logo
Ayotte says two priority bills she signed back parental rights

Ayotte says two priority bills she signed back parental rights

Yahoo11-06-2025
Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed into law two of her signature priority bills Tuesday, a parental rights law to give them access to information about their children in schools and one allowing parents of any income level to receive a taxpayer-paid Education Freedom Account (EFA).
Surrounded by legislators, education choice advocates and school children, Ayotte said the two bills put the state on the right course for education reform that emphasizes choice and promotes families.
'Giving parents the freedom to choose the education setting that best fits their child's needs will help every student in our state reach their full potential,' Ayotte said.
'I'm proud to sign this into law today along with the Parental Bill of Rights, which ensures parents are the central voice in their children's education. I thank the House and Senate for working to get these across the finish line.'
But critics maintain that both bills harm the public school system.
They contend the parental rights measures (HB 10 and SB 72) could make it harder for educators to report cases of suspected child abuse to authorities.
They opposed the EFA legislation (SB 295) since this expansion is estimated to add another $17 million a year to a program that was already costing taxpayers $30 million annually.
'All students deserve a high-quality education and the support they need to thrive. Unfortunately, expanding the unaccountable voucher scheme will exacerbate the already inequitable public education funding system in New Hampshire,' said Megan Tuttle, president of the National Education Association of New Hampshire.
'Limitless vouchers will take millions of dollars out of public schools to subsidize private school education for a few at the expense of nearly 90% of students who attend community public schools.'
Outgoing Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut had been one of the leading advocates for EFAs, which were created in a 2021 state budget trailer bill that then-Gov. Chris Sununu signed into law.
"New Hampshire's Education Freedom Account program has already transformed lives by giving families access to the educational pathways that best fit their children's needs,' Edelblut said.
'Expanding this opportunity through universal eligibility is a bold and forward-thinking move that reimagines what education can be, providing every student with the opportunity to reach their full potential and experience a bright future. We are proud to support this expansion and eager to see the lasting impact it will have on student success across our state.'
Limiting EFA expansion was proposed
The EFA law went far beyond what Ayotte had asked for from legislators four months ago.
Currently, EFAs are limited to families making up to 350% of the federal poverty level or just over $100,000 a year for a family of four.
The bill would eliminate that income eligibility limit while initially setting a cap on 10,000 EFAs given statewide.
Currently, there are about 5,600 families that receive EFAs, averging about $5,100 a year.
Ayotte had only wanted the expansion of EFAs to apply to families that have their children in public schools.
According to surveys, more than 75% of those who have received EFAs already had their children enrolled in private schools.
'New Hampshire parents are grateful and relieved that more doors are finally open,' said Kate Baker Demers, executive director of the Children's Scholarship Fund, the nonprofit group that administers the EFA program for the state. 'They've known what their children needed — and now, thanks to this law, more families can access the freedom to choose what works best. This isn't about politics. It's about possibility.'
Several leaders of education choice groups praised Ayotte's move on the EFA.
"Gov. Ayotte knows that every young Granite Stater has unique needs to fulfil their education. Today, she ensured that every family is empowered with resources to find what works best for them,' said Nick Murray, public affairs manager for yes. every kid. 'We look forward to working with her administration to ensure New Hampshire's EFA program continues to serve families' needs in the best ways possible.'
EdChoice President Robert Enlow said New Hampshire becomes the 19th state to offer these vouchers to all students.
'What New Hampshire has done isn't just expand eligibility — it's set a new benchmark for what educational freedom should look like,' Enlow continued. 'We're proud to support the Granite State in realizing the vision Milton Friedman outlined nearly 70 years ago — one in which every family has the freedom to choose, and every child has the opportunity to thrive.'
State Sen. Victoria Sullivan, R-Manchester, sponsored the EFA bill that became law.
House Democratic Leader Alexis Simpson said a byproduct of the parental rights bill will be to target transgender students who will no longer be able to confide in 'one trusted adult' at school about their views about gender identity that their parents don't know about.
"Today, Gov. Kelly Ayotte and State House Republicans turned our classrooms into political battlegrounds. They've passed a bill that forces teachers to out LGBTQ+ teens to potentially abusive parents and makes it harder for educators and DCYF to protect vulnerable kids who need help the most. They've made teachers' jobs a nightmare and put children at risk, all in the name of a hateful culture war. Nobody asked for this.'
House Speaker Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, was the prime author of the parental rights bill.
'By advancing education freedom and the Parental Bill of Rights, we've reaffirmed a simple truth: parents, not bureaucracies, should make decisions about their children's lives. This legislation gives families real choices and ensures their values are respected,' Packard added.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Derek Dooley's Chances of Beating Jon Ossoff in Georgia Senate Race
Derek Dooley's Chances of Beating Jon Ossoff in Georgia Senate Race

Newsweek

time8 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Derek Dooley's Chances of Beating Jon Ossoff in Georgia Senate Race

