US, Ukraine May Wait Decade Or More To See Revenue From Minerals Deal
London:
The financial payoff from a new minerals deal between Ukraine and the US is likely to take a decade or longer as investors face many hurdles to getting new mines into production in the war-ravaged country.
Developing mines that produce strategically important minerals in countries with established mining sectors such as Canada and Australia can take 10 to 20 years, mining consultants said on Thursday.
But most mineral deposits in Ukraine have scant data to confirm they are economically viable. Investors may also baulk at funnelling money into a country where infrastructure such as power and transport has been devastated by Russia's three-year-old full-scale invasion and future security is not guaranteed.
"If anyone's thinking suddenly all these minerals are going to be flying out of Ukraine, they're dreaming," said Adam Webb, head of minerals at consultancy Benchmark Minerals Intelligence.
"The reality is it's going to be difficult for people to justify investing money there when there are options to invest in critical minerals in countries that are not at war."
While the financial benefits from the deal are uncertain, officials in Ukraine hailed it as a political breakthrough: They believe it will help shore up US support for Kyiv that has faltered under President Donald Trump.
Ukraine needs US support - especially weapons and cash - to withstand Russia's military invasion.
On the US side, Trump heavily promoted the deal, especially the access it provides to Ukraine's deposits of rare earth elements which are used in everything from cellphones to cars. So government policy could hasten investment.
The US does not produce significant amounts of rare earths and has ramped up a trade war with China, the world's top supplier.
The text of the deal signed in Washington showed that revenues for the reconstruction fund would come from royalties, licence fees and production-sharing agreements.
The text mentions no financial terms, saying that the two sides still have to hammer out a limited partnership agreement between the US International Development Finance Corp and Ukraine's State Organization Agency on Support for Public-Private Partnership.
The text details 55 minerals plus oil, natural gas and other hydrocarbons. According to Ukrainian data, the country has deposits of 22 of the 34 minerals identified by the European Union as critical, including rare earths, lithium and nickel.
"The transition from a discovered resource to an economically viable reserve requires significant time and investment, both of which have been constrained, not only since the onset of the war but even prior to it," said Willis Thomas at consultancy CRU.
Ukrainian finance ministry data showed that in 2024, the Ukrainian state earned 47.7 billion hryvnias, or around $1 billion, in royalties and other fees related to natural resources exploitation.
But the joint fund created under the deal will only get revenue from new licences, permits and production-sharing agreements concluded after the accord comes into force.
Slow pace of mining licences
Ukraine was slow to issue new natural resources licenses before Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion. From 2012 to 2020, about 20 licences were issued for oil and gas, one for graphite, one for gold, two for manganese and one for copper, according to the Ukrainian geological service. There are 3,482 existing licenses in total.
Since the agreement creates a limited partnership, the two countries may be looking at direct government investment in a mining company, analysts said.
Chile, the world's biggest copper producer and owner of state mining company Codelco, could be an example they follow, Webb said.
Another hurdle is that some potentially lucrative projects are on land occupied by Russia, and the agreement does not include any security guarantees. Washington has said the presence of US interests would deter aggressors.
Seven of 24 potential mining projects identified by Benchmark are in Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine and include lithium, graphite, rare earth elements, nickel and manganese.
An official of a small Ukrainian company that holds the licence for the Polokhivske lithium deposit, one of the largest in Europe, told Reuters in February it would be tough to develop without Western security guarantees.
"The deal ties the US more closely into Ukraine in that now they've got a bit more of a vested interest in this war coming to an end so that they can develop those assets," Webb said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In one of his first acts of his second term as president, Donald Trump pardoned hundreds of people who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to try to keep him in office, including those who beat police Monday, Trump posted a warning on social media to those demonstrating in Los Angeles against his immigration crackdown and confronting police and members of the National Guard he had deployed: "IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!"The discrepancy of Trump's response to the two disturbances - pardoning rioters who beat police on Jan. 6, which he called "a beautiful day," while condemning violence against law enforcement in Los Angeles - illustrates how the president expects his enemies to be held to different standards than his supporters."Trump's behavior makes clear that he only values the rule of law and the people who enforce it when it's to his political advantage," said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth pardoned more than 1,000 people who tried to halt the transfer of power on that day in 2021, when about 140 officers were injured. The former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew Graves, called it "likely the largest single day mass assault of law enforcement " in American pardon covered people convicted of attacking police with flagpoles, a hockey stick and a crutch. Many of the assaults were captured on surveillance or body camera footage that showed rioters engaging in hand-to-hand combat with police as officers desperately fought to beat back the angry some who were pardoned were convicted of nonviolent crimes, Trump pardoned at least 276 defendants who were convicted of assault charges, according to an Associated Press review of court records. Nearly 300 others had their pending charges dismissed as a result of Trump's sweeping act of 180 of the defendants were charged with assaulting, resisting or impeding law enforcement or obstructing officers during a civil disorder."They were extremely violent, and they have been treated as if their crimes were nothing, and now the president is trying to use the perception of violence by some protesters as an excuse to crack some heads," said Mike Romano, who was a deputy chief of the section of the U.S. Attorney's office that prosecuted those involved in the Capitol siege. White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, defended the president's response: "President Trump was elected to secure the border, equip federal officials with the tools to execute this plan, and restore law and order."Trump has long planned to use civil unrest as an opportunity to invoke broad presidential powers, and he seemed poised to do just that on Monday as he activated a battalion of U.S. Marines