The idyllic Scottish island that could be yours for just £5.5m
Shuna, a 1,100-acre Hebridean island bought in 1945 by the Gully family as a retreat from the horrors of the Second World War, is on the market for £5.5m.
Estate agents Sotheby's described it as 'a truly rare offering, rich in heritage, natural wonder and possibility'.
The island, which features eight properties with a collective 27 bedrooms, as well as the ruins of the 20th-century Shuna Castle, is a short boat ride away from Oban and the village of Ardfern, as well as the infamous Corryvreckan whirlpools.
Its six holiday cottages are powered by sustainable power sources, including solar panels, wind turbines, battery storage and back-up generators, and the island has a helipad for those travelling from nearby Glasgow and Islay airports.
Shuna is a working estate, with livestock farming and country pursuits, including storied woodcock shoots and deer stalking offered for visitors.
It is one of two islands called Shuna found near Oban, which is described by Sotheby's as the 'Gateway to the Isles'.
Shuna was bought by the Dowager Viscountess Selby, a descendant of politician Sir William Court Gully, who brought up her four children, Xandra, Audrey, Michael, and Edward on the island.
Jim Gully, who grew up on the island and said he had an 'idyllic' childhood there, said that it would be a relief for his father to no longer have to manage the properties.
His father Eddie, the fourth of the Viscountess' children, moved to the island at three months old and lived there for 80 years, his son said.
Mr Gully, who now lives on the nearby Isle of Seil, which is linked to the mainland by road, told the BBC: 'My brother and I grew up on Shuna. We were home-schooled by our grandfather [Donald Wells] on the island.
'It's idyllic for a childhood being taught there, running the farm and the holiday cottages, and we still do that.'
He added: 'It's been a huge part of all of our lives and definitely sad that all of that is coming to an end. But it's tinged with relief for my father that it's going to be slightly easier not having to manage it all and having to get over to the island three or four times a week.'
The management of the island has been handled by Rob and Kathryn James, who have lived there full-time for the past 12 years. The couple's plans to move on to other jobs prompted the family to sell.
The castle on the island was built in 1911 by New Zealand-born explorer George Buckley, who had joined an expedition to the South Pole in 1907 on the Nimrod with Ernest Shackleton.
Blueprints for the building, which fell into disrepair in the 1980s and now has trees growing through its windows, are thought to have been on the Titanic's doomed voyage.
There has been human activity on the island for more than 4,500 years, as evidenced by Stone and Iron Age burial mounds and ruins. It is estimated that between 70 and 80 people lived there between 1750 and 1850.
Viewings are set to begin next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why does British Airways want to charge £652 for switching one domestic flight?
Many transatlantic flights overfly the Outer Hebrides; my British Airways flight last week from London to Denver did just that. But for the residents of Scotland's wonderful Western Isles, reaching America proves a palaver. Dolina MacLeod and her husband face a long journey in October when they travel from the Outer Hebrides to visit their daughter in New York. 'We booked some time ago on British Airways from Edinburgh to New York via London Heathrow, both ways,' she says. 'Since then, flight schedules have updated.' Many people like to book flights months ahead. You have a fair chance of getting a better fare. But one downside is that airlines may tweak their schedules. A one-hour shift earlier or later is not much of a problem for straightforward point-to-point flights. But for connecting flights, it can mean an extended wait and a much longer journey overall. 'I enquired with British Airways to change the last leg of our journey – from Heathrow to Edinburgh – to an Inverness flight,' says Ms MacLeod. 'This provides easier transportation links to return home to the Outer Hebrides.' The extra distance is 112 miles. The extra cost? 'I was incredibly shocked to be quoted £652 as the charge to make this change,' she says. 'I accept that there will always be amendment charges but the charges being quoted are more than the original fare for the entire trip from Edinburgh to NYC and back for one person.' Ms MacLeod also spotted that the very Heathrow-Inverness flight she wished to fly on is being sold for just £56 one way, including a checked bag. So how could this bizarre state of affairs come about: that so small an amendment could trigger such a surge in cost? And is there anything to stop the couple from simply buying London-Inverness tickets? Let me explain. Passengers rationally want to book at the lowest possible fare. Airlines are prepared to sell cheap tickets – but always with strings attached. If changes are permitted at all, they will come with an amendment fee plus any increase when the fare is recalculated. Edinburgh-London-New York and back, booked months ahead, is a different beast from an outbound flight to JFK from the Scottish capital, but returning to Inverness, two months out. Computer doesn't say 'no', but it does say '£652'. Unreasonable? It might appear so, but the dark art of airline revenue management makes that sort of figure inevitable. Connecting flights such as Ms MacLeod's, going New York-London-Edinburgh tend to be cheaper than non-stop JFK-Heathrow tickets, because other airlines are offering enticingly priced routings via Dublin, Reykjavik or Amsterdam. So what's to stop them from forfeiting the Heathrow-Edinburgh leg and just buying those new flights? Plenty. First, as soon as you 'no-show' for a segment of a multi-stop journey, you are technically in breach of contract and the airline could pursue you for the difference in cost between what you