Beijing Official Overseeing Hong Kong Warns of Persisting National Security Threats
A top Beijing official overseeing Hong Kong affairs warned of persisting threats in the city as a China-imposed national security law approaches its fifth anniversary, while seeking to allay concerns about the law's impact on the financial hub's openness.
Speaking at a forum about the law, attended also by the city leader John Lee and other officials, Xia Baolong, the director of China's Hong Kong and Macao Work Office, said various forms of 'soft resistance' continue to emerge in new forms and external forces have 'never ceased their intervention' in Hong Kong. 'Hong Kong has transformed from chaos to order. But just as a tree desires stillness, the wind continues to blow,' Xia said.
The Beijing and Hong Kong governments deemed the law necessary to maintain the city's stability following anti-government protests in 2019. Under the law, many leading pro-democracy activists, including Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, were prosecuted. Dozens of civil society groups disbanded.
This month, authorities have stepped up their crackdown, including charging young activist Joshua Wong, who was already sentenced last year over a subversion case under the law for the second time, and targeting a mobile game app. Last week, China's national security authorities in Hong Kong and the city's police launched their first publicly known joint operation, raiding the homes of six people on suspicion of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security.
Critics say the political changes indicate that the Western-style civil liberties Beijing promised to keep intact when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 are shrinking. But Xia said the law only targeted an 'extremely small number' of people who 'severely endanger national security.' He also sought to allay concerns about Hong Kong's openness and international position. He insisted that 'normal international exchanges do not violate Hong Kong's national security law, but rather are protected by it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Where does India stand on the Israel-Iran conflict?
NEW DELHI: India is on a path of non-involvement in the growing conflict in the Middle East, experts said on Saturday, as they warned Delhi's silence could have serious implications for the region. Israeli attacks on Iran started on June 13 when Tel Aviv hit more than a dozen sites — including key nuclear facilities and residences of military leaders and scientists — claiming they were aimed at preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. After Iran retaliated with ballistic missile strikes against Israel, the two countries have been on a tit-for-tat cycle of bombing. Israel's attacks on Iran have reportedly killed at least 639 people and wounded 1,329 others, while Iranian missile strikes have killed 24 people and injured hundreds more in Israel. India has yet to join other Asian nations — such as China, Japan, Pakistan and Indonesia — in condemning Israel's initial strikes against Iran. It was also the only country in the 10-member Shanghai Cooperation Organization which did not endorse a statement issued by the bloc, condemning Israel's military strikes on Iran. SCO is a political and security body that includes China, Russia, India, Pakistan and Central Asian nations. In a statement, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs urged 'both sides to avoid any escalatory steps' and engage in dialogue and diplomacy 'to work towards de-escalation.' 'India enjoys close and friendly relations with both the countries and stands ready to extend all possible support,' the ministry said. Talmiz Ahmad, an Indian diplomat who served as ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE, described the statement as 'a very low-key remark and is meant for the record.' 'India is not interested in engaging itself with serious matters pertaining to regional diplomacy. India is not interested in pursuing ways in which we could promote security and stability,' he said. Historically, India's ties with countries in West Asia — a region that includes the Middle East — have been bilateral and transactional, lacking engagement 'with the region in a collective sense.' 'With regard to the Israeli-Iran issue we have taken a position of non-involvement … (but) silence in this matter where Israel has initiated a conflict that could have potentially horrendous implications for the region, is another and is something which India should be very concerned about,' Ahmad said. 'There is no justification whatsoever for India to be so indifferent to the flames that are now gathering speed and strength right in our neighborhood.' India is Israel's largest arms buyer and Israel is India's fourth-largest arms supplier. According to a report from Reuters, India has imported military hardware worth $2.9 billion over the last decade. Delhi also has strategic interests in Iran and has invested around $370 million in a port development project in the Iranian port of Chabahar, aimed at hastening trade and connectivity links to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Moreover, there are over 10,000 Indian nationals living in Iran, the majority of whom are students. Delhi has prioritized safely evacuating them since Israeli attacks began last week. Peace in the region should be within India's strategic interest, according to Delhi-based foreign policy scholar and researcher N. Sai Balaji, who highlighted the 9 million Indians living and working in West Asia. 'Not only that these (9 million) Indians contribute to billions of dollars in terms of remittances (but) India's energy needs are met from West Asia,' Balaji told Arab News. 'Any conflict with Iran or any conflict in West Asia does not only destabilize its financial stability in forms of remittances but also energy security.' He said the Indian government was 'taking sides clearly by not calling out the aggression of Israel.' 'India is not only abdicating its historic responsibility but also changing its foreign policy to accommodate Israel,' Balaji added. Sudheendra Kulkarni, who served as an advisor to India's former premier Atal Bihari Vajpayee, said the country had shifted its traditional approach in foreign policy. 'India has always stood for peace in the world … Therefore, it is deeply painful that Narendra Modi's government has deviated from this traditionally pro-peace foreign policy of India,' Kulkarni told Arab News. 'It is wrong for the government to keep silent in the face of Israel's naked aggression against Iran … Under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, Israel is the aggressor. It has violated international law. Iran is the victim. Iran has the right to defend itself.'
