logo
Understanding Trump's CVI diagnosis

Understanding Trump's CVI diagnosis

Politico18-07-2025
Presented by
Driving the Day
WHAT IS CVI? President Donald Trump was recently diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a medical condition that's the result of damaged leg veins struggling to pump blood to the heart. Sean Barbabella, the president's physician, said in a letter released to the public that Trump 'remains in excellent health' — but medical experts say the condition is important to monitor.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump tested for other, more serious complications that sometimes go hand in hand with chronic venous insufficiency, but none were found. 'No signs of heart failure, renal impairment or systemic illness were identified,' she said.
Here are some things to know about CVI.
It's very common: CVI affects about 1 in 20 adults, according to the Cleveland Clinic. It's especially common in older adults, and the risk increases with age.
Trump turned 79 last month.
It's generally mild but can worsen over time: If left untreated, it can cause a range of symptoms, including swelling, cramps, skin changes, leg ulcers and varicose veins.
'What's interesting about this is that it runs the spectrum from very, very mild — where you might have a little bit of swelling, maybe a few varicose veins — to very severe, where you have very severe swelling, skin changes, hyperpigmentation, sort of fibrosis or leather appearance of the skin and even wounds,' said Dr. Thomas Maldonado, a vascular surgeon and medical director of the Venous Thromboembolic Center at NYU Langone Health, who is not involved in Trump's care. 'It's chronic, and over the course of a lifetime, especially as we age, this can be more severe.'
Barbabella called CVI 'a benign and common condition, particularly in individuals over 70' in a letter released to the public.
A range of treatment options: Barbabella, in his letter, didn't specify what treatments — if any — Trump would be undergoing.
Lifestyle changes, like regular exercise, leg elevation and weight management, are typically the first steps in treating CVI, according to Maldonado. Compression therapy, which involves wearing tight stockings or bandages, is also an option.
Oral anticoagulants are sometimes prescribed to prevent blood clots from forming, and in more severe cases, minimally invasive procedures and surgery are used.
But those options are typically used only if the vein is 'superficial,' or close to the skin. In cases where deeper veins are damaged, treatment is more complicated.
'Sometimes the ultrasound will show it's mostly in the deep system. And unfortunately, those are sacred. We can't really do surgery or shut those veins down. They're critical for the circulation,' said Maldonado.
WELCOME TO FRIDAY PULSE. Some nutrition experts argue that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s push to remove synthetic dyes from ice cream won't move the needle on health. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@politico.com and sgardner@politico.com, and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj.
In Congress
RESCISSIONS PACKAGE PASSES — House Republicans gave final approval just after midnight Friday to President Donald Trump's proposal to claw back $9 billion in public media and foreign assistance, green-lighting the Senate's changes to the measure that will bake in proposed DOGE cuts to public media and foreign aid. The package now heads to the president's desk.
The House's 216-213 vote to clear the Senate-amended package comes less than 24 hours after the Senate voted to tweak the administration's original proposal that would have cut an additional $400 million from the global AIDS fighting program, the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR. Senate Republicans also added language vowing that certain food-assistance programs would be protected and staved off impacts to other food aid, maternal health, malaria and tuberculosis-related initiatives.
'This bill tonight is part of continuing that trend of getting spending under control. Does it answer all the problems? No. Nine billion dollars is a good start,' said House Majority Leader Steve Scalise.
In the House, the chamber's top Democratic appropriator, Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, said Republicans' approval of the clawbacks package was tantamount to 'a rubber stamp on the Trump administration's stealing' from the American people.
'This rescissions bill is another effort to subvert the Congress' power of the purse,'' she said.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
RISKY RESEARCH REBUKE — HHS accused its own staff of 'malicious compliance' in compiling a list of agency-funded experiments that President Donald Trump has ordered the agency to review and possibly halt because the administration believes they could endanger the public, POLITICO's Erin Schumaker reports.
According to a Thursday post on the agency's official X account, staff at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had acted inappropriately by omitting certain grants while compiling a qualification list.
On Wednesday, The Washington Post reported that NIH Principal Deputy Director Matt Memoli, the agency's No. 2 official, had added 11 new grants to the list career staff had compiled, overriding them in classifying tuberculosis studies NIH reviewers deemed safe as potentially dangerous gain-of-function research.
