logo
The AI Ethics Tightrope: How Leaders Can Innovate Responsibly

The AI Ethics Tightrope: How Leaders Can Innovate Responsibly

Forbes5 hours ago

Punnam Raju Manthena, Co-founder & CEO at Tekskills Inc. Partnering with clients across the globe in their digital transformation journeys.
AI has changed the very way we live; no two ways about it. AI helps companies make informed decisions and offer better services, and it can improve their revenue and bottom line. It can also improve products and, importantly, give customers a better experience. With an innate ability to automate repetitive, routine and time-consuming tasks, AI has transformed every facet of our lives, including manufacturing, distribution, transportation, healthcare, education, entertainment and more.
Challenges With AI
However, all is not so great with AI. First, AI is said to cost people their jobs. Also, there are fears that AI may allow personal information to be misused. But an equally big fear relates to cybercriminals using AI for deepfake phishing. In this, the attacker uses AI to fabricate audio, video or images that appear to be genuine and uses them to cheat or even intimidate the victim into taking actions that benefit the attacker.
According to IBM, an attacker spoke to an employee through AI exactly like the company's CFO and made him transfer about $25 million. Much the same way, an attacker scammed a U.K. energy company out of $243,000 in 2019.
There is also the fear of AI bias. An AI with built-in bias can add to existing biases, exaggerate existing or perceived discrimination or reinforce favoritism, preconceptions and stereotyping. Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University have looked at various Google online ads and observed that the platform is more likely to show high-end job openings to male candidates than to female candidates, according to ITRex Group. Similarly, a report from Chapman University in Orange, CA states that you may get biased hiring suggestions if you train your AI using data from male-biased organizations.
Deepfake and biases aside, there is also the issue of data manipulation, where the attacker uses AI not to steal your data but to alter it to make it hard for you to run your business.
So, you can see that AI gives you power, all right—but remember that you need to temper it with a sense of responsibility. When you run a company, you need to walk a tightrope in the sense that you must balance AI technology with ethical and humanistic practices.
To achieve this, you need to be both transparent and accountable. You should be transparent to make your AI system easy to use, understandable and accessible to your users, but also ensure that you or your developers are responsible for the impact it may have. Transparency helps you build your AI system, while accountability ensures that it has a positive effect on people and society.
How To Walk The AI Ethics Tightrope
OK, then. Transparency and accountability are essential to building trust and ensuring ethical AI development and deployment. Fine. But as a company, how do you do that? Rather, as a CEO, how would you ensure transparency and accountability?
To start with, you could document your data sources: how you collect, process and use the data; how you identify biases; and how you work to reduce their impact. Next, clearly define responsibilities: who will collect the data, who will develop the model, who will deploy it and who will supervise—all while ensuring these steps align with your values and goals.
Make sure your people are using AI in an ethical and responsible manner and, importantly, that they are complying with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. While doing all this, ensure that your AI systems do not perpetuate or magnify existing social biases and that they are generally beneficial to society.
Why This Matters
But why do you need to achieve transparency and accountability in your AI system? What do you stand to gain from building them into your AI? If you were to make a business case for ethical AI, looking at your efforts, your costs and the benefits, you might well say that ethical AI is like any ethical marketing effort: It earns you market trust, brand recognition and ROI in the long run.
All of this could lead to greater customer loyalty, stronger employee engagement, reduced regulatory risks and, of course, a significant competitive advantage.
Already, companies have started practicing responsible AI in developing their products and services. A case in point is IBM's watsonx Orchestrate, which automates a majority of workflows and processes and promotes fair play and inclusiveness.
This product has helped NatWest Group achieve a 20% increase in customer loyalty and a 10% decrease in call duration through the use of an AI-powered digital mortgage support tool, according to IBM. It has helped Avid Solutions slash their new customer onboarding time by 25% and reduce their legacy processes-induced errors by 10%.
Similarly, Camping World used a virtual assistant and saw a 40% hike in their customer engagement, a 33% growth in agent efficiency and a reduction in wait times.
Now, how do you govern an AI model? What are the recommended AI governance models, whether for a mid-sized or a large enterprise?
To begin with, you can view AI governance as a structure of policies, processes and rules that guide the development and use of AI to ensure safety, fairness and transparency. It aims to reduce risks related to bias and privacy while promoting the deployment of responsible AI. Governance addresses human errors in AI creation and maintenance, provides a structured approach to mitigating such risks and monitors whether the AI complies with ethical standards and societal expectations to guard against potential negative outcomes.
AI governance is essential for an organization to achieve a higher level of trust and compliance in the development and application of AI technologies.
With AI comes power. With AI power comes responsibility. As a CEO, you must walk a tightrope to balance AI-driven innovation with ethical practices. And finally, don't forget: AI compliance is not a "set it and forget it" task; it's an ongoing commitment.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China Is Way, Way Ahead in the Car Business—Can the West Catch Up?
China Is Way, Way Ahead in the Car Business—Can the West Catch Up?