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Derek Dooley, the former University of Tennessee football coach, jumped into the battleground Georgia Senate race on Monday as Republicans hope to flip the seat held by Democrat Jon Ossoff. Why It Matters Georgia's Senate race is set to be among the most competitive of the 2026 midterms as Ossoff is defending a seat in the state narrowly won by President Donald Trump last November. Holding onto the seat is key for Democrats, who are hoping to reclaim a majority in the Senate amid hopes of a 2018-style "blue wave" that could carry them to victory across the country despite a challenging map. Republicans are hopeful that candidates like Dooley could make the race difficult for Ossoff. Dooley has ties to Governor Brian Kemp, a popular Republican who opted against running despite being viewed as a potentially strong GOP candidate. Senator Jon Ossoff, left, questions a witness during a Senate hearing on July 9, 2025, in Washington. Derek Dooley, right, attends an NCAA college football practice on August 12, 2019, in Columbia, Missouri. Senator Jon Ossoff, left, questions a witness during a Senate hearing on July 9, 2025, in Washington. Derek Dooley, right, attends an NCAA college football practice on August 12, 2019, in Columbia, Missouri. AP Photo/Jeff Roberson, File andfor Breakthrough T1D What To Know Dooley launched his campaign with a "Georgia First" message, a riff on MAGA's "America First" slogan. "Leadership matters," Dooley wrote in a statement. "Our state doesn't have a voice in the U.S. Senate who reflects Georgia values because Ossoff is more concerned with protecting his own political future, opposing everything the Trump Administration is working to accomplish, and repeatedly voting with the extreme left." So far, only one poll of the race has included Dooley. The Cygnal poll, as reported by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, showed Ossoff with a narrow lead over Dooley. The initial ballot showed Ossoff up by nine points (50 percent to 41 percent), but an informed ballot showed a closer race, with Ossoff up about three points (47 percent to 44 percent). The same poll showed Ossoff leading Representative Buddy Carter by about seven points (49 percent to 42 percent) on an initial ballot and three points (47 percent to 44 percent) in an informed ballot. He led Insurance Commissioner John King by about 10 points on an uninformed ballot (50 percent to 40 percent), but they tied on an informed ballot at 45.9 percent support. The poll surveyed 610 likely voters from June 16-18 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.92 percentage points. William Hatcher, chair and professor of social sciences at Augusta University, told Newsweek that Dooley's strength is "unclear." "In recent years, we've seen well-known football players and coaches enter politics in the South. Some are successful like Tommy Tuberville wining the U.S. Senate seat in Alabama, and others are not like Herschel Walker losing the U.S. Senate seat in Georgia in 2022," he said. "Dooley will have more name recognition than other candidates, which will be a strength for him out of the gate." Regardless of who wins the primary, the race will be "a very competitive contest," Hatcher said. Kalshi betting odds give Ossoff an advantage ahead of the midterms. Democrats have a 73 percent chance of winning to the Republicans' 27 percent, according to the betting market. The Georgia Democratic Party responded to Dooley's candidacy in a statement. "This chaotic, crowded Republican primary just got messier with the entrance of failed and fired former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley, who has failed to live up to his family name throughout his career," Georgia Democratic Chair Charlie Bailey wrote in the statement. "We'll see what's harder for Dooley—answering for a Trump bill that strips health care for 750,000 Georgians, or remembering which SEC team to root for." The Ossoff and Dooley campaigns pointed to public statements when reached by Newsweek. What People Are Saying Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spokesperson Maeve Coyle, in a statement: "The latest addition to Georgia's messy and chaotic GOP primary is a failed football coach who has only ever spoken out to cheerlead Medicaid cuts that hurt Georgians. As this primary gets even more crowded and devolves into a proxy war between President Trump and Governor Kemp, Senator Ossoff is fighting for working families in Georgia and will hold his seat in 2026." Derek Dooley, in a statement: "I'm not part of the political establishment, and I haven't spent my life climbing the D.C. political ladder. For thirty years, I led young people from all walks of life and fought every day to create hope and opportunity for them and their families. The foundation of football is the American Spirit. You work hard, you play by the rules, you keep fighting when adversity hits—you have a fair shot at achieving your dreams. As a coach, I wanted that for all my players. As your next U.S. Senator, I want that for all Georgians—and all Americans." What Happens Next Candidates may still jump in over the coming months, and more polling could come out and indicate how competitive the race may become. The Cook Political Report currently rates Georgia as a toss-up for 2026.

Why dozens of Democrats left Texas and how Republicans want to punish them
Why dozens of Democrats left Texas and how Republicans want to punish them

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Why dozens of Democrats left Texas and how Republicans want to punish them

AUSTIN, Texas — Dozens of Democratic state lawmakers in Texas have scattered to points across the country in a last-ditch effort to prevent Republicans from adopting U.S. House maps that President Donald Trump wants in place before the 2026 midterm elections . The Republican-controlled state House scheduled a vote on a district map for Monday afternoon. By leaving the state, Democrats are beyond the reach of Texas law enforcement, and they can effectively shut down the vote by ensuring the 150-member House does not have the quorum required to do business.

Gov. Greg Abbott's options to force a redistricting vote are more limited than they appear
Gov. Greg Abbott's options to force a redistricting vote are more limited than they appear

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Greg Abbott's options to force a redistricting vote are more limited than they appear

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had a message Sunday for the dozens of Democratic legislators who fled the state to derail a mega-partisan gerrymander: 'This truancy ends now.' But Abbott's options to compel those Democrats — whose departure to Illinois and other states is preventing the state Legislature from conducting any business — to return and vote are more constrained and legally uncertain than he let on. And they may take significant time to resolve in court. Abbott and other Texas Republicans face a hard deadline as they are preparing to adopt maps that could net the GOP five seats in the U.S. House, potentially cementing the party's majority in Congress. Maps need to be completed before the end of the year so that election officials can prepare for the state's March 3 primaries. The move has also prompted retaliation threats by Democratic governors in other states and roiled expectations for the 2026 elections, when Democrats hope to take the House and act as a check on President Donald Trump. Here's a look at the central questions as Abbott's standoff with Texas House Democrats deepens into a monumental political and legal brawl. Texas' constitution requires two-thirds of the state's 150 House members to be present to conduct business. That gives the 62-member House Democratic minority a break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option to grind the Capitol's business to a halt even if they would be outnumbered on an up-or-down vote. By absconding from Austin — and the state altogether — Democrats ensured that the Legislature lacked a quorum to convene for a special session called by Abbott to address redistricting. There is some recent history on this: Democrats mounted a similar effort to 'break quorum' in 2021 in protest of election-related legislation. The effort ended after Democrats gradually trickled back into the state, amid a similar flurry of arrest threats and lawsuits. Importantly, breaking quorum is not a crime. However, if the absentee Democratic lawmakers remained in Texas, Abbott could order state troopers to haul them to the Capitol. That's why they fled for the friendlier confines of Illinois and other blue states, where Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker and other allies have vowed to shelter them from Texas' demands to bring them back. Federal laws allow states to demand the return, or 'extradition,' of criminal fugitives from other states. But because breaking quorum is not illegal, Abbott can't seek help from the courts to compel the Democrats' return. Instead, Abbott threatened to take another action against the absentee lawmakers: Ask Texas courts to remove them from office altogether. State law permits a Texas district court to determine whether a public official has 'abandoned' his or her office, declaring it vacant — enabling the governor to set new elections to fill the empty seats. 'Come and take it,' dared state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader, in an appearance Monday morning on CNN. Wu declared Abbott's threat to be 'all bluster.' The governor's threat is rooted in a nonbinding legal opinion issued in 2021 by Attorney General Ken Paxton, amid the last attempt by Democrats to break quorum. Paxton, notably, took no position on whether breaking quorum is constitutional. The republican AG also declined to say whether fleeing Democrats could or should be removed from office. Rather, he called it a 'fact question for a court' that he said was beyond the scope of his office to decide. He noted instead that he could file what are known as 'quo warranto actions' in court, asking a judge to determine whether the missing lawmakers had officially vacated their seats. How would a judge make that call? Paxton said he wasn't certain. 'We find no constitutional provision or statute establishing an exhaustive list for why a vacancy occurs or the grounds under which an officer may be judicially removed from office,' he wrote. This is the most uncertain aspect of Abbott's gambit. Paxton's office would need to file 'quo warranto' actions in various judicial districts for more than 50 fleeing lawmakers. Judges may take up these cases on different timelines and reach different conclusions, requiring appeals that could wind their way to the Texas Supreme Court. Paxton acknowledged in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that the timeline would be problematic. 'The challenge is that [it] wouldn't necessarily be an immediate answer, right?' he said. 'We'd have to go through the court process, and we'd have to file … in districts that are not friendly to Republicans,' Paxton said. 'So it's a challenge because every, every district would be different. We'd have to go sue in every legislator's home district to try to execute on that idea." And even if Abbott and Paxton win a clean sweep in removing the Democrats from office, it would then require a time-intensive process of calling special elections to fill the vacancies — and guaranteeing that the winners of those elections also remain in the state as well. That timing matters when the GOP-led redistricting plan is on a fixed timeline: A new map must be adopted by early December in order to be in place for the 2026 midterm cycle. That would require Democrats to remain out of state for about four months while they accumulate $500-per-day civil fines. The current special Legislative session is slated to end on Aug. 19, but Abbott could call another one. Abbott's letter, though sharply critical, stopped short of actually accusing Democrats of breaking the law. Rather, he suggested that if outsiders are helping them fundraise to cover their fines, they might run afoul of bribery laws. 'It would be bribery if any lawmaker took money to perform or to refuse to perform an act in the legislature,' Abbott said in a Fox News interview Monday. 'And the reports are these legislators have both sought money and offered money to skip the vote, to leave the legislature, to take a legislative act." If Texas prosecutors in fact level any such charges, then Abbott's authority to return them grows stronger. He could then ask courts in Texas and Illinois to seek the return of the missing lawmakers. 'I will use my full extradition authority to demand the return to Texas of any potential out-of-state felons,' he said in his Sunday statement. Liz Crampton contributed reporting. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store