
Gayton McKenzie should be relieved of his Cabinet position
While everyone was distracted by the spectacle in the Oval Office between Presidents Trump and Ramaphosa, Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie was engaging in xenophobic outbursts, not as a campaigning Patriotic Alliance rabble-rouser but, in effect, asserting xenophobia as government policy.
While addressing the chairpersons and CEOs of all Department of Sport, Arts and Culture entities – including museums, theatres and heritage and funding agencies, he launched into an attack on 'foreigners' in South Africa.
He is quoted, inter alia, as saying:
'Some of you here [have] the audacity to hire foreigners instead of South Africans.';
'I don't care how you used to do it. But for as long as I am the minister, there will be no foreigner that will work in an entity while a South African can do the same thing.';
He said that 'foreigners' employed by departments needed to be 'out in three weeks'. 'I said it, I want them out, get them out.'
Leaving aside the inappropriate tone of engagement by a Cabinet Minister, it is the language of 'them' and 'us', threatening to divide and fomenting hate, which should disturb us all.
In reporting by Marianne Thamm, we understand that, 'Daily Maverick has seen a letter dated 9 May from McKenzie to the chair and CEO of the Market Theatre following up on 'an audit' of 'non-South Africans employed by the various entities incorporated under the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture'. '
We need to fully understand how dangerous this kind of exercise of authority is from a man patently unfit to hold any leadership position. It beggars belief that he could have been considered for a Cabinet position. An 'all-in' GNU required this irksome compromise, it would seem.
His Patriotic Alliance won eight seats in the National Assembly in last year's election, which represents 2.05% of the vote. But, Sport, Arts and Culture has mostly been a ministry where shamed politicians go, to while away time or recover from scandal. The ANC has never really taken this portfolio seriously, which is shameful and says a great deal about what the party prioritises.
We should also not be surprised at McKenzie's 'instruction' to Department of Sport, Arts and Culture entities. This is who he is, a crude, embarrassing street-fighter, former criminal and a well-known driver of xenophobia and hate. While district mayor in Beaufort West, McKenzie vowed to make the Central Karoo an 'illegal immigrant-free zone', sending shivers down the spines of the Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Ethiopian communities.
As Richard Pithouse has written in a piece worth reading again, 'When McKenzie and the Patriotic Alliance were brought into the government of national unity, all its participants knew that they were right-wing populists whose xenophobia was openly at odds with the Constitution.' There is a reason McKenzie initially expressed a desire for the Home Affairs portfolio.
Constitutional rights undermined
No one in the Cabinet seems to have raised an eyebrow at their colleague's most recent statements. The President himself has said and done nothing in response to McKenzie's comments, which a large grouping of civil society organisations has called, 'vulgar', in a statement released on 20 May. It further called the comments 'morally repugnant and entirely devoid of legal authority'.
The civil society statement says that, 'His demand of CEOs that they immediately dismiss foreign employees or face dismissal themselves constitutes an egregious violation of South Africa's constitutional law, its labour laws and its international treaty obligations. South Africa's Constitution enshrines the rights of everyone – including foreign nationals – to fair labour practices. The minister's remarks and instructions undermine these rights and amount to unlawful discrimination based on nationality, which is expressly prohibited under both domestic and international law.'
Again, these sorts of sentiments, while rightly called 'morally repugnant', are not new. They course dangerously through our political discourse. The ANC itself has frequently expressed xenophobic sentiments. A few examples to recall: In 2022, Phophi Ramathuba stood at the bed of a Zimbabwean patient who had been involved in a car accident, in a hospital in Bela-Bela, Limpopo, and said: 'You are killing my (sic) health system.'
Ramathuba was MEC of Health at the time. It was a shameful scene, and even while the cameras rolled, Ramathuba showed very little care.
When these words were followed by an outcry, Ramathuba insisted she would not apologise.
Defiant and callous. After the May 2024 general election, Ramathuba was elevated to Premier of Limpopo. So, xenophobia pays, it seems.
Stilfontein
When we witnessed a most abhorrent act as illegal miners were trapped inside a mine in Stilfontein with no help forthcoming, the response from Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, made national and international headlines when she said, stone-cold: 'You want to send our law enforcement officers to risk because criminals want to destroy our country? What if we send the police or military down there to supply them with food, the place explodes and caves in? What will happen? So families must continue to sacrifice because criminals got themselves into a bind?'
It ran on, with Ntshavheni saying the government would not send help.
'We will smoke them out', she said, without understanding how objectionable her words were.
What a disgrace.
We recall Operation Dudula, which gained prominence on the streets, especially after its leader, Nhlanhla 'Lux' Dlamini, was arrested in 2022. Operation Dudula brought with it violent language and has enticed those at the margins of our society.
There is a straight line from where we are today back to 2008 and the painful moment when violence was unleashed against foreigners across our country.
McKenzie doubles down
Instead of being remorseful and attempting to understand the constitutional imperatives at play, McKenzie reinforced his comments during an interview with the Africa Report on 22 May while attending the South Africa-France Investment Conference at Place Vendôme in Paris.
