India, European Union Naval Force plan joint naval exercise
The Indian Navy and the European Union Naval Force (EUNAVFOR) will hold a joint exercise at sea soon.
The exercise will see the participation of ESPS Reina Sofia and ITS Antonio Marceglia from EUNAVFOR, as well as ships and aircraft from the Indian Navy. The complex tactical exercises are aimed at enhancing the interoperability between the two sides and enabling seamless operations when deployed for combating non-traditional threats such as piracy and smuggling in the Indian Ocean Region, according to a release.
In the run-up to the exercise, ESPS Reina Sofia, commanded by Commander Salvador Moreno Regil of the Spanish Navy, and ITS Antonio Marceglia, commanded by Cdr Alberto Bartolomeo of the Italian Navy, were in Mumbai from May 26 to June 1 on a short port visit. Both ships presently operate under EUNAVFOR. 'The visit is significant as it is their first such visit to India under the aegis of the European Union,' the release said.
Shared goal
The development was a follow-up to the discussions between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and European Union President Ursula von der Leyen, highlighting their shared commitment towards international peace and security.
The EUNAVFOR side led by Rear Admiral Davide Da Pozzo, Force Commander, Op Atalanta, interacted with Rear Admiral Vidyadhar Harke, Chief Staff Officer (Operations), Western Naval Command of the Indian Navy, at the Western Naval Command headquarters, and held discussions on furthering maritime cooperation between the two sides.
Boosting cooperation
Both the naval forces also took part in some harbour engagements. 'Both sides agreed on the need for extended cooperation in the military domain, and the meeting was a stepping stone for expanding avenues of cooperation between the Indian Navy and EUNAVFOR. During the ships' stay in harbour, activities such as subject matter expert exchanges and a table-top exercise were conducted between the two sides, aimed at refining key issues necessary for tactical-level cooperation at sea,' it said.
'Both India and EU share a strong commitment towards rules-based maritime order, allowing for free and open use of international waters while respecting the territorial integrity of littoral states,' said the release.
The current visit embodies the shared interest of safeguarding legitimate trade and countering non-traditional threats such as piracy and unregulated fishing. It is also in line with the discussions undertaken during the 4th India-EU Maritime Security Dialogue, held in Delhi in March 2025. 'These maritime engagements will further strengthen the multi-domain cooperation between India and the EU,' it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US pushes countries for best offers by June 4 as tariff deadline looms
In the draft, the US is asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of US industrial and agricultural products Reuters The Trump administration wants countries to provide their best offer on trade negotiations by Wednesday as officials seek to accelerate talks with multiple partners ahead of a self-imposed deadline in just five weeks, according to a draft letter to negotiating partners seen by Reuters. The draft, from the office of the United States Trade Representative, provides a window into how President Donald Trump plans to bring to a close unwieldy negotiations with dozens of countries that kicked off on April 9 when he paused his "Liberation Day" tariffs for 90 days until July 8 after stock, bond and currency markets revolted over the sweeping nature of the levies. The document suggests an urgency within the administration to complete deals against its own tight deadline. While officials such as White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett have repeatedly promised that several agreements were nearing completion, so far only one agreement has been reached with a major US trading partner: Britain. Even that limited pact was more akin to a framework for ongoing talks than a final deal. In the draft, the US is asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of US industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. Other requested items include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter. The US will evaluate the responses within days and offer "a possible landing zone" that could include a reciprocal tariff rate, according to the letter. It was unclear which countries would receive the letter, but it was directed at those with active negotiations that included meetings and exchanges of documents. Washington has been engaged in such talks with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and India, among others. A USTR official said trade talks were ongoing. "Productive negotiations with many key trading partners continue at a rapid pace. It is in all parties' interest to take stock of progress and assess any next steps". 'REGARDLESS OF ONGOING LITIGATION' Tiffany Smith, vice president of global trade policy at the National Foreign Trade Council, welcomed the USTR moves. "We are encouraged that USTR is moving negotiations ahead as quickly as they can," she told Reuters, adding that trade deals that removed barriers for US companies abroad and lowered US tariffs would be "a win-win if they are done in a way that returns predictability and stability to trade relationships." Trump's ambitious - and often frenetic - tariff policy is a pillar of his "America First" economic agenda as he seeks to reshape US trade relationships, reduce trade deficits and protect American industries. Republican lawmakers are also banking on tariffs to add to federal revenue and offset the cost of the tax cut legislation now working its way through Congress. Trump's tariff policies have taken investors on a rollercoaster ride. In May, US stocks held their biggest rally of any month since November 2023, but that was after global indexes had cratered under the barrage of Trump's tariff announcements through February, March and early April. Stocks were little changed on Monday afternoon after Trump announced a surprise doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports on Friday at an event in Pittsburgh. Meanwhile, the legality of the approach used for imposing the most sweeping of his tariffs has been cast into doubt. Last Wednesday, the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority with tariffs devised under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, including the "Liberation Day" levies and earlier ones imposed on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to Trump's accusations that the three countries have facilitated the flow of fentanyl into the US Less than 24 hours later, an appeals court temporarily paused that decision. The tariffs at the center of the legal dispute are expected to remain in effect as the case plays out. The draft letter to trading partners warns them not to believe the tariffs will be sidelined if the court rules against Trump's use of the IEEPA. "Regardless of ongoing litigation concerning the President's reciprocal tariff action in US courts, the President intends to continue this tariff program pursuant to other robust legal authorities if necessary, so it is important that we continue our discussions on these matters," the draft says. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.) Editing by Dan Burns and Matthew Lewis)
