Court upholds 30-year jail term for 6 in KLIA2 drug trafficking case
In delivering the unanimous verdict, Court of Appeal judge Che Ruzima Ghazali said the trial judge made no error in inferring that the appellants knew they were carrying prohibited drugs.
PETALING JAYA : The Court of Appeal today upheld the 30-year prison sentences imposed by the High Court on six people convicted of trafficking in 7.58kg of methamphetamine at the KLIA Terminal 2 (KLIA2) in 2018.
Bernama reported that a three-judge panel consisting of Justices Che Ruzima Ghazali, Collin Lawrence Sequerah and Azmi Ariffin ruled that the appeal had no merit.
The court also affirmed the High Court's decision to impose 15 strokes of the cane on Low Wei Ryh, 33, Mak Kwong Ming, 48, Yap Fook Chen, 31, Joon Zheng Han, 28, and two others who were teenagers at the time of their arrest.
Ruzima, delivering the unanimous verdict, said the trial judge made no error in inferring that the appellants knew they were carrying prohibited drugs, based on their own cautioned statements.
'The defence of (being) innocent carriers does not favour the appellants. They failed to make sufficient inquiries about the items, as required by law,' he said.
The court also rejected a request from the appellants to reduce the number of strokes from 15 to 12.
According to the facts of the case, the drugs were strapped to the appellants' thighs and hidden inside the soles of their shoes when they were arrested by auxiliary police at the airport during a security screening.
The appellants, in their defence, claimed they had accepted part-time job offers from a man known only as 'The Company' to deliver packages to South Korea.
They were told the items were not dangerous drugs but were gym supplements, or clenbuterol, which is banned in South Korea.
In July last year, the High Court convicted them of trafficking in the drugs at the Narcotics Crime Investigation Division office, KLIA2, on Aug 11, 2018. They were sentenced to 30 years in prison and 15 strokes of the cane each.
In today's proceedings at the Court of Appeal, lawyers Kitson Foong and Chew Jee San represented the two unnamed teenagers, while Izwan Ishak acted for Yap. Lawyer Ahmad Ishrakh Saad represented Joon while lawyer Goh Cia Yee represented Low and Mak.
Deputy public prosecutor Afzainizam Abdul Aziz appeared for the prosecution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
11 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-cop's murder death penalty affirmed as message to police officers
The Court of Appeal upheld the death penalty imposed on Ahmad Rizal Umar for the murder of Kartini Borhan, 27, four years ago. PETALING JAYA : The Court of Appeal said it upheld the death sentence imposed on a former investigating officer for the murder of his lover 14 years ago to convey a clear message to all police officers of the need to uphold the law. Justice Wong Kian Kheong said all officers were required under Section 13 of the Police Act 1967 to take an oath. 'By murdering the deceased, the appellant had betrayed his declaration to 'obey, uphold and maintain' the law,' he said, adding that the bench exercised its sentencing discretion to affirm the punishment on grounds of public interest. Last September, a three-member bench chaired by Justice Supang Lian, sitting in Kota Kinabalu, dismissed Ahmad Rizal Umar's appeal against conviction and sentence for killing Kartini Borhan, 27. Also on the panel hearing the appeal was Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah. Rizal, who held the rank of inspector, committed the offence at an apartment in Taman Andika, Keningau, between 4am and 5am on Sept 29, 2011. Wong delivered his 37-page written grounds earlier this week, paving the way for Rizal, 43, to exercise his automatic final right of appeal to the Federal Court. The judge said Rizal had used violence and great force to kill Kartini with a knife leaving the victim suffering 10 injuries, including a horrific second stab wound. 'After the murder, he attempted to conceal the offence by alleging that Kartini had been killed by an assailant who broke into the premises to rob her. 'Worse still, he had the temerity to make the false police report and had not shown any remorse,' he said. He said Rizal used his police training and work experience as an investigating officer to conceal the crime. According to the facts of the case, Rizal was in Kartini's rented apartment on the day of the incident but made it look as if a robber had broken into the premises and attacked both of them. Wong said a forensic pathologist gave evidence that Rizal's injuries were self-inflicted and not consistent with the consequences of a combative encounter with a robber. The motive for the murder was a love triangle as the deceased was alleged to have been having an affair with another man. In mitigation earlier, lawyer Ram Singh, who was assisted by Chen Wen Jye, asked for Rizal to be imprisoned and whipped, saying he was a first offender and father to two children. In response, deputy public prosecutor Amril Johari called for the death penalty to be retained as the accused was a law enforcement officer who had attacked his victim brutally.
