23 minutes to avenge 26 deaths: How India's Akash missiles and suicide drones pounded Pakistani airbases during Operation Sindoor
Operation SINDOOR
as a carefully planned military response to the terrorist strike in Pahalgam just weeks earlier. That attack, which killed tourists, marked a grim evolution in asymmetric warfare—civilians were being directly targeted, not just soldiers. In retaliation, India avoided crossing the Line of Control or international boundary but still managed to hit multiple terrorist infrastructures deep inside enemy territory.
What stood out was not just the speed or accuracy of the response. It was the sophisticated use of indigenous technology—across air defence,
drone warfare
, and electronic surveillance. This operation has become a defining moment in India's journey towards
military self-reliance
.
The night of the attack—and defence
Late on 7 May, Pakistan attempted coordinated missile and drone strikes on Indian military installations across multiple cities—Srinagar, Jammu, Pathankot, Amritsar, and more. India's
air defence systems
, armed with both legacy weapons and modern indigenous platforms, sprang into action. The Integrated Counter-UAS Grid neutralised the threats.
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
By morning, Indian forces had already retaliated. They targeted air defence radars in Pakistan, including one in Lahore, which was destroyed. Indian systems not only defended but outmanoeuvred.
Synergy of air defence systems
India's response relied on a web of integrated technologies. The Akash missile system—an indigenous platform—was central. Capable of targeting multiple threats in real time, Akash is a mobile, short-range surface-to-air system equipped with Electronic Counter-Counter Measures (ECCM). Alongside Akash, India deployed proven systems like Pechora, OSA-AK, and low-level air defence guns.
Live Events
The Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) brought all elements together—Air Force, Army, and Navy—creating a seamless, net-centric operational picture. These systems worked as one to repel the threat.
Surgical precision strikes
India's offensive actions were quick and clinical. Using loitering munitions—so-called 'suicide drones'—the
Indian Air Force
struck key Pakistani airbases, including Noor Khan and Rahimyar Khan. These munitions hovered above target zones before locking in and hitting high-value enemy installations, like radar and missile sites.
There were no Indian losses. That precision came from tight coordination between surveillance, jamming, and drone delivery systems. Indian forces bypassed Chinese-made Pakistani air defences and completed their mission in just 23 minutes.
Proof of threats, neutralised
Post-operation recoveries painted a clear picture. India collected debris of:
PL-15 Chinese-origin missiles
Turkish-made UAVs labelled 'Yiha' or 'YEEHAW'
Quadcopters, long-range rockets, and commercial drones
These fragments proved Pakistan had sourced advanced foreign weapons. Yet, India's homegrown systems outperformed them, exposing the robustness of its defence tech.
Layers of defence, years in the making
On 12 May, Lt Gen Rajiv Ghai, Director General Military Operations, briefed the press. He praised a blend of old and new technology, 'A unique blend of Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems, Electronic Warfare assets, and Air Defence Weapons from both Army and Air Force' ensured defence against retaliation.
He added that multi-layered defences—ranging from handheld missile launchers to long-range radar—prevented any damage to India's airfields and logistics hubs.
Ghai underlined that these systems were built over the last decade through sustained government investment.
'They played a crucial role in ensuring that both civilian and military infrastructure across India remained largely unaffected during enemy retaliation attempts.'
ISRO's eyes in the sky
ISRO's satellite network quietly supported Operation SINDOOR behind the scenes. On 11 May, ISRO Chairman V Narayanan confirmed, 'At least 10 satellites are continuously working round-the-clock for the strategic purpose to ensure the safety and security of the citizens of the country. It has to monitor its 7,000 km seashore areas. It has to monitor the entire Northern part continuously. Without satellite and drone technology, the country can't achieve that.'
These satellites enabled real-time surveillance and targeting accuracy.
A growing drone ecosystem
The
Drone Federation of India
(DFI) plays a vital role in India's rise as a drone power. With over 550 drone firms and 5,500 pilots, DFI aims to make India a global drone hub by 2030. It also runs initiatives like the Bharat Drone Mahotsav to showcase local innovation.
Key players include:
Alpha Design Technologies (Bengaluru) – in collaboration with Israel's Elbit Systems, builds SkyStriker drones.
Tata Advanced Systems – long-standing defence partner to Indian forces, offering integrated tech solutions.
Paras Defence & Space Technologies – pioneers in Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured (IDDM) capabilities.
IG Drones – specialises in defence drones, partnered with the Indian Army and multiple government bodies.
