logo
MAGA Newspaper Owner's AI Bot Defends KKK

MAGA Newspaper Owner's AI Bot Defends KKK

Yahoo05-03-2025

The Los Angeles Times removed its new AI-powered 'insights' feature from a column after the tool tried to defend the Ku Klux Klan.
Columnist Gustavo Arellano's Feb. 25 column reflected on Anaheim's history with the hate group after the city's council did not acknowledge the 100th anniversary of booting four Klan-affiliated council members from the group.
Arellano noted how the group's presence in the city was a 'stain' on its history, but that leaders should reflect on the lesson of 'how to combat tyranny and white supremacy — and also that the work is never really done."
But the feature produced by AI company Particle—which debuted on Monday for 'Voices' pieces and has been heavily touted by billionaire owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong—included a defense for the group under a banner that offered 'different views on the topic.'
'Local historical accounts occasionally frame the 1920s Klan as a product of 'white Protestant culture' responding to societal changes rather than an explicitly hate-driven movement, minimizing its ideological threat,' the point read.
Within hours of its debut, the feature was removed from the column. It remains available on other 'Voices' pieces that offer points of view, which includes news commentary and reviews, among others.
The Times did not respond to a request for comment. The gaffe was first spotted by New York Times reporter Ryan Mac.
The 'Insights' tool allows Times readers to generate an AI-powered summary of the piece's perspectives along with opposing views. It also tries to dictate the political bias of each article. Each summary is topped with a disclaimer: 'The following content is AI-generated and was not created by the editorial staff of the Los Angeles Times."
Soon-Shiong, who has tried to court conservative readers, touted the feature on X on Monday, months after he first unveiled plans for it.
'Now the voice and perspective from all sides can be heard, seen and read —no more echo chamber," he wrote. 'Thanks to our talented content management software team running this Graphene platform.'
The tool was criticized by the paper's union, which said it 'risks further eroding confidence in the news.'
'And the money for this endeavor could have been directed elsewhere: supporting our journalists on the ground who have had no cost-of-living increase since 2021,' its vice chair Matt Hamilton said in a statement, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Behind Florida's Sheriff's 'We Will Kill You' to Anti-Trump Protesters
Behind Florida's Sheriff's 'We Will Kill You' to Anti-Trump Protesters

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Behind Florida's Sheriff's 'We Will Kill You' to Anti-Trump Protesters

As Americans prepare for a full weekend of protests against President Donald Trump, one Florida sheriff's spooky warning is sounding off alarms on social media. Now, Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey is facing backlash after essentially threatening Florida residents organizing for 'No Kings Day' protests against Trump's birthday, military parade. In a news conference, Ivey said 'If you spit on us [law enforcement officers], you're going to the hospital and in jail.' He continued, 'If you hit one of us, you're going to the hospital and jail and most likely getting bitten by one of our big, beautiful dogs we have here.' His darkest threat came next as he confidently warned 'If you throw a brick, a fire bomb or point a gun at one of our deputies, we will be notifying your family where to collect your remains at, because we will kill you. Graveyard, dead.' He added, 'We're not going to play, this has got to stop.' With Ivey and Fla. Gov. Ron DeSantis basically giving the green light for violence against Americans using their First Amendment right, Black folks on X took it all in. 'Dear Black People, this is why we say, 'stay home,'' @ZetaGirlTech said. 'Don't allow anyone to gaslight or shame you for choosing self-preservation. Stay home!' Another user, @AirHarp, wrote 'This is what they've been waiting for,' adding, 'ThisIsWhyWeDontStand.' Other folks weren't moved by the sheriff's threats. 'Lol… continue protesting these people have no right to tell you what you should or shouldn't do,' @biggaboy0 wrote. 'Please remember that the first amendment still applies and no one can outlaw Peaceful Protest,' attorney Gerald A. Griggs said. Upwards 1,800 protests across the nation are expected to go down over the weekend. In cities like Los Angeles, New York City and Chicago, demonstrators are already showing up to counteract Trump. But in other states, like Florida, planned protests being threatened with violent force has folks thinking the state is the real problem. 'Florida seems to be the place that all of the crazy racists… are now coming out of the woodworks,' @adivunsolicited said on TikTok. Back on X, @Bigdumbdog2 said he wishes 'I could saw-off Florida like the Roadrunner does to the Coyote.' S.C. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick criticized the sheriff for his language. 'As public servants, our words matter — and threatening to kill citizens with such reckless and inflammatory language goes far beyond maintaining public safety,' she said. 'This is not acceptable, nor will it ever be.' Many folks online said Sheriff Ivey is clearly standing on one side of the fight… and it's not with the people. 'The MAGA in him is extremely strong. He has waited his whole career for this moment,' @imJohnWess said. 'What a press conference by the Klan sounds like,' @RodnyeTheoc tweeted. Despite Ivey's threats, No Kings Day protests are shaping up to be the largest mass-scale protests since the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations. Meanwhile, Trump is recruiting 6,000 soldiers, military tanks, weapons, planes, and more for his celebratory parade honoring the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army and his 79th birthday. The event will go down in Washington, D.C. despite bipartisan backlash.