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
DAP demands AG justify ‘no further action' ruling in Teoh Beng Hock case, backs judicial review
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — DAP today called on Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar to explain in detail his decision to classify Teoh Beng Hock's death as requiring no further action (NFA). In a joint statement issued by DAP national chairman Gobind Singh Deo and secretary-general Loke Siew Fook, the party said the Attorney General must justify why he believes there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for Teoh's death. 'The Attorney General and no one else has the discretion to prosecute under the Constitution. He must explain why he is unable to do so in this case particularly in light of the decisions of the Court of Appeal and civil proceedings in the High Court,' the statement said, as published on the DAP's official Facebook page. On May 21, the Attorney General classified the case as NFA after receiving investigation papers from the police, and on May 30, issued a letter to the family's lawyers stating that there was not enough evidence to support criminal prosecution. The party said it had consistently pushed for accountability since Teoh's death in 2009 and had formed a legal team that initiated an inquest to determine the cause of death. The inquest found bruises on Teoh's neck, but on January 5, 2011, the coroner returned an open verdict. DAP then challenged the finding in the High Court, which upheld the coroner's decision, prompting an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal overturned the earlier findings, concluding that Teoh's death was caused by 'an unlawful act or acts of persons unknown, inclusive of MACC officers who were involved in the arrest and investigation of the deceased.' DAP also supported the family in a civil suit that led to a government admission of liability for negligence and a RM600,000 compensation award with RM60,000 in costs. The party argued that both the Court of Appeal and civil court decisions provided grounds for renewed police investigations to identify those responsible. DAP said it supports the family's intention to challenge the NFA decision through a judicial review. 'We support this action and also call upon the Attorney General to review his decision and push ahead with charges against those responsible for Teoh Beng Hock's death without further delay,' the party said.
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Fine, see you in court': Fahmi Reza calls out authorities over travel ban confusion, says no one taking responsibility; vows legal action
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — Graphic artist and activist Fahmi Reza has criticised the government over his recent overseas travel ban, saying no authorities have taken responsibility for the incident. In a strongly worded statement posted on Facebook, Fahmi said despite government claims that there was 'no official travel restriction' against him, he was still barred from leaving the country due to what authorities described as a 'confusion during an immigration check'. 'I don't see any government body owning up to the mistake that resulted in the restriction of my freedom of movement,' he said. 'You keep saying there is 'no official ban'. But in reality, I was still blocked and denied my right to travel,' he added. Fahmi questioned the government's accountability, saying he had lost time and money because of the incident, yet no agency had taken the blame. He also pointed out the double standards in how regular citizens are swiftly prosecuted for offences, whereas authorities often escape responsibility. 'This time, it's the people's turn to drag those in power to court,' Fahmi said. He insisted that no government or authority is above the law and that citizens should not be afraid to challenge injustice. 'You always tell me to 'use the right channel', don't you? Fine, see you in court,' he said. The travel issue came to light after Fahmi was reportedly prevented from boarding an international flight yesterday. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had earlier denied the existence of a blacklist order against Fahmi, saying there was no directive from the government to restrict his movement. Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain similarly stated that police did not issue any instruction to bar Fahmi from leaving the country and attributed the matter to possible confusion at the immigration checkpoint.