'Memoli corrected NIAID staff to assure that NIH was in compliance with the [executive order] by ordering them to submit the full list for temporary pause,' the agency's X post said.
Contacted by POLITICO, an official at HHS described the behavior as 'malicious compliance' and said the administration wouldn't tolerate it.
The list the agency ultimately adopted includes 40 experiments that the administration believes could constitute dangerous gain-of-function research, which involves altering pathogens to make them more transmissible or deadly to study them, according to a Washington Post report.
Why it matters: Trump and many Republicans in Congress believe the Covid-19 pandemic was caused by a lab leak stemming from gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China, where the virus first emerged. The scientific community believes the virus most likely spilled over from animals into humans.
The executive order banned federal funding to countries Trump said have insufficient research oversight and ordered a pause on U.S. research on 'infectious pathogens and toxins' that pose a danger to the public.
What's next? The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy will decide whether to halt funding the experiments.
Medicare
WOUND-CARE CRACKDOWN — Some health providers are ecstatic that CMS is going after a billion-dollar Medicare scam — but they want regulators to guarantee they won't be hurt financially, POLITICO's Robert King reports.
On Monday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed to slash Medicare spending on pricey wound care treatments that have become a magnet for fraud. Accountable care organizations, which manage Medicare costs, first identified the fraud and lauded the move. But they don't want to be held responsible for the out-of-control spending caused by bad actors.
'The financial consequences of fraud should rest with those responsible for it, not with ACOs striving to uphold the integrity of value-based care,' said Nicole Bradberry, CEO of the advocacy groups the Florida Association of ACOs and the Texas Association of ACOs.
ACOs are groups of doctors and hospitals that agree to keep their Medicare spending below a certain level. They receive a share of any savings but must pay Medicare for exceeding their targets.
A few years ago, some ACOs noticed big spikes in Medicare spending on skin substitutes that mimic human skin and are used to treat burn victims. CMS' projected spending on the pricey treatments shot up from $256 million in 2019 to more than $10 billion in 2024.
The increase stemmed largely from independent wound-care clinics billing for medically unnecessary treatments, according to CMS investigations. Beneficiaries can be treated at a home health or independent clinic not affiliated with an ACO, but costs are still attributed to the ACO responsible for those patients' care.
The agency proposed reclassifying the treatments and slashing spending by 90 percent. But ACOs are worried they'll still be responsible for increased spending they had nothing to do with.
CMS said in a statement that it understood the ACO's concerns but didn't comment on whether it would release a rule to address the issue.
Industry Intel
FIRST IN PULSE: FIGHT 340B FRAUD — Roughly 40 conservative leaders, including Grover Norquist, who heads Americans for Tax Reform, are calling on Republican congressional leaders to crack down on the 340B drug-pricing program, which provides discounted prices for certain so-called safety-net providers to purchase outpatient drugs.
'The 340B program is supposed to help hospitals provide care to indigent populations at low or no cost, but it is now routinely used fraudulently,' the leaders wrote in a letter. 'Hospitals serving low income areas receive the medicines at low or no cost, but then distribute them throughout a vast hospital network, specifically targeting affluent areas, and increasing the price for everyone.'
Hospital groups have argued that 340B financially props up hospitals that serve low-income patients, and if the program were overhauled, it could mean closures and loss of access to care.
In the spotlight: Congressional Republicans have long floated reforming 340B, arguing that it is frequently abused. But with Trump in the White House and Republicans holding both chambers of Congress, 340B reform has been top of mind in many conservative circles.
In April, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, released a report calling for more transparency in the program, and the Trump administration has indicated it wants to move oversight of 340B from Health Resources and Services Administration to CMS, where the program could face more intense scrutiny.
WHAT WE'RE READING
Reuters' Diana Novak Jones reports on Democratic attorneys general suing to block HHS changes to ACA health insurance marketplaces.
STAT's Olivia Goldhill reports on suicide rates rising in older men.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Indefinitely Postponed A Critical Meeting — And It Could Have 'Devastating Effects' On All Of Us
RFK Indefinitely Postponed A Critical Meeting — And It Could Have 'Devastating Effects' On All Of Us

