A Glass Girl, Gods, Ghosts And An Imp. Inside Caryl Churchill's Universe
Deirdre O'Connell in GLASS. KILL. WHAT IF IF ONLY. IMP., written by Caryl Churchill and directed by ... More James Macdonald, at the Public Theater Joan Marcus
This past November when Deirdre O'Connell was sent the script of a quartet of Caryl Churchill's short plays that would be performed together, there was no question that she had to be a part of the ensemble.
'I knew that my life was about to be swallowed up with the plays. There was the brilliance of the writing. And it's rare to feel there is only mining and nothing incomplete about it,' says the Tony-winning actor about the mosaic of themes and characters in Churchill's plays Glass. Kill. What If If Only. IMP. 'All I have to do is surrender to it and try to understand how it needs to be done. Because it is perfect.'
All vastly different, yet linked together in subtle ways, the plays feature a girl made of glass who has to navigate her world, a God on a white cloud giving her take on humanity, a bunch of ghosts who have a keen insight on mortality and two kissing cousins, (who don't kiss), who may have an escaped IMP from a bottle running amok in their living room. Directed by James Macdonald, who often collaborates with Churchill, the four one acts are presented together for the first time and playing at the Public Theater.
Often considered one of the world's finest playwrights, Caryl Churchill's work delves into sexual politics, identity, power, human instincts and why we behave the way we do. A pioneering, boundary pushing playwright, she blows the lid off convention and creates her own forms.
(From left): John Ellison Conlee, Adelind Horan, and Deirdre O' Connell in GLASS. KILL. WHAT IF IF ... More ONLY. IMP Joan Marcus
Oskar Eustis, the Public Theater's artistic director calls Churchill the most influential living playwright in the English language. 'For over 50 years she has been creating utterly unique, unpredictable plays that combine formal experimentation with deep social engagement. She's a profoundly political playwright whose work is always aesthetically compelling; she's a brilliantly innovative artist whose work tackles the deepest and most difficult issues we face,' writes Eustis in the show's playbill about the Public Theater's collaboration with Churchill that has spanned nearly five decades.
'She isn't the most commercially successful writer we have; indeed, she's never aimed at that kind of success. But her influence on generations of playwrights is unequalled in the Anglo-American theater.'
O'Connell is part of an ensemble featuring Japhet Balaban, Ruby Blaut, John Ellison Conlee, Adelind Horan, Maddox Morfit-Tighe, Cecilia Ann Popp, Sathya Sridharan, Junru Wang, Ayana Workman, Kyle Cameron, Orlagh Cassidy and Anya Whelan-Smith. When asked about why she believes Churchill's work has endured all these decades O'Connell points to the depths of her writing.
'She has a very clear headed way that she looks at the world combined with this acknowledgement of its mysteries,' says O'Connell of the plays that are running at the Public Theater through May 25. 'There is the glee she has as a writer. And she offers that pleasure to the artist making it and, hopefully, to the world watching it.'
Jeryl Brunner: In the one act IMP you play Dot, a former nurse who is nursing her own bad back and stays put in her reclining armchair. While in Kill you take on the role of 'Gods' and are perched on a cloud delivering an epic monologue. Both pieces are extremely different. What is that like for you?
Deirdre O'Connell: They are each remarkable in their own way and so utterly different from each other. One kind of earns you the ability to do the other. Kill , in particular, was terribly intimidating. On the page, there is very little punctuation. It's just four single spaced pages of ferocious writing about death, war, families and cultures. It's about how the world creates an impossible situation for each generation and tries to move out of it, Yet it's impossible to do, because you are birthed into a legacy of some kind of violence and revenge fantasy. It seemed very prescient , yet she had written it around six years ago. I guess it will never stop feeling like this is the exact story that needs to be told right now.
I was terrified reading Kill . I thought, Can I just do IMP , the fun British comedy? But of course, no, you can't. You have to be able to do both things. And the fun British comedy wouldn't be the same thing without the Gods in Kill , and the Gods wouldn't be the same thing without the fun British comedy.
Brunner: Were you able to connect with Caryl Churchill at some point?
O'Connell: A little bit. She did some Zoom meetings with us from London as a group when we were beginning rehearsal. Imagine social anxiety. We didn't know each other yet. There was all of us in a room on one screen, and then there was her and her cat, by herself in London. She was very nice. It was like we all came over for tea and she was such a great hostess to us.
I did not sit down and have in-depth question answer sessions with her. We had our director James, who has worked with her so much and understands her writing so well and had directed these plays before [in the United Kingdom] a few years ago. It was funny because it was long ago enough so when I would ask him very specific questions, like: 'How did you solve this problem?' But he would say, 'I don't remember.' So we were starting from scratch, but with someone who had already figured out and knew that worked. It was as if we were working with a magician who solved the tricks but had to teach them to you.
