ushakov, Putin's foreign affairs adviser. Zelenskyy said in Denmark after meeting with major European Union backers that he hopes to talk to Trump in the coming days about the suspension. The administration says it is part of global review of the U.S. stockpile and is a necessary audit after sending nearly $70 billion in arms to Ukraine since Putin launched the war on Ukraine in February 2022. The pause was coordinated by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby. Colby, before taking his position, spoke publicly about the need to focus U.S. strategy more on China, widely seen as the United States' biggest economic and military competitor. At his Senate confirmation hearing in March, he said the U.S. doesn't have a 'multi-war military.' 'This is the restrainers like Colby flexing their muscle and saying, 'Hey, the Pacific is more important,'' said retired Navy Adm. Mark Montgomery, an analyst at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Backers of a more restrained U.S. foreign policy say the move is necessary, given an unsettled Middle East, rising challenges in Asia and the stress placed on the U.S. defense industrial complex after more than three years of war in Ukraine. 'You're really coming up to the point where continuing to provide aid to Ukraine is putting at risk the U.S. ability to operate in future crises,' said Jennifer Kavanagh, a senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities. 'And you don't know when those crises are going to happen."


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
How Trump got his "Big Beautiful Bill" passed
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) celebrates President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill that passed in the House in May. (Photo by Matt McClain/The Washington Post) President Donald Trump is poised to sign the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, after the House and Senate passed the bill in two all-night sessions this week. Trump and his allies consider its passage to be a big victory, but the bill, which extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, will also result in millions losing their health insurance — a cost that could leave fissures in the Republican Party. Today on 'Post Reports,' Colby Itkowitz sits down with congressional reporter Theodoric Meyer and the Post's 'Early Brief' newsletter author Dan Merica to discuss the consequences of the bill and how it could influence the 2026 midterm elections. Today's show was produced by Arjun Singh, and edited by Laura Benshoff with help from Emily Rauhala. It was mixed by Sam Bair. Subscribe to The Washington Post here.