Capital Group Canada Announces Cash Distribution for the Capital Group Canada ETFs (CAPM, CAPW)
Details of the "per unit" distribution amounts are as follows:
Capital Group Canada ETF
Ticker symbol
Distribution per unit ($)
CUSIP
ISIN
Payment frequency
Capital Group Multi-Sector Income Select ETFTM (Canada)
CAPM
0.117772
14021Y101
CA14021Y1016
Monthly
Capital Group World Bond Select ETFTM (Canada)
CAPW
0.093114
14021X103
CA14021X1033
Monthly
For more information on the Capital Group Canada ETFs, visit: www.capitalgroup.com/ca/en
About Capital Group
Capital International Asset Management (Canada), Inc. is part of Capital Group, a global investment management firm originating in Los Angeles, California. Since 1931, the Capital Group organization has been singularly focused on delivering superior results for long-term investors using high-conviction portfolios, rigorous research and individual accountability. As of June 30, 2025, Capital Group manages more than US$3.0 trillion in equity and fixed income assets for millions of individual and institutional investors around the world.
Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital Group organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
SOURCE Capital Group Canada
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/August2025/20/c2592.html
登入存取你的投資組合
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Link Between Hyper-Competition and Freight Fraud
Training gaps and outdated tools have left freight security full of blind spots; competition makes them wider. The trucking industry carries roughly 70% of all goods across the United States, yet it's operating in the middle of a freight recession. Volumes are down, rates are volatile, and with many providers fighting load to load just to stay in operation, competition is at an all-time high. This downturn isn't happening in a vacuum. A slowing economy means both businesses and consumers are purchasing less. Lower demand ripples directly into trucking, driving fierce competition for every shipment. And despite frequent headlines claiming otherwise, this isn't a driver shortage story. Capacity exists; it's freight demand that has shrunk, leaving carriers and brokers battling harder for fewer loads. The people on the front lines of this industry are working harder than ever – balancing coverage speed, customer service, and compliance under extreme pressure. But that same intensity comes with a cost: security practices are being stretched thin at the exact moment fraud is growing more sophisticated. The challenge isn't that companies are careless or unwilling to train their people. It's that many systems in use were built for a different market cycle, and they're showing their age. Paired with the reality of today's fraud schemes, blind spots are inevitable. The Competitive Trap Competition has always been part of freight, but a recession magnifies it. With volumes down and margins razor-thin, providers are under relentless pressure to win business. That pressure reshapes security in three ways: Immediate rewards, delayed risks: Shippers reward speed. A load booked in minutes looks like a win, while fraud may not be uncovered until weeks later. That lag makes it harder for operators under pressure to slow down and double-check. Coverage over caution: When customers are pushing for lower rates and faster turnarounds, pausing to investigate anomalies feels impossible. If one provider hesitates while another jumps, the load is gone. In this climate, every second feels like the difference between keeping and losing business. Tools outpaced by fraud: Many of the systems in use today were designed to catch traditional compliance issues, not the sophisticated identity theft and document fraud that dominate now. Providers may be following the process, but the technology itself can't see what's hiding in plain sight. Fraudsters count on that. This isn't about anyone 'cutting corners.' It's about a market that demands speed at the same time fraud has become more complex. That combination leaves blind spots wide open. The Gaps Technology Doesn't Flag Technology has transformed how freight is booked, tracked, and vetted, but it hasn't eliminated risk. Systems are built to catch what they're programmed to see: safety scores, expired insurance, duplicate MC numbers. But fraud doesn't always follow those patterns. In today's market, the absence of an alert isn't proof of safety. It's just silence. Busy, overworked operators in high-pressure, high-volume roles often have to keep moving if nothing obvious is flagged. That isn't neglect; it's the reality of covering freight in minutes, not hours. The challenge is that fraudsters know how to design their scams to pass as 'normal' inside these systems. Fraudsters count on this. They know how to slip inside the gaps: activating dormant authorities with a few legitimate trucks to appear 'normal,' forging insurance certificates that pass at first glance, or impersonating carriers whose data looks clean on a platform. On the surface, everything checks out. Underneath, the risk is already in motion. It does not help the industry when many so-called fraud prevention experts are exposing 'how' they are catching some of these