Why does Putin want the Donbas? How ‘fortress belt' region scarred by 11yrs of war is tyrant's top prize in peace talks
BUFFER ZONE Why does Putin want the Donbas? How 'fortress belt' region scarred by 11yrs of war is tyrant's top prize in peace talks
PUTIN laid his cards on the table when he declared that he wants the whole of Ukraine's Donbas region in exchange for peace.
The eastern zone, home to Ukraine's "fortress belt", would be a valuable prize for Putin with murderous potential - and one he has sought for over a decade.
8
A member of the Ukrainian Volunteer Army patrol around the town of Velyka Novosilk
Credit: Getty
8
Putin said he would freeze the entire frontline if Ukraine handed over the last remaining section of the Donbas
Credit: Reuters
Advertisement
8
Fighting in raging on the frontline in Donetsk - which has seen unrest now for 11 years
Credit: Getty
8
Since invading in 2022, Russia has overrun almost the entire Donbas - comprised of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.
But one corner of the Donetsk region remains clinging on.
Advertisement
The frontline there accounts for just a fraction of the whole conflict, but suddenly the last remaining sliver of land has been thrust to the heart of the peace conversation.
At last week's Alaska summit, Putin declared he would freeze the frontline if Ukraine handed over the last remaining enclave of the Donbas.
read more on the ukraine war
SUITED… NOT BOOTED Trump pledges to protect Ukraine's security as Zelensky wins concessions
But Kyiv has consistently rejected the idea of releasing any territory it currently holds - creating a major sticking point in the negotiations.
But why is Putin so obsessed by this particular patch?
Advertisement
The Donbas is Ukraine's industrial powerhouse and holds rich reserves of coal and metal underground.
By taking it all Russia would totally suffocate the vital supply of those fossil fuels to Ukraine.
The Donbas is also a crucial strategic location in the conflict.
It is a gateway guarding the central heartland of Ukraine - built around Ukraine "fortress belt".
Moment warped Russian soldiers taunt Ukraine by flying an AMERICAN flag into battle ahead of crunch Zelensky-Trump talks
This refers to a run of fiercely-defenced towns and cities which Russia has so far failed to undo.
Advertisement
The valley around the Kazenyi Torets river, which runs through the unconquered region, has been fortified into a defensive stronghold.
Over more than a decade, defensive lines have been embedded into the terrain and the slopes measured up for artillery ranges.
Ukraine's army knows every inch of the land - hence the Russians have been unable to penetrate it.
8
Zelensky, who met Trump in the White House on Monday, has vowed not to give over any more land to Russia
Credit: AFP
8
In last week's Alaska summit, Putin made the Donbas region a key bargaining chip
Credit: Getty
Advertisement
With the Donbas out of the way, Putin's ranks would find it much easier to storm through and take large swathes of central Ukraine in any future attacks.
The region also holds a very particular history which means Russia feels a particular claim to it.
It has long been one of the most Russian speaking parts of Ukraine, and political loyalties there have sometimes landed in favour of Russia.
Donetsk was the home and main power base of Viktor Yanukovych - Ukraine's former president loyal to the Kremlin.
Yanukovych was toppled in 2014 and it was in the aftermath of this when Russia seized Crimea.
Advertisement
Unrest raged for the next eight years, with a separatist movement fuelled by Russian guns.
8
Strikes on Ukraine continued even as Zelensky and EU leaders sat down with Trump in Washington
Credit: Getty
8
A school in the Donbas destroyed school after a strike in the city of Bakhmut
Credit: AFP
Even though the people of the Donbas firmly backed Zelensky in 2019 votes, Putin used the protection of its residents as a key justification for his so-called special military operation.
He recognized two breakaway territories — the self-declared 'Donetsk People's Republic' and 'Luhansk People's Republic' — before launching his full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Advertisement
This thin excuse was debunked within hours when the marauding Russians advanced far beyond its boundaries.
While the remaining piece of land demanded by Putin may be small, the future of a vast area would be destabilised if it falls into Russian hands.
A former high-ranking Kremlin official previously warned: 'Putin has acted opportunistically; when he launched the invasion he had no fixed territorial limits in mind.