paid for and what you actually flew. Ending the journey at Heathrow without taking the onward flight could easily trigger an additional fare of hundreds of pounds. In practice, carriers do not chase passengers for the difference in fare unless there is clear evidence of repeated 'tariff abuse' – which, of course, does not apply to the Hebridean couple. I confess I once booked an Orlando-Manchester-Dublin ticket with no intention of using the leg to the Irish capital, thereby saving £500. I self-justified this episode of tariff abuse on the grounds that Virgin Atlantic would not have got my business at the price it wanted to charge for the non-stop flight from Florida alone. On that premeditated occasion, I made sure to carry cabin baggage only. If your ticket says Dublin via Manchester, that is where your checked luggage will be going. In my experience, airlines will not countenance requests for your bag to be checked for only part of the journey. Some might take advantage of BA's mighty cabin baggage allowance – two bags weighing up to 23kg each. But I fear Ms MacLeod and her husband will simply need to stick with the flight to Edinburgh, and perhaps vow to book closer to departure next time. Meanwhile, they can gaze at all the transatlantic traffic six miles overhead. Simon Calder, also known as The Man Who Pays His Way, has been writing about travel for The Independent since 1994. In his weekly opinion column, he explores a key travel issue – and what it means for you.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Center Parcs seek exemption from Scottish right-to-roam laws
Members of Scottish Borders Council will this week be asked to agree to the company's request to restrict Scotland's access laws for its planned village, which is expected to comprise around 700 lodges located three miles north of Hawick. The development will create approximately 1200 permanent jobs and an additional 750 to 800 during the construction stage, it is claimed. Modelled on the six existing Center Parcs villages across England and Ireland, the Scottish site will include a wide variety of indoor and outdoor activities, retail outlets, bars, restaurants, and signature swimming and spa attractions. READ MORE: Center Parcs' Scottish village will 'transform' area, says chief When members of Scottish Borders Council meet on Thursday, August 21, they will be recommended to endorse a draft byelaw restricting the right to responsible access to the development site at Huntlaw and Muirfield Farm. A report to full council concludes that there is an 'exceptional case' for the byelaw to be proceeded with. Central to Center Parcs business model is that the holiday village itself is enclosed and access is carefully controlled for the safety and comfort of both staff and guests. A report to members states: 'Center Parcs Scotland Limited (CP) are seeking to progress a substantial and significant development within the Scottish Borders on land at Huntlaw and Muirfield Farm. 'The proposed development is the creation of a holiday village and, central to their business model, is the fact that the holiday village itself is enclosed and access is carefully controlled for the safety and comfort of both staff and guests. 'A right of responsible access exists across land in Scotland by virtue of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003. READ MORE: Why I'm walking the West Highland Way for the 100th time – and my advice to newcomers 'There are exemptions to that right of access contained within the act itself which seek to, for example, safeguard privacy around homes. 'The act also contains a provision which enable[s] a local authority to make byelaws which restrict or control the exercise of responsible access rights. 'Center Parcs has requested SBC to exercise this power, submitting that their proposed development constitutes an exceptional case. 'In light of the material presented by Center Parcs, while balancing the duty of the local authority to uphold access rights, this report concludes that an exceptional case does exist and recommends that the council agrees to make a byelaw.' If the draft byelaw is agreed there will follow a consultation period, to consider whether to seek confirmation of the byelaw from Scottish Ministers.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Starmer returns to Scotland after family holiday interrupted by Ukraine talks
Sir Keir Starmer has returned to Scotland after a family holiday was interrupted by crunch talks on Ukraine in Washington DC. The Prime Minister's plane flew from the US to Glasgow overnight following the White House discussions, landing on Tuesday morning. It had taken off from the same airport the previous day when Sir Keir was heading to the US for the brief trip. On his return to Scotland, Sir Keir will co-chair a call of the so-called 'coalition of the willing', a group of nations looking to help Ukraine that he has been leading with French President Emmanuel Macron. It is the second summer in a row that the Prime Minister's holiday plans have been disrupted after he cancelled a European trip last August when rioting broke out in the UK and tensions escalated in the Middle East. The Prime Minister also delayed his departure for a trip last Christmas following the death of his brother aged 60 who had been suffering from cancer. A minister has said it is an 'occupational hazard' that prime ministers can see their holidays disrupted. Pensions minister Torsten Bell told Sky News that Sir Keir has been making a 'real difference' in the negotiations over Ukraine. He told the broadcaster: 'It is an occupational hazard for prime ministers that holidays are interrupted. You'll have been covering that for years. 'I've been around British politics enough to have seen that happen, unfortunately, year after year. 'I want the Prime Minister to have a rest […] all we want to do is make sure that we're addressing these big issues, and that in this summer means making sure we get those security guarantees in Ukraine.'
