Co-op to stop sourcing carrots from Israel to ‘support peace and co-operation'
The supermarket chain said it will stop sourcing relationships with countries where there are 'internationally recognised community-wide human rights abuses and violations of international law'.
The policy says that, wherever possible, the grocer will not use ingredients in Co-op branded products or sell whole products from 17 countries of concern.
Products and ingredients on the prohibited list include Russian vodka, mangoes from Mali and carrots from Israel.
They will be removed from Co-op shelves and products on a phased basis, starting this month.
The supermarket said the policy had been approved by the Co-op Group Board and coincided with the start of Co-op Fortnight in the UK.
It followed a year of 'detailed analysis' and was based on three criteria: agreement across respected assessments of behaviour which would constitute community-wide human rights abuses or violations of international law; that the actions Co-op could take would make a difference to those affected; and that the grocer's actions would not negatively affect its integrity as a commercially successful business aligned with co-operative values and principles.
Over recent years, Co-op members had made clear through surveys, engagement and motions that conflict was one of their biggest concerns and that 'their Co-op should do all it can to advocate and build peace', it said.
Debbie White, chairwoman of the Co-op Group Board, said: 'This policy – which has been developed over the past year as a part of our Hate Divides Communities, Co-operation Builds Them campaign – is a clear demonstration of our co-operative values in action, where the voices of our members have been listened to and then acted upon.
'We are committed, where we can, to removing products and ingredients from our shelves which are sourced from those countries where the international consensus demonstrates there is not alignment with what happens in those countries and our co-operative values and principles.
'As a business, we have a long-standing legacy of doing the right thing, supporting Fairtrade and championing ethical sourcing, and this policy is a natural progression of this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
North Korea to open beach resort as Kim Jong Un bets on tourism
North Korea is opening a beach resort that its leader Kim Jong Un hopes will boost tourism in the secretive Communist regime, state media Kalma on the east coast will open to domestic tourists on 1 July, six years after it was due to be completed. It is unclear when it will welcome foreigners. Kim grew up in luxury in Wonsan, where many of the country's elite have private villas, and has been trying to transform the town, which once hosted a missile testing media KCNA claims the resort can accomodate up to 20,000 visitors, occupying a 4km (2.5 mile) stretch of beach, with hotels, restaurants, shopping malls and a water park - none of these claims can be verified. Heavily scanctioned for decades for its nuclear weapons programme, North Korea is among the poorest countries in the world. It pours most of its resources into its military, or monuments and landmarks, often in Pyongyang, that embellish the image and cult of the Kim family that has run the country since observers say this is an easy way for Pyongyang to earn money. While foreign tourists are allowed in, tour groups largely tend to come from China and Russia, countries with whom Pyongyang has long maintained friendly relations. I was hoping this might signal a broader reopening to international tourism, but unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case for now," Rowan Beard, co-founder of Young Pioneer Tours, tells the from overseas took a hit with the pandemic though, with the country closing its borders in early 2020. It did not scale back restrictions until the middle of 2023 and welcomed Russian visitors a year opened to more Western visitors in February, when visitors from UK, France, Germany and Australia drove across the border from China. It abruptly halted tourism weeks later without saying why. Some tour agencies are sceptical of Wonsan's appeal to foreigners. It is "unlikely to be a major draw for most Western tourists", Mr Beard says. "Key sites like Pyongyang, the DMZ, and other brutalist or communist landmarks will continue to be the main highlights for international visitors once broader tourism resumes."Elliott Davies, director of Uri Tours, however, says North Korea holds a "niche appeal" for travellers drawn to unconventional destinations."It's intriguing to experience something as familiar as a beach resort that's been shaped within the unique cultural context of North Korea."KCNA described the Wonsan development as a "great auspicious event of the whole country" and called it a "prelude to the new era" in was initially scheduled to open in October 2019, but ran into construction delays before the pandemic attended a ceremony to celebrate its completion on 24 June, accompanied by his daughter, Kim Ju Ae and wife Ri Sol Ju. It marked Ri's first public appearance since a New Year's Day event. Russian ambassador Alexander Matsegora and embassy staff also tour operators expect the resort to be opened to Russian tourists, who are currently the only foreign nationals allowed into some parts of the country. The resort's opening comes as North Korea and Russia strengthen their partnership in the face of sanctions from the Korea has sent troops to fight with Russia against Thursday, the two countries also reopened a direct passenger train route between their capitals after a five-year suspension because of the pandemic.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
CNN slams Trump for criticizing reporter as tensions escalate