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
For Volatile Trump, Trade Pacts With China, Europe Prove Elusive
US President Donald Trump is eager to land more trade deals, but talks with China and Europe continue to languish amid communications breakdowns and fresh tariff threats. So far there has been few signs of a breakthrough with either of the two biggest American trading partners. In recent days, the path forward has only grown more complicated, with Trump engaging again in trade brinkmanship and pronouncements that have fueled tensions. Friction between the US and China increased as Beijing claimed Washington had "seriously undermined" a recent tariff truce and threatened to defend its interests - hinting at possible retaliation. That came as the Trump administration accused the Chinese government of dragging its feet on lifting export controls on rare earths the US saw as a linchpin of the deal. The White House on Monday sought to push ahead with efforts to arrange a call between Trump and his counterpart Xi Jinping to ease tensions, with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saying she expected the leaders to speak this week. But representatives of the Chinese president have yet to publicly reciprocate interest. Meanwhile, the European Union issued a fresh warning of countermeasures if Trump follows through on his tariff threats. The European Commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, slammed Trump's promised 50% levy on steel and aluminum, saying it would undermine efforts to reach a resolution on trade barriers. Retaliatory measures are ready if no deal is reached, EU officials warned. This is a modal media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported. Trump's negotiating style is driven by his fundamental faith in tariffs as an economic tool to reshape global trade, as well as a belief that outsized threats would help deliver maximum results during the 90-pause on his April 2 higher duties to allow time for negotiations. Thus far, that approach has delivered limited results. Aside from the pause with China, the president has reached a broad framework with the UK. Deals with other major partners that the president and his advisers have promised for weeks have yet to materialize. Despite the recent tumult, Trump's team has projected optimism that his approach will work. Leavitt argued Monday that Trump's threats brought the EU to the negotiating table and that the White House remains "hopeful and optimistic" they will reach a deal. "As you know, we are in discussions with many other countries around the world as well who understand the need to cut a good deal with this president and the administration," she added. Trump's tariffs are also under legal threat after the US Court of International Trade ruled last week that the majority of the levies were issued illegally and ordered them blocked. The ruling was paused by an appeals court to give the body time to review it. If the trade court ruling is upheld, it would deal a major setback for Trump's economic agenda and his ability to wield leverage with foreign capitals. Still, US officials have pointed to some opportunities for progress. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is set to meet with his European counterpart this week in Paris. If a call between Trump and Xi does materialize, it would be their first known conversation since January, before Trump's inauguration. Investors are watching the turbulent negotiations warily. European stocks edged lower Monday as global trade tensions rose. On Wall Street, stocks wavered as the tariff agenda caused market angst. As firms pulled back in the face of tariffs, US factory activity contracted and a gauge of imports hit a 16-year low. The fragile détente between the US and China has been under threat in recent weeks as the US has taken a series of actions that frustrated the Chinese government. The Trump administration announced it planned to start revoking visas for Chinese students. Officials have also moved to restrict the sale of chip design software and critical US jet engine parts to China, and crack down on Huawei Technologies Co. exports. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said a call between Trump and Xi might be necessary to move forward. On Sunday, he expressed confidence that a direct conversation between Trump and Xi will help the two nations iron out some of their issues. "I think we're going to let the two principals have a conversation, and then everything will stem from that," he said on CBS News' Face the Nation. Trump's complaints about the EU are longstanding. He recently accused the bloc of slow-walking negotiations and unfairly targeting US companies with lawsuits and regulations. He threatened a higher 50% tariff on the bloc starting June 1, but delayed it until July 9 after a phone call with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
How Japan's new AI Act fosters an innovation-first ecosystem