Brunner: How has doing the play impacted you?
O'Connell: It might be something about the nature of the dark and the light of the task, but it makes me feel extremely happy. I don't always feel that way. Even when I'm in something I really like, feel excited and challenged. This is a particular kind of happiness. And even sometimes when I have the dark moments of the soul, I remember how this makes me incredibly happy. As dark as the play is, it's also extremely pleasurable to do.
Brunner: Why do you think that is?
O'Connell: I believe that has a lot to do with Carol and James. James is incredibly gentle as a director, but he also puts out breadcrumbs through the forest for you. They are these brilliant, bright breadcrumbs and you just have to follow them. He is so gentle that anytime you start to bite down, he says, 'No, no, no. You don't have to freak yourself out about this.' He has a way of not freaking out as a director, in terms of having faith that the soup will brew up into the thing it needs to be. James trusted us a lot and let us build. But at the same time, he was guiding with such a gentle hand. So I felt very held by him while feeling a lot of freedom inside a very tight structure.
(From left:) Adelind Horan, Ayana Workman, Sathya Sridharan and Japhet Balaban in Glass. Joan Marcus
Deirdre O'Connell Courtesy The Public Theater
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
14-05-2025
- Business Insider
Ryan Coogler's deal to own 'Sinners' is a gamble that could still pay off big time
After years of making films based on existing IP like Marvel comics and Apollo Creed, Ryan Coogler finally made an original movie. It could pay dividends for the rest of his life. The unique terms of Coogler's deal with Warner Bros. for his genre-bending vampire movie "Sinners" give the 38-year-old filmmaker ownership of the movie in 25 years, putting him in rare company with the likes of auteurs like Jim Jarmusch and Quentin Tarantino, both of whom have landed similar deals. And with "Sinners" becoming a box office sensation — it's brought in over $200 million domestically, making it the second-highest grossing North American release in 2025 — Coogler could have his hands under a moneymaking faucet. "He's making a lot of money off it now and has the potential to make money 25 years from now through ownership," Jonathan Handel, a veteran entertainment and technology attorney with the law firm Feig Finkel, told Business Insider. "But he's rolling the dice." Will that gamble pay off, and how, exactly, could Coogler make or lose money on the deal? Though Handel hasn't seen the contract between Coogler and Warner Bros., he used his decades of experience writing contracts for directors and stars to walk us through some scenarios to explain what could happen when Coogler regains the rights to "Sinners." Deals like Coogler's come with creative control — but they're not a blank check There are various ways a filmmaker can come to own their own work. Some use a tactic known as a "negative pickup," in which the filmmaker finds the financing and makes the movie on their own, then sells the finished project to a studio, which distributes it and does the marketing. M. Night Shyamalan did this with Universal for the 2019 thriller "Glass," and most recently, Francis Ford Coppola did it with Lionsgate for "Megalopolis." Others self-distribute, side-stepping a studio or distributor and footing the bill for the entire release. For instance, Steven Soderbergh launched Fingerprint Releasing for the run of his 2017 heist movie "Logan Lucky," while Taylor Swift made deals directly with theater chains for the release of her Eras Tour concert movie in 2023. But it's exceedingly rare to get a studio to agree to give the rights of one of its movies back to the filmmaker after some period of time. Many of the auteurs who enjoy this perk got their start on the independent film scene, where the practice was more common. Jim Jarmusch has pushed to own most of his films, while Quentin Tarantino owns "Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood" because he made a deal with Sony that grandfathered him into the rights deal he'd had since the "Pulp Fiction" days with Harvey Weinstein at Miramax Films. Creatively, the deal was something Coogler said he needed. He previously told Business Insider that his only motivation for the deal was to emphasize the film's themes of Black ownership, as the two main characters, both played by Michael B. Jordan, set out to own a juke joint in the Jim Crow South before things take a bloody turn. Handel noted that by pushing for ownership in 2050, Coogler is literally and symbolically betting on himself, and the prospect that "Sinners" will still be in the public consciousness two-plus decades from now. "Coogler would have gotten more money up front if he hadn't pushed for ownership," he said. "You have to give something to get something in negotiation. So he's definitely betting that it will have value in 25 years." Coogler could score a major licensing deal if new technology changes how we consume movies after 2050 According to Handel, Coogler could really cash in if there's a major shift in the way we watch movies after he regains the rights to "Sinners." For example, if we're suddenly watching movies on an immersive 3D platform and "Sinners" is under the ownership of Coogler, he could take in millions landing licensing agreements to view the film in that format. However, if that technology becomes the streaming of tomorrow before the rights to "Sinners" revert to Coogler in 25 years, the director could miss out, either because Warner Bros. could choose not to convert the title to that platform, or because of something called a "holdback," in which the copyright cannot revert to Coogler until certain conditions are met. "In this instance, WB might do a holdback where there can be no new version created within five years of the rights reverting," Handel said. Though this is only a hypothetical, Handel said it's an example of the level of complexity that could be in the contract Warner Bros. and Coogler signed. Even if Coogler doesn't have the rights to 'Sinners' sequels, he could still cash in The ending of "Sinners" hints at a potential franchise, and 25 years from now, Coogler would be in control to do whatever he wants in building that out. But chances are, Warner Bros. would want a sequel — maybe even more than one — a lot sooner than 2050. When that moment comes, a lot of questions about payout will depend on who has the sequel rights. Reps for Coogler and Warner Bros. did not respond to a request for comment about who holds those rights. Even if Coogler doesn't have the rights to the sequels, Handel said he would still benefit. Coogler still presumably would have profit participation on any sequels, as he does on the first movie, and if Warner Bros. wanted to do any kind of box set 25 years from now, they would have to make a deal with Coogler to have the first movie involved. "He's got the upper hand, because if I'm Warners and I own the other pictures, I have to go to Ryan and do a deal with him," Handel said. So how much money could Coogler make once the "Sinners" rights revert to him? Reports from Matthew Belloni at Puck put that figure at about $1 million a year, based on the predictions of Hollywood insiders who focus on movie libraries and licensing deals. But Handel isn't confident that any figure can be put on the deal as of now. "To contend that you can make a prediction like that is fantasy land," he told BI, noting that there are too many unknown variables to predict what Coogler could earn from "Sinners" 25 years in the future. What he is sure of is that Coogler's deal has left the rest of Hollywood interested and intrigued: "The high-level directors are having conversations with their representatives about this."
Forbes
07-05-2025
- Forbes
A Glass Girl, Gods, Ghosts And An Imp. Inside Caryl Churchill's Universe
Deirdre O'Connell in GLASS. KILL. WHAT IF IF ONLY. IMP., written by Caryl Churchill and directed by ... More James Macdonald, at the Public Theater Joan Marcus This past November when Deirdre O'Connell was sent the script of a quartet of Caryl Churchill's short plays that would be performed together, there was no question that she had to be a part of the ensemble. 'I knew that my life was about to be swallowed up with the plays. There was the brilliance of the writing. And it's rare to feel there is only mining and nothing incomplete about it,' says the Tony-winning actor about the mosaic of themes and characters in Churchill's plays Glass. Kill. What If If Only. IMP. 'All I have to do is surrender to it and try to understand how it needs to be done. Because it is perfect.' All vastly different, yet linked together in subtle ways, the plays feature a girl made of glass who has to navigate her world, a God on a white cloud giving her take on humanity, a bunch of ghosts who have a keen insight on mortality and two kissing cousins, (who don't kiss), who may have an escaped IMP from a bottle running amok in their living room. Directed by James Macdonald, who often collaborates with Churchill, the four one acts are presented together for the first time and playing at the Public Theater. Often considered one of the world's finest playwrights, Caryl Churchill's work delves into sexual politics, identity, power, human instincts and why we behave the way we do. A pioneering, boundary pushing playwright, she blows the lid off convention and creates her own forms. (From left): John Ellison Conlee, Adelind Horan, and Deirdre O' Connell in GLASS. KILL. WHAT IF IF ... More ONLY. IMP Joan Marcus Oskar Eustis, the Public Theater's artistic director calls Churchill the most influential living playwright in the English language. 'For over 50 years she has been creating utterly unique, unpredictable plays that combine formal experimentation with deep social engagement. She's a profoundly political playwright whose work is always aesthetically compelling; she's a brilliantly innovative artist whose work tackles the deepest and most difficult issues we face,' writes Eustis in the show's playbill about the Public Theater's collaboration with Churchill that has spanned nearly five decades. 'She isn't the most commercially successful writer we have; indeed, she's never aimed at that kind of success. But her influence on generations of playwrights is unequalled in the Anglo-American theater.' O'Connell is part of an ensemble featuring Japhet Balaban, Ruby Blaut, John Ellison Conlee, Adelind Horan, Maddox Morfit-Tighe, Cecilia Ann Popp, Sathya Sridharan, Junru Wang, Ayana Workman, Kyle Cameron, Orlagh Cassidy and Anya Whelan-Smith. When asked about why she believes Churchill's work has endured all these decades O'Connell points to the depths of her writing. 'She has a very clear headed way that she looks at the world combined with this acknowledgement of its mysteries,' says O'Connell of the plays that are running at the Public Theater through May 25. 'There is the glee she has as a writer. And she offers that pleasure to the artist making it and, hopefully, to the world watching it.' Jeryl Brunner: In the one act IMP you play Dot, a former nurse who is nursing her own bad back and stays put in her reclining armchair. While in Kill you take on the role of 'Gods' and are perched on a cloud delivering an epic monologue. Both pieces are extremely different. What is that like for you? Deirdre O'Connell: They are each remarkable in their own way and so utterly different from each other. One kind of earns you the ability to do the other. Kill , in particular, was terribly intimidating. On the page, there is very little punctuation. It's just four single spaced pages of ferocious writing about death, war, families and cultures. It's about how the world creates an impossible situation for each generation and tries to move out of it, Yet it's impossible to do, because you are birthed into a legacy of some kind of violence and revenge fantasy. It seemed very prescient , yet she had written it around six years ago. I guess it will never stop feeling like this is the exact story that needs to be told right now. I was terrified reading Kill . I thought, Can I just do IMP , the fun British comedy? But of course, no, you can't. You have to be able to do both things. And the fun British comedy wouldn't be the same thing without the Gods in Kill , and the Gods wouldn't be the same thing without the fun British comedy. Brunner: Were you able to connect with Caryl Churchill at some point? O'Connell: A little bit. She did some Zoom meetings with us from London as a group when we were beginning rehearsal. Imagine social anxiety. We didn't know each other yet. There was all of us in a room on one screen, and then there was her and her cat, by herself in London. She was very nice. It was like we all came over for tea and she was such a great hostess to us. I did not sit down and have in-depth question answer sessions with her. We had our director James, who has worked with her so much and understands her writing so well and had directed these plays before [in the United Kingdom] a few years ago. It was funny because it was long ago enough so when I would ask him very specific questions, like: 'How did you solve this problem?' But he would say, 'I don't remember.' So we were starting from scratch, but with someone who had already figured out and knew that worked. It was as if we were working with a magician who solved the tricks but had to teach them to you. Brunner: How has doing the play impacted you? O'Connell: It might be something about the nature of the dark and the light of the task, but it makes me feel extremely happy. I don't always feel that way. Even when I'm in something I really like, feel excited and challenged. This is a particular kind of happiness. And even sometimes when I have the dark moments of the soul, I remember how this makes me incredibly happy. As dark as the play is, it's also extremely pleasurable to do. Brunner: Why do you think that is? O'Connell: I believe that has a lot to do with Carol and James. James is incredibly gentle as a director, but he also puts out breadcrumbs through the forest for you. They are these brilliant, bright breadcrumbs and you just have to follow them. He is so gentle that anytime you start to bite down, he says, 'No, no, no. You don't have to freak yourself out about this.' He has a way of not freaking out as a director, in terms of having faith that the soup will brew up into the thing it needs to be. James trusted us a lot and let us build. But at the same time, he was guiding with such a gentle hand. So I felt very held by him while feeling a lot of freedom inside a very tight structure. (From left:) Adelind Horan, Ayana Workman, Sathya Sridharan and Japhet Balaban in Glass. Joan Marcus Deirdre O'Connell Courtesy The Public Theater
New York Times
05-05-2025
- New York Times
Branden Jacobs-Jenkins on Winning a Pulitzer for ‘Purpose'
Branden Jacobs-Jenkins was getting ready for his first Met Gala on Monday afternoon when he got the news: his latest play, 'Purpose,' which is now on Broadway, won this year's Pulitzer Prize for drama. The other finalists were Cole Escola's 'Oh, Mary!,' which is also running on Broadway, and 'The Ally,' by Itamar Moses, which had an Off Broadway run last year at the Public Theater. Jacobs-Jenkins, 40, has been a Pulitzer finalist twice before, for 'Gloria' in 2016 and for 'Everybody' in 2018, and last year he won a Tony Award for 'Appropriate.' In 2016 he also won a so-called genius grant from the MacArthur Foundation. He grew up in Washington, D.C., and now lives in Brooklyn. 'An Octoroon' and 'The Comeuppance' are among his other well-received works. 'Purpose,' directed by Phylicia Rashad, was first staged last year by Steppenwolf Theater Company in Chicago, which had commissioned the play; Jacobs-Jenkins wrote it for the company's actors. The Broadway production opened in March, and has been nominated for six Tonys, including best play. 'Purpose' is currently on Broadway at the Helen Hayes Theater in Manhattan. The cast includes, from left: LaTanya Richardson Jackson, Jon Michael Hill, Kara Young and Alana Arenas. Credit... Sara Krulwich/The New York Times Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
