logo
Chrononutrition guide: Is when you eat as important as what you eat?

Chrononutrition guide: Is when you eat as important as what you eat?

Yahoo10-06-2025
Americans have long heard about the health benefits of adhering to diets rich in fresh produce and whole grains and low in red meat and processed sugars. But they may not be aware of how meal timing can affect their health.
A recent publication from the UF/IFAS department of food science and human nutrition describes chrononutrition, an emerging field of study that connects eating with circadian rhythm, the body's 24-hour internal clock.
How someone schedules meals throughout the day can impact their weight and body mass index (BMI) as well as increase their odds of developing cardiometabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, according to the authors of the publication, an Ask IFAS guide.
'Healthy eating is not only what you eat but also how much you eat and when,' said doctoral candidate Kaylyn Koons, the publication's lead author.
Franz Halberg, a Romanian-born physician, introduced the idea of chrononutrition in 1967. The concept is based on the premise that the sleep and wake cycle regulates bodily functions, including metabolism and digestion, so the timing, frequency and consistency of food intake affects health.
There is a broad range of eating behaviors that influence chrononutrition, according to the UF/IFAS guide.
One of the key behaviors relates to the 'eating window,' the time frame between the first meal of the day and the last.
Optimizing that window — typically between 8 and 12 hours — could realign food intake with the circadian clock. In fact, a systematic review of studies on time-restricted eating with an eating window of 12 hours or less found an average weight loss of 3%, along with reductions in fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and LDL cholesterol levels.
Many eating behaviors related to poor chrononutrition center around evening food consumption. Eating at or after 8 p.m. is associated with weight gain and metabolic disorders, for example.
Potential reasons include the prevalence of poorer food choices at night and late eaters' propensity to stay up late, which can negatively impact sleep.
Evening latency, the amount of time that lapses between eating the last meal of the day and sleeping, can also play a part, according to the guide. It describes a 2023 study of Malaysian college students which found that those who didn't observe a delay between eating dinner and sleeping were more likely to be underweight.
'This finding may seem counterintuitive because you might expect this behavior would reduce energy expenditure and promote weight gain rather than weight loss,' Koons said. 'But it could be associated with other adverse chrononutrition habits such as skipping meals or irregular meal timing, which lead to an overall reduced calorie intake.'
Koons recommends anyone desiring to improve their chrononutrition examine their eating behaviors and identify chrononutrition-related behaviors that may be negatively affecting their health. Then they can set attainable goals to reduce the frequency of those behaviors.
Patience is key, however, she said.
'Eating habits tend to be ingrained in routine and become habitual,' Koons said. 'It's important to remember that behavior change is difficult, and it takes time.'
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: When you eat may be as important as what you eat
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides
MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides

The Hill

time37 minutes ago

  • The Hill

MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides

MAHA, a movement aimed at tackling the nation's chronic disease epidemic through food, health and environmental reforms, has been deeply skeptical of Big Pharma, Big Agriculture, and Big Chemical. MAHA groups have been strongly aligned with the Trump administration's actions to date on vaccines and food. But cracks are beginning to form. MAHA-aligned groups and influencers are raising alarms about provisions in a House appropriations bill they say will shield pesticide and chemical manufacturers from accountability — and ultimately make Americans less healthy. Meanwhile, a draft of the administration's 'MAHA Report' on children's health reportedly omits any calls to prevent pesticide exposure, also disappointing advocates. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his disciples espouse stricter environmental protections, while also bucking mainstream science on vaccine safety. Conservatives have traditionally sided with big business, supporting fewer regulations on potentially toxic substances. So far, business interests appear to be winning. The industry-friendly draft of a report from a commission run by Kennedy shows just how much the White House has been able to rein him in. 'It's obvious that there are tensions within this newfound coalition between MAHA and MAGA, and there are some big issues there,' said Mary Holland, CEO of Children's Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy. While the pesticide issues have generated some sparks between MAHA and MAGA, the administration has taken a number of other actions to also reduce restrictions on the chemical industry more broadly. Trump himself exempted from environmental standards more than 100 polluters, including chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, coal plants and medical device sterilizers. The EPA, meanwhile, has put chemical industry alumni in leading roles and has said it wants to loosen restrictions on emissions of various cancer-linked chemicals. 'Those factions, if you will — more protective of corporate and more challenging to corporate — are both striving to get the president's ear, and I don't think they've come to a complete, sort of settlement agreement,' Holland said.

Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'
Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'

Atlantic

time38 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'

Millions of Americans might soon have mail from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The health secretary—who fiercely opposes industrial, ultraprocessed foods—now wants to send people care packages full of farm-fresh alternatives. They will be called 'MAHA boxes.' For the most part, MAHA boxes remain a mystery. They are mentioned in a leaked draft of a much-touted report the Trump administration is set to release about improving children's health. Reportedly, the 18-page document—which promises studies on the health effects of electromagnetic radiation and changes in how the government regulates sunscreen, among many other things—includes this: 'MAHA Boxes: USDA will develop options to get whole, healthy food to SNAP participants.' In plain English, kids on food stamps might be sent veggies. The idea might seem like a throwaway line in a wish list of policies. (Kush Desai, a deputy White House press secretary, told me that the leaked report should be disregarded as 'speculative literature.') But MAHA boxes are also referenced in the budget request that President Donald Trump sent Congress in May. In that document, MAHA boxes full of 'commodities sourced from domestic farmers and given directly to American households' are proposed as an option for elderly Americans who already get free packages of shelf-stable goods from the government. When I asked the Department of Health and Human Services for more information about MAHA boxes, a spokesperson referred me back to the White House; the Department of Agriculture, which runs the food-stamp program, did not respond. MAHA boxes are likely to come in some form or another. Some of the packages might end up in the trash. Lots of people, and especially kids, do not enjoy eating carrots and kale. Just 10 percent of U.S. adults are estimated to hit their daily recommended portion of vegetables. But if done correctly, MAHA boxes could do some real good. For years, nutrition experts have been piloting similar programs. A recent study that provided diabetic people with healthy meal kits for a year found that their blood sugar improved, as did their overall diet quality. Another, which provided people with a delivery of fruits and vegetables for 16 weeks, showed that consumption of these products increased by nearly half a serving per day. It makes sense: If healthy food shows up at your door, you're probably going to eat it. 'Pretty much any American is going to benefit from a real healthy food box,' Dariush Mozaffarian, the director of the Tufts Food Is Medicine Institute, told me. Sending people healthy food could be a simple way to deal with one of the biggest reasons why poor Americans don't eat more fruits and veggies. The food-stamp program, otherwise known as SNAP, provides enrollees with a debit card they can use for food of their choosing—and a significant portion of SNAP dollars go to unhealthy foods. Research finds that has less to do with people having a sweet tooth than it does the price of a pound of brussel sprouts. Several studies have found that, for food-stamp recipients, price is one of the biggest barriers to eating healthy. Many states already have incentives built into SNAP to encourage consumption of fruits and vegetables. MAHA boxes would be an even more direct nudge. Most nutrition experts I spoke with for this story were much more supportive of MAHA boxes being sent to Americans in addition to food stamps than as a replacement for them. Exactly how the care packages would fit into other food-assistance programs isn't yet clear. Despite its shortcomings, SNAP is very effective at limiting hunger in America. Shipping heavy boxes of produce to the nation's poor is a much bigger undertaking than putting cash on a debit card. There's also the question of what exactly these MAHA boxes will include. If the 'whole, healthy food' in each care package includes raw milk and beef tallow —which Kennedy has promoted—that would only worsen American health. (His own eating habits are even more questionable: Kennedy once said that he ate so many tuna sandwiches that he developed mercury poisoning.) In May, after the Trump administration mentioned MAHA boxes in its budget request, a White House spokesperson told CBS News that the packages would be similar to food boxes that the first Trump administration sent during the pandemic in an effort to connect hungry families with food that would otherwise go to waste. According to a letter signed by Trump that was sent to recipients, each box was supposed to come with 'nutritious food from our farmers.' News reports at the time suggested that wasn't always the case. One recipient reportedly was shipped staples such as onions, milk, some fruit, and eggs, along with seven packages of hot dogs and two blocks of processed cheese. Another described their box as 'a box full of old food and dairy and hot dogs.' The COVID-era program did eventually deliver some 173 million food boxes. But it was still a failure, Gina Plata-Nino of the Food Research & Action Center, an organization that advocates for people on food-assistance programs, told me. The logistics were such a mess that they prompted a congressional investigation. Nonprofits, which helped distribute the packages, received 'rotten food and wet or collapsing boxes,' investigators were told. And the setup of the program was apparently so rushed that the government did not bother to check food distributors' professional references; investigators concluded that a 'company focused on wedding and event planning without significant food distribution experience' was awarded a $39 million contract to transport perishables to food banks. This time around, the White House doesn't have to navigate the urgency of a sudden pandemic in its planning. But questions remain about who exactly will be responsible for getting these boxes to millions of Americans around the country. The White House will likely have to partner with companies that have experience shipping perishable items to remote areas of the country. And although the White House budget says that MAHA boxes will replace a program that primarily provides canned foods to seniors through local food banks, it remains to be seen whether these organizations would have the resources to administer a program of this size. Perhaps the Trump administration has already thought through all these potential logistical hurdles. But trouble with executing grand plans to improve American health has been a consistent theme throughout Trump's tenures in office. In 2020, for example, he pledged to send seniors a $200 discount card to help offset rising drug costs. The cards never came amid questions about the legality of the initiative. Americans do need to change their eating habits if we hope to improve our collective problems of diet-related disease. Getting people excited about the joys of eating fruits and vegetables is laudable. So, too, are some of Kennedy's other ideas on food, such as getting ultraprocessed foods out of school cafeterias. But Kennedy still hasn't spelled out how he will deliver on these grand visions. The government hasn't even defined what an ultraprocessed food is, despite wanting to ban them. The ideas are good, but a good idea is only the first step.