Motor Trend

time22 minutes ago

  • Motor Trend

China Is Way, Way Ahead in the Car Business—Can the West Catch Up?

It's tricky for Americans to appreciate the magnitude of the technology gap that has formed and continues growing between new Chinese cars and those being produced elsewhere in the developed world. That's because our market has effectively been walled off, at least from China's homegrown brands and global nameplate electric cars. MotorTrend has attempted to lead on American press coverage of this vital market, by producing a documentary on China's inroads to Mexico (and, therefore, North America), attending Chinese auto shows, and by testing more domestic-market Chinese cars than our peer publications. The West lags behind China's rapid car development due to slower innovation cycles and differing market priorities. To catch up, Western automakers must prioritize speed, adaptability, and cost-efficiency, targeting China as the main competitor, not traditional rivals. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next So we listened, nodded, and took lots of notes as Terry Woychowski—CEO of vehicle benchmarking firm Caresoft Global, addressed the Society of Automotive Analysts and the Automotive Press Association, shared his thoughts on what it might take for The West to begin closing the gap with the Chinese. The question to ask yourselves is, do we have the resolve to implement his suggestions? Speed is a Key Differentiator China seems to better appreciate that the one thing there's simply no getting any more of, whether by hard work, cunning, guile, or force: time. Once a minute's gone, there's no getting it back. Terry recounted many examples of the huge differences in vehicle development time, noting that China typically spends one and a half to two years developing a new platform, versus legacy OEMs' four to five years. That's how Xpeng developed five platforms in nine years, launching one in 2018, another in 2020, and the next three in 2024. Volkswagen, by contrast, launched its MEB architecture in 2019; announced PPE in 2019 and launched it in 2025; while SSP was announced in 2021 and is scheduled for the 2028–2029 timeframe. He presented the chart below illustrating the phases of a model development program, each of which established automakers spend three to four times as long completing. Development Cycle Times (in months) Longer Hours Terry claims his contacts in China report a 9-9-6 paradigm that, frankly, seems utterly anathema to Western sensibilities. Engineers work from 9 in the morning to 9 at night six days per week. It is a pace they become inured to growing up in China, where admission slots to the coveted engineering colleges are extremely competitive. So they reportedly study way harder and party way less throughout their secondary and higher educations. Terry serves on the College of Engineering Advisory Board at Michigan Technological University, so he took time to visit ShanghaiTech University on a weekend day while in town for the auto show. He reported the library being jammed full. Speed of Innovation The days of Chinese R&D being jokingly referred to as 'receive and duplicate' instead of "research and development" are long gone. Terry reports BYD has filed as many as 45 patents per day . To date the Chinese giant holds 15 times as many patents as Tesla. Speed of Implementation Even when they don't think up a great idea on their own, the Chinese are way faster at implementing that idea once they see it. And they put up far less resistance to outside ideas. Some examples Woychowski provided: Tesla implemented its innovative integrated heat pump and EV thermal management 'Octovalve' on the Model Y in March 2020 and Huawei developed a similar 'super-manifold' with heat-pump capability for its AVATR models by mid-2022. Tesla switched from flexible copper onboard power cables used in Model S/Y to a lighter, cheaper, easier-to-install rigid aluminum setup on the Model 3/Y. The Chinese new-energy vehicle startups adopted this practice from their inception, while the legacy EV manufacturers still mainly use copper. Tesla proposed using the Transformer AI network (large language model) in Full Self Driving in 2021. Great Wall Motor followed suit launching its Highway Pilot in mass production the same year; Nio and Xpeng in 2022; and Li-Auto in 2023. DeepSeek was developed in China by Hangzhou DeepSeek AI Basic Technology Research Co. to make it easier to implement the Transformer AI LLM into automotive platforms. According to Terry, no traditional OEM has deployed it yet. Tesla introduced Gigacastings, and already Xpeng's are lighter and stronger than Tesla's. Tesla uses 9,000-ton presses; the Chinese are developing 16,000-ton presses that may be able to make an entire half of a car. The Chinese car buyer's top-five purchase considerations are technology (digital cockpits, smart features, ADAS, etc.), connectivity (embedded cellular connection with smartphone integration and AI assistants), relational priorities (brand status and reputation, OEM-customer ownership experience, riding comfort), non-traditional values (buying smarter, with less regard for traditional brand loyalties, focus on affordability, youthfulness), and environmental priorities (electrification, willingness to pay more for greener tech). By contrast, Terry says the main North American, European, Korean, and Japanese manufacturers ' top-five priorities are acceleration, power/torque, chassis grip and handling, NVH, and fit/finish. He contends the priority gap between Chinese and global buyers may be narrowing, suggesting a realignment of priorities might be overdue in Western automakers. Good question. And maybe not. But then again, those cars sell for vastly less money when new, and the march of technological progress may render them unsalable after six or eight years anyway. In that case, maybe they just need to be highly recyclable (or perhaps the third world will soon be able to tap into a huge cache of obsolete but still drivable cars). Structural Cost Advantages The playing field is not level and may not be level-able. There's no way to put a number on the cost savings of a government regulatory framework that is established and never gets altered by changes in the political winds. But some factors that have been quantified include the general cost to acquire land, raise capital, and borrow money, which is estimated to be 7–9 percent lower for Chinese OEMs. Chinese OEMs and suppliers are each said to be about 7 percent less profitable. One practice that might suggest potential savings for the establishment is a Chinese auto industry willingness to make common certain products and specifications, sharing some parts across manufacturers and suppliers to lower the cost for all (Caresoft attributes a 7–15 percent savings to this practice). What Must American Companies Do? Change everything. Bust paradigms. Stop prioritizing features and attributes that customers aren't willing to pay for nor care about. Establish a moon-landing mission mindset and target China as the competition, as opposed to cross-town or trans-Atlantic rivals. Lobby governments in lockstep to reduce structural costs. Most of all, take full advantage of any temporary relief tariffs may afford to lower costs and accelerate development. China faces some internal headwinds, including gross overcapacity, which is driving both the national impetus to export and an expected consolidation or culling of brands in the next few years. Some suppliers are in tenuous financial shape, which the government is looking to shore up by forcing OEMs to pay suppliers more quickly. But western automakers will only catch up by accelerating their own efforts; not by waiting and hoping for internal troubles to slow China down.

