Thailand shuts scenic viewing spot after Laos clashes
Representative Image (AI-generated)
BANGKOK: Rare armed clashes in Laos believed to be linked to drug smuggling have forced Thailand to close a popular mountain viewing point on the border and prompted a security warning from the United States.Thai national park officials said on Monday that the Phu Chi Fa scenic spot, on the border with Laos in northern Chiang Rai province, has been closed until further notice.The US embassy in Vientiane urged Americans thinking of travelling to Bokeo province to reconsider after reports of "clashes between the Lao army and unidentified armed groups"."Local officials have requested raised security levels, which will include an increase in military checkpoints and troop presence," the embassy said on its website.Unrest is rare in communist Laos but the country forms part of the Golden Triangle -- covering the border areas with Myanmar and Thailand -- that has been a hub for Southeast Asia's lucrative drug trade for decades.State-run Lao National Radio reported on Tuesday that a border patrol clashed with drug smugglers in Bokeo on Saturday and arrested four suspects.The report said that some border patrol officials were killed and wounded in the clashes, without giving details.Police in Laos did not respond to AFP's request for comment.Suphakorn Phromcharoen, the police chief in Thailand's Wiang Kaen district, across the border from the location of the clashes, told AFP that at least one stray bullet had hit a house on the Thai side of the border.Thai authorities estimate that at least one soldier may have been killed and more than a dozen wounded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump wants cheaper drugs like Europe has. How it works.
President Donald Trump doesn't just want to bring down prescription drug prices for Americans. He wants European countries to raise them to make up the revenue that drugmakers would lose from his policy. Trump is proposing a so-called most-favored-nation pricing model, which would set U.S. drug prices at the lowest level in other wealthy countries. But the pharmaceutical industry isn't buying into tying drug prices in the U.S. to prices in Europe—at least not knowing the details of the president's proposal. More details about the government's pricing model could come this week. On May 12, Trump directed government health officials to benchmark drug prices to international standards within 30 days. The lobbying group PhRMA, with members including U.S. pharma giants Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie, has argued there are two reasons why U.S. drug prices are high: foreign countries not paying 'their fair share" for medicines, and middlemen such as pharmacy-benefit managers. Today, U.S. drug pricing is largely market driven. It involves negotiations between drug manufacturers, pharmacy-benefit managers, healthcare insurers and providers. European countries do it much differently. Each has its own way of determining drug prices, but most follow one of two broad approaches. The first approach, which Germany and France use, considers the overall clinical effectiveness of a new medicine. How does the new treatment compare to existing ones? Does it have added therapeutic benefits? If the new drug is substantially better, its price would reflect that. A second approach, used by the U.K., the Netherlands, and Sweden, analyzes cost effectiveness. This model not only compares the new drug to existing ones but also assesses the incremental value that the medicine brings to the health system. After the assessments, negotiations between drugmakers and the countries begin. Because many European countries have national health systems, they are in a strong negotiation position. If government negotiators think a medicine is too expensive for its effectiveness, they won't recommend its use. How Trump's MFN policy would work in practice isn't clear. Drug prices would probably be based on list prices in Europe since the prices paid by national health systems, or net prices, are confidential. The president's open-ended directive, laid out in an executive order, has many wondering how the U.S. could raise prices in Europe. Trump has made clear he wants to close the gap between U.S. and international prices, and has suggested he would use tariffs and export controls to achieve his goal. In theory, drugmakers could set list prices higher in Europe as long as it doesn't affect net prices, health policy expert Dr. Huseyin Naci told Barron's. In the U.K., for example, a higher list price could still lower the prices in other European countries. 'So that would still not be an acceptable approach to many other European countries," said Naci, who is associate professor of health policy at the London School of Economics. Overhauling Europe's decades-old pricing approaches would require fundamental changes to their pricing regulations—and there will be 'little appetite or ability" to alter them, Naci added. Cost is another complicating factor. 'Pharmaceutical spending is already one of the top categories of spending in many countries in terms of healthcare expenditure, so there's little room to accommodate higher prices and spending for pharmaceuticals in Europe," according to Naci. How Trump is planning to make Europeans pay more for drugs is the big question. He could use tariffs and trade negotiations as leverage. In early April, the president said a 'major" tax on pharmaceutical imports is coming 'very shortly," however nothing has been announced yet. In a trade agreement with the U.K. a month later, there is a provision on pharmaceuticals that states the U.K. will 'endeavor to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies." What that means in practice still isn't clear. Write to Elsa Ohlen at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Israel is 'fully ready' to attack Iran's nuclear sites, US on high alert
