US stocks mixed as indexes struggle to retain records
A Financial Times report indicating Donald Trump was pushing for steep new tariffs on European Union products sent markets lower before they partly recovered. Photo: Reuters
Wall Street stocks closed mixed on Friday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq struggling to log significant gains as investors awaited further corporate results and remarks by the Federal Reserve chair next week.
The Dow slumped by 0.3 percent to 44,342, the S&P 500 was flat at 6,296, and the Nasdaq ended little changed at 20,895.
"Investors are gearing up for next week," said Peter Cardillo of Spartan Capital Securities, noting that major brands like Coca-Cola, Tesla and Mattel are set to report their earnings.
Briefing.com added in a note that "a lack of major developments has kept the major averages drifting sideways since falling from session highs this morning."
For now, traders shrugged off a Financial Times report on Friday that US President Donald Trump is pushing for a minimum tariff of 15-20 percent on European Union products in any deal with the bloc.
This would mark a higher level than the 10 percent added tariff the EU – and most other US trading partners – are facing.
Markets also digested the preliminary results of a University of Michigan survey, which found that consumer sentiment crept up to the highest value in five months in July, although still substantially below its historical average.
Looking ahead to next week, traders will be eyeing Fed Chair Jerome Powell's remarks on Tuesday at a conference in Washington. (AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariffs to hurt the US more than most others
The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is professor of economics, Auckland University of Technology This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How the trade war is turbocharging an American rare earth mine: ‘it's all changed'
For Joshua Ballard, the US' trade war against China has been a game-changer. The CEO of USA Rare Earth – a company launched in 2019 with the goal of reviving America's rare earth magnet supply chain – was having a hard time raising capital from Wall Street until a few months ago. China has dominated the rare earths sector for decades, with its firms having a huge competitive advantage due to their lower costs and massive capacity, making the American company's vision a tough sell to investors. But then came US President Donald Trump's return to office. After a US tariff blitz led Beijing to impose export controls on seven rare earth elements, America's vulnerability was exposed in vivid fashion as a string of blue-chip American companies warned that a lack of magnets could soon disrupt their production All of a sudden, the investment environment 'all changed', Ballard said, and the CEO has been quick to take advantage. 'We're looking at how we can accelerate,' he told the Post in an interview near his home in the San Francisco Bay Area. 'We want to be a major player in this.'
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
White House defends Trump's firing of labour statistics head over US jobs data
White House economic advisers on Sunday defended US President Donald Trump's firing of the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics , pushing back against criticism that Trump's action could undermine confidence in official US economic data. Later on Sunday, Trump again criticised BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, without providing evidence of wrongdoing, and said he would name a new BLS commissioner in the next three or four days. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had 'real concerns' about the BLS data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president 'is right to call for new leadership'. Hassett said on Fox News Sunday the main concern was Friday's BLS report of net downward revisions showing 258,000 fewer jobs had been created in May and June than previously reported. Erika McEntarfer, who was fired as BLS Commissioner. Photo: US Bureau of Labour Statistics via Reuters Trump accused McEntarfer of faking the jobs numbers, without providing any evidence of data manipulation. The BLS compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data.