Stock Movers: Coinbase, FedEx, General Mills
Stock Movers: Coinbase, FedEx, General Mills

Bloomberg

time25 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Stock Movers: Coinbase, FedEx, General Mills

On this edition of Stock Movers: - Coinbase (COIN) shares gain after Bernstein raised the target on the crypto trading platform to $510, a Street high and 48% above Tuesday's close, from $310. The company's revenue is set to more than double by 2027 as it benefits from strong trading growth, as well as non-trading revenue lines such as staking and stablecoins, analyst Gautam Chhugani wrote in a note to clients. - FedEx (FDX) shares sank after the carrier warned that its profit would be worse than expected this quarter and declined to offer guidance for the rest of the year, underscoring the significant impact that President Donald Trump's trade war continues to have on its business. The company's shares fell 5.6% as of 9:33 a.m. in New York on Wednesday after FedEx reported quarterly results, extending their slide for the year. The shipping giant's stock was down 18% in 2025 through Tuesday's close, while the S&P 500 index rose modestly over that span. - General Mills (GIS) shares fell after the food company reported a larger-than-expected drop in 4Q organic sales, driven by a 7% decline in its North America Retail segment. GIS also projects a steeper decline in annual adjusted EPS than the current consensus estimate. 'Our full-year sales trends did not meet our expectations, driven in part by continued value-seeking orientation and weaker consumer sentiment,' CEO Jeff Harmening said.

KBW Backs AXP Amid Bold Platinum Card Overhaul and Fee Growth Potential
KBW Backs AXP Amid Bold Platinum Card Overhaul and Fee Growth Potential

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

KBW Backs AXP Amid Bold Platinum Card Overhaul and Fee Growth Potential

American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) ranks among the top stocks for an early retirement portfolio. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods kept its Outperform rating and $360 price target on American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) shares on June 17 following the announcement that the company would be updating its Platinum Cards, claiming it would be its largest card refresh expenditure ever. The firm noted that the announcement follows reports that rival Chase intends to revamp its Sapphire Reserve card this summer. An annual fee rise for the Platinum card may be part of the card refresh, which KBW analysts think would contribute to the growth of card fee income in the upcoming years. The firm also proposed that adjustments might lead to increased card account growth and engagement levels. Although there are competition pressures from Chase's anticipated Sapphire Reserve changes, KBW regarded AXP's the announcement as 'incrementally positive' for the company, adding that competitor card launches have historically had little effect on American Express Company (NYSE:AXP). American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) is a leading bank holding company that provides a comprehensive digital payment network, including credit cards, charge cards, and financing options. While we acknowledge the potential of AXP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store