New Peer-Reviewed Study in New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst Finds Twin Health's AI Precision Treatment Significantly Improves Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Reduces Reliance on Costly Medications, Including GLP-1s
New Peer-Reviewed Study in New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst Finds Twin Health's AI Precision Treatment Significantly Improves Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Reduces Reliance on Costly Medications, Including GLP-1s

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New Peer-Reviewed Study in New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst Finds Twin Health's AI Precision Treatment Significantly Improves Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Reduces Reliance on Costly Medications, Including GLP-1s

Cleveland Clinic-led study finds Twin Health's precision AI and hyper-personalized care outperforms standard diabetes treatment—reducing A1C, unhealthy weight, and medication use MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., Aug. 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, Twin Health announced the publication of results from a Cleveland Clinic-led study in the New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst, evaluating its Twin Precision Treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes. The program features technology-driven interventions that leverage artificial intelligence to deliver personalized insights and lifestyle recommendations aimed at improving glycemic control and metabolic health in adults with type 2 diabetes. The findings, published today, showed that 71% of study participants using the Twin Precision Treatment system met the primary endpoint of achieving an A1C below 6.5% while eliminating most blood sugar-lowering medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and insulin. Type 2 diabetes affects nearly 1 in 10 Americans, and prolonged elevated blood sugar levels increase the risk of serious complications like heart disease, kidney failure, and stroke. Twin Precision Treatment System Uses Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors for Sustainable Results Developed by Twin Health, the Twin Precision Treatment combines digital twin AI with personalized clinical care, including licensed providers, nurses, and coaches. Using data from wearable sensors, the system continuously tracks real-time health metrics such as blood glucose levels, weight, blood pressure, stress, physical activity, and sleep. Users access these insights through a smartphone app, offering personalized nutrition and exercise guidance, encouraging patients to achieve their goals and sustainable health improvements. The specific app-generated dietary recommendations were based on AI-enabled predictions of each patient's blood glucose responses to specific meals. "The study demonstrates that AI-driven precision medicine is the key to metabolic healing," said Dr. Lisa Shah, chief medical officer and executive vice president of Twin Health. "We're committed to our mission of producing real results for real people. This study is an important milestone on that journey and a glimpse into what's ahead for the future of metabolic care." Kevin M. Pantalone, D.O., Director of Diabetes Initiatives at the Cleveland Clinic and a professor of medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, served as the primary investigator for this study. For the clinical trial (NCT05181449), researchers aimed to determine whether Twin Health's Twin Precision Treatment system could help individuals with type 2 diabetes, managed in a primary care setting, achieve their blood sugar goals while also eliminating glucose-lowering medications. "In routine clinical practice, type 2 diabetes is often treated with a one-size-fits-all approach where individuals are prescribed medications and told to 'watch their diet and stay active," said Dr. Pantalone. "Our study demonstrated the AI-enabled system of sensors to understand each patient's unique metabolic profile, and AI-enabled human care team coaching facilitated significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and quality of life versus usual care, while allowing marked de-escalation of glucose-lowering medications. Interventions like this system can help patients make informed, lasting lifestyle changes to control their blood sugar and sustain weight loss." Dr. Pantalone collaborated with a team of 13 primary care physicians to recruit 150 patients from the Cleveland Clinic Twinsburg Family Health Center located in Twinsburg, Ohio. Of these, 100 were assigned to the Twin Precision Treatment group and 50 to the standard of care group. On average, patients were 58.5 years old, had been living with type 2 diabetes for about nine years, and presented with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 35.1 and an average A1C level of 7.2%. The primary endpoint was to see how many participants reached an A1C below 6.5% after 12 months without needing any glucose-lowering medications except for metformin, a common low-cost diabetes medication. After one year, a majority of study participants in the Twin intervention group achieved an A1C below 6.5% After one year, 71% of participants enrolled in the intervention group lowered their A1C levels below the 6.5% threshold, while taking only metformin. By comparison, only 2.4% of participants receiving standard care achieved the same result. Participants in the Twin intervention group also lost more weight (8.6% vs 4.6% of body weight) while significantly reducing their reliance on medications: GLP-1 Receptor Agonist medication use decreased from 41% to 6% among participants SGLT-2 Inhibitor use decreased from 27% to 1% of participants Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use decreased from 33% to 3% in participants Insulin use decreased from 24% to 13% among participants The quality of life scores and treatment satisfaction were notably better for those using the Twin Precision Treatment, highlighting its potential as a highly effective and sustainable option for diabetes management. Real-World Reduction in GLP-1 UseIn the Cleveland Clinic-led study, 85% of participants in the Twin Health program eliminated GLP-1s, demonstrating that many individuals can sustain clinical goals without long-term dependence. Translating Clinical Success into Cost SavingsTwin Health is proven effective for diabetes, weight loss and metabolic health comorbidities, including hypertension. Twin Health's real-world results echo the RCT findings, delivering over $8,000 in average first-year savings per member. These savings result from reducing reliance on high-cost medications, such as GLP-1s, and avoiding unnecessary care utilization, making Twin a scalable and cost-effective solution for employers and health plans seeking to address the growing burden of metabolic disease. About Twin HealthTwin Health's AI digital twin technology creates a real-time model of each individual's unique metabolism using data from smart devices, lab results, and meal logs. This model provides personalized guidance on nutrition, activity, sleep, and more, supported by a compassionate clinical team. Twin's AI digital twin and human care work in synergy, providing a continuous new standard of care for metabolic health. For employers and health plans, Twin delivers $8.0K+ in annualized savings per member by safely reducing reliance on high-cost medications and lowering avoidable medical utilization. Twin's clinical results for diabetes, weight loss and metabolic health co-morbidities, including hypertension, are peer-reviewed and published in top journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine Catalyst and those of the American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association, and American College of Cardiology. Learn more at Press ContactAlex McKechnieAOX3 for Twin View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Twin Health Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store