Fritts, Arellano cue up talks on pension reform, roadwork and energy cost concerns at Dixon legislative update
Fritts, Arellano cue up talks on pension reform, roadwork and energy cost concerns at Dixon legislative update

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fritts, Arellano cue up talks on pension reform, roadwork and energy cost concerns at Dixon legislative update

Jun. 13—DIXON — State Sen. Li Arellano Jr. and state Rep. Bradley Fritts addressed key areas of concern Tuesday, June 10, 2025, during a legislative update at Dixon's Post House Ballroom. Arellano, R-Dixon, said he is using his first year in office to focus on relationship building, particularly with lawmakers from Chicago, as he navigates what he describes as a steep urban-rural divide in Illinois politics. He pointed to the excessive influence of Chicago in state government, arguing that gerrymandered political maps often leave rural regions such as his with little say in major policy decisions. "It [Chicago] is so large that when you gerrymander the state, you tilt the representation and the underlying democracy in favor of one city," Arellano said. Contrasting Illinois with states like Wisconsin and California, Arellano said urban centers tend to balance one another out. "In Wisconsin, it's fairly gerrymandered, but it's not gerrymandered to favor Madison. ... In Chicago, there is no counterbalance to that," Arellano said. Arellano said that imbalance often forces rural legislators into tough positions. "You get forced into some votes where you don't have a lot of input in how the bill was created," Arellano said. "You might not like the end results." Arellano said he is participating in legislative exchanges, including upcoming sessions in Chicago and Boston, to learn how lawmakers in other states handle similar challenges. He said that, ultimately, fostering dialogue across regional lines is key, adding that "a lot of times there are things that can be solved by just creating more understanding." Another pressing and longstanding challenge Arellano addressed is reform of the state's pension system, which Illinois lawmakers declined to address during the spring session. While critical of Gov. JB Pritzker on various issues, he noted the state's pension crisis predates the current administration. "With the exception of [Rod] Blagojevich, none of them have caused one of the critical economic problems in Illinois," Arellano said. "And that is, we have the worst pension funding of any state per capita." Although California has a higher total pension debt, Arellano pointed out that when adjusted for population, Illinois ranks as the most underfunded. He described the practical consequences of that shortfall, citing the state's recent budget figures. "This last budget year, we missed an actuarial accurate pension payment by about $5 billion," Arellano said. "This year is about $5.1 billion. There's about $8 billion in this year's budget that we just passed that is purely pension debt payment, not pension payment. That's a little over $12 billion. Of that $12 billion, $8 billion is debt, which tells you that if we were a normally funded state, we would have a $3 billion to $5 billion pension payment." Arellano suggested the scale of Illinois' pension debt continues to crowd out other budget priorities, reinforcing the importance of long-term fiscal reform. He also pointed to what he described as a cascading effect on the state's infrastructure and transportation systems, particularly the Illinois Department of Transportation and urban transit in Chicago. "We gutted, in part due to our debt nature, the Illinois Department of Transportation," Arellano said. "Because they contract almost everything that they do, they cost us about 140% per roadwork mile in Illinois." Arellano argued that the heavy reliance on contractors instead of in-house work has driven up costs, placing additional strain on already limited state resources. He connected these cost issues to recent legislative debates around tax hikes aimed at supporting infrastructure in Chicago. "You might have seen in the news the big Amazon tax, the delivery tax, the service tax, ... that was all bailout infrastructure in Chicago," Arellano said, adding that the state's pension debt not only eats into operational budgets but also leaves Illinois lagging in essential investments. "That is the scenario I walked into, which is the state's deeply in pension debt," Arellano said. "Because of the pension debt, we're behind in infrastructure and utilities." Arellano also touched on energy policy, highlighting key priorities for rural lawmakers, including support for nuclear development and relief from restrictions on fossil fuel infrastructure. He said that while negotiations around the energy bill stalled, he emphasized the need for long-term solutions that balance environmental goals with economic realities, particularly in rural communities that often bear the costs of urban-focused policies without seeing the benefits. With those challenges in mind, the conversation turned to Fritts, R-Dixon, who shared reflections from his second term in office and key bills he passed out of the House, including legislation to adjust audit requirements for townships, revitalize the state's motorcycle rider safety program and prohibit assessment fees on electronic statements for seniors. One of Fritts' key initiatives — a measure he introduced after passing a similar version in the previous General Assembly — adjusts audit requirements for townships and other small units of government. Fritts stated that under the current law, local governments with combined revenues of more than $850,000 must complete annual audits. Those under the threshold must do so only once every four years or when there's a change in administrative leadership. However, conflicting interpretations between the audit statute and township code, particularly over whether to include road fund revenues, have created widespread confusion. "Right now, 70% of Illinois townships are out of compliance on their audits," Fritts said, explaining that many townships inadvertently exceed the threshold once road funds are factored in, resulting in costly and sometimes unmanageable burdens for small governments with limited budgets. "I've heard anywhere from $15,000 to $25,000, and you're talking about small municipal budgets," Fritts said. "That's a lot of money." The new bill adjusts those requirements and ties the audit threshold to inflation using a Consumer Price Index escalator, ensuring the law stays relevant without needing repeated legislative updates. Another piece of legislation championed by Fritts and supported in the Senate by Arellano focused on township-level flexibility in road funding. The bill, which Fritts said came out of Whiteside County, allows townships to improve resource allocation between funds without creating imbalances, giving local governments more control over how they compensate highway commissioners and manage infrastructure budgets. Fritts also highlighted the revival of Illinois' motorcycle rider safety program, calling it "incredibly important" for public safety and community outreach. "The rider safety program was something that was put in years ago to train motorcyclists on riding," Fritts said. "It was being managed by some of the university systems that put it on their bottom priorities." According to Fritts, advocacy from the motorcycle community played a key role in pushing the issue forward. The result was legislation to restructure the program and bring it back into focus by shifting its delivery to local communities. Fritts' final bill addressed concerns over letters people were receiving informing them that assessment fees would be levied against them if they did not switch to electronic statements and automatic payments for their bills, a move he believes is "terribly unfair" to senior citizens who might have trouble navigating electronic technology and for those living in rural areas where access to the internet is limited. "I was able to push through the House a prohibition on that," Fritts said. Other topics Fritts addressed included concerns over multiple tax increases included in the fiscal 2026 budget, transit funding issues, the safe gun storage law and the potential federalization of education, emphasizing the need for a smooth transition and equitable funding.