If the interview is anything to go by, one shudders to think what further contribution McKenzie made at this conference. Responding to the civil society statement, he said, ''Our people don't have jobs. We've got double-digit unemployment, youth unemployment in our country, but illegal foreigners have jobs.
'We cannot allow this and they can call me vulgar. What is vulgar? It's giving your neighbour children food, shelter, water, while your own children are starving. That is vulgar…
'I will get rid of illegal foreigners. I will close this type of charity because we need patriotic charities in our country. I will close down the charities that are anti-government, that are anti-South Africa.'
McKenzie, like all populists, understands grievance.
But he was greeted with cheers by attendees at the Paris conference while hugging and handshaking. During the same interview, he claimed he had 'Presidential aspirations'. So, President Ramaphosa needs to be clear about where this GNU stands on xenophobia and also the threats to 'close down' 'anti-government' charities (sic). What exactly does this mean?
In the same interview, he specifically attacked the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, one of the civil society signatories to the statement mentioned above. There can be no ambiguity about the role of civil society in a democracy. It is not McKenzie's gift, but a constitutional right and the President of the country should reassert this as head of state of our constitutional democracy.
Complex causes
As with everything else in South Africa, the reasons for violence are complex. Sometimes it has been driven by xenophobia, at other times a rather more confusing cocktail of anger, frustration and intolerance bubbling at the surface of our society, fuelled by exclusion, poverty and rampant unemployment.
We seem to be straining at the seams as the repercussions of deep inequalities, our inability to bring about structural economic transformation after 1994 and the old baggage of the apartheid years come to haunt us.
The environment is ripe for blaming 'the other' while competing for scarce resources. At the heart of the incendiary rhetoric lies populist exploitation and an instinct to simplify the complex. This is not unique to South Africa. We have seen it in Donald Trump's presidency and the arguments for Brexit.
Widespread dissatisfaction with the status quo has driven voters in small towns towards the politics McKenzie espouses. Our towns and municipalities, mostly falling apart as a result of ANC corruption and neglect, are ripe pickings for the Patriotic Alliance.
Last week, the party won a seat off the ANC in the small town of Sutherland, and the ANC was able to hold off the PA in two other closely contested by-elections.
Last week, we heard of xenophobic violence flaring up in Addo, with dire consequences.
We should not be so distracted by historical clips of Julius Malema singing 'Kill the boer!' that we fail to see McKenzie and his ilk in plain sight. Our challenges require thoughtful leadership rooted in the Constitution, not McKenzie's brand of politics, which will only result in further corruption and hate.
We can call on our hapless politicians to 'put an end' to the xenophobic violence, rhetoric and disruption that often accompanies these protests, but xenophobia is a challenge for the whole of our society.
Having said this, however, President Ramaphosa needs to send a clear message against this thuggery and intimidation by one of his Cabinet ministers.
The reality is that McKenzie has no place in government and his clownishly dangerous comments must be met with sanction. If our passive President does not act against McKenzie's threatening comments against civil society and his illegal pronouncements against government entities, then we must assume that these comments represent the GNU Ramaphosa leads. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
17 minutes ago
- The South African
6-hour power outage to affect these Johannesburg areas
The city of Johannesburg has implemented a 6-hour planned power outage that will affect 12 areas in the city. The power outage will occur on Saturday, 7 June 2025. The power utility stated that the power outage is due to regular maintenance work done on the electricity network for better service provision. 'The interruption is necessary to do essential maintenance work on our network, which is part of our program of constantly striving to provide a better service,' the City said in a statement. The power outage will affect these 12 Johannesburg areas from 8:30 to 14:30 (6 hours) at Fort Substation: San Hancock Street Edith Cvale Street De Korte Street/ Simmonds Street Civic Theatre Klein Street East Avenue (Pretoria Gate CNP Pretoria and Clarendon) Constitutional Court Civic 3 Constitutional Court No. 2 Constitutional Court No. 1- Queens Street Hospital Street Civic Braam Park Repairs are underway in parts of Joburg CBD after an underground fire resulted in a power outage in certain parts of the city. The fire broke out in an underground tunnel between Fordsburg and Bree Substation on Saturday, 31 May 2025. According to City Power Johannesburg, investigations are allegedly pointing to illegal mining as the cause of the fire. 'Investigations into circumstances that led to the incident are still ongoing but preliminary findings point to suspected illegal mining (Zama Zama) activity as the cause of the underground fire, an issue that has been linked to similar incidents in the past.' 'Our teams are still hard at work, exploring ways to restore supply using backfeeding options,' said City Power. More than 15 areas were affected by the fire, including New Stock Exchange, Bank City No. 2, President Street West, JCI Buildings, Pritchard Street West, Kerk Street Central, Jeppe Street West, Bree Street West, Kerk Street East, Newtown Junction 1, De Villiers Street, Von Brandis Star, OLL Southern Sun, Bree Street East and Pritchard Street East. The power utility apologised for any inconvenience caused by the fire. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
23 minutes ago
- The Citizen
MK party could alienate voters over Shivambu's ties to Bushiri, expert warns