to support the presence of the National Guard. He mobilized the Guard on Saturday over the opposition of California's governor, Gavin Newsom, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Guard was last sent to Los Angeles by a president during the Rodney King riots in 1992, when President George H.W. Bush invoked the Insurrection Act. Those riots were significantly more violent and widespread than the current protests in Los Angeles, which were largely confined to a stretch of downtown, a relatively small patch in a city of 469 square miles and nearly 4 million current demonstrations were sparked by a confrontation Saturday in the city of Paramount, southeast of downtown Los Angeles, where federal agents were staging at a Department of Homeland Security officials, who are largely Democrats, argued that Trump is trying to create more chaos to expand his power. Newsom, whom Trump suggested should be arrested, called the president's acts "authoritarian." But even Rick Caruso, a prominent Los Angeles Republican and former mayoral candidate, posted on the social media site X that the president should not have called in the National escalated after the Guard arrived, with demonstrators blockading a downtown freeway. Some some set multiple self-driving cars on fire and pelted Los Angeles police with debris and said he worried that Trump's double standard on how demonstrators should treat law enforcement will weaken the position of police in American recalled that, during the Capitol attack, many rioters thought police should let them into the building because they had supported law enforcement's crackdown on anti-police demonstrations after George Floyd was murdered in 2020. That sort of "transactional" approach Trump advocates is toxic, Romano said."We need to expect law enforcement are doing their jobs properly," he said. Believing they just cater to the president "is going to undermine public trust in law enforcement."
India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump unveils $1,000 govt-funded accounts for newborns: What to know
US President Donald Trump on Monday unveiled a new federal initiative that would provide every newborn American with a $1,000 government-funded investment account -- a signature component of what he calls "the One Big Beautiful Bill."The accounts, branded as "Trump Accounts," aim to foster long-term financial growth for the next generation and are already drawing support from some of the country's top business is a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation," Trump said at a White House event. "They'll really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economy."BABY ACCOUNTS WITH LIMITS The accounts would be seeded at birth with a one-time $1,000 government contribution and grow tax-deferred, tracking a broad stock index. Parents and guardians could contribute an additional $5,000 annually. The accounts will be privately held and accrue interest until the child turns bill would require at least one parent to produce a Social Security number with work authorisations, meaning US citizen children born to some categories of immigrants would be excluded from the benefit. But unlike other baby bond programs, which generally target disadvantaged groups, this one would be available to families of all Trump hailed the proposal as a "pro-capitalist answer to inequality," experts were quick to raise concerns, especially as the program comes amid proposals by Trump-aligned lawmakers to cut programs that directly support low-income families."The rise and fall of nations occurs when you have a wealth gap that grows, when you have people who lose faith in the system," said Brad Gerstner, a Silicon Valley investor who helped craft the proposal. "We're not agentless. We can do something."However, experts say the accounts are more symbolic than transformative. Assuming a 7% annual return, the $1,000 seed investment would grow to roughly $3,570 over 18 years — a meaningful boost, but not a game-changer for children growing up in program is drawing mixed reviews from social advocates. While some applaud the intent to build generational wealth, others argue that Trump Accounts won't help families facing food insecurity, homelessness, or lack of health care today."Having children have health care, having their families have access to SNAP and food are what we really need the country focused on," said Shimica Gaskins of End Child Poverty inputs from Associated PressMust Watch
Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Nato learns as Ukraine's 'creativity' changes battlefield
AP NATO maneuver (Representational Image) Ukraine's "creativity", including its massive "Spider's web" drone attack deep inside Russia, holds profound lessons for Western militaries, the top Nato commander overseeing battlefield innovation told AFP. "What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse - and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago," French Admiral Pierre Vandier, Nato's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview. "Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity."Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed."It was a real coup." "We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning," the navy commander said."We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated."Faced with the Russian threat, Nato this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow. But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping Nato and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years. "Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly," Vandier admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said Nato needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack. "When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter," he said."That's what should prevent war - making the adversary think: "Tomorrow morning, I won't win."Nato countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month. That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware. But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems?"No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment," Vandier said. "However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it."Officials say that over 70 percent of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones. But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent. "Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10-meter-long (33-foot-long) drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools," Vandier said. "If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs."The admiral, who works out of Nato's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was "integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine".Nato and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield. "All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities," Vandier said. "It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155-millimeter (six-inch) shell."This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which Nato aims to expand by at least 30 percent over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros (dollars). Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was "substantial" it was "fully realistic". "Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started," he said.
