‘No doubt' UK will spend 3% of GDP on defence by mid-2030s, Healey says
The Government has previously set out its 'ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament', after meeting its pledge to ratchet up defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027.
But the Defence Secretary has promised a 'certain decade of rising defence spending', according to The Times, and said there was 'no doubt' the UK would meet its target.
Mr Healey told the newspaper: 'It allows us to plan for the long term. It allows us to deal with the pressures.'
The Government is looking at the roles, capabilities and reforms required by UK armed forces as part of its strategic defence review (SDR).
It will explore 'deliverable and affordable' solutions 'within the resources available to defence within the trajectory of 2.5%'.
When he announced the targets earlier this year, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'In an ever more dangerous world, increasing the resilience of our country so we can protect the British people, resist future shocks and bolster British interests, is vital.'
The new defence money will be found by reducing UK overseas aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GNI (gross national income), according to the Government, a move which prompted then-international development minister Anneliese Dodds to resign.
'You have maintained that you want to continue support for Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine; for vaccination; for climate; and for rules-based systems,' she told Sir Keir.
'Yet it will be impossible to maintain these priorities given the depth of the cut.'
Nato heads of government are set to meet in The Hague, in the Netherlands, next month.
Addressing the alliance's parliamentary assembly in Dayton, USA this month, Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte said: 'I assume that in The Hague we will agree on a high defence spend target of, in total, 5%.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn Jared Isaacman as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Disposable vape ban begins - here's everything you need to know
A ban on disposable vapes is now in force across the UK. The ban on selling or supplying disposable vapes, announced in January last year, applies both in shops and online. Vapes have skyrocketed in popularity in recent years, with usage growing by more than 400% between 2012 and 2023, according to the government. But why is the government cracking down on disposable ones, what are the punishments for continuing to sell them - and could there be wider vape bans in the future? Why are disposable vapes being banned? The UK-wide ban is designed to tackle waste and the impact of vapes on the environment. It only applies to disposable vapes, also known as single-use vapes, while reusable vapes can still be sold. Analysis by Material Focus released in December showed an estimated 8.2 million vapes were being thrown away or littered every week in the UK - the equivalent of 13 per second. Disposable vapes are typically thrown away in general waste bins or littered rather than being recycled, according to the government. Even when recycled, they usually need to be disassembled by hand, which is a slow and difficult process, it said. The government, in its latest guidance on the ban, called them an "inefficient use of critical resources" that "causes harm to biodiversity". It said their lithium-ion batteries can also cause fires, adding the ban would stop plastic, lead, and mercury from "leaching into the environment, which can cause waterways to be contaminated and poison our wildlife". The government has also said it hopes the ban will make vaping less accessible to children, as statistics show a growing popularity among those aged 11 to 15. NHS figures from last year showed nearly a quarter of children in that age bracket had tried vaping and nearly one in 10 did it frequently. 1:06 Is it illegal to own a disposable vape? No, having disposable vapes in your possession is not illegal if you are not intending to sell or supply them. Customers who still have disposable vapes will still be able to return the vapes and vape parts to shops that have sold them, and those shops will have an obligation to dispose of them properly. What if I still have a supply of disposable vapes? Any leftover disposable vapes will have to be recycled. The government says they should only be disposed of in vape bins and collected for recycling. 0:52 What is the punishment for continuing to sell and supply them? A variety of government agencies, including the Border Force, can inspect shops for illegal vapes and report anyone breaking the rules. Methods of punishment vary slightly depending on where in the UK you are found to be violating the rules. Here's a summary of how it will work in each country: England and Wales Civil sanctions can be applied in the first instance if you're found selling or supplying vapes. These can include a stop notice, a compliance notice or a fine of £200. If you continue to violate the rules, you can be charged with an unlimited fine, a prison sentence of up to two years, or both. Scotland If you are found violating the rules, you could be slapped with a fixed penalty notice of £200, which, if paid within 14 days, would be discounted to £150. The fine rises by £200 every time you are caught. If you do not accept the fixed penalty notice, or in instances where an enforcement officer does not consider a fine appropriate, the offender can be fined £5,000, sentenced to two years in prison, or both. Northern Ireland There will be no civil sanctions in Northern Ireland, and anyone breaking the rules could instead receive a fine of up to £5,000 on summary conviction in a magistrates' court. On further conviction, you could face a prison sentence of up to two years. How to know the difference between a disposable and reusable vape A reusable vape must be rechargeable and refillable, meaning it has to have a battery and