India's drone market is expected to hit $11 billion by 2030, accounting for over 12% of the global share.
India's defence shift isn't sudden. It stems from years of reform. Since 2021, the government banned imported drones and rolled out a Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to encourage domestic manufacturing. This long-term planning bore fruit during Operation SINDOOR.
The operation proves that India no longer needs to depend on foreign imports to respond to national threats. Its tech is homegrown, its defences tested, and its vision clear.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan's Ayub Khan sought US help to annexe Kashmir after Indus Treaty in 1960
A new book reveals Ayub Khan's attempt to gain US support for capturing Kashmir after the Indus Waters Treaty. Khan linked water rights to territorial claims. He warned that US aid to India would be wasted without resolving the Kashmir issue. Kennedy offered a compromise, but Khan insisted on securing water resources. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Following the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960, the then Pakistani President Ayub Khan sought US President John F Kennedy 's support to capture Kashmir from India, a new book on the treaty has 'Trial by Water: Indus Basin and India-Pakistan Relations ', author Uttam Sinha, an expert on international water issues and IDSA senior fellow, recounts how, in July 1961-months after signing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)-Khan arrived in Washington, already bristling over America's generous aid to a reception in his honour at Mount Vernon, tastefully arranged by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, Ayub's displeasure was clear. In protest, he had suspended CIA's covert flights from airbases in East Pakistan, which supported Tibetan rebels, as well as U-2 flights over China from West Pakistan.A private garden walk with Kennedy thawed the frost. Ayub agreed to reopen the airbases; Kennedy, in turn, promised that the US will not supply any military equipment to India, according to the later in the Oval Office, Ayub, like a campaign general, spread out maps to press Pakistan's security concerns. The first showed Indian troop deployment-of the 1.5 million soldiers, only 15% faced China, while 85% were positioned against Pakistan. The second detailed 80,000-90,000 Afghan troops on the western border, armed with Soviet-supplied equipment. The third mapped Pakistan's thin defences against both neighbours. Throughout, Ayub insisted that without Kashmir, "Pakistan would be up the gum tree" if attacked from India or Afghanistan, Sinha pointed out in his and his advisers doubted the alarmism but recognised Kashmir as the litmus test of Indo-Pak peace. Kennedy proposed a compromise that the then Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru might accept. Ayub's answer was calculated. India could keep Jammu, but Pakistan needed "some miles" across the Chenab to secure water resources . His logic was simple-if the Indus Treaty gave Pakistan rights to the western rivers, and those rivers flowed from Kashmir, adjoining territories should belong to suggested Nehru, politically spent and out of touch with Kashmiris, was now ready for settlement. Without resolving Kashmir, he warned, US aid to India was wasted. Kennedy countered that US assistance was aimed at keeping India free from communist influence, not to buy loyalty, Sinha pointed out in his the meeting closed, Ayub made one final ask-if Kennedy's effort to sway Nehru during the latter's planned November 1961 Washington visit failed, and Pakistan returned to the UN over Kashmir, would the US back it?"Yes," Kennedy replied - an episode that, as the book makes clear, showed how deeply water and territory were entwined during the Cold War era's South Asian book also recalls how Nehru faced internal criticism over the IWT. He was described as an umpire in a cricket match-was how one MP described the PM during a fiery Lok Sabha debate on the treaty in November and December 1960. The charge, recorded in the book, captured the frustration of parliamentarians who believed India was giving away too much, too the treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, and debated in the House on November 30, the mood was anything but celebratory. Criticism came from across the political spectrum, including even the Congress benches. Ashok Mehta of the Praja Socialist Party famously called it a "second partition."
