Keep Clocks on Permanent Standard Time, Says Canadian Group
The annual switch to daylight saving time (DST) in many parts of the world is detrimental to public health and should be abolished in favor of permanent standard time (ST), Canadian researchers wrote in a recent editorial.
The policy of turning clocks forward by an hour in the spring causes 'discrepancies between the circadian biological clock and the environmental light-dark cycle,' leading to 'social jet lag,' noted lead author David Dongkyung Kim, MD, assistant professor of geriatric psychiatry at the University of Toronto, Toronto, and colleagues.
The Viewpoint was published on April 29 in JAMA.
Clear Evidence
'DST is a policy that affects the lives of millions of people, but the potential benefits do not seem to outweigh the potential harms to public health,' Kim told Medscape Medical News.
'Clear evidence in the medical literature as well as widespread expert consensus [shows] the acute transition of the clock time in the spring has been associated with increased myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and atrial fibrillation admissions,' he added. 'But it is not only the sudden change in the clock that is the issue. ST is more aligned with our natural circadian rhythms, and chronic misalignment has been associated with many negative health effects.'
Canada first initiated DST during World War I. The rationale was to add more light to waking hours, thus saving energy. Today, only Saskatchewan and Yukon have abolished the time change, staying on permanent ST. Ontario passed legislation in 2020 to change to permanent DST, but it was contingent on Quebec and New York doing likewise, said Kim.
'Many studies seem to show an acute worsening of health with the spring transition, but not the fall transition, suggesting the health issues are due not only to acute changes in clock time but also to the discrepancy between clock time and circadian rhythm,' the authors noted. 'Although many studies suggest increased traffic crashes due to DST transition, others do not show this connection,' they added. And findings on DST transition and mental health risks such as unipolar depression, manic episodes, and suicide are also mixed.
'The main argument I hear for establishing permanent DST is that it is nicer to see the sun set later in the day,' said Kim. 'To that, I respond that you can use your own volition to wake up an hour earlier without forcing permanent DST on the entire population.'
Late evening light, which DST makes possible, disrupts the natural seasonal adjustment of circadian rhythms. The misalignment between one's personal schedule and the circadian rhythm, which is called social jet lag, is well understood. It is associated with negative outcomes such as obesity, heart disease, metabolic syndrome, and depression.
Global Consensus
In a position statement, the Canadian Sleep Society called for abandoning DST, and there is 'global consensus from sleep and chronobiology experts on this matter,' said Rébecca Robillard, PhD, a clinical neuropsychologist and associate professor of psychology at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa. Robillard, who did not contribute to the editorial, also leads clinical sleep research at the University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre and is co-chair of the Canadian Sleep Research Consortium.
'Considering the impacts that this practice has on a large range of health and safety issues, we should abolish DST and stick to ST all year around,' she told Medscape Medical News. 'Time change goes beyond gaining or losing an hour of sleep; it perturbs our biological clock, which results in population-wide increases in heart attacks, strokes, infections and immune diseases, digestive problems, pregnancy and childbirth complications, and a deterioration in mental health. It's not a question of opinion or personal preference, but of public health and scientific evidence.'