Despite condemnation from the South African government, Shivambu recently defended his association with fugitive Bushiri. A political analyst has warned that the 'puzzling' relationship between uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu and Shepherd Bushiri may come back to hurt the party. Shivambu visited Malawi in April, meeting with politicians and Bushiri. During the trip, Shivambu was introduced at the controversial pastor's church as a South African politician, to loud cheers. Bushiri was arrested in South Africa in 2020 but fled the country soon after. He faces charges of alleged rape, contravention of bail conditions, and forgery. The self-proclaimed prophet and his wife, Mary, also face fraud charges. Despite condemnation from the South African government, Shivambu defended his association with fugitive Bushiri again last week. A stance that may hurt the party at the polls 'Shivambu's visit to Bushiri is rather puzzling given the controversy that surrounds him,' Sanet Solomon from the University of the Free State told The Citizen. 'By associating with Bushiri, Shivambu and his party, by association, could be alienating voters. 'South Africans are facing many challenges related to femicide, rape, corruption and fraud that voters would want to distance themselves from this.' Despite Bushiri being an influential figure and businessman in Malawi, Solomon said the 'MK party would certainly not benefit from any association with the rogue 'pastor'.' Shivambu heads to the 'house of the Lord' Meanwhile, Shivambu said he will not apologise for accepting an offer to go to the 'house of the Lord'. 'One thing I will never apologise for is when I went to see Prophet Shepherd Bushiri, and he said, 'Let's go to church'. I said, 'I will go to church'. 'I am like those who say I am glad when they say, 'Let us go unto the house of the Lord'.' The MK party distanced itself from the visit at the time, claiming Shivambu had travelled in his personal capacity. ALSO READ: Malawi court grants South Africa's request to extradite Shepherd Bushiri and wife Zuma knew about visit However, the politician said this week that even party president Jacob Zuma was aware of the trip. 'There is nothing that I do without informing the president. There is no political programme that I engage in without making the president aware. 'There is no decision that I communicate to the membership of MK and externally without the president knowing,' he said. NOW READ: 'He's talking rubbish,' Malema responds to Shivambu's comments on EFF

IOL News
38 minutes ago
- IOL News
Anti-migrant politics escalate as ActionSA seeks to change Constitution
Analysts say political parties hoping to score points with anti-migrant sentiment ahead of 2026 local elections are going to be disappointed. Image: Itumeleng English/Independent Newspapers As the 2026 local elections draw nearer, political analysts expect a rise in anti-immigrant rhetoric - but caution that parties banking on such sentiment may face disappointment. This follows ActionSA's submission of a series of proposed constitutional amendments aimed at tightening provisions the party says have been exploited, contributing to South Africa's immigration crisis. The party claims that existing constitutional clauses have enabled abuse of limited public resources, particularly in housing, healthcare and education. ActionSA's parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, said the proposals were intended to guide Parliament's Joint Constitutional Review Committee, while still upholding the Constitution's core principles. 'Our proposed amendments recognise the noble aims of the Constitution as a living document,' said Trollip. 'But we must also prioritise protecting the rights of genuine residents and close off interpretations that inadvertently enable abuse.' A key focus is amending the Preamble of the Constitution. Trollip argued that the phrase 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it' has been misinterpreted to extend protections to undocumented migrants. 'This misreading has placed undue pressure on public resources and compromised the government's responsibility to prioritise the needs of South Africans,' he said. 'A careful revision is needed to reaffirm the original intent without undermining the inclusive spirit of the Constitution.' ActionSA also wants to amend Section 26 of the Bill of Rights to limit the state's obligation to provide Temporary Emergency Accommodation (TEA) to South African citizens and those lawfully present in the country. 'The current universal application of Section 26 has led to unintended consequences,' Trollip said. 'Municipalities are forced to divert scarce housing and emergency accommodation resources to individuals who are not lawfully present.' Similar revisions are being proposed for Section 27 (healthcare) and Section 29 (education), citing strained public services. Trollip noted that clinics in Johannesburg have reported over 70% of patient files belonging to foreign nationals, and schools face court-ordered enrollments that strain limited capacity. Meanwhile, political analyst Siyabonga Ntombela from the University of KwaZulu-Natal told IOL News that while the proposals reflect real public concerns, they are unlikely to shift electoral dynamics significantly. 'South African politics often revolves around personalities and party loyalty, not policy,' Ntombela said. 'This move by ActionSA may be warranted, but it's unlikely to sway voters dramatically. Local government elections will likely mirror previous general election outcomes.' He added that although the proposals might raise concerns among NGOs, they are unlikely to provoke a hostile international reaction since no evictions or forced removals are being proposed. However, Ntombela acknowledged that the amendments could exacerbate existing social tensions. 'Of course, they will deepen political and social divides, but they're not likely to spark xenophobic violence if handled constitutionally by the government,' he said. He pointed to a wave of public protests and political scrutiny, such as KZN Premier Thami Ntuli's recent factory visits targeting illegal employment of immigrants, as signs of mounting public pressure. 'This is a national imperative that should be handled with care and humility,' Ntombela said. 'Any party thinking this will automatically win them votes is doing it for the wrong reasons.'