Judicial review of Environment Agency's handling of Walleys Quarry
Ms Currie previously began legal action in August 2021 over the matter but ran into a dead end after an appeal at The Supreme Court, after earlier success in the High Court.In February this year, she said problems from the landfill extended beyond a "bad smell" and that pollution from the site were still affecting her son."Mathew's consultant has again reported that the pollution from Walleys Quarry is shortening Mathew's life - it's killing him," she said.The EA has previously said its decision to issue a closure notice demonstrated its "commitment" to the local community.
Ms Currie said Mathew was doing "really, really well" up until about January, but the emissions worsened and he worsened, meaning he had to be put back on antibiotics three times a week."It angers me. I'm angry. I'm really frustrated. The simple fact is, if the EA had [closed the site] four years ago, people in our community would've had four years of cleaner air."I just want somebody held accountable for what [the EA] have allowed the people who run the landfill to do."Somebody has got to be held accountable for what they've done."
'Levels underreported'
Mathew was born prematurely at 26 weeks with a chronic lung disease and needed oxygen support for 19 months. In 2021 his doctor told the High Court that the landfill emissions were preventing his recovery and he risked developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the future.In August, the EA revealed that its pollution detectors had been underreporting levels of hydrogen sulphide at Walleys Quarry as they had been incorrectly calibrated.At the time, documents showed levels in some parts of the site were exceeding guideline levels and warned those living nearby could experience headaches, nausea, dizziness, watery eyes, stuffy noses, irritated throats, coughs or wheezes, sleep problems and stress.People who had health conditions that affect breathing, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), may experience a worsening of their symptoms, it said.
Speaking this week, Ms Currie said she was not seeking financial compensation."You can put £1m in front of me or my son's health, that hasn't even entered my mind. My son shouldn't be this poorly," she said.A judicial review involves a judge assessing the procedures used by public bodies to come to a decision.It will not judge whether the EA's decisions were right or wrong, but simply the lawfulness of the process used. During a public meeting in March, bosses said they were now using discretionary powers to manage the site, paid for with a £2.6m fund that it previously secured from the operator - Walleys Quarry Ltd - as part of its landfill permit conditions.Walleys Quarry Ltd went bust at the end of February, with the site falling to The Crown Estate.This came after an failed bid by the firm against the EA closure notice.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Galleries warn they will be ‘crippled' by new policy which allows people to visit for free
Britain's leading heritage organisations have urged the government to close a 'loophole' in new consumer rights legislation, warning it could 'cripple them'. Heads of organisations including the National Trust, Tate, Historic Royal Palaces and Victoria & Albert Museum wrote to the government to highlight how the new rules could allow people to abuse their membership schemes. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA) will allow consumers a 'two-week cooling off period' after purchasing a charity membership scheme. This means they could obtain the membership, use its perks to enjoy paid-exhibitions or visits for free, before cancelling and getting a full refund days later. The letter, seen by The Times, asks the prime minister to ensure charities are treated differently to commercial businesses to protect this vital revenue stream. A National Trust spokesperson told The Independent: "Up to now membership has been treated as a charitable donation by law and this is part of a long-held recognition that UK charities are fundamentally different from commercial businesses. 'Charities are currently facing sustained financial pressures, due to the difficult economic climate. This legislation would add to that cost burden and see more charities having to reduce their vital services. 'Just last month the Government made a firm commitment through the Civil Society Covenant to support our sector: closing this loophole would be a clear demonstration of that commitment." The DMCCA was introduced by the previous Conservative government but has been put into place under this government. It is intended to protect consumers following growing concerns around 'subscription traps'. However, heritage organisations and galleries have become increasingly reliant membership schemes for vital funding in recent years. 'The proposed cooling-off period would create a loophole that could allow people to join charities as members and enjoy benefits, such as free entry to sites, for a two-week period before claiming substantial refunds for the rest of the year,' their letter to the government reportedly reads. 'This threatens to cripple the very future value of membership itself as a functional model of income generation for charities with visitor models — currently worth hundreds of millions [of pounds] to charities across the UK every year.' Under the rules, someone could hypothetically buy a National Trust family membership for £168.60 before visiting several sites within two weeks - which could cost upwards of £100 for the family. They could then cancel their membership, receiving a full membership refund, having not paid for their visits. A similar concern applies to galleries, who sometimes offer members free access to paid exhibitions. A government spokesperson said it was engaging with charities on the issue and added: 'The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act does not change the definition of what constitutes a consumer contract. 'Our plans to protect consumers from rip-off subscriptions will not unfairly affect charities, and we continue to engage closely with them to understand their concerns.'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth arrested and charged over indecent images
MSP Colin Smyth has been arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images, prompting his suspension from Scottish Labour. The South Scotland MSP was arrested on Tuesday and is due to appear in court at a later date. He was first elected as an MSP in 2016 and returned to Holyrood again at the 2021 election. The Scottish Parliament website now lists him as an Independent. A spokesperson for Police Scotland said: 'On Tuesday, August 5, 2025, officers executed a warrant at a property on Marchfield Avenue, Dumfries. 'A 52-year-old man was arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images. He is due to appear at Dumfries Sheriff Court at a later date.' A spokesman for Scottish Labour said: 'The whip has been removed from Colin Smyth MSP, pending an investigation. 'We cannot comment further on this matter while the investigation is ongoing.' It is understood the MSP was administratively suspended by Labour after the party became aware of the police investigation.
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Family of man who died in custody in Aberdeen sue police and NHS
Relatives of a young man who died in custody are suing the police and NHS, BBC Scotland News has Fenty, 20, died from a drugs overdose at Kittybrewster Police Station in Aberdeen in had been arrested after discharging himself from Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, against medical advice, and was being held in the station's custody suite. A sheriff later ruled his death might have been Fenty's mother, Sharon Fenty, and other relatives have launched a legal action against Police Scotland and NHS Grampian. Both organisations declined to comment. The sheriff's fatal accident inquiry (FAI) ruling was in May last Pyle, the sheriff principal of Grampian, Highlands and Islands, said that custody officers should have conducted cell checks of Mr Fenty in accordance with the then standard operating was an opportunity which might have led to Mr Fenty's readmission into hospital which "might have avoided his death", he said in a written ruling. He said: "I have concluded that no one individual can be held responsible."Indeed, all those involved, whether medical practitioners or police officers, were doing their best in what proved to be quite exceptional circumstances."Nevertheless, I do identify certain institutional failures by Police Scotland which, while not on the evidence being the cause of death or indeed materially contributing to it, resulted in missed opportunities to have Mr Fenty returned to hospital where it is likely, although by no means certain, that he would have survived." The legal action against Police Scotland and NHS Grampian seeking damages has been lodged at the Court of Session in Fenty's mother previously told BBC Scotland News: "It's been a nightmare."I just had to keep on going for Warren's sake. I'm never going to be the Sharon I used to be."I am angry. That was my son. I miss him so much, he should be here."