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Indefinitely Postponed A Critical Meeting — And It Could Have 'Devastating Effects' On All Of Us

It's hard to keep track of the funding cuts, layoffs, vaccine recommendation changes and other major shake-ups happening within the country's federal public health organizations at the hands of the Trump administration and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary. One of the latest changes is RFK Jr's postponement of a preventive health panel meeting by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which was scheduled for July 10 and the rumored dismissal of all task force members, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. The USPSTF sets guidelines for preventive health screenings for conditions such as diabetes, depression and cancer in children and adults. Insurance companies are then required to cover these screenings based on the USPSTF's guidelines. This news comes not long after Kennedy postponed the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which sets vaccine recommendations, and replaced the entire committee with individuals known to spread vaccine and health misinformation, according to earlier HuffPost reporting. The changes to the USPSTF meeting and task force members is worrisome for a few reasons and could directly impact your health. Here's what doctors want you to know: This task force sets preventive screening recommendations. Changes or delays to the meeting schedule can mean missed diagnoses or changes to what insurance companies cover. The United States Preventive Services Task Force, which was formed in 1984, is a group of non-partisan volunteers who are 'nationally recognized experts' in the fields of primary care, prevention and evidence-based medicine, according to the USPTF website. All members are screened for biases, are chosen through public nomination and appointed by the Health and Human Services secretary. They serve four-year terms with new task force members rotating in each year. 'The cancellation of this specific task force ... is going to affect every American if [Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services does] what they did to the ACIP and fire or remove the 16 independent medical experts who really scour the literature and then grade the evidence for each of their recommendations,' Dr. Anita Patel, a pediatric critical care doctor in Washington, D.C., told HuffPost. Once again, this hasn't been done yet, but it is allegedly in the works. One of the significant roles of the task force is to make recommendations and guidelines for preventative care services such as mammograms, colonoscopies, depression screenings and more, said Patel. Insurance companies are then required to cover these screenings and services as part of the Affordable Care Act. Doctors across the country also follow these guidelines when recommending health services for patients. In response to the reports of the dismissal of current task force members, the American Medical Association sent a letter to RFK Jr. in support of the task force in which they said, 'USPSTF plays a critical, non-partisan role in guiding physicians' efforts to prevent disease and improve the health of patients by helping to ensure access to evidence-based clinical preventive services.' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) also backed the task force by introducing a resolution that underscores the importance of the group, according to NPR. 'If the [task force] is unable to continue its work, this could have devastating effects on access to preventive services,' Dr. Oni Blackstock, a primary care physician and executive director of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consultancy, told HuffPost via email. 'We [already] know millions of Americans are at risk for losing their Medicaid,' Blackstock said, referring to the nearly $1 trillion cuts in Medicaid as part of the so-called Big, Beautiful Bill. 'Now, many others who have insurance coverage will be at risk for losing no-cost coverage of preventive care services,' added Blackstock. It's worth knowing that the meeting is currently postponed; it's not clear when it will happen instead, and who will be part of the task force when that time comes. But, as of now, what the task force recommends hasn't changed. 