anomalies. Broadcasting how a scam was detected may generate views, engagement, and impressions, but it is also tipping our hand as to what the bag guys are doing wrong. In the short term, fraudsters may be getting caught in some of these publicly advised traps, but at the end of the day we have only shown the bad guys what exactly they did wrong, and they will change it. This keeps the already battle-weary groups of legitimate carriers and brokers wondering what the next evolution of scam is coming their way. Case Studies: How Blind Spots Become Breaches Case Example 1: The Ghost Carrier with Rented Authority A logistics provider onboarded a carrier whose MC and DOT numbers checked out as valid. Their authority was active, insurance was current, and they even had a couple of trucks on file – enough to pass a surface-level review. On paper, everything looked normal. But behind the scenes, the carrier wasn't hauling most of the freight they booked. Instead, they were renting out their authority to other operators and sub-brokering loads. Because they had a minimal fleet, they could appear legitimate while moving most shipments through unaffiliated drivers. This is a classic example of illegal brokerage. The provider only realized the problem when a shipment failed to deliver and could not be traced to the supposed carrier. The authority holder insisted they hadn't hauled it themselves – and technically, they hadn't. The fraudster had simply leveraged their 'legitimacy' to hide the scheme in plain sight. Case Example 2: The Recycled MC Number A dormant authority suddenly reappeared in FMCSA records as 'active.' To a logistics provider under pressure to cover a load, it looked like a small fleet restarting operations. The system showed it as compliant, so the load was booked. What didn't show: the carrier's authority had been hijacked. The listed address no longer matched the company's history, the phone number was a VoIP line, and the 'carrier' had no verifiable equipment. The freight was immediately re-brokered, and by the time the scam was uncovered, it had vanished. Case Example 3: The Stolen Identity A mid-sized 3PL was stung by a fraud ring that impersonated a well-known regional carrier. The scammers didn't stop at recycling the carrier's MC number – they layered their deception. They created a nearly identical Gmail domain to mimic the company's email addresses, set up a prepaid phone to field calls, and even spoofed phone numbers to appear as if they were calling from the carrier's real office. In some cases, fraudsters go further still by exploiting call forwarding or even SIM hijacking, a tactic where they convince a phone carrier to transfer a number to their own device. When that happens, all calls and texts, even verification codes, are routed to the fraudster. From the outside, it looks like you're speaking to the real carrier. On the surface, everything matched. With freight moving fast, it was almost impossible for busy staff to distinguish the scammer from the legitimate carrier. By the time the deception came to light, the freight – and the money – were long gone. Turning Tools Into Real Protection No technology can replace the discipline of looking past the surface. Fraudsters know how to make their paperwork look clean and their records appear compliant inside the very systems providers trust. That's why technology should be used to support human judgment, not replace it. Compliance platforms like Carrier411, Highway, and Carrier Assure can surface carrier history, safety scores, and operating patterns. Fraud-prevention tools such as FreightValidate add identity verification and facial recognition, while DAT and Truckstop have rolled out stronger anti-fraud features on their load boards. Insurance verification services like RMIS give real-time policy checks. All of these are valuable. But the reality is that fraud doesn't always show up in a system. A COI can still be forged. An reinstated authority can still be hijacked. An email domain can still be off by a single letter. These are the small details that systems miss, and the cracks fraudsters step through. And while time is the scarcest resource in a freight recession, the few extra moments it takes to verify what's behind the data can be the difference between protecting freight or losing it. Why Security Has to Evolve The freight recession has created a paradox: at the very moment providers are working harder than ever to win and protect business, fraud is getting more sophisticated and harder to spot. Competitive pressure demands speed. Systems deliver data. But neither alone is enough to close the gaps that fraudsters exploit. The blind spots aren't the result of neglect. They're the natural outcome of a market moving faster than the tools designed to secure it; of teams asked to do more with less, in an environment where every load feels like survival. Security doesn't have to slow providers down, it simply has to evolve with the market. But the tools have to be matched with training, the process has to adapt to today's fraud schemes, and the industry has to share more openly about what's working and what isn't. Freight isn't failing because people don't care. It's failing where competition collides with outdated tools and limited time. Until that alignment is addressed, fraud will keep finding its way in. For 3PLs, brokers, and providers of every size, the path forward is clear: keep competing on speed and price alone – and risk opening the door to more fraud – or build resilience into security and give customers a reason to stay. The post The Link Between Hyper-Competition and Freight Fraud appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklo (OKLO) Partners With ABB To Enhance Aurora Powerhouse Automation And Operator Flexibility