The US is on high alert amid heightened tensions in the Middle East, as Israel could launch a strike on Iran's nuclear sites, with no clear breakthrough in talks between Washington and Tehran. read more Advertisement Representational Image- AFP The United States is on high alert over concerns that Israel might launch a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, The Washington Post reported. The Trump administration is concerned that Israel could target Iran's nuclear sites without US approval if nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran break down. Amid these fears, heightened tensions have emerged as hopes fade for President Trump to reach a deal with Tehran to limit Iran's nuclear programme and prevent another major conflict in the Middle East following the Israel-Hamas war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump said on Wednesday that the United States would not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. 'They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon,' he said. West Asia is 'a dangerous place': Trump Speaking at the Kennedy Center in Washington on Wednesday evening, President Trump said: 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens. We've given notice to move out, and we'll see what happens.' US pulling non-essential personnels According to reports, the US is also planning a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iraq and will allow families of military personnel to leave certain locations in the Middle East due to heightened security threats, Reuters reported, citing US and Iraqi sources. The State Department said it had ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel from the US Embassy in Baghdad following its latest review and a commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' The embassy was already operating with limited staff, so the order will not affect a large number of personnel. Meanwhile, Israel has informed the US that it is fully prepared to launch a strike on Iran, CBS News reported, citing several American officials. Iran's warning Iran has repeatedly warned that the United States, as Israel's main military and political supporter, would face consequences if Israel attacks Iran. On Wednesday, Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said that if Iran is targeted, it will retaliate by striking US bases in the region.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'We won't rest': S.African families seek justice for apartheid killings
A winter chill hung over the windswept cemetery in South Africa's eastern town of Cradock where the untended graves of four activists assassinated by the apartheid regime were watched over by a monument in their memory, itself in disrepair. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In the city of Gqeberha two hours' drive away, the murders in 1985 of the young men in one of the most notorious atrocities of the previous regime was the focus of an emotional courtroom inquest into the deaths. Forty years on from the killings, the families of Fort Calata, Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli and Sparrow Mkhonto -- husbands, fathers, three of them teachers and one a unionist -- are still bereft and seeking answers. "We are not going to rest in this matter up until there is some form of justice," Calata's son, Lukhanyo, told AFP in Gqeberha, an Indian Ocean city formerly called Port Elizabeth. The 43-year-old journalist was barely in school when his father did not come home one night in June. His body was later found beaten, stabbed and burned with the others. "I was pregnant and my hope was taken away... everything was taken away in such a brutal manner," his mother, Nomonde Calata, now in her mid-sixties, told the inquest. Her third child was only born two weeks after her husband was buried. "I couldn't show the enemy my pain because they would laugh at me," she told the court, fighting back tears. A first inquest was held in 1985 in Afrikaans, a language Nomonde did not understand, but did not identify the killers. A second inquest in 1993 confirmed the security police were responsible but gave no names. After the apartheid regime that enforced a brutal system of racial oppression ended in 1994, a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) into the atrocities committed during apartheid also heard the case of the Cradock Four. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Led by Nobel laureate Desmond Tutu, it found six members of a police hit squad were involved and denied them amnesty from further prosecution. But there was no follow-up action and all six have since died. Lukhanyo Calata was unsurprised that the apartheid authorities covered themselves for this killing, one of scores of government-ordered actions against people seen as threats to the apartheid system. "They did everything that they could to protect themselves. We weren't actually expecting better from them," he said. 'Will not forgive' But this time he and the other relatives in the latest inquest are expecting more. Relatives are allowed for the first time to give testimony, which is regularly broadcast live on national television. The court has also visited the location where the four are believed to have been killed after being pulled off a road at night while driving back from a political event in Port Elizabeth. Of the one former police officer who confessed before he died, Nomonde said: "He robbed me from the love of my husband, he robbed the children from the love of their father. I will not and did not forgive." Besides wanting accountability, these families and many others who lost loved ones in apartheid-era killings want to know why there have been no prosecutions 30 years since the fall of the previous regime. Delays may have been due to a "toxic mix of idleness, indifference, incapacity or incompetence" and even political interference, one of the families' lawyers said at the opening of the inquest. President Cyril Ramaphosa set up a judicial inquiry in April into claims of deliberate delays in prosecuting apartheid-era crimes. A separate court case by 25 families, including these ones, is seeking government compensation. Finding peace In the small and dusty town of Cradock itself, now called Nxuba, residents who knew the slain activists have watched the decades pass without answers and their sense of loss is still unresolved. "I grew in front of those people," said Sibongile Mbina Mbina, in his late 50s. "Two of them taught me in high school, so I'm worried that this has not been solved." "It's painful because it has been quite a long time," said Mawonga Goniwe, 65, whose uncle was among the Cradock Four. "We wanted closure as a family. How did our family member die?" "The truth must come out... they must face what they have done," he told AFP who was in Gqeberha for the inquest.
