
Cambridge University ‘discriminates' against white job seekers
The University of Cambridge has been accused of discriminating against white job seekers.
Guidance issued at the world-leading university advises departments to 'try to ensure' that at least one candidate from 'underrepresented groups' is invited for every interview.
The 'diverse recruitment framework' further encourages recruiters to readvertise positions if the longlist of candidates 'is not diverse', is all white or male.
The guidance, currently in use at the university, also says interview panels should be 'diverse both in gender and race' and composed of individuals who have taken training courses in equality, diversity, inclusion (EDI) and unconscious bias.
Edward Skidelsky, the lecturer in philosophy at the University of Exeter and director of the Committee for Academic Freedom, said the policies were 'tantamount to discrimination against white applicants'.
'This is one of the worst cases we have come across of EDI interference in what should be a purely academic process,' he said.
'Favouritism towards women and non-whites demeans them, and encourages the very prejudices it is intended to overcome.'
Documents seen by The Telegraph show the guidance, first issued in 2019, is copied word for word in 'hiring instructions' sent to academics involved in recruitment processes at the university.
The framework advises academics that recruitment panels should not be made up entirely of 'white males' or 'people with a particular career track record'.
It reads: 'Conduct the shortlisting with more than one person on the panel, ideally forming the panel that is diverse both in gender and race if possible.
'Research shows that when the final applicant pool has only one minority candidate, they are unlikely to be offered the position: try to ensure that more than one candidate from under-represented groups is invited to [the] interview stage.
'If the longlist is not diverse, you do not have to appoint someone immediately, consider readvertising the position to encourage a more diverse shortlist.'
Elsewhere, it says all members of recruitment panels 'must have completed the online University modules on E&D [equality and diversity] and Understanding Unconscious Bias'.
Those involved in hiring decisions are also told to 'reflect' on the university's EDI commitments, 'their own biases' and the potential for 'implicit bias' before interviews and after selecting a favoured candidate.
A source familiar with the workings of Cambridge's EDI committee said members were told 'don't worry about it' when they raised questions about the policies' legality.
The source said: 'I joined the committee, wanting to see what was actually going on and maybe prevent things from going off the rails.
'When I got there, I discovered it was already off the rails.'
The source added: 'If you criticise it, you're just seen as a bad person.'
They went on to claim they had witnessed colleagues from non-underrepresented backgrounds – such as white people and men – being actively discouraged from applying to positions because of their race or sex.
A spokesman for Cambridge denied that applicants were told this, saying it was 'not a view held by the university, relevant committees or senior management and is directly prohibited in law and our own policies'.
Prof David Abulafia, the professor emeritus of Mediterranean history at the University of Cambridge, said the guidance was 'arrant nonsense'.
He said: 'The sheer fanaticism of the bureaucracy at Cambridge and the craven submission of academics to their arrant nonsense spells the end of a once great university.'
Prof John Marenbon, the philosopher and fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, added: 'Academic appointments should be made solely on the basis of academic merit. Academics who do otherwise betray their calling.'
The university's EDI 'plan for action' includes a target to increase ethnic minority applications to 'academic and research posts to 8 per cent or higher' and 'for professional services roles to 30 per cent'.
A spokesman for the University of Cambridge said: 'Every candidate is recruited based on merit. We have no quotas for staff recruitment and strongly refute claims of discriminating against white and male job applicants
'Our 'diverse recruitment framework' is a guidance document aimed at ensuring that all suitably qualified candidates are encouraged to apply for roles at Cambridge – not to dictate the outcome of recruitment.
'Use of this guidance, including training recommendations, is not mandated in our recruitment policy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
UK military could 'potentially' be used to defend Israel, chancellor tells Sky News
The chancellor has told Sky News that UK military assets could "potentially" be used to help defend Israel, and the government is "not ruling anything out". Rachel Reeves said that while the UK is calling for de-escalation in the region, it is also sending military assets, including fighter jets, "to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies". The chancellor went further than the prime minister last night, who confirmed the movement of military assets, but refused to say if they could be used to help Israel. She also warned about rising oil prices and disruption to key trade routes in the Middle East, which could see inflation in Britain. Speaking to Sky's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, the chancellor said sending military assets to the Middle East "does not mean that we are at war", and emphasised that "we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict". "But we do have important assets in the region," she continued. "And it is right that we send jets to protect them. And that's what we've done. It's a precautionary move, and at the same time, we are urging de-escalation." 0:30 Asked what the UK government would do if the Israelis requested the deployment of assets to support their operations, Ms Reeves reiterated that there has been no UK involvement so far and would not get in to "operational decisions for the future". She said: "This is a fast moving situation. Israel has every right to defend itself. We also are very concerned about Iran's nuclear deterrent." She continued: "We have, in the past, supported Israel when there had been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future. But so far we haven't been involved. We're sending in assets to protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies." Pushed on the question of what the UK would do if Israel asked for support with its operations, the chancellor replied: "I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage. It's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. But we don't want to see escalation." Asked if the UK would support a change of regime in Tehran, she replied: "I've got no time for the Iranian regime for the suppression and repression of their own people, and we have serious concerns, which we've expressed on a number of occasions, about the Iranian nuclear programme. "But we want to see de-escalation at the moment. We are not trying to ramp up the rhetoric." Ms Reeves also warned of the consequences of the conflict in the UK, saying that oil and gas prices "have gone up by just over 10%" since the conflict started, and warning there is a risk that key trade routes through the Middle East could be disrupted.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Britain ‘not at war' despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East, Reeves says
Rachel Reeves has insisted Britain is not at war despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East amid devastating strikes between Iran and Israel. The chancellor said the UK could play a military role defending Israel from ongoing Iranian attacks, but said moves so far 'do not mean we are at war'. Speaking to Sky News, she said: ' We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Ms Reeves also warned that the conflict has pushed up oil prices by 10 per cent and could threaten to block key trade routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, hitting the finances of families in the UK. She said: 'It's very early days, and things are moving quickly, but when we urge for de-escalation in the region, that is in part because of the lives at risk… but also because what happens in the Middle East affects us here at home.' Iran and Israel continued trading heavy missile strikes overnight on Saturday, with at least seven dead in Israel and an unknown number of casualties in Iran. Israel targeted Iran's Defence Ministry headquarters in Tehran, while dramatic footage showed a huge blaze raging at the Shahran oil depot near Iran's capital, after it was targeted in an Israeli attack. Air sirens were heard in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as casualties were reported from strikes on buildings in northern Israel and Bar Yam, a city just south of Tel Aviv. The outburst of conflict was sparked when Israel launched a series of attacks on the heart of Tehran's nuclear programme and armed forces. After Iran hit back, Sir Kir on Saturday said: 'I'm not going to get into the precise details, but we are moving assets, we've already been moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support across the region.' 'Our constant message is de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having, are to do with de-escalation,' he added. Donald Trump has vowed to respond 'at levels never seen before' if Tehran follows through on a threat to strike US bases. Posting on Truth Social, the US president said his forces had 'nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight" but warned: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' It comes after Iran warned on Saturday that it would target US, UK or French bases in the region if they shot down missiles heading for Israel.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
China considers lifting sanctions on UK parliamentarians as relations warm
China is considering lifting the sanctions it imposed on UK parliamentarians in 2021, in the latest sign of warming relations between London and Beijing. The Chinese government is reviewing the sanctions, which it introduced four years ago in response to what it called 'lies and disinformation' about human rights abuses in Xinjiang, according to two UK government sources familiar with the conversations. Asked to comment, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in London said: 'China has always attached importance to developing relations with the UK. Currently, UK-China relations are showing a positive momentum.' 'Exchanges and dialogues between the UK and China at all levels and in all fields will help enhance mutual understanding and trust between the two sides, and will also help promote the continuous development of bilateral relations and practical cooperation, which benefit the two peoples.' The development comes after a week in which several high-ranking Chinese officials visited the UK and held talks with senior government figures. He Lifeng, China's vice-premier, and Wang Wentao, its commerce minister, were in London for trade talks with the US last week. He met Rachel Reeves, the UK chancellor, while Wang held talks with Jonathan Reynolds, the business and trade secretary. Liu Jianchao, one of China's top diplomats who heads the international department of the Chinese Communist party, paid a three-day visit to the UK early last week where he met David Lammy, the foreign secretary, and Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser. None of these meetings were publicised by the UK government. Liu also participated in an event with British MPs hosted by the Great Britain China Centre, an arm's-length government body, where China's sanctions on UK parliamentarians were raised repeatedly. The visit faced criticism because Liu is an architect of China's campaign of repression against its citizens overseas. It is unknown whether China is considering lifting all the sanctions it imposed on UK citizens and organisations four years ago, or only some. Nine UK citizens were banned from China in 2021, including five Conservative MPs and two members of the House of Lords. They were targeted for highlighting human rights violations against the Muslim Uyghur community in the north-western province of Xinjiang. China's sanctions were a retaliation against the UK imposing sanctions on Chinese officials held responsible for atrocities in Xinjiang. UK officials said there was no prospect of the government lifting those. The five MPs sanctioned in 2021 were the former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, Tom Tugendhat, Nusrat Ghani, Neil O'Brien and Tim Loughton, who stood down last summer. The two peers were David Alton, a crossbencher, and Helena Kennedy from Labour. Several are members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China. The Newcastle University academic Jo Smith Finley, whose research focuses on the Uyghurs, and Geoffrey Nice QC, who chaired the Uyghur Tribunal that investigated atrocities against the minority group, also had sanctions imposed upon them. Those under sanctions are banned from entering China, Hong Kong and Macau, any property they have in China has been frozen and Chinese citizens and institutions are prohibited from doing business with them. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion In April, China lifted its sanctions on five MEPs and on the European parliament's subcommittee on human rights, which were also imposed in 2021 in response to the EU's own sanctions. The move was part of Beijing's charm offensive to improve ties and revive talks over a trade deal with Brussels, amid the turmoil caused by Donald Trump's tariffs. There is no prospect of a UK-China trade deal. However, Beijing is awaiting a government decision over the fate of its proposal to build a controversial super-embassy near the Tower of London. Ministers are due to approve or reject the plan this summer. The US government has reportedly raised concerns about the security implications. UK officials are drawing up plans for Reynolds to visit Beijing to revive a key trade dialogue with China later this year, and for Keir Starmer to make a bilateral trip to the country, potentially in the autumn. Labour took a much stronger stance towards human rights abuses in Xinjiang in opposition, when it pledged to take action to recognise them as genocide. It has softened its position in government and sought to build closer ties with China in pursuit of economic growth. During his visit to London last week, Liu also met Tony Blair, the former prime minister. Blair, who is expected to travel to China later this year, continues to informally advise senior figures in the UK and US on foreign policy matters.