
Food for Peace Showed How Foreign Aid Can Benefit Both the U.S. and the World
With devastating indifference, President Donald Trump and his special assistant Elon Musk have crippled Food for Peace, a program few Americans have heard of, but one that did tremendous good for over six decades. President John F. Kennedy effectively launched the program in 1961 with the help of a special assistant of his own, George McGovern. Within a year, it was feeding tens of millions of children around the world. The press generally regarded it as one of the Kennedy administration's more impressive achievements.
Though some Republicans have critiqued foreign aid as wasteful, the Food for Peace initiative vividly illustrated how foreign aid can do incalculable humanitarian good, while helping the American economy and advancing U.S. foreign policy goals.
In the late 1950s, as a young congressman, McGovern had been a critic of foreign aid, albeit for reasons much different than those espoused today. For every dollar the U.S. spent on economic assistance in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, he pointed out, it spent $10 on military aid. The spending disparity ignored the circumstances of many of the countries receiving this aid: people did not have enough to eat, and rates of illiteracy were as high as 90%. For McGovern, the test for any program of foreign aid should be "how effectively it enables the people of the underdeveloped areas to build up the kind of society where better standards of life are possible."
This philosophy made McGovern a champion of Public Law 480, enacted under Dwight Eisenhower, in 1954, to reduce America's ruinous postwar agricultural surpluses by distributing them overseas. Critics branded PL 480 a clumsy Republican 'dumping program,' one without any overt humanitarian mission, intended only to pacify electorally important farm states. McGovern saw things much differently. Instead of spending $1 billion annually to store surplus grain, he wanted to use PL-480 to feed more of the world's hungry. Doing so would raise 'living standards' and promote 'peace and stability in the free world" he argued before Congress. McGovern and Minnesota Senator Hubert Humphrey turned his proposal into the 'Food for Peace' Act, which Congress passed in 1959.
Like many Republicans in the 1950s, Kennedy initially saw Food for Peace through a political lens, as a partial solution to the 'farm problem' which he could not ignore it during the close 1960 campaign. McGovern, who was running for Senate in South Dakota, helped him find his voice, explaining the dynamic connection between the domestic issue and foreign policy. Under McGovern's tutelage, the candidate played on the theme whenever he traveled to farm states.
For example, to thousands of cheering South Dakotans in McGovern's hometown of Mitchell, Kennedy declared the agricultural surplus 'an opportunity." No group could do more for the country than farmers if Americans 'recognize that food is strength' that gave the U.S. the power to win 'good will and friendship' from people around the world Kennedy told the crowd.
Kennedy won a narrow victory, but McGovern lost his race for the Senate. The President-elect admired the South Dakotan's agricultural expertise and his distinguished record as a B-24 bomber pilot in World War II and appointed him the first Director of Food for Peace.
McGovern set out to turn the program into a bona fide progressive instrument of foreign policy by burying the old 'surplus disposal' concept and dramatically increasing the volume of food distributed through a variety of initiatives. For example, he marshaled allotments of millions of tons of surplus American food and fiber to fuel labor-intensive economic development projects in a 'food for wages' program. In 22 underdeveloped countries, Food for Peace provided partial wage payments for over 700,000 workers engaged in land clearance, irrigation, reforestation, and the construction of roads, schools, hospitals, and agricultural cooperatives. (Workers received food not only for themselves but for their families as well.) For McGovern, this was the way to fight the Cold War—by improving the nutritional health of many millions of people while launching essential public works projects that otherwise might have gone undone.
Dearest to his heart, however, was the overseas school lunch program, which he worked tirelessly to expand in 17 countries, including Cold War hotspots like South Korea and South Vietnam. Feeding hungry school children did enormous good; it resulted in striking improvements in school attendance (often by 40 and 50%) and in the health of tens of millions of malnourished children. Pre-schoolers and nursing mothers often came at lunchtime, too. In 1962, McGovern arrived in Bombay to deliver the 14 millionth ton of wheat to India. One out of five Indian school children then received a Food for Peace lunch every day. The children, Ambassador John Kenneth Galbraith remarked at the event, 'are better fed and better read as a result of this progressive vision.'
McGovern had masterminded the greatest humanitarian achievement of the Kennedy-Johnson era; but it was one that also came with substantial economic and political benefits for the U.S. In recounting to farm audiences the successes of Food for Peace, McGovern highlighted the practical advantages: it absorbed surpluses, saved millions of dollars in storage costs, and, because American ships carried half of all the exported commodities, it benefitted the merchant marine as well. Further, the program served a Cold War purpose: the abundance produced by American farmers alleviated the worst kinds of human suffering that had spawned tyranny abroad. It was 'our most constructive instrument of foreign policy,' McGovern would tell audiences. 'American food has done more to prevent communism than all the military hardware we've shipped around the world.'
This meant that America's rural heartland was now a force in foreign policy. Indeed, 'America could make its greatest contribution to world peace by fully utilizing our agricultural abundance,' said McGovern. He often reminded farmers that they composed just 8% of the U.S. population, yet they produced a volume of commodities five times greater than did their counterparts in Russia who made up nearly half of its labor force. 'Marx,' he liked to say, "was a city boy."
This experience would have a lasting impact on McGovern's thinking about the ways powerful nations might figure in the life of weaker nations. He went on to help establish the World Food Program in 1961. Though he won a Senate race in 1962, he never forgot the lessons of Food for Peace. What today we call 'food security' became his top domestic priority. In 1968 he launched the first serious investigation of the scope of hunger and malnutrition in America, which resulted in a major expansion of the school lunch program; in 1971, he worked with Kansas Republican Senator Robert Dole to quadruple the number of families who could qualify for Food Stamps, thus (for the while) nearly eradicating hunger in America.
