
Four ways the Chancellor shifted financial habits of the middle-classes in under a year, by LEE BOYCE
How much more can we be taxed? That's been a common conversation I've had with friends, family and colleagues not just since Labour have been in power, but since the pandemic.
I'd hazard a guess it's been a hot topic in your circles too – ranging from stories of people uprooting to move to more tax-friendly countries, like Dubai and Portugal, to bemoaning the rising cost of everything in Britain.
The tax rot began in my view, when the previous Tory government froze income tax thresholds, creating fiscal drag of epic proportions.
Millions more will be dragged into the higher tax rate net in the rest of the decade for earning more than £50,720 – if it went up by inflation, the 40 per cent tax band should be more like £75,500.
It's no longer an outlier to be a higher-rate taxpayer, but feels like its shifting more towards the norm, and it's hard for the Government to wean itself off the money it brings in.
Add to that rising council tax, water bill hikes that have been eye-watering, increasing train prices… the list goes on and on, and I feel more than ever, hard-working Britons are fed-up.
Many are at boiling point once they calculate how much of their monthly salary is hoovered up by tax and these rising, unavoidable, bills.
And the Chancellor has added her own special ingredients into the mix, such as NI hikes for employers, farm inheritance tax changes, culling the winter fuel allowance and sticking with those frozen tax bands, with plenty of other examples below.
For the middle-classes, it has resulted in changes to their financial behaviour in the past year, as they look to shield themselves from a larger and larger tax grab, from Isas to sidestepping a future inheritance tax burden…
1. Stuffing cash into Isas
A few months ago, when it was rumoured Rachel Reeves was considering chopping the £20,000 annual allowance for cash Isas to £4,000, the first thing that sprang to mind was… if she didn't say this wasn't happening, more Britons would see the 2025/26 tax year as a last chance to stuff their tax-free accounts with cash.
Last month, she said she wouldn't cut the £20,000 overall Isa limit, but didn't say the cash element was off limits.
This lack of commitment has essentially resulted in far more money heading into cash Isas, as people see it is as a last chance opportunity to stick £20,000 into tax-free savings, rather than invest it.
If the cash allowance was cut to £4,000, it would take five years to be able to fill the same amount. Isas are crucial to higher and additional-rate taxpayers, as they keep their savings interest tax-free.
Lo-and-behold, a humongous £14billion was placed in cash Isas in April, the highest figure for any month since Isas were introduced in 1999, according to the Bank of England.
It's likely a big chunk of that has been diverted away from stocks and shares – the very product Reeves is looking for Britons to turn to.
2. Sidestepping future inheritance tax
One of the big Budget moves was to announce pensions would no longer be exempt from inheritance tax calculations.
It is likely that roughly 10 per cent of estates will be hit with IHT when the move takes place in 2027 – up from 4 per cent today. I'd expect that figure to grow higher still in the 2030s.
The Treasury is now predicted to rake in a total of £66.9billion between 2024 and the end of the decade, when the annual inheritance tax take will hit £14.3billion.
What this has done has put IHT into even sharper focus and it's likely many more savvy Britons are already planning to avoid a future tax sting for their descendants.
We're not talking ultra-wealthy here. We're talking hard working people who own a home and have saved diligently for their retirement.
The IHT plans include using the maximum tax-free gifting of £3,000 a year to children, grandchildren and relatives, and then going above that to try to benefit from the seven-year rule for giving more away.
It is also clear that interest around gifting surplus income has gained plenty of traction this year, if our traffic statistics are anything to go by.
This week, we had a story on a 59-year-old who is gifting his two daughters a monthly income from his self-invested personal pension – and you can read how to successfully do it without penalty (AKA, keep good records).
3. Moving pensions into Isas
When This is Money senior reporter Angharad Carrick wrote an article titled: Could you fall into the pension inheritance tax trap? We reveal how four families could face huge bills, there was a flurry of reader comments below stating they were busy emptying their pensions into Isas.
It's a good bellwether to see what's happening in the world of personal finance.
Trust me when I say… us journalists and editors take note of what you're saying in those comment sections.
The jury is out whether this is a good move – indeed Ian Cook, chartered financial planner at Quilter Cheviot, warns emptying a pension into an Isa to dodge inheritance tax could backfire.
Nevertheless, it's clear that some people are choosing to take this road, all thanks to a changing of goalposts when it comes to IHT and pensions.
Some people unfortunately feel the need to act and potentially rush into quick decisions.
4. Earning £100,000 is a burden
There is a feeling among those working their way up the earnings ladder that tipping above an annual salary above £100,000 is a financial own goal.
Some reader comments on our recent stories on six-figure earners state earning £100,000 doesn't make you wealthy.
A large reason for this is the fact a 60 per cent income tax rate effectively comes in for those earning between £100,000 and £125,140.
This is thanks to a move in April 2009. Against a backdrop of emergency financial crisis measures, Chancellor Alistair Darling announced the personal allowance would start to be removed at a rate of £1 for every £2 earned above £100,000.
It wasn't fixed by the Conservatives, it hasn't been fixed by the current Chancellor and hard-working people are starting to wonder if it is worth tipping over this salary level, hitting productivity and willingness to push careers to the limit.
With an enhanced childcare programme now available to those who earn under £100,000 with savings of potentially £8,000 per year, you can see the dilemma.
Sure, a nice dilemma – but a dilemma for being successful in a chosen career path nonetheless.
