22 killed after suicide bomber opens fire at church in Syria - and then detonates explosive vest
This is the first such incident since Bashar al Assad was toppled in December, and officials claim the attacker was a member of Islamic State.
It happened at a Greek Orthodox church in Damascus, with estimates suggesting that 350 worshippers were praying there at the time.
Witnesses said the perpetrator had his face covered when he began shooting - and blew himself up as crowds attempted to remove him from the building.
A security source told Reuters that two men were involved in the attack, with a priest saying he saw a second gunman at the entrance.
Officials say 63 people were injured, and children were among the casualties.
Syria's information minister, Hamza Mostafa, condemned the terrorist attack - writing on X: "This cowardly act goes against the civic values that bring us together.
"We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship... and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organisations."
Reports suggest that IS has attempted to attack several churches in Syria since Assad fell, but this is the first time they have succeeded.
Footage filmed by Syria's civil defence, the White Helmets, showed scenes of destruction inside the church - including bloodied floors and shattered pews.
The Greek foreign ministry says it "unequivocally condemns the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing", and called on Syria "to guarantee the safety" of Christians with new measures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Whatever Gaza's future, October 7 was the beginning of Netanyahu's end
Israel's military operations against Gaza City have begun, accompanied by protests in Israeli cities and widespread international condemnation. Envisaged as the last stage in Israel's campaign to destroy Hamas as the force responsible for the October 7 attacks, the ground offensive is as high-risk as any of the previous Gaza assaults by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) – and one of the most contentious. The security cabinet took the best part of a day to sign off on it two weeks ago, with senior military figures publicly voicing misgivings. Ongoing street protests swelled, against the perils of the operation itself, against the call-up of 60,000 reservists (with highly unusual appeals from some for recruits to refuse the call-up), and fears that this new operation in Gaza will make the return of Israel's remaining hostages, of whom 20 may still be alive, an even more remote prospect than it already is. Negotiations for a new ceasefire and possible hostage releases have been resumed with Qatar and Egypt, but with Israel's position being that any ceasefire is conditional on the return of all hostages, and previous rounds of talks having failed, there can be little confidence in success. Meanwhile, the enforced evacuation of more than a million people from Gaza City into the rest of the devastated Strip is in progress. Presiding over all this is the prime minister who has dominated Israeli politics for nearly 30 years, Benjamin Netanyahu, whose political stamina has helped to keep him in his job, even as crises and scandals have threatened to topple him. As the Gaza City operation begins, a legitimate question is whether this could finally prove a risk too far. Israel's operation against the Gaza Strip, whose professed aim was to destroy Hamas, has turned out to be in many ways a very uncharacteristic campaign on Israel's part. It has appeared clumsy, lacking in overall direction, extravagant in firepower, ruthless in the scale of casualties, and inefficient and vindictive in the provision of humanitarian assistance. It is hard to understand how, facing an adversary so relatively poorly equipped, a country and a military known for their precision elsewhere could have caused such devastation over so long in a territory it well knew from its earlier occupation. Part of the explanation may be the very asymmetry of capabilities and the extent to which Hamas was, and remains, embedded in the population. But another has surely been the presence of Israeli hostages, with Israel essentially pursuing two incompatible goals: rooting out Hamas and securing all the hostages' release, if possible, alive. With no hostages, Israel's operations in Gaza could have been a great deal simpler, if no less brutal. Hamas's apparent understanding of the value Israel places on the lives of its own may have been part of its rationale on 7 October. But the effect has not only to complicate Israel's military plans, but to divide Israelis between those who think their leaders should have been more amenable to ceasefires in the hope of speeding the safe return of the hostages and those for whom defeat of Hamas, and vengeance for 7 October, was paramount. Fractures have also opened up between sections of the military, with the army's chief of staff among those publicly questioning the wisdom of the Gaza City offensive. Divisions are also evident among some veterans refusing to re-enlist, and reservists saying they will refuse the call-up. This is a level of dissent perhaps unprecedented in a country where, except for the Orthodox Jews, the duty to serve in the military is an article of national faith. These divisions may eventually prove fatal for Netanyahu, but not yet. He has remained in power precisely because he remains the only person able to maintain the complex coalitions that Israeli elections produce. Maybe, as is sometimes said, his concern to hang on to power reflects his risk of prosecution for corruption if and when he leaves office. But his longevity probably reflects more a popular reluctance to change leaders when the security of the state may seem under threat. As for whether what appears at this point to be a murderous and mismanaged operation that has still not defeated Hamas will turn out to be the failure that ends and defines Netanyahu's career, I would rather suggest the events that precipitated it. The killings of 7 October 2023 stand as a colossal failure of intelligence and security in a country widely seen as a byword for both, and they happened on his watch. It is understandable that he would choose to stay in office to initiate the response and then relentlessly defy every setback in pursuit of the desired end. Whatever the future of Gaza, however, it is 7 October that will forever be the beginning of Netanyahu's end.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
British troops could uphold a ceasefire in Ukraine and keep Europe safe - Alex Cole-Hamilton