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan says sharing battlefield intel with China on India air war last month
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said this week it was 'very normal' for Islamabad to share battlefield intelligence with close ally China in the aftermath of last month's brief but intense military confrontation with India, though he downplayed suggestions Beijing played a direct operational role or provided decisive satellite support during the aerial fight. The May 7–10 conflict — the heaviest fighting in decades — has drawn significant interest from Western militaries, security observers and diplomats, who see it as a rare opportunity for China to study the performance of Indian pilots, fighter jets, air defense systems and air-to-air missiles in real combat conditions. With Beijing locked in its own longstanding border disputes and strategic rivalry with New Delhi, analysts believe any Pakistani data trove could sharpen China's military readiness. China is already Pakistan's principal supplier of military hardware, providing fighter jets, missiles, submarines and surveillance technology. The two neighbors share a strategic alliance driven in part by their disputes with India, which has fought wars with both nations. Close economic and security ties, anchored by the multi-billion-dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has further strengthened the relationship. 'It is very normal if we are sharing any information which we have which can threaten us or the Chinese because the Chinese also have problems with India,' Asif told Arab News in an interview this week when questioned if Pakistan was sharing intelligence with Beijing on Indian use of air defenses and launches of cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as command and control information. 'I think it's very natural if we share intelligence which is gathered through satellites or gathered through other means.' In the military confrontation that began on May 7, Indian fighter jets bombed what New Delhi called 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan in response to an April 22 attack in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. Islamabad denied involvement in the Kashmir assault but retaliated to the Indian airstrikes with tit-for-tat military action that involved fighter jets, drones, missiles and artillery. A ceasefire was brokered by the US and announced on May 10. Pakistan said its Chinese jets shot down at least six Indian military planes, including three French-made Rafales, during the four days of clashes. General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defense staff, has admitted that an unspecified number of its jets were lost. 'MADE IN PAKISTAN' VICTORY The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) says China now operates at least 115 satellites dedicated to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and 81 for monitoring military electronic and signals data, a network second only to the United States and far ahead of India's capabilities. According to two Islamabad-based Western diplomats involved in the May ceasefire negotiations and one Pakistani security official, all of whom requested anonymity, 44 of these satellites were at Pakistan's disposal during the conflict with India. The Western officials suggest the Chinese satellite and signals intelligence may have assisted Pakistan in monitoring Indian troop and missile movements during the air war, possibly giving Pakistan a real-time edge. The Pakistani defense minister rejected the claims. 'You are underestimating the ability of our armed forces,' Asif said, cautioning against downplaying Pakistan's own capabilities in electronic warfare and precision targeting. Asked directly about the use of Chinese satellite capabilities for any kind of support during the fighting, the defense chief said: 'I don't know and I don't think so … We are very advanced as far as this warfare is concerned … China's help is always, always very valuable … but this fight was Pakistani, the victory is 'Made in Pakistan'.' He also denied that Chinese personnel were able to monitor the fighting in real time or access Pakistan Air Force monitoring systems during the May 7–10 period. 'No, I don't think so they had any access. They were watching the situation very closely, as a neighbor, as a friend,' Asif said. 'But I'll again assert that this war was fought by our boys and girls.' While Asif noted that Pakistan sourced most of its military hardware — including submarines, aircraft and weapons — from China, as well as some from Turkiye, the United States and European countries, he maintained that the actual fighting remained fully under Pakistani command. 'So, in that backdrop [of China being a major defense supplier], you can always speculate that China was very helpful to us in this conflict,' he said. 