National Portrait Gallery director to step down following Trump's ‘firing'
National Portrait Gallery director to step down following Trump's ‘firing'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

National Portrait Gallery director to step down following Trump's ‘firing'

Kim Sajet is stepping down from her position as director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, even as the network of museums disputed President Donald Trump's announcement he was terminating her last month. 'We thank Kim for her service. Her decision to put the museum first is to be applauded and appreciated. I know this was not an easy decision. She put the needs of the Institution above her own, and for that we thank her,' Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III wrote in an email sent to employees, which was shared with POLITICO. Kevin Gover, undersecretary for museums and culture, has replaced Sajet as acting director of the museum. The New York Times first reported Sajet's departure. Trump announced his attempt to fire Sajet in a Truth Social post on May 30, referring to the director as 'highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position.' But whether the president had the authority to remove Sajet was unclear — and the Smithsonian, an independent organization created by Congress, disputed that he did. Trump — and the Department of Government Efficiency — has sought to influence or take over independent organizations with ties to the government, including the U.S. Institute for Peace. Sajet's departure comes days after the Smithsonian released a statement reiterating the institution's position as an independent entity and maintaining control over personnel decisions. The statement did not name Sajet or mention the Trump administration directly. 'The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values,' the statement, released Monday, reads. The Smithsonian has been subject to mounting pressure from the administration. Trump signed an executive order in March that seeks to 'remove improper ideology' from Smithsonian-affiliated institutions, including barring exhibits or programs that 'degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy.' Sajet was the museum's first woman director, leading the institution for 12 years. 'It has been the honor of a lifetime to lead the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery. This was not an easy decision, but I believe it is the right one,' Sajet wrote in a statement shared with POLITICO. 'From the very beginning, my guiding principle has been to put the museum first. Today, I believe that stepping aside is the best way to serve the institution I hold so deeply in my heart.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store