'Canceling the USPSTF meeting without a clear plan to reschedule puts essential, evidence-based health guidance at risk, including continued access to preventive services that millions of Americans rely on, from cancer and diabetes screenings to depression checks to support for breastfeeding,' Dr. David Higgins, a pediatrician and preventive medicine specialist at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, told HuffPost via email. Any delays to the task force's meeting schedule can also cause issues. 'Delays or disruptions can mean delayed diagnoses, missed opportunities for early treatment, and ultimately, worse health outcomes,' added Higgins. Not only do these changes threaten the guidance from the task force, but they 'affect whether a patient catches their cancer early enough or a person with chronic heart disease gets optimal treatment,' he noted. The task force was recently criticized for being 'woke,' which some experts think is why it's being targeted now. 'Unfortunately, this [postponement] fits a troubling pattern of political interference in scientific and public health processes,' Higgins said. Just a few days after Kennedy told panel members that the preventive health meeting was postponed, 'The American Conservative' published an essay titled 'Time for Kennedy to Kill the USPSTF.' The article claimed the task force is 'woke' and follows 'left-wing ideological orthodoxy' and is part of the 'deep state,' among other things. 'The claim that the task force is driven by 'woke' ideology is a political talking point, not a reflection of how the USPSTF actually operates,' said Higgins. 'Their work is based on a rigorous review of scientific evidence. Identifying and addressing disparities in health outcomes is part of delivering high-quality care,' Higgins added. It's well-established that certain demographics do have worse health care outcomes; Black people have higher rates of maternal mortality than other groups, upward of 50% of Latinx folks are predicted to be diagnosed with diabetes, Black people are 30% more likely to have asthma than white people and the list goes on. The task force should be considering how race and gender impacts health outcomes. Blackstock noted that USPSTF hasn't always done this, but that is changing. 'It's lacked community voices and, for a long time, didn't focus on health equity or racism's impact on health and was not focused on ensuring diverse representation among its members,' Blackstock said. Recently, though, this has changed, and the task force has worked to address these issues, Blackstock added. 'It has taken steps to formalize the use of inclusive language, and to flag if data is missing for a population, particularly those that are minoritized,' Blackstock said. The group is also piloting an equity checklist that helps integrate equity throughout the screening recommendation process, Blackstock noted. These recent steps put a target on USPSTF's back, she said. 'I believe this is why the [task force] is being targeted, because it is paying attention to health inequities and racism's harmful effects on health,' Blackstock said. Patel added that USPSTF isn't taking care away from white Americans. Instead, it's 'trying to level the playing field so that everyone got equal care,' Patel noted. 'But, of course, [critics of the task force] saw the term 'diversity' or 'equity' and really tried to blow up one part of a much larger organization to play to their base and say, 'Hey, these guys are woke idiots,'' Patel said. USPSTF is now trying to advance medicine and make sure everyone, no matter where they live or what they look like, has access to preventive health screenings. The task force is here to 'take out the inherent racism that we've had in medicine for decades that has been really unduly perpetuated,' Patel noted. While racism does certainly still exist in medicine, awareness allows medical professionals to address any biases and make sure everyone gets the care they deserve regardless of their race, socioeconomic background or ethnicity, Patel noted. 'It's an evil thing to walk back all of these medical and diversity advancements that we've made in the past decade just because they want to pander to their base. It's unconscionable,' Patel said. Related... Experts Say Trump's Big Bill Will Shut Down This 1 Type Of Hospital — And It'll Impact Multitudes COVID Cases Are Rising This Summer, But Not All The Data Shows It — Here's Why RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It Solve the daily Crossword