Kim and Robillard reported having no relevant financial relationships.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership ‘crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
WASHINGTON (AP) — There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Redfield described Kennedy as 'very supportive' of Monarez's nomination. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who have stepped up to the plate.' The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation.' An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. Controversial COVID-19 vaccine recommendations bypassed CDC panel The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Over 4,400 Riders Embark on Ride to Conquer Cancer, Canada's Largest Athletic Fundraiser, Raising Over $20.61 Million for Life-Saving Research
Riders Begin 2-Day, 200+ KM Journey in Support of The Princess Margaret for a World Free From the Fear of Cancer TORONTO, June 7, 2025 /CNW/ - The 18th annual The Princess Margaret Ride to Conquer Cancer, presented by Johnson & Johnson, commenced this morning with over 4,000 riders departing from Sherway Gardens, Toronto in a group peloton. At the same time, more than 400 riders began their journey from the Niagara-on-the-Lake start line. Both groups will converge at McMaster University in Hamilton for overnight camp later today. This year's Ride sets a record for funds raised with $20.61 million, surpassing the previous record of $20.6 million set in 2024. United in their mission to create a world free from the fear of cancer, all riders are taking on the two-day, 200+ km journey to Niagara-on-the-Lake in support of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment centres. "Cancer remains one of the greatest global health threats of our time," said Dr. Miyo Yamashita, President and CEO of The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation. "Yet, through the unwavering dedication of our Ride community— riders, donors, supporters and volunteers, together we are transforming the way cancer is understood, prevented, diagnosed and treated in Canada and around the world." Among the riders was Dana Fox, who knows firsthand the importance of this cause. Diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive cancer, Dana is currently undergoing treatment at The Princess Margaret but is committed to completing the 200km journey. "You are fueling hope, you are funding discovery, and you are changing lives," Dana rallied to the crowd in his opening ceremony's patient remarks. "This isn't just a fundraiser. This is a movement." Participants have collectively raised an astounding $20.61 million this year, bringing The Ride's all-time fundraising total to more than $320.61 million since its inception in 2008. These funds directly support life-saving cancer research and patient care at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment The Ride's 2025 Honourary Chairs, Nicholas and Lia Fidei said, "After witnessing some of the success stories and meeting cancer patients who have overcome cancer, there is no doubt in our minds how much we need to support The Ride and the advancements in cancer research that The Princess Margaret is renowned for." Nicholas, President of Treasure Hill and President of the Nicholas Fidei Foundation, and this year's top individual fundraiser also added, "No other fundraising event that I have participated in has inspired me to greater achievements." All riders are now making their way to Hamilton, where they'll be welcomed by cheering family and friends, enjoy a hot meal at camp ceremonies and spend the night at McMaster University. On Day 2, they'll continue their journey to the finish line at Peller Estates Winery in Niagara-on-the-Lake. For more information, to donate or to register for the 2026 Ride to Conquer Cancer, please visit ABOUT PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation is Canada's largest cancer charity. We're dedicated to raising funds for Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment centres, known for its breakthrough discoveries that transform patient outcomes. Together, our work benefits cancer patients everywhere in our mission to create a world free from the fear of cancer. Through philanthropy, fundraising events, and our world-leading lottery program, we're changing how the world understands, prevents, diagnoses, and treats cancer, benefitting patients at The Princess Margaret, throughout Canada, and around the world. SOURCE Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
9 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Does coffee boost longevity? 47,000 women were studied for 30 years to find out
Drinking moderate amounts of coffee in midlife may boost healthy aging decades later, according to a study presented this week at the annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition. The findings add to the existing body of research showing there may be health and longevity benefits to consuming coffee. Most of these studies are observational and do not directly show that consuming coffee necessarily causes better health, just that people who drink coffee often tend to be healthier — as measured by such metrics as lower cardiovascular mortality, lower risk of some cancers and lower risk of Type 2 diabetes. The analysis, which followed more than 47,000 women over about 30 years, found that those who drank coffee during midlife, ages 45 to 60, were more likely to exhibit healthy aging later in life. On average, they consumed 315 milligrams of caffeine a day, the equivalent to about three small cups of coffee. The researchers defined healthy aging as being at least 70 years old and free from 11 major chronic diseases — including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer and Parkinson's disease — with no major mental health or cognitive impairment or memory problems. The study followed female nurses starting in 1984 and asked them to fill out questionnaires about their consumption of coffee, tea and soda. By 2016, about 3,700 women were considered part of the healthy aging group. Within that group, each extra cup of coffee a day was linked to a 2% to 5% higher chance of doing well later in life, up to five small cups a day. The same link between coffee consumption and better health in later life was not found among women who drank tea, soda or decaffeinated coffee. 'While past studies have linked coffee to individual health outcomes, our study is the first to assess coffee's impact across multiple domains of aging over three decades,' Sara Mahdavi, an adjunct professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Toronto who led the study, said in a statement. 'The findings suggest that caffeinated coffee — not tea or decaf — may uniquely support aging trajectories that preserve both mental and physical function.' The study did not examine why caffeinated coffee and not other caffeinated beverages was linked to healthy aging. But previous research suggests that coffee contains antioxidants like polyphenols, which may help the body lower inflammation, reduce oxidative stress on cells and fight diseases. The analysis accounted for other factors that influence healthy aging including body weight, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, education level and protein in the diet. 'The takeaway is not that people should start drinking coffee for the sake of longevity, nor that more is better,' Mahdavi said. 'What we found is that moderate caffeinated coffee consumption — approximately 1 to 3 cups per day — was associated with a modestly higher likelihood of healthy aging over time.'