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Picture: Carl Court/PA Wire Over Easter this year, at an army base in the forests of Western Ukraine I met a Greek Orthodox Chaplain named Father Taras. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... He has served for 10 years on the eastern front since Russia's initial incursion into Eastern Ukraine and as a man of God, he has never carried a gun. I asked him if many soldiers at the front attended his services, to which he replied, 'Not really, mostly they just want me to hear their confession, because they think they're going to die.' Such is the weary resignation of the armed forces of Ukraine. They are prepared to hold out to the last so that they might preserve the freedom and the territorial integrity of the country that they love. They are fighting for all of us. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Monday, I watched Volodymyr Zelensky's artful redux of his Oval Office meeting with Donald Trump. Considering the outrageous way in which he was treated the last time he was given an audience there, he handled himself impeccably. On the horizon, however, is the prospect of a meeting less palatable even than the bullies of the Oval Office. A trilateral sit down with Trump and Vladimir Putin himself. So far Zelensky has greeted that possibility with real poise, but the prospect of being forced to shake hands and sit down with the Butcher of Bucha and Irpin, the man in whose name countless battlefield atrocities have been committed, nightly air raids on civilian targets have been perpetrated and in whose name thousands of Ukrainian children were kidnapped, must be utterly repellent. But if military victory is beyond reach for either side, then this can only be ended through diplomacy. And by necessity, such meetings must take place. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The challenge of finding a deal that is agreeable to each party in terms of where the new Russia-Ukraine border should lie, the prisoner exchanges, the return of kidnapped children, is astronomical. It is when it comes to the maintenance of a just and lasting peace that Britain's role really matters. Ukraine was given security assurances by the West in 1994 when it first became an independent state and was beseeched by the international community to give up its stockpile of nuclear weapons. Those assurances turned to ash on the morning of 24th February 2022 when Russia launched its full scale assault. Zelensky and the Ukrainians can only be expected to stop fighting with a new kind of guarantee. One such proposal would be for a "Coalition of the Willing", made up of Ukraine's allies, to send troops to be garrisoned on the Ukrainian border to uphold the new frontier. This is a long way from sending troops into battle against Russia - the Ukrainians have done an excellent job of that without us - but it would involve us playing a role in keeping the peace, locking in the support of international allies and ensuring that Putin is not minded to chance his arm again. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All of this feels like a tall order, but given that Ukraine managing to reclaim all its lost territory on the battlefield seems a long shot, it appears that some kind of compromise may regrettably be where we end up. I'm not giving up on outright victory for Ukraine, I would dearly like to see both the EU and America use their full economic might to bring Putin to heel, but short of that, and to secure a reprieve for Father Taras and the brave soldiers of Ukraine, any kind of settlement must be underwritten with the military protection of Britain and her allies.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Teenager who planned mass killing at mosque given ten-year sentence
A teenager inspired by Hitler who planned to livestream a terrorist attack at a mosque has been sentenced to ten years in custody. The 17-year-old had planned to set fire to a Muslim centre in Greenock, Inverclyde, after befriending the imam and mapping out the building's interior on his phone. In January this year police apprehended the youth, who was carrying a camouflage military-style rucksack, as he tried to gain entry to the Inverclyde Muslim Centre on Laird Street. Inside the bag they found a German-manufactured Glock-type air pistol, ammunition, ball bearings, gas cartridges and aerosol cans, prosecutors said. He was sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow on Thursday after pleading guilty to two terrorism charges, the Crown Office said. The teenager, who cannot be named due to his age, was also sentenced to eight years of supervision on licence upon release. In a sentencing statement, Lord Justice Arthurson said: 'What you had in mind was what can properly be characterised as a quite diabolical atrocity involving extreme violence and multiple deaths. You even requested that your attack be livestreamed. 'Your conduct was only stopped by your arrest, when you were quite literally at the very door of the centre.' Prosecutors said the teenager, who was radicalised online and idolised the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik, began to plot an attack on the site in December and planned to set it on fire using aerosols and lighters. He boasted of his plans on the social media platform Telegram. The teenager joined the mosque's WhatsApp group, saying he was 'looking for guidance'. Despite harbouring anti-Muslim views which he had been writing about for two years, the boy won the trust of the imam during several visits. He later filmed himself wandering the corridors, including footage that showed him with the superimposed image of a hand carrying a semi-automatic pistol. When the image moved over a religious poster, it appeared to be set on fire, due to a visual effect. In January this year the boy contacted a local rifle club about how to obtain a firearm and had become fixated on an attack, according to prosecutors. On January 23, police apprehended him as he tried to gain entry to the mosque. The teenager had mapped out the mosque's interior on his phone, according to prosecutors, who said he was about to act on his neo-Nazi views 'to cause pain and suffering'. The boy pleaded guilty to two terrorism charges: being in possession of documents likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, and engaging in the preparation of committing acts of terrorism. The court heard that in 2022, the boy began formulating plans to carry out a terrorist attack at his school and started writing a personal manifesto on his mobile phone from November that year. Split into chapters, the notes outlined his political beliefs and contained anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim rhetoric. Following his arrest, detectives found a copy of Adolf Hitler's autobiographical manifesto Mein Kampf in his bedroom, as well as air weapons, knives, masks, and instructions and ingredients to manufacture explosives. He also had a list on his phone of fascists he idolised, including Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Breivik. Sineidin Corrins, the deputy procurator fiscal for specialist casework at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, said: 'The offences committed by this individual were deeply disturbing. 'Viewing, sharing and posting such extreme and illegal material online can encourage and incite others into extremist activity, spreads hatred and poses a serious risk of harm to the public. 'This heinous plan to attack those within his own local community was prepared and driven by racial and religiously motivated hatred, and showed that he not only held neo-Nazi beliefs but was about to act on them to cause pain and suffering. Fortunately, he was apprehended and this was prevented.' Stuart Houston, Police Scotland assistant chief constable, said: 'This was a fast-moving and complicated inquiry and officers carried out a diligent and thorough investigation to gather the evidence and brought him to court, which will now see him face the consequences of his intentions. 'Keeping our communities safe from acts of terrorism remains a priority for Police Scotland and its officers.'