In May 2025, Japan enacted a landmark piece of legislation — the Act on the Promotion of Research, Development and Utilisation of Artificial Intelligence-Related Technologies — with a clear ambition: to make AI the foundation of Japan's economic revival and digital leadership. This law does more than set policy direction; it marks a philosophical departure from the dominant regulatory approaches shaping the global AI landscape. At a time when major regions like the European Union are moving toward risk-based regimes, Japan's AI law signals a pivot toward coordination, and voluntary responsibility. The Japanese approach The contrast could not be starker. The European Union's AI Act, passed in 2024, is defined by its restrictive architecture. It classifies AI systems into risk tiers — ranging from 'Unacceptable' to 'Minimal' — and imposes strict, legally binding obligations on developers, especially those building high-risk applications in areas such as health, education, employment, or law enforcement. The EU framework is comprehensive, enforceable, and aligned with its values of human dignity and digital sovereignty. Non-compliance invites steep penalties and regulatory scrutiny. Japan's approach is fundamentally different. Rather than focusing on risk classification and penalties, it emphasises enabling innovation, encouraging collaboration, and fostering international competitiveness. The law creates an Artificial Intelligence Strategy Headquarters under the Cabinet and tasks it with formulating and implementing a national Basic Plan for AI. This plan will cover everything from foundational research to industrial deployment, international cooperation and public education. Crucially, the Japanese law avoids the trap of overregulation. It does not create binding enforcement mechanisms or define risk categories. Instead, it frames AI-related technologies as foundational for societal development, economic growth, administrative efficiency, and national security. The state assumes responsibility for facilitating research, creating shared infrastructure, supporting workforce development, and ensuring transparency and ethical conduct in AI utilisation. Local governments, universities, research bodies, businesses, and even the public are assigned cooperative roles under the law's basic principles. This model rests on two key assumptions. First, that innovation ecosystems thrive better in the absence of rigid regulatory burdens. Second, that voluntary cooperation — when guided by national coordination and ethical principles — can effectively mitigate risks associated with the misuse of AI. Article 13 of the Act affirms the government's responsibility to develop guidelines that reflect international norms and prevent harm, such as misuse, privacy breaches, or intellectual property violations. However, it stops short of codifying hard rules or penalties. The strengths of this approach are obvious. Japan avoids the chilling effect that often accompanies over-regulation. It builds an innovation-first ecosystem, where AI development can progress across sectors — public and private — without being prematurely constrained by legal ambiguity or bureaucratic friction. It also signals to industry and academia that the government is a facilitator, not a regulator. Myriad challenges But there are risks too. In the absence of clear standards and enforcement, critical questions remain: what happens when AI harms go unreported? How do we define accountability in the event of bias, disinformation, or algorithmic failures? How will Japan ensure that voluntary principles translate into enforceable safeguards in sectors such as healthcare or defence? By avoiding a risk-tiered model like that of the EU, Japan may gain agility — but at the potential cost of clarity and public trust. As generative AI and autonomous systems become more embedded in daily life, even jurisdictions that adopt light-touch approaches will eventually face mounting pressure to articulate what 'responsible AI' means not just in theory, but in law. The geopolitical context also matters. The EU's model is shaped by its strong tradition of rights-based governance and a cautionary approach to data and digital technologies. Its AI Act is a natural extension of its General Data Protection Regulation-era regulatory posture. Japan, on the other hand, is facing unique economic challenges — a shrinking workforce, global competition in advanced technologies, and the need to stimulate domestic innovation. The new AI law reflects a strategic choice to double down on science and technology as national growth drivers. That does not mean Japan is ignoring international alignment. On the contrary, Article 17 of the law mandates that the state actively engage in international cooperation and norm-setting. This is a timely move. Just as the Financial Stability Board (FSB) is conducting a global peer review on crypto frameworks, similar coordination efforts are emerging in the AI space — under the G7 Hiroshima Process, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development frameworks, and the UN's AI advisory body. Japan's ambition to lead in these forums will require it to balance its promotion-first model with a willingness to define guardrails in line with emerging global standards. Global methods Other countries are also taking diverse approaches. In the U.S., the momentum is shifting toward legislative clarity through the AI Disclosure Act. This aims to delineate agency jurisdiction, ensure transparency in training data and outputs, and safeguard national security interests. The U.S. approach, while still evolving, seeks a balance between innovation and oversight — empowering sectoral agencies to issue context-specific rules for AI deployment. Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is positioning itself as a leader in state-led AI strategy. With its Office of Artificial Intelligence, national AI university, and industry-driven AI sandbox programmes, the UAE blends strategic investment with targeted regulation. Sectoral pilots in education, transport, and healthcare have helped create trusted ecosystems while still fostering AI-led transformation. Unlike Japan's voluntary model, the UAE's approach is executive-driven but agile and business-friendly. In many ways, Japan's AI law is a gamble on institutional trust. It bets that government ministries, research institutions, local authorities, and businesses can work together to ensure ethical AI innovation — without needing to be policed into compliance. This reflects a broader cultural confidence in technocratic leadership and consensus-driven governance. But this trust must be earned continuously. The law's promise will only be fulfilled if the Artificial Intelligence Strategy Headquarters can effectively coordinate across sectors, issue timely guidance, and revise its policies based on real-world feedback and global developments. The law itself includes provisions for future review and amendment — a tacit acknowledgement that today's principles may need tomorrow's precision. The world is watching to see whether Japan's model of responsibility without rigidity can truly offer a sustainable and scalable path forward. If it succeeds, it could offer a compelling alternative to both laissez-faire deregulation and enforcement-heavy regimes. But if it falters, it will serve as a cautionary tale about the risks of moving too lightly in the face of transformative technologies. Japan has chosen to lead with coordination, not control. The real test begins now. Sanhita Chauriha is a Technology Lawyer.