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan's Ayub Khan sought US help to annexe Kashmir after Indus Treaty in 1960
A new book reveals Ayub Khan's attempt to gain US support for capturing Kashmir after the Indus Waters Treaty. Khan linked water rights to territorial claims. He warned that US aid to India would be wasted without resolving the Kashmir issue. Kennedy offered a compromise, but Khan insisted on securing water resources. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Following the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960, the then Pakistani President Ayub Khan sought US President John F Kennedy 's support to capture Kashmir from India, a new book on the treaty has 'Trial by Water: Indus Basin and India-Pakistan Relations ', author Uttam Sinha, an expert on international water issues and IDSA senior fellow, recounts how, in July 1961-months after signing the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)-Khan arrived in Washington, already bristling over America's generous aid to a reception in his honour at Mount Vernon, tastefully arranged by First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, Ayub's displeasure was clear. In protest, he had suspended CIA's covert flights from airbases in East Pakistan, which supported Tibetan rebels, as well as U-2 flights over China from West Pakistan.A private garden walk with Kennedy thawed the frost. Ayub agreed to reopen the airbases; Kennedy, in turn, promised that the US will not supply any military equipment to India, according to the later in the Oval Office, Ayub, like a campaign general, spread out maps to press Pakistan's security concerns. The first showed Indian troop deployment-of the 1.5 million soldiers, only 15% faced China, while 85% were positioned against Pakistan. The second detailed 80,000-90,000 Afghan troops on the western border, armed with Soviet-supplied equipment. The third mapped Pakistan's thin defences against both neighbours. Throughout, Ayub insisted that without Kashmir, "Pakistan would be up the gum tree" if attacked from India or Afghanistan, Sinha pointed out in his and his advisers doubted the alarmism but recognised Kashmir as the litmus test of Indo-Pak peace. Kennedy proposed a compromise that the then Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru might accept. Ayub's answer was calculated. India could keep Jammu, but Pakistan needed "some miles" across the Chenab to secure water resources . His logic was simple-if the Indus Treaty gave Pakistan rights to the western rivers, and those rivers flowed from Kashmir, adjoining territories should belong to suggested Nehru, politically spent and out of touch with Kashmiris, was now ready for settlement. Without resolving Kashmir, he warned, US aid to India was wasted. Kennedy countered that US assistance was aimed at keeping India free from communist influence, not to buy loyalty, Sinha pointed out in his the meeting closed, Ayub made one final ask-if Kennedy's effort to sway Nehru during the latter's planned November 1961 Washington visit failed, and Pakistan returned to the UN over Kashmir, would the US back it?"Yes," Kennedy replied - an episode that, as the book makes clear, showed how deeply water and territory were entwined during the Cold War era's South Asian book also recalls how Nehru faced internal criticism over the IWT. He was described as an umpire in a cricket match-was how one MP described the PM during a fiery Lok Sabha debate on the treaty in November and December 1960. The charge, recorded in the book, captured the frustration of parliamentarians who believed India was giving away too much, too the treaty was signed on September 19, 1960, and debated in the House on November 30, the mood was anything but celebratory. Criticism came from across the political spectrum, including even the Congress benches. Ashok Mehta of the Praja Socialist Party famously called it a "second partition."
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Insult to taxpayers and servicemembers across America': Democrats slam Pentagon's move to scrap $800 million in 'near done' software projects
Democrats are reportedly upset with Trump administration as Navy and Air Force are on the verge of canceling nearly $800 million in software projects. As per a Reuters report, Democrats took aim at the Trump administration after it reported that the Navy and Air Force were poised to cancel nearly completed software projects worth over $800 million. The reason, according to the report, is an effort by some officials to reassign the work to new companies, including Salesforce and Palantir. In a statement, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine stated that the Pentagon "has yet to show that it had a good reason for halting these contracts in the last inning and scrapping work American tax dollars have already paid for." He added, "If it can't show its homework, then this announcement - just days after Palantir's CEO spoke at Mike Johnson's Wyoming donor retreat - reeks of corruption.' The comments are reported to highlight a growing concern among Democratic lawmakers about what they see as wasteful spending at the Pentagon . This comes even as Donald Trump's administration vowed to eliminate waste and abuse, creating the Department of Government Efficiency, which claims to have canceled over $14 billion in Defense Department contracts. Democrats blast Pentagon's plans, call it "an insult to taxpayers and servicemembers across America." Democratic Representative Maggie Goodlander, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, told Reuters, 'If you're serious about cracking down on waste, fraud, and abuse, the last thing you'd do is cancel $800 million in projects that are nearly ready to roll out just to turn around and steer the same work to corporations of your choosing." She called the move "an insult to taxpayers and servicemembers across America." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Another House Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, Salud Carbajal, described the action as part of a pattern of waste, citing "lavish" military parades and "unnecessary" troop deployments. 'This administration has repeatedly shown a blatant disregard for the responsible use of taxpayer dollars,' he said. Echoing these concerns, Representative Jill Tokuda, also on the committee, reportedly said the move was "downright reckless." She noted that after many delays, the Pentagon was finally set to implement military pay systems that could pass an audit. "Taxpayers should not fund sweetheart deals for the well connected," Tokuda added. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