needs to have either a removable and replaceable coil or a chamber, pod or tank that can be refilled with e-liquid. To be considered reusable, replacement components like pre-filled pods, e-liquid refill bottles and coils must be separately available to buy either in-store or online. You can check whether specific products are reusable by checking the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency's notified products list. If you search for a product and it doesn't appear, it means it is not legal to sell or supply, as all legal nicotine-containing vapes are listed. From 1 June, any single-use ones will be removed. Has the ban changed much so far? It was Rishi Sunak's Conservative government that originally proposed the ban before it was adopted by Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Party. While the ban is only coming in now, a study by University College London (UCL) looked at the impact after it was announced in January 2024. Researchers found the proportion of people vaping increased by nearly a quarter each year from January 2022 to January 2024, but stayed constant between January 2024 and January this year, including for young people. They also said they saw a steep decline in disposable vape use after January 2024, particularly among 16- to 24-year-olds, whose use of disposables almost halved from 63% to 35%. While it's a positive development for the environment, lead author Dr Sarah Jackson said results suggested the ban "may have limited impact on vaping rates in general" and said it was "likely that people using these products will move to reusable versions rather than stop vaping completely". Vaping has been marketed as a way for cigarette smokers to quit and is generally considered to be healthier because you inhale nicotine in a vapour rather than smoke. Also vapes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide - two of the most damaging elements in tobacco smoke. But the long-term effects of vaping on people's health is not fully understood. The government has backed a 10-year study to track 100,000 young people and collect health data, which is expected to provide the most detailed information yet on the impacts of vaping. While there is no further ban on vapes in the works, the government's Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which is currently in the committee stage at the House of Lords, includes powers to potentially restrict the packaging, marketing and flavours of e-cigarettes.
Powys County Times
3 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Government plan to build munitions factories to ‘better deter our adversaries'
Building at least six munitions and energetics factories will 'better deter our adversaries', Defence Secretary John Healey has said as part of plans for an 'always on' weapons pipeline. The Government has pledged £1.5 billion as part of the strategic defence review (SDR) to set up at least six factories, and will support the procurement of up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons. The announcement responds to the SDR's call for an 'always on' munitions production capacity that could be scaled up quickly. Mr Healey said: 'The hard-fought lessons from (Russian president Vladimir) Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine show a military is only as strong as the industry that stands behind them. 'We are strengthening the UK's industrial base to better deter our adversaries and make the UK secure at home and strong abroad. 'We will embrace the strategic defence review, making defence an engine for economic growth and boosting skilled jobs in every nation and region as part of our Government's plan for change.' According to the Ministry of Defence, the new funding will see UK munitions spend hit £6 billion during this Parliament. It will support around 1,800 jobs throughout the country. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'A strong economy needs a strong national defence, and investing in weaponry and munitions and backing nearly 2,000 jobs across Britain in doing so is proof the two go hand-in-hand. 'We are delivering both security for working people in an uncertain world and good jobs, putting more money in people's pockets as part of our plan for change.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer launched the SDR last year, with its recommendations due to be published in the coming days. In addition to its call for an 'always on' munitions production capacity, the Ministry of Defence will be urged to lay the industrial foundations for an uplift in munitions stockpiles to meet the demand of 'high-tempo' warfare. Also as part of its response to the SDR, the Government has unveiled more than £1.5 billion in extra funding for military homes. The cash will be spent on urgent repairs such as fixing boilers and roofs, and other issues including tackling damp. 'Our forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe and to serve this country and yet for years, we've forced their families to live in substandard homes,' Mr Healy said on a visit to military accommodation in Cambridgeshire. The Conservatives criticised the investment in munitions factories as too slow. Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'It's a bit rich of Labour to talk about 'always on' munitions production when procurement has been largely switched off for the past year. 'Rachel Reeves has deliberately used the SDR to put an effective freeze on new orders for the kit our military needs. 'Of course, we welcome investment in new munitions factories, but we don't know when they will be ready, only that these orders should have been placed months ago. 'Ultimately, we need to see greater ambition for the pace and scale of rearmament our armed forces require, given the threats we face and the need to replace inventory gifted to Ukraine. 'That means 3% of GDP by the end of this parliament, and Labour properly prioritising defence spending – instead of seeking to outspend Reform on welfare.'