"She lied on the Laptop from Hell Story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story, attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad when, in fact, they did a GREAT job and hit 'pay dirt' -- TOTAL OBLITERATION!" Trump said in the post. The president's comments come as Bertrand and CNN reported June 25 that the U.S. strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the country's nuclear program. Instead, they reported that it simply set the country's capabilities back by months. It appears that Trump's "laptop from hell" comments were referring to Bertrand's 2020 story for Politico that suggested that the laptop controversy surrounding former President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was a case of Russian disinformation. While unleashing against the network in his comments, Trump said Bertrand "should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN." "It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network. Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!" Trump continued. But CNN pushed back on Trump's claims, defending Bertrand, her reporting and the network's talent roster. "We stand 100% behind Natasha Bertand's journalism and specifically her and her colleagues' reporting of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities," the company's PR team wrote in a statement posted to X on June 25. "CNN's reporting made clear that this was an initial finding that could change with additional intelligence." 'Allison Cooper': Trump calls CNN anchor Anderson Cooper 'Allison' in rant "We have extensively covered President Trump's own deep skepticism about it," the network said. "However, we do not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest." Before she joined CNN in April 2021, Bertrand covered national security and politics for two years at Politico. Previously, she covered the same beat at The Atlantic and Business Insider. Kaitlan Collins, CNN star and frequent Trump adversary, will cover White House for network Donald Trump called CNN's Anderson Cooper 'Allison' As CNN has attempted to neutralize its coverage of Trump during his second term, the president himself has ramped up his attacks on the network's reporting staff in recent weeks. On June 23, Trump unleashed on CNN's star anchor Anderson Cooper. Trump lashed out on Truth Social, calling the "AC360" host "Allison Cooper" and slamming what he referred to as "fake news" organizations that "would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible" in their stories about U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. In his post, Trump also slammed "Dumb Brian L. Roberts, Chairman of 'Con'cast, Jonny Karl of ABC Fake News, and always, the Losers of, again, Concast's NBC Fake News," referring to Comcast chairman Roberts and ABC News' chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Nato split highlights the confusion lying at its heart
But the US, then on the cusp of its unipolar moment, was in no mood to compromise. If the Soviets wanted cash, president George Bush Senior declared at the time, they would have to embrace economic pain – Thatcherite shock therapy, in fact: deregulation, spending cuts, privatisation and the abolition of consumer price controls. Of course, shock therapy is precisely what Russia got. Throughout the 1990s, Russian living standards slumped as the IMF asset-stripped the country and oligarchs annexed its natural resources. Out of such chaos, Putin and Putinism emerged. READ MORE: Meet the engineer hoping to be the first Palestinian-Scot MSP in Holyrood The West, however, had been warned. According to Zubok, in response to Bush's demands, Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's then-foreign minister, wrote to the US secretary of state James Baker. In the absence of financial assistance, Shevardnadze said, Russia would fail, and if Russia failed, Western governments would soon find themselves confronted by 'some beastly dictator' whose actions forced them to spend 'more on defence than what Gorbachev is asking from you now'. Baker was unmoved and Gorbachev's dream of a Soviet Marshall Plan never materialised. I found it hard not to think about that anecdote as this week's Nato summit, held at The Hague, unfolded across my TV screen. The central theme of the summit was deterrence – bigger weapons, deeper intel and smarter tech to counter the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. Nato's secretary general, Mark Rutte, worked hard to convey an image of Western consensus. 'Across the alliance, we have opened hundreds of new production lines and expanded existing ones,' he said during his opening remarks on Tuesday afternoon. 'We are now on course to produce more ships, planes and ammunition than we have done in decades.' But the facade began to crack even before the summit got under way. On Monday, Rutte announced that all Nato allies had agreed to raise their defence budgets to a record-breaking 5% of GDP, in line with commands issued by Donald Trump. Hours later, Rutte's announcement was contradicted by Pedro Sanchez, the socialist prime minister of Spain, who said that Madrid would meet its defence obligations by spending just 2.1% of GDP. Sanchez's reasoning was sound. The 5% target was 'incompatible' with Spain's domestic welfare commitments. Plus, for all the talk of European 'strategic autonomy', the target would only broaden Europe's dependence on Washington by incentivising 'off-the-shelf' purchases of US military hardware. Rutte's spat with Sanchez highlights the confusion at the heart of Nato's post-Soviet existence. Is the alliance a mechanism for the projection of US hard power abroad, a containment structure for Russian nationalism or the nucleus of an independent European defence system? Europeans themselves can't decide. In Finland, Poland and the Baltic states, support for Nato is strong because the immediate sense of Russian menace runs deep. But in Hungary and Slovakia – Nato members since 1999 and 2004, respectively – populist governments with pro-Moscow sympathies are more eager to placate Putin than to provoke him. Meanwhile, here in the UK, a Labour prime minister simultaneously slashes social security payments while green-lighting the purchase of new nuclear-capable war planes. Our leaders could have listened to Gorbachev and Shevardnadze. Instead, we are still living in the rubble of 1991.