'His appetite grows once he's tasted success.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
US court overturns $464m civil fraud penalty against Trump, calling the sum 'excessive'
A US COURT has thrown out a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum 'excessive' but upholding the judgment against him. Trump's son, Don Jr, has labelled it a 'massive win'. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions. Engoron went on to order the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favourable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a 'corporate death penalty.' On Thursday, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was 'excessive' and that it 'violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Advertisement 'Massive win!' State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, could now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a 'massive win!!!' 'New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice… and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!' he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it 'weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls.' As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. - © AFP 2025
The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Ireland and UK among 21 nations to condemn Israel's plan for illegal Jerusalem settlements
IRELAND IS AMONG 21 countries to sign a joint statement calling Israel's approval of a major settlement project in the occupied West Bank 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, had been under consideration for more than two decades – but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12-square-kilometre parcel of land which would effectively cut the West Bank in two on Wednesday. The joint statement, which has also been signed by Australia, Canada and Italy, said the plans are 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms. Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden also signed the statement, as did the European Commission's foreign affairs chief. Tánaiste @SimonHarrisTD has joined 21 counterparts from Europe and globally in condemning plans for settlement construction in the E1 area of the West Bank. These plans are a violation of international law & a fundamental threat to the two-state solution - they must be reversed. — Irish Foreign Ministry (@dfatirl) August 21, 2025 Advertisement The statement noted that Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the plan 'will make a two-state solution impossible by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem'. 'This brings no benefits to the Israeli people,' the foreign ministers said. 'Instead, it risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace. The statement concluded: 'The government of Israel still has an opportunity to stop the E1 plan going any further. We encourage them to urgently retract this plan. 'Unilateral action by the Israeli government undermines our collective desire for security and prosperity in the Middle East. The Israeli government must stop settlement construction in line with UNSC Resolution 2334 and remove their restrictions on the finances of the Palestinian Authority.' The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last week. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. Related Reads American citizen killed in the West Bank died from arson by Israeli settlers, his family say 'They just want to bury him': West Bank village devastated as Israel holds onto body of slain activist Israeli settler kills Palestinian teacher and activist linked to Oscar-Winning film in West Bank The two cities are 14 miles apart by air, but Palestinians travelling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority has slammed the latest move, which has also been criticised by UN chief Antonio Guterres. Britain today summoned Israeli ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely to the foreign ministry to protest the decision. 'If implemented, these settlement plans would be a flagrant breach of international law and would divide a future Palestinian state in two, critically undermining a two-state solution,' the foreign office said in a statement. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
7 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Eddington: conspiracy and dread in small-town USA
A shocking and provocative tale of conspiracies and small-town politics gone wild as director Ari Aster continues to tackle subjects that send a shiver down the viewer's spine. This time, it's the year 2020. It's May 2020 in the New Mexico town of Eddington, we meet Sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix). A hot-headed reactionary, he lives with his wife, Louise (Emma Stone), who barely acknowledges her husband's struggles, and his deluded mother-in-law, Dawn (Deirdre O'Connell), who has fallen far down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole thanks to Facebook. While not a COVID denier, and despite being asthmatic, Joe is frustrated with the mask mandates that have just reached his sleepy apparently COVID free town. Joe pushes back, creating further friction with the progressive but smug mayor, Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), Louise's slick and self-satisfied ex. Tensions escalate when Joe decides to run against the unopposed Ted for mayor. To do so, he embraces being the anti-Ted, anti-lockdown, anti-government, and pro-conspiracy. The film's targets shift often. Both sides of the American cultural divide are skewered. Dawn is shown clutching her printed-out sheets of unsubstantiated theories, while Austin Butler's creepy YouTube guru a man who has all the answers, is clearly predatory. But the other side doesn't escape either. We meet cops who take offense at Joe not wearing a mask while sitting alone in his car in the middle of the desert, or the virtue-signalling young white activists who tie themselves in knots apologizing for speaking truth to power, all while barely noticing the rapidly advancing plans for a resource guzzling data centre just outside town, something the supposedly eco-conscious mayor is quietly supporting. The mayoral race quickly turns dirty, ideologies clash, and the political and cultural divide widens in a town that might be better off cut off from the rest of America and its problems. Eddington is a town on the brink, and its sheriff and mayoral candidate's mental health is hanging by a thread. If someone wanted to understand how America got to where it is today, pointing them towards this film would be an excellent start. Bound to be just as divisive as his previous Beau is Afraid, Ari Aster's Eddington runs a little too long and isn't as slick or focused as his previous projects, but it's still well worth your time (as was Beau is Afraid). It's a razor-sharp satire with genuinely shocking moments and pitch-perfect performances, especially from Phoenix, whose volatile sheriff is a joy to watch.