'But physical participation or participation through satellites or through other means, I don't think so.' China has been Pakistan's closest defense partner since the 1960s and the Pakistan Air Force operates a fleet of Chinese JF-10C multirole fighters, and JF-17 Thunder planes, jointly developed and assembled in Pakistan to reduce dependence on Western defense equipment. After the India standoff, Beijing is also widely reported to be fast-tracking the sale of fifth-generation J-35 stealth jets to Islamabad, potentially giving Pakistan deep-strike capabilities into Indian airspace. Asked if the J-35 jets would be delivered in 2026 as suggested in recent media reports, Asif responded: 'I think it's only in the media, you know. It's only in the media and it's good for sales, Chinese defense sales.' NUCLEAR ALERT POSTURE? A full-scale war between India and Pakistan — both nuclear powers — remains one of the most dangerous strategic flashpoints in the world. Experts have long warned that even limited, high-intensity skirmishes run the risk of unintended escalation toward nuclear war. Asked if last month's clash had triggered any consideration of moving to a nuclear alert posture, Asif was categorical: 'No… Absolutely, with certainty I can say that.' He also dismissed the idea that Pakistan had considered launching a broader conventional offensive across the border, saying modern warfare was no longer dependent on crossing territorial lines: 'Now you don't have to cross the border. You don't have to capture the territory. Capturing territory or crossing over... that is something which is obsolete. War is being fought now... cyber.' The defense minister also said there had been no back-channel diplomacy between Islamabad and New Delhi following the May 10 ceasefire, although military operations heads in both countries had been in contact via a hotline. And while the Pakistan-India clash may have faded from global headlines amid the ongoing crisis between Israel and Iran in the Middle East, Asif said India remained Pakistan's most pressing security concern. 'We have been on alert so we have not lowered guards, that I can confirm,' the defense minister said, particularly due to concerns Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi could resort to fresh military action as he was under pressure from a public questioning how Pakistani forces struck military facilities deep inside the country and downed Indian jets. Modi also has domestic political pressures to manage ahead of elections in Bihar, a pivotal swing state that is crucial for both national and state-level power equations. 'Modi has internal compulsions to avenge [the May conflict] … There are elections around the corner… and his popularity has plummeted, his political opponents can smell blood, politically,' Asif said. 'That can drive him to some desperate measures, otherwise, I don't think so there is a possibility of some replay of what happened a month back.'
Al Arabiya
5 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Beijing Official Overseeing Hong Kong Warns of Persisting National Security Threats
A top Beijing official overseeing Hong Kong affairs warned of persisting threats in the city as a China-imposed national security law approaches its fifth anniversary, while seeking to allay concerns about the law's impact on the financial hub's openness. Speaking at a forum about the law, attended also by the city leader John Lee and other officials, Xia Baolong, the director of China's Hong Kong and Macao Work Office, said various forms of 'soft resistance' continue to emerge in new forms and external forces have 'never ceased their intervention' in Hong Kong. 'Hong Kong has transformed from chaos to order. But just as a tree desires stillness, the wind continues to blow,' Xia said. The Beijing and Hong Kong governments deemed the law necessary to maintain the city's stability following anti-government protests in 2019. Under the law, many leading pro-democracy activists, including Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily newspaper, were prosecuted. Dozens of civil society groups disbanded. This month, authorities have stepped up their crackdown, including charging young activist Joshua Wong, who was already sentenced last year over a subversion case under the law for the second time, and targeting a mobile game app. Last week, China's national security authorities in Hong Kong and the city's police launched their first publicly known joint operation, raiding the homes of six people on suspicion of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security. Critics say the political changes indicate that the Western-style civil liberties Beijing promised to keep intact when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997 are shrinking. But Xia said the law only targeted an 'extremely small number' of people who 'severely endanger national security.' He also sought to allay concerns about Hong Kong's openness and international position. He insisted that 'normal international exchanges do not violate Hong Kong's national security law, but rather are protected by it.'