McGovern is best remembered today for his prescient opposition to the Vietnam War and his landslide loss in the 1972 presidential election. But he was also the statesman who, according to Robert F. Kennedy, 'almost single-handedly' transformed a mere surplus distribution venture and made it 'mean something around the rest of the world.' President Kennedy did not exaggerate when he stated proudly in 1962, 'Food for Peace has become a vital force in the world.'
In the decades since, Congress has continued to reauthorize the program with an emphasis on international food security in the underdeveloped world. Legislators also recognized that it advanced the economic standing of American farmers and the country's foreign policy goals. It remained, in Kennedy's words, 'a vital force' and the enlightened instrument of practical idealism that McGovern had crafted. As of February 2025, Food for Peace had fed upwards of some four billion people around the world.
In light of the Trump administration's approach to foreign aid, Americans today would do well to recall McGovern's legacy. For it demonstrates how foreign aid can have political and economic benefits while also accomplishing undeniable good. The history of Food for Peace exemplifies the value of internationalism and humanitarian endeavors in the making of American foreign policy.
Thomas J. Knock is professor of history in the Clements department of history at Southern Methodist University and distinguished fellow at its Center for Presidential History. He is the author of The Rise of a Prairie Statesman, The Life and Times of George McGovern; and To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump addresses the nation after US bombs Iranian three nuclear sites
President Trump is set to address the nation tonight after he announced the U.S. had dropped bombs on three sites in Iran, including the Fordow site located in a mountainside. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home,' Trump added. 'Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' The action follows days of speculation over whether the U.S. would join the Israel-Iran conflict, and comes shortly after Trump noted he would make a decision on involvement within two weeks. Trump's remarks are scheduled to begin at 10 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.

Los Angeles Times
27 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
With US airstrikes, Trump aims to deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Iran
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump with his decision to order U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear facility is gambling that direct U.S. involvement can deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Tehran while managing to avoid bringing the U.S. into an expansive regional conflict. Trump announced the strikes on three Iranian enrichment facilities — Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan — and said that a 'full payload of BOMBS was dropped' on Fordo. 'All planes are safely on their way home,' Trump added in his post. 'Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' It remained to be seen whether the attacks mark the totality of direct American involvement in strikes against Iran or the opening salvo of a larger campaign. Trump, who said he will address the nation about the strikes at 10 p.m. Eastern U.S. time, called it a 'very successful military operation.' The president also celebrated the strikes in a call with the news site Axios in which he said, 'We had great success tonight' and that 'Israel is much safer now.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday had said that Trump would decide whether to move forward with U.S. strikes on Iran within two weeks. But on Saturday afternoon, commercial flight trackers identified multiple U.S. aerial refueling tankers that were on a path suggesting that they were accompanying aircraft from the Midwest to the Pacific, raising speculation that something could be afoot. Still, the flight pattern left many in Washington speculating that an attack might happen soon but would not happen immediately because of the time it would take for the aircraft to make it to the region. But that aircraft may have been a decoy — it was not part of the the mission that was carried out early Sunday morning in Iran. Trump returned from his New Jersey golf club just after 6 p.m., and was to head to a previously scheduled meeting with his national security team. Less than two hours later, the president announced the strikes had been completed. The decision to directly involve the U.S. comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. The strikes are a perilous decision for the U.S., as Iran has pledged to retaliate if it joined the Israeli assault. The stakes are also high for Trump personally — he won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and the U.S. 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground, including at Fordo. It was not immediately clear if the U.S. bombers did in fact drop the bunker busters on the Iranian facilities. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States in advance that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic would 'result in irreparable damage for them.' And Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared 'any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the damage inflicted by the bombings. Trump has vowed that he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped that the threat of force would motivate the country's leaders to give up their nuclear program peacefully. But Trump appears to have made the calculation — at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers — that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program, perhaps permanently. The Israelis have said their offensive has already crippled Iran's air defenses, allowing them to already significantly degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. But to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel had appealed to Trump for the U.S. bunker-busting bombs, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which uses its immense weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. The penetrator is currently only delivered by the B-2 stealth bomber, which is only found in the American arsenal. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, and is believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Trump's decision for direct U.S. military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push — including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians — aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear program. For months, Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice — in April and again in late May — persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The U.S. in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and U.S. bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a 'second chance' for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump said in a social media posting. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The military showdown with Iran comes seven years after Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, U.S. and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump decried the Obama-era deal for giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behavior. Trump has bristled at criticism from some of his MAGA faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further U.S. involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end U.S. involvement in expensive and endless wars. The action by Trump immediately raised some concerns among U.S. lawmakers that the president had exceeded his authority. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., quickly posted on the social media site X: 'This is not Constitutional.' Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said on social media that Trump hit Iran without congressional authorization and lawmakers should pass a resolution he's sponsoring with Massie 'to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war.' Vice President JD Vance in a lengthy posting on X earlier this week defended his boss, while acknowledging that 'people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.' 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' Vance wrote. He added, 'I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals.' Madhani and Boak write for the Associated Press. Madhani reported from Morristown, N.J.

Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Tax Bill Would Deliver a Big Win for Private Schools—and Investors
Republicans' tax-and-spending megabill would give the school-choice movement a major, long-sought victory—and deliver an unusually generous tax break to wealthy taxpayers. The bill includes a new way for taxpayers—whether they are parents or not—to direct tax dollars to private-school scholarships instead of the Treasury. There is an extra twist: It could deliver virtually risk-free profits to some savvy investors.