Oklo recently gained notable attention by signing a memorandum of understanding with ABB to advance automation and safety at its digital monitoring room in Santa Clara, California. This strategic alliance could have supported the 68% increase in Oklo's share price over the last quarter. The robust collaboration highlights a shift towards efficient nuclear power technology, a focus further emphasized by regulatory milestones with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and ongoing partnerships, including those aimed at ensuring a domestic supply of nuclear fuel. These advancements may have added weight against broader market declines seen recently. Be aware that Oklo is showing 6 weaknesses in our investment analysis and 2 of those are significant. These 13 companies survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. Discover why before your portfolio feels the trade war pinch. Oklo has experienced an extraordinary share price increase, with its total returns over the last year soaring over a very large percentage. This performance substantially surpasses both the US Electric Utilities industry's 12.5% return and the broader US Market's 14.4% return over the past year. Such significant gains underscore market confidence in Oklo's advancements in nuclear technology and strategic collaborations. The company's recent strategic initiatives, as outlined in the introduction, may directly influence future revenue and earnings forecasts. Though Oklo is currently unprofitable and is expected to remain so over the next three years, its partnerships and regulatory milestones could position it for eventual revenue growth. Despite its current earnings performance, analysts have set a price target of US$69.20 for Oklo's stock, indicating a marginal premium over the current share price of US$66.57. This target reflects measured investor optimism, factoring in Oklo's potential for long-term growth amid its ongoing developments. Gain insights into Oklo's future direction by reviewing our growth report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include OKLO. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Coty Stock Is Plummeting Today
Key Points Coty beat Wall Street's sales target in fiscal Q4, but the business posted an unexpected loss. Margin pressures have investors worried about the company's earnings outlook. Coty is guiding for another substantial sales decline in the current quarter, and the margins picture is concerning. 10 stocks we like better than Coty › Coty (NYSE: COTY) stock is getting crushed in Thursday's trading. The beauty products and fragrance company's share price was down 22.3% as of 2 p.m. ET. amid the backdrop of a 0.4% loss for the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC). After the market closed yesterday, Coty published results for the fourth quarter of its last fiscal year, which ended June 30. While the company posted sales that topped Wall Street's expectations, earnings fell short of the market's target. Making matters worse, management issued guidance that suggested more pain could be on the horizon. Coty stock crashes on big earnings miss Coty reported a non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) adjusted loss of $0.05 per share on sales of $1.25 billion. While the company's sales performance topped the average Wall Street analyst estimate by $40 million, its earnings performance fell short of the consensus target by $0.07 per share. With the business posting an unexpected loss and sales declining 8.1% year over year in the quarter, the consumer goods specialist is looking significantly weaker coming out of its latest quarterly report. What's next for Coty? While Coty is seeing some growth in its prestige-fragrance product category, the company's latest business update didn't arrive with much for investors to be excited about. Coty reiterated its guidance for like-for-like (LFL) sales to improve over the levels seen last quarter in the current fiscal year, but management said that it expects an LFL sales decline between 6% and 8% in fiscal Q1. With worse-than-expected margins leading to an unexpected loss last quarter and guidance for another big sales decline in the current quarter, Coty's earnings outlook has taken a substantial turn for the worse. Should you invest $1,000 in Coty right now? Before you buy stock in Coty, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Coty wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $654,624!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,075,117!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Coty Stock Is Plummeting Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio