Interest rate cut tipped despite Trump tariff backdown
A clear majority of economists believe the Reserve Bank of Australia will cut interest rates at its next meeting, but developments abroad mean it's no longer a sure thing.
US President Donald Trump recently slashed tariffs on China to 35 per cent from a whopping 145 per cent, prompting Beijing to lower its own tariff wall and triggering a rebound in values for riskier assets such as shares.
Following strong labour market data released on Thursday, the market now predicts three rate cuts by year's end, down from four priced in at the start of the week.
But traders are still nearly fully priced in for a 25 basis point cut to the cash rate, which sits at 4.1 per cent, on Tuesday.
Almost nine in 10 economists agreed in a survey by comparison website Finder.
Oxford Economics Australia's Sean Langcake is among the vast majority of the 41 economists surveyed who predict a cash rate reduction.
Despite better news on the tariff front, the economy would still be negatively impacted by the "uncertainty shock", he said.
"With upside inflation risks dissipating, the RBA can afford to lend the economy some more support," Mr Langcake added.
Economists at all four big banks also expect a cut, with NAB still holding onto its prediction of a turbocharged 50 basis point cut.
Nomura analysts Andrew Ticehurst and David Seif said the case for an "aggressive" 50-point cut was relatively weak, given the detente in the Sino-American trade war.
"We expect the RBA to deliver a 25 basis point rate cut, reflecting both further welcome progress in returning core inflation back towards target and the continuing highly uncertain global backdrop," the pair said.
The central bank will also update its quarterly economic predictions on Tuesday in an otherwise quiet week on the data front.
The Victorian government will unveil its budget on the same day, with ratings agency S&P Global warning the nation's most indebted state to rein in spending or risk seeing its AA credit rating downgraded further.
Meanwhile, US markets were buoyed by the tariff reprieve, rising for their fifth day in a row by the end of the week.
Australian shares reached a three-month high on Friday after eight straight sessions of gains.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
ECB Is in Good Position on Rates, Lagarde Tells Monaco Info
The latest interest-rate moves primes the European Central Bank to meet its medium-term inflation goal, President Christine Lagarde told television station Monaco Info. 'We think we have really reached a good position,' she said in an interview broadcast Saturday, adding that the latest olicy decision was 'well calibrated.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nearly 25% of Americans are now ‘functionally unemployed' — here's what that ‘harsh reality' really means
A low unemployment rate typically signals that an economy is generally healthy. The unemployment rate in the U.S. remained near a 50-year-low in April 2025 at 4.2% — plus, American employers added 177,000 jobs in April despite the uncertainty of Trump's tariffs and trade wars. This all sounds good, right? Not so fast. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) The 'true' rate of unemployment in April, according to the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), was 24.3%, up 0.03% from the previous month. LISEP's True Rate of Unemployment (TRU) includes the unemployed, as well as workers who are employed but still struggling. 'We are facing a job market where nearly one-in-four workers are functionally unemployed, and current trends show little sign of improvement,' said LISEP Chair Gene Ludwig in a statement published on PR Newswire. 'The harsh reality is that far too many Americans are still struggling to make ends meet, and absent an influx of dependable, good-paying jobs, the economic opportunity gap will widen.' That could help explain why, despite the supposedly healthy employment rate, consumer confidence in the American economy has been plunging. So, why is there a 20-point difference between the LISEP and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) unemployment numbers? The BLS collects a massive amount of data on unemployment, but some of that data is excluded from the official unemployment rate. For example, BLS found that 5.7 million people who aren't employed do, in fact, want a job — but they weren't counted as unemployed because 'they were not actively looking for work during the four weeks preceding the survey or were unavailable to take a job,' according to BLS. LISEP uses data compiled by BLS, but instead of simply measuring unemployment, LISEP measures what it calls the 'functionally unemployed.' This is defined as the portion of the U.S. labor force that 'does not have a full-time job (35+ hours a week) but wants one, has no job, or does not earn a living wage, conservatively pegged at $25,000 annually before taxes.' Its metrics capture not only unemployed workers, but also those stuck in poverty-wage jobs and those working part-time but can't get full-time work. LISEP's measurements aim to include these functionally unemployed Americans to provide a more complete picture of unemployment across the country, including the nuances that other economic indicators miss. This, in turn, can help 'provide policymakers and the public with a more transparent view of the economic situation of all Americans, particularly low- and middle-income households, compared with misleading headline statistics,' according to LISEP. 'Amid an already uncertain economic outlook, the rise in functional unemployment is a concerning development,' Ludwig said. 'This uncertainty comes at a price, and unfortunately, the low- and middle-income wage earners ultimately end up paying the bill.' Ludwig says the public would be 'well served by a commitment from economic policymakers to adopt a stable course of action' based on real-world metrics. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it LISEP uses two important differentiators in its metrics. First, to be considered fully employed, an individual must have a part-time job (with no desire to work full time, such as students) or have a full-time job working at least 35 hours per week. Second, the individual must earn at least $20,000 annually, adjusted for inflation and calculated in January 2020 dollars, as per the Department of Health and Human Services' U.S. poverty guidelines. While 'not technically false,' LISEP says the rate reported by the BLS is 'deceiving,' considering the number of Americans in the workforce who are 'employed on poverty-like wages' or 'on a reduced workweek that they do not want.' 'For example, it [BLS' unemployment rate] counts you as employed if you've worked as little as one hour over the prior two weeks,' Ludwig told CBS MoneyWatch. 'So you can be homeless and in a tent community and have worked one hour and be counted, irrespective of how poorly-paid that hour may be.' TRU also paints a bleak picture for certain demographics, with Hispanic and Black workers faring worse than white workers and women faring worse than men. For example, 27% of Black workers and about 28% of Hispanic workers are functionally unemployed compared to 23% of white workers. Every month since 1995, black Americans have had a 'meaningfully higher' TRU than caucasian Americans, according to LISEP. The TRU numbers suggest the U.S. economy is much weaker than the BLS unemployment rate would have you believe — particularly for lower- and middle-income Americans — and that there's a need for policy solutions that reflect this more nuanced reality. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Wall Street's Dr. Doom now wants to be Dr. Boom
Nouriel Roubini, who's been known as "Dr. Doom" for 17 years, is feeling more upbeat. The economist has scaled back his recession call and thinks the US is headed for an investment boom. He told BI there are three things that have driven his newfound optimism. Wall Street has been calling him "Dr. Doom" for 17 years, but Nouriel Roubini — the economist famous for his persistently bearish and frequently dystopian takes on the world economy — is sounding surprisingly positive lately. He's rescinded his earlier call for a recession, and now sees a US tech and artificial intelligence investment boom unfolding that will uplift the economy through the rest of this decade. By 2030, Roubini thinks economic growth in the US will double from around 2% to 4%, while productivity growth surges from around 1.9% to 3%. The stock market is also likely to climb higher, he told Business Insider in an interview, predicting the S&P 500 would see high single-digit percentage growth in 2025, on par with its historical return. It's a sharp turnaround from the gloomy forecasts he' is known for. Roubini told BI the nickname started to stick in 2008, when the New York Times referred to him as "Dr. Doom" after he correctly called the Great Financial Crisis, he told BI. "Even before, I always said I'm not Dr. Doom and I'm Dr. Realist, first of all," Roubini said. He said that he's made numerous forecasts that were more bullish than the consensus throughout the years when the evidence lines up. "So I don't know why people think that I'm always Dr. Doom. It's not the case." His outlook, though, has brightened considerably since 2022. Back then, he appeared on TV and penned op-eds warning of a coming stagflationary debt crisis. At the time, he described the turmoil he saw looming as an all-in-one financial crisis involving spiraling debt levels, soaring inflation, and a severe recession. Roubini told BI there are a few things that have gotten him to change his tune. Roubini says he began to hear the murmurs of the AI revolution well before ChatGPT went viral at the end of 2022. In his 2022 book, "Megathreats," he acknowledged the potential for artificial intelligence to significantly boost economic growth and serve as a major tailwind for markets. That's become a reality way faster than Roubini expected, and a major reason he's become more bullish, he told BI. He believes the economy could start to reap the growth and productivity benefits of AI in the next several years, particularly as humanoid robots enter the mainstream. A breakthrough in fusion energy would be another bullish force for the economy, Roubini said. Fusion energy hasn't been achieved yet, but tech firms are pouring vast sums of money into making it happen. Chevron and Google contributed to a more than $150 million funding round this week for TAE Technologies, a fusion energy company that plans to have a working prototype power plant by the early 2030s. Type One Energy, another fusion energy firm, also plans to roll out a power plant by the middle of the next decade. "We're not in an AI winter anymore. We had the fusion winter for 40 years. We're not anymore," Roubini said, pointing to the stagnation in tech and fusion energy development is the past. "Now it's happening." President Donald Trump's tariffs may not be as harmful to the US economy as some investors think, Roubini says. He thinks it's more likely that markets will throw a tantrum and force Trump to walk back his most aggressive policies. That's already happened a few times this year. Roubini pointed to sharp sell-offs in the bond market that preceded Trump's 90-day pause of his "Liberation Day" tariffs, and the softening of his tone regarding firing Jerome Powell. "That means the bond vigilantes are the most powerful people in the world," Roubini said. "The instincts might be very bad, but then, markets are unforgiving," he added of policymakers. Roubini speculates that tariffs on China, for instance, could wind up somewhere around 39%, well-below the 145% tariff rate Trump proposed earlier in the year. Meanwhile, AI, quantum computing, and other tech advancements in the US can more than offset the impact of the trade war, Roubini said. Tariffs are expected to drag down GDP growth by 0.06% a year through 2035, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. It's a fraction of the 2 percentage point increase in growth Roubini expects to see by the end of the decade. Roubini now pegs the odds of a recession to just around 25%. Even if the US enters a downturn this year, Roubini says he expects it to be shallow and short, as the Fed can cut interest rates to boost the economy, while tech powers growth over the long-run. That's not to say Dr. Doom has shed all of his bearish views. Roubini says many of the things he feared several years ago — stagflation, spiraling government debt levels, and rising geopolitical conflict — still loom. He rattled off a list of potential risks the US could conceivably face in the future: migration controls fueling stagflation in the economy, the US dollar collapsing in value, and China and the US not reaching a trade agreement and seeing an escalating cold war, to name a few scenarios. "So there's plenty of stuff in the world that can go wrong," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
