Commonwealth unlikely to stop Victoria's work from home laws, Tanya Plibersek indicates
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan used a weekend Labor conference to unveil her government's plan to introduce protections for employees who want to work at least two days a week from home.
Her party intends to legislate the change next year.
Industrial relations laws are typically the domain of the federal government, and working from home laws were a major issue at this year's federal election.
The Coalition's opposition to working from home arrangements before a significant policy reversal during the campaign, is said to have contributed to Peter Dutton's election loss.
Ms Plibersek on Monday told Channel 7's Sunrise program that her government supported working from home where it was practical and had been negotiated between employees and employers.
"We know that Australians value it, and when Peter Dutton tried to get rid of it in the last election, there was quite a backlash," the social services minister said.
She said it was a matter for Victoria whether it legislated to enshrine the right.
Ms Allan's announcement has sparked concern from some business leaders, including prominent employer representative group the Committee for Melbourne.
Chief executive Scott Veenker said the move was unnecessary.
He said working from home policies, which are generally determined by employers, were successful under current arrangements, and introducing legal protections would only create more red tape.
"We don't think this is in their realm of control as far as dictating how businesses should be accommodating their staff," he told ABC Radio Melbourne.
"The reality is, working from home is something that businesses and employees have embraced, and they will continue to do that, but they don't need to be dictated under what parameters."
Mr Veenker said businesses recognised that accommodating the needs and requests of their staff was crucial for sourcing and retaining the best workers for their roles, and he had not heard of any of the committee's members trying to restrict working from home arrangements.
"Roles advertised at the moment are absolutely listing work from home as a benefit, if it works for the organisation," he said.
Mr Veenker said workplace relations should stay in the hands of the federal government.
Speaking to ABC Radio Melbourne this morning, Ms Allan said her government had a "range of legislative options available" to make the change, particularly through the Equal Opportunity Act.
"If you look at it this way, the [federal] Fair Work Act provides us the floor," she said.
"What we're choosing to do here in Victoria, is build on that floor to protect working from home as a right."
Under the constitution, if a state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law prevails.
Giuseppe Carabetta, an associate professor of workplace and business law at the University of Technology Sydney Business School, described Victoria's plan as being "a bit out there, legally".
Dr Carabetta said employers would likely argue the new laws were invalid because they were inconsistent with the federal Fair Work Act.
But he warned any legislation at a state level could be met with constitutional challenges that could need to be dealt with in court.
Dr Carabetta said the proposal would improve workplace conditions and access for women and carers.
But he said he suspected the motive behind the announcement was more political, citing Mr Dutton's election loss.
"So we have the Victorian premier here going, 'Why don't I go the other way, this is keeping with what a lot of workers want, what the unions want, and it's progressive, so this is going to be very popular and it's going to score me a lot of political points.'"
Ms Allan said the plan was focused on improving workers' lives but that it was also good for business.
"The data tells us that those workers are also more productive," she said.
"When they can work from home, they are doing more hours — up to 20 per cent more hours.
"When we've got the opportunity to protect something that works for workers and is good for business and the economy, then of course I'm going to take that opportunity."
The Victorian opposition has distanced itself from Mr Dutton by voicing support for working from home.
Victorian leader Brad Battin declared on Sunday that "hybrid working is part of the future".
However, he said it was too soon to say whether his party would back the legislation.
"Because the fact is at the moment not even the premier can come out and explain to anyone what the legislative rights are, how they are going to implement this or even what act they're going to change," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
Woodside slammed by regulator for safety incidents at multiple WA decommissioning sites
A key union says it is aware of "significant failures" in Woodside's safety management at one of its offshore projects, days after the national regulator ordered it to suspend its decommissioning work over similar issues. The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) last Thursday revoked the oil and gas giant's decommissioning obligations at Griffin and Stybarrow gas fields until it completed "essential planning and preparatory activities". The orders come after what NOPSEMA called "preventable health and safety incidents" at both sites. NOPSEMA asked BHP to decommission both gas fields in 2021, a year before its petroleum arm was bought by Woodside. Decommissioning refers to the process of safely closing a mine or oil and gas site, with the expectation that the impacted environment will be rehabilitated afterwards. In May, 16,000 litres of oil spilled into the ocean during removal operations at Woodside's Griffin oil and gas field, which NOPSEMA said had the potential to expose workers to hydrogen sulphide. Meanwhile, the regulator said there had been unsuccessful recovery attempts and the presence of hydrates in some infrastructure at Stybarrow. A Woodside spokesperson said the company had made substantial progress towards decommissioning the Stybarrow, Griffin and Minerva fields, concluding a multi-year decommissioning program. "Across the campaign, more than 25,000 tonnes of infrastructure, including over 140 kilometres of pipe and 100 subsea structures, have been brought to shore to enable recycling and reuse," it said. A Woodside spokesperson said NOPSEMA's revised general directions provided additional time and clarity for essential planning and preparatory activities. The regulator's directions were welcomed by Maritime Union of Australia organiser Doug Heath, who has sent the regulator a deluge of reports about "near misses" at Woodside's decommissioning projects. He told the ABC that "a fundamental breach" had occurred at one of Woodside's offshore projects just this week. "We've had a series of incidents where workers have suffered, in one case a punctured lung," Mr Heath said. "In other cases, there have been a series of near misses." In March, NOPSEMA confirmed it was investigating lifting and crane operations at McDermott's DLV 2000 vessel, which has been decommissioning the Stybarrow gas field. Two years ago, Woodside contractor Michael Jurman died while working at the North Rankin offshore facility, an incident that NOPSEMA is still investigating. Since then, Woodside's health and safety data showed the number of high-potential incidents and total recordable injuries had increased. Mr Heath said the company had not learned its lesson. "If they need the regulator to tell them that they're not doing a good enough job, they've got some significant failures within their HSC management," he said. "[Woodside is] doing more decommissioning work than probably any other oil and gas company in WA, but their standards have slipped over the course of time. A Woodside spokesperson said safety always had been and would continue to be its priority, and it was continuously taking action to strengthen its safety culture.