What would you add to the list? Let us know in the comments section below or email: editor@thisismoney.co.uk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Former Rangers owner who came close to buying Manchester United labels Sir Jim Ratcliffe's decision-making at Old Trafford as 'shoot your-head stuff'
The British steel magnate who owned Glasgow Rangers in a period when they won 35 trophies and once came close to buying Manchester United, has described Sir Jim Ratcliffe 's decision-making at Old Trafford as 'shoot your-head stuff.' Sir David Murray, who was so close to owing half of United and installing Graeme Souness as a successor to Sir Alex Ferguson in 1989 that he was even negotiating the former Liverpool captain's contract there, told Mail Sport that the club had become 'dysfunctional.' Referencing one of the most outlandish of the many eye-watering salaries being paid at Old Trafford, Murray said: 'Without being disrespectful, whatever United are doing now is dysfunctional. The guy Ratcliffe has come in… and how anyone can pay Casemiro the money [he gets] and take food off the staff and get rid of the backroom staff. That's shoot-your-head stuff. Why would anybody do that?' Ratcliffe's cost-cutting measures at Manchester United have included the closure of the staff canteen and replacing free lunches with complimentary fruit. He has stood by this decision, insisting: 'No-one ever gave me free lunches.' Casemiro, meanwhile, has commanded a wage of £370,000 a week. Referencing Ratcliffe's ownership of the Scottish Grangemouth refinery, which the United co-owner has claimed is financially unviable, Murray said of United: 'This is not a gasoline terminal. This isn't Grangemouth. It's a business thing 'The boy Ratcliffe has put his money in for a third [of United] and though I don't want to be criticising him, he's got to watch he doesn't rip the heart and soul out of the club. Because that's what's made Manchester United, like it's made Rangers. It's the people.' Murray recognised that the demise of Rangers after his disastrous sale of the club to businessman Craig Whyte in 2011 also impacted on ordinary employees at Ibrox. 'One of my big regrets about what has happened at Rangers - and I've apologised – is the impact on the hardworking people who've worked at the club,' he said. 'It's the bond that I have with those people here to this day.' Murray's agreement to buy half of United from the club's chairman Martin Edwards in 1989 came after maverick business Michael Knighton asked him to go halves on the £10million needed. Murray was confident, even asking his marketing team to produce a 12-point 'merger plan' outlining 'exactly where United and Rangers could jointly benefit.' The plan, published in Murray's new autobiography, Mettle, proposed joint United/Rangers pitches for 'advertisers', reducing administration costs by 'merging accounting and banking facilities' and 'improving players' perks' by striking joint club deals for cars and other products. 'While the formation of a power base could not be the main objective of any merger, it is an inescapable fact that a unified voice presented by Manchester United and Rangers would be a powerful one at home and in Europe,' the report also states. Murray was asked to help raise collateral for his Knighton against his co-investor's properties – which included a castle in Scotland. But the valuation process established that they were not worth the £5million he was trying to raise.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Crystal Palace's European fate could be decided TODAY after former owner John Textor rushed to sell his shares due to UEFA's multi-club ownership rules
A decision on whether Crystal Palace can play in the Europa League or not next season could be made as early as today. The Eagles' historic place in the Europa League had been under threat under UEFA's rules on multi-club ownership thanks to the fact that Eagle Football Holdings - who had a 43 per cent stake in the club - are also the owners of Lyon. John Textor, who owns the group, sold his stake in Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson in a desperate attempt to keep the south London side in the competition following their shock FA Cup Final win over Manchester City. A decision had been expected by the end of the month after Palace officials flew to UEFA HQ in Switzerland for a crunch summit. Under UEFA rules, Lyon would have taken the spot in the Europa League because they finished higher (sixth) in their domestic league than Palace (12th). Palace officials had been due in Switzerland again today, and Mail Sport understands a decision is expected either today or on Monday. The rules state that in multi-club groups the club which finished in a higher league position take precedent in such circumstances. Palace have been confident of finding a resolution given that no facilities, players or resources are shared with Lyon. It is thought that Johnson will be subject to the same set-up as Textor's firm, in that despite owning 43 per cent of the club, he will only have a quarter share of the voting rights, along with chairman Steve Parish, and US investors Josh Harris and David Blitzer. Blitzer's ownership of Danish club Brondby was another potential sticking point should Palace have been 'demoted' from the Europa League to the Europa Conference. Lyon, meanwhile, last year, reported debts of around €500 million (£418m). Textor, though, has insisted the financial state had improved before Lyon stood in front of the DNGC. The club have been relegated to Ligue 2, but the decision is subject to appeal. The relegation of the club, who faced off against Manchester United in the Europa League quarter-finals last season, will mean former Premier League stars could line up in the second tier next season. Former United and Chelsea man Nemanja Matic is on the club's books, as well as ex-Arsenal duo Ainsley Maitland-Niles and Alexandre Lacazette. They are seven-time Ligue 1 champions, last winning the league in 2008 - their seventh domestic title in a row. Palace and UEFA declined to comment.


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government expected to unveil welfare concessions after talks with Labour rebels
Labour rebels are understood to have been offered concessions by the Government on its controversial welfare reforms, with an announcement expected shortly. Number 10 had been locked in crisis talks with backbenchers after some 126 MPs within the party signed an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. On Thursday night, sources said a deal was being thrashed out between leading rebels and the Government as it seeks to head off the prospect of Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat in a crunch vote next week. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. However, concessions offered by the Government to save the Bill from defeat are understood to include a commitment that those currently receiving Pip will continue to get the allowance. This would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but fresh changes such as these would leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find more money elsewhere. Rebels had also been calling for the Government to row back on a freeze in the health element of universal credit, which was expected to lead to a £450 real decline in support for some 2.2 million existing claimants. The Government had earlier said it was listening to suggestions to improve the legislation amid concerns about the swift timetable of the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' led by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. Speaking in the Commons earlier, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He said there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' There was mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'