
The Enduring Style Legacy of 'Mad Men' Women
Mad Men
—
the seductive period drama about the golden age of advertising during the 1960s that concluded its seven-season run almost exactly 10 years ago, on May 17, 2015.
As someone who's still trying to discern, a decade later, whether Don Draper (Jon Hamm) found nirvana in the end or simply went back to shilling soda, it was impossible to not be lured in. The visually rich series is captivating, thanks in part to its mesmerizing and meticulously researched costume design, helmed by
Deadwood
,
The Last Tycoon
, and
1883
—is a master of her craft. And the sartorial evolutions of
Mad Men
's complex, painfully flawed characters prove as much.
Jordin Althaus/AMC/Everett Collection
Christina Hendricks as Joan Harris on
Mad Men.
Joan Sees Green
The ability to choose and create a life for oneself irrespective of societal expectations is a central theme of the show. But for the female characters, it's a power struggle on the brink of boiling over. The second part of season 7 takes place from April to November 1970. The turbulent '60s are spilling into the '70s; though
Roe v. Wade
would not be decided for another three years, second-wave feminism and women's liberation are on the rise.
Joan Harris (Christina Hendricks) understands these changing cultural tides when she confronts the cruel McCann Erickson executive Jim Hobart (H. Richard Greene) about the $500,000 she's owed as a former partner of SC&P, following McCann's acquisition of the agency. During this exchange, she's wearing an emerald green ensemble and gold jewelry, which essentially scream, 'Show me the money.'
Even so, Jim chauvinistically belittles her partnership and the value she brings to the company, instructing her to play nice with a gross colleague who's making unwanted passes at her, or else expect a letter from their lawyer. 'I wonder how many women around here would like to speak to a lawyer,' Joan retorts. 'I believe the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has one.'
She threatens to file a complaint, arguing the ACLU would be in her office and Betty Friedan in the lobby 'with half the women who marched down 5th Avenue.' (Friedan led the Women's Strike for Equality on Aug. 26, 1970.)
When this scene first aired 10 years ago, I remember practically lunging off my couch, cheering on Joan for going toe-to-toe with the show's most formidable villain figure. Initially, it felt like a departure from the compromising positions Joan had previously been put in by men, when she was forced to choose between safety and survival.
Take, for example, season 5 episode 11, aptly titled 'The Other Woman,' when Joan officially enters the boys' club. She becomes a voting partner after agreeing to sleep with a sleazy Jaguar rep who's been eyeing her so the agency can secure the account. After the deed is done, she walks into the office with her newly-minted status and partnership stake, wearing yet another money-hued look—