ABC News
36 minutes ago
- ABC News
Why is the Trump administration threatening to deport this Iranian man to Australia?
The US government is threatening to deport an Iranian man to Australia — even though he has no connection to Australia and has lived in the US since 1985. Reza Zavvar, a 52-year-old recruiter from Maryland, has been targeted for deportation because of a marijuana possession conviction from the 1990s, his lawyer says. A court order means he cannot be returned to Iran because of the risk of persecution there. So immigration authorities say they are sending him to either Australia or Romania after arresting him in the street near his home in late June. "They got him while he was walking his dog in his quiet suburban neighbourhood," his lawyer, Ava Benach, told the ABC. "And they detained him and sent him to Texas to hold him, and they said: 'We're gonna deport you to Australia or Romania.' His family, friends and locals are fundraising for a legal fight. They say Mr Zavvar had been quietly contributing to his community for years, helping out his elderly neighbours and making sandwiches each week for those in need of food. He had adopted his dog from a local shelter and recently moved in with his mother to help care for his grandmother. "After 40 years of living in the US, Reza knows no other home," his sister, Maryam, wrote as part of an online petition. "He waits in a privately run detention centre, thousands of miles from anything familiar, while bureaucrats decide his future." Mr Zavvar's case has highlighted a controversial strategy increasingly used by the Trump administration as part of its mass deportation regime — sending migrants to countries they have no connection to, sometimes using historical low-level misdemeanours as justification. But immigration lawyers said they had not seen Australia listed as a destination before. "Most of us in the immigration bar have been hearing about cases being sent to Central and South America," said Mahsa Khanbabai, an elected director on the American Immigration Lawyers Association board. "Normally, what we've been seeing is that the Trump administration is targeting countries where they feel they have some leverage, that they feel they can push around and bully. "Australia is not a country that we would normally consider to be in such a position." The Australian government said it had not been contacted by US authorities about the case. "There have been no new agreements made with the Trump administration on immigration," a government spokesperson said. Despite repeated requests for clarification, neither Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) explained why Australia had been selected. But in a statement, DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: "ICE continues to try and find a country willing to accept this criminal illegal alien." Mr Zavvar's sister said her brother had "built his life in Maryland, surrounded by his loving family, including his parents, sister, and cousins". "He was a natural athlete, excelling in football during high school, where he was affectionately known as a 'gentle giant' — competitive on the field but kind and warm-hearted off." He had a green card, allowing him permanent residence in the US — but his lawyer says his past marijuana-related conviction was later used to jeopardise that status. In 2004, an airport agent noticed his conviction and started a process that could have led to deportation. But three years later, a judge issued a "withholding of removal" order, preventing his return to Iran. DHS says his previous conviction — for attempted possession of a controlled substance — remains a reason to deport him. "Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US," the department's Ms McLaughlin said. "Zavvar had almost 20 years to self-deport and leave the United States." The Trump administration has been pushing other countries to accept deportees who cannot return to their countries of origin: either because those countries will not take them back, or because of protection orders like Mr Zavvar's. The "withholding of removal" orders theoretically allow the US to deport the migrant to a different country, but that is historically rare. "We've never really seen people being sent to third countries in my 25 years of practice," Ms Khanbabai said. "When the UK started doing that a few years ago, I remember thinking, what a horrendous situation, thank God the United States doesn't do that. And now here we are seeing the US carry out these very same inhumane, what I would consider illegal, practices." The US government recently struck deals with several African countries, which have opened the door to more of these deportations. Small numbers of migrants — from countries including Vietnam, Cuba and Jamaica — have been sent to South Sudan and Eswatini. And on Wednesday, local time, Reuters reported that Rwanda had said it would accept up to 250 deportees, "in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". The Trump administration says it is delivering on an election promise to crack down on the millions of people in the US who don't have legal rights to live there, and especially those with criminal convictions. "Under President Trump … if you break the law, you will face the consequences," Ms McLaughlin said. "Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the US." But immigration lawyers and advocates say Mr Zavvar is among what appears to be a growing number of Iranians detained since the US air strikes on Iran in June. Green card and student visa holders, many of whom have clean records, are among them, Ms Khanbabai said. The lawyer, who is Iranian American and has many Iranian clients, said the community felt it was being targeted. "The Trump administration claimed that they were going to be going after criminals, yet the vast majority of people, including the Iranians, don't have any serious criminal offences or any at all," she said. "And so we're trying to figure out, is there an uptick of this focus on Iranians … or is this just part of the massive targeting of and scapegoating of immigrants?" Mr Zavvar's lawyer hopes her client's arrest will prove to be a publicity stunt that doesn't lead to his deportation. "I honestly think that they wanted to make a show of arresting Iranians in the wake of our bombing of the Iranian nuclear facility," Ms Benach said. "What people are going to remember is that the administration was arresting Iranians when they were certain that the Iranians were going to retaliate … and then six months from now, they might have to release them under the law, but we'll have moved on to something else."

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Federal politics live: Treasurer urged to 'be bold' on productivity and ditch 'lazy' AI approach
Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie has accused the government of being "lazy" and looking to artificial intelligence as a way of boosting productivity. Follow our live coverage below.