Kemi Badenoch's 'panic button' reshuffle with return of top Tory to frontline
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has been accused of hitting the "panic button" with a reshuffle of her top team.
The Conservative chief, who has been struggling to revive her party's gloomy fortunes, brought gaffe-prone Sir James Cleverly back into the fold. The former Foreign Secretary, who stood against Ms Badenoch in last year's Tory leadership contest, will now be Shadow Housing Secretary.
His return to frontline politics means he will now face Deputy PM Angela Rayner, who is also Housing Secretary, in the Commons. In 2023, The Mirror reported the ex-Cabinet minister joked about giving his wife a date-rape drug - just hours after announcing a crackdown on the growing epidemic of drinks spiking.
The top Tory told female guests at a No10 reception that 'a little bit of Rohypnol in her drink every night' was 'not really illegal if it's only a little bit'. A spokesman for the ex-Home Secretary said at the time: "In what was always understood as a private conversation, James, the Home Secretary tackling spiking, made what was clearly meant to be an ironic joke - for which he apologises."
In the autumn of 2022 Sir James suggested getting rid of ex-PM Liz Truss would be a "disastrously bad idea". She announced her resignation seven days later.
The following year the ex-minister- a key face in recent Tory governments - also said he could not remember if he ever described the Conservatives' flagship Rwanda deportation scheme as "batsh**".
And the same year it was claimed he described a Labour MP's constituency as a "sh**hole". A source close to the then-Home Secretary denied the claim at the time. They added: "James made a comment. He called Alex Cunningham a sh** MP. He apologises for unparliamentary language. As was made clear...he would never criticise Stockton."
Among other appointments on Tuesday the Tory MP Kevin Hollinrake, who held the housing brief, became chairman of the Conservative Party. Ex-chairman Nigel Huddleston was appointed Shadow Culture Secretary.
A Labour source told The Mirror: 'After initially claiming her Shadow Cabinet would be in place until the next election, Kemi Badenoch has already hit the panic button." The Tory leader can shuffle as many deckchairs as she likes, but it'll still be the same old faces that were responsible for 14 years of failure. They crashed the economy and ran public services into the ground.'
The Lib Dems added: 'Kemi Badenoch has appointed the very man who said that replacing Liz Truss as Prime Minister would be a terrible idea. It's like appointing an iceberg apologist to a role steering the Titanic.
"The public won't forgive this group of failed former Conservative ministers for the damage they did to our economy and NHS."
On Tuesday the Tory MP Ed Argar also quit as Shadow Health Secretary, citing a "health scare". Ms Badenoch said she was "saddened" that Mr Argar feels "unable to continue" in his position, but agreed "that you must put your health first".
In a letter to the party leader dated July 9, Mr Argar said: "I had a health scare earlier this summer and remain grateful to the doctors and hospital staff who looked after me."
He added: "I have been well looked after, but have also listened to what the doctors said to me, and have listened to my family, and have concluded that lightening my front-bench workload over the coming months, in order to complete my recovery and fully restore my health in that period, is the sensible approach." Mr Argar was replaced by Stuart Andrew, who previously held the culture brief.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Tory membership falls under Badenoch
Membership of the Conservative Party has plummeted under Kemi Badenoch, figures reveal. The Tories have 8,000 fewer members than they did when Mrs Badenoch won the party leadership in November. The figures are likely to prompt concern among MPs that the party is failing to recover from the wipeout at the general election last year. At the time of the leadership election last year, the Tories had 131,000 members but this has since fallen to 123,000. The statistics, first reported by The Spectator and not denied by the party, are a further blow to Mrs Badenoch and come amid mounting questions about her future as party leader. The Tories have consistently lagged behind Reform UK in the polls since the beginning of the year. The party currently sits at just 17 per cent in opinion polls, behind Reform on 28 per cent and Labour on 22 per cent. A war of words between Mrs Badenoch and Mr Farage erupted last December when they accused each other of faking their parties' membership numbers. Mr Farage said that his party had more members than the Conservatives for the first time on Boxing Day last year. The Tory leader alleged that Reform's online membership tracker was 'not real' and claimed that analysis of their website showed that it automatically increased, regardless of the real number of members. Reform then invited several media outlets, including The Telegraph, to examine the system. The demonstration provided strong evidence that the ticker was based on verified membership data logged in real time through a third-party website. Mr Farage responded: 'We understand you are bitter, upset and angry that we are now the second biggest party in British politics, and that the Conservative brand is dying under your leadership. However, this [is] not an excuse to accuse us of committing fraud.' The Conservatives have also been hit by a series of defections of former MPs to Reform, most recently Sir Jake Berry, the former chairman of the party. The Tories suffered a bruising round of local elections in May, losing over 650 seats and control of all its councils amid a Reform surge. Their leader is likely to face another challenging set of May elections next year, when voters go to the polls to elect members of the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Senedd. Mrs Badenoch won the race to become Rishi Sunak's successor on the back of her 'Renewal 2030' campaign last November. She focused on returning the party to 'first principles' such as personal responsibility, freedom and family, rather than making concrete policy proposals. The approach has attracted criticism from some Tories, with over half of members saying they believed she was moving too slowly on policy development, according