States sue Trump admin over trans care access
States sue Trump admin over trans care access

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

States sue Trump admin over trans care access

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia are suing the Trump administration over what they charge is a coordinated federal effort to intimidate health care providers into stopping gender-affirming care for individuals under age 19. The big picture: The suit revolved around a January executive order President Trump issued and subsequent administration actions the states say amount to an attempt to enforce a nationwide ban on transition-related care. The latest: The administration actions are not only denying medically necessary care but coercing hospitals and doctors into violating anti-discrimination and other state laws, according to the complaint. The suit referenced Justice Department guidance threatening criminal prosecution of providers, investigations of hospitals, and demands for patient data. The states asked the court for an injunction, saying the actions were unlawful and intrude on their authority to enforce their own laws. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts by attorneys general from California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island and Wisconsin. Pennsylvania Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro was also listed as a plaintiff. Between the lines: While courts have temporarily blocked the administration from stripping federal funding from providers of gender-affirming medical services to minors, the Justice Department has taken other steps, including subpoenaing doctors for patient information. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission has launched an inquiry into whether providers are making false claims about gender-affirming care's benefits or not disclosing risks. The efforts have prompted major hospitals to pause or shut down on transition-related services in states where they remain legal. "This reduction in services has caused significant harm to transgender adolescents in the Plaintiff States, depriving them of essential care at a critical time in their development," the states argue in the complaint. What they're saying:"The federal government is running a cruel and targeted harassment campaign against providers who offer lawful, lifesaving care to children," New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. The White House last week claimed credit for making providers halt what it termed "child sexual mutilation," issuing a release listing more than a dozen health systems that stopped providing puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgeries. "For years, politicians have promised to end the barbaric, pseudoscientific practice — but President Trump is the only one who has actually delivered," it said in a statement. About 40% of transgender youth live in the 27 states that already limit access to gender-affirming care for minors, according to KFF. Of those states, 17 currently face legal challenges to their policies.

Video/Pic: Trump demands drug companies lower prices
Video/Pic: Trump demands drug companies lower prices

American Military News

time4 hours ago

  • American Military News

Video/Pic: Trump demands drug companies lower prices

President Donald Trump sent 17 pharmaceutical companies letters on Thursday and demanded that the companies lower prices for Americans. The president warned that the 'unacceptable burden' of prescription drug prices will 'end' with his administration. During a press briefing on Thursday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, 'The president signed an executive order earlier this year to solve the problem of exorbitant pharmaceutical pricing.' 'According to recent data, the prices that Americans have been paying for brand-name drugs are more than three times the price other similarly developed nations pay,' Leavitt added. 'The president is determined to solve this problem and took further action today. He has signed 17 letters to pharmaceutical companies' CEOs.' .@PressSec reads one of the letters sent by @POTUS today to the CEOs of pharmaceutical companies: "Moving forward, the only thing I will accept from drug manufacturers is a commitment that provides American families immediate relief from the vastly inflated drug prices…" — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 31, 2025 Leavitt also shared the letter Trump wrote to the CEO of Eli Lilly and Company. In the letter, Trump warned Eli Lilly and 16 other pharmaceutical companies that the 'unacceptable burden' of brand-name drugs costing 'up to three times higher on average' for Americans than for citizens of other countries 'ends with my administration.' Trump told the pharmaceutical companies, 'Most proposals the Trump administration has received to resolve this critical issue promised more of the same shifting blame and requesting policy changes that would result in billions of dollars in handouts to industry.' The president added, 'Moving forward, the only thing I will accept from drug manufacturers is a commitment that provides American families immediate relief from the vastly inflated drug prices and an end to the free ride of American innovation by European and other developed nations.' READ MORE: Video: Trump order against 'Big Pharma' aims to reduce drug prices While Trump explained that a collaborative effort to reach 'global pricing parity' would be most effective for pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. government, and U.S. patients, he warned that his administration will 'deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families' if pharmaceutical companies refuse to take action. In addition to the letter sent to Eli Lilly and Company, Trump sent letters to AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. In the letters, Trump gave the companies 60 days to extend 'Most-Favored-Nation' pricing to Medicaid and provide 'full portfolios' of drugs for Medicaid patients, guarantee Most-Favored-Nation pricing for new drugs, negotiate with 'foreign freeloading nations' and return 'increased revenues abroad' to patients in the United States, and allow Americans to directly purchase drugs at Most-Favored-Nation prices. Today, @POTUS sent letters to 17 drug manufacturers outlining steps they must take to bring down prescription drug prices. If they refuse to step up, the Administration will use every tool to protect Americans from continued abusive drug pricing practices. Letter to Eli Lilly: — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 31, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store