to a poll in April. Mrs Badenoch dismissed the claims, telling BBC Radio 4 that she was elected on such a strategy and adding: 'I'm not changing my mind or getting blown off course.' Meanwhile, Robert Jenrick, who came second to Mrs Badenoch in the race for the leadership and serves as her shadow justice secretary, continues to be the subject of speculation about a future tilt. But Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said in June that Mrs Badenoch will 'get better' as Tory leader like Margaret Thatcher did. Mrs Badenoch this week brought Sir James Cleverly, her former rival for the leadership, back onto her front bench in a move to boost party unity. As shadow housing secretary, Sir James will take on Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, making him one of the most senior frontbenchers. Last week, the former home secretary said that the Tories had to 'get out of this habit of cycling through leaders in the hope that ditching this one and picking a new one will make life easy for us'.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
State pension age rises target the north of the UK disproportionately
Increases in the pension age target the north of the UK disproportionately as Westminster closed down our industrial sector, resulting in higher levels of poverty and deprivation, meaning fewer people will live to receive their state pension. READ MORE: Labour launch review into raising retirement age When will Scots learn, and stop voting for these [[Westminster]] parties? Just because they have Scottish in their title doesn't mean they are working for Scotland. Scots need to wake up and vote for independence. SNP, you have all the political and economic ammunition to make the case, why don't you? A Wilson Stirlingshire
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘This is not action': MPs respond to David Lammy's condemnation of Israel
When David Lammy stood at the dispatch box to deliver a statement condemning Israel's killing of starving civilians in Gaza on Monday, he was met with anger from MPs. 'We want action, and this is not action,' thundered one Labour MP. 'Is this it?' another questioned. 'At what point does our basic humanity require us to take stronger action? Many of us think the red line was passed a long time ago,' a third said. The fury across the Commons was evident. 'Are words enough?' asked one veteran Tory. A second accused Lammy of 'complicity by inaction' and warned it could land him at The Hague. A Lib Dem highlighted that repeated UK expressions of regret had not prevented further carnage. A clearly despairing Lammy attempted to reassure the politicians the government was playing its part. 'Me raising my voice will not bring this war to an end. I lament that and I regret that. But am I sure that the UK government are doing everything in our power? Yes, I am.' But as international condemnation of Israel over the horrors it is inflicting on starving Palestinian civilians grows, Keir Starmer's government is struggling to convince the British public that it is doing enough. The outrage in the Commons is reflected across the country more widely, with the public increasingly regarding Israel's response since the October 7 attacks as disproportionate, as the atrocities continued. The government have been on the defensive, pointing out that it has restored funding to the UN agency UNWRA, provided millions in humanitarian assistance, sanctioned far-right Israeli ministers and those who committed settler violence, and broken off trade negotiations with Israel. But it has struggled to explain its export licensing regime. Ministers insist they have stopped the sale of arms, despite there still being more than 300 licences in operation. These include, they say, body armour sent to protect NGO workers, chemicals for Israeli universities and components for goods which are then transported to Nato allies. In particular, there is anger at the UK decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, which ministers argue is unavoidable because they are part of a global programme over which the UK does not have unilateral control. It exposes serious weaknesses in the regime and some believe the government should go further – with a fuller export embargo and an end to all military co-operation with Israel. Lammy has only recently sought to explain that RAF flights that overfly Gaza do not share information to help Israel conduct the war. 'We are not doing that. I would never do that,' he said this week. Starmer is also under pressure to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, both from his own back benches, within his cabinet and from the wider diplomatic community. Ministers say the UK will 'play its part' in working towards formal recognition, with a UN conference led by the French and Saudis later this month a key moment. Privately, they warn the move would only be symbolic unless there is a ceasefire first. But for many, who think the UK should be matching France's more hardline stance, that is not a good enough reason not to. 'If not now, then when?' one cabinet minister said. The government has stated it could issue more sanctions – with calls to do so against senior Israeli military officers, government ministers and even Benjamin Netanyahu himself. But that has not happened yet. Nor have suggestions it might expel the Israeli ambassador been heeded. 'That's unserious,' said one insider. The UK has also backed away from declaring that Israel has broken international law, insisting that while the government believes it is 'at risk' of doing so, it is up to the international courts to reach that judgment. Aides cite the same reason for avoiding the term 'genocide' to describe the horrors unfolding in Gaza. Back in the Commons on Monday, the criticism kept coming. 'The will of the House is clear on this matter: it wants action, not words. Why are you not hearing that?' a Labour MP asked. 'How could I not?' the foreign secretary responded. But while Lammy may have got the message, he appears to remain restricted by both the caution of the UK prime minister, and the realpolitik that there is only one foreign power that could single-handedly force an end to the conflict: the US. 'I wish we could, but the truth is … we are unable to do that just as the United Kingdom,' he told MPs. 'We have to work in partnership with our allies.' But for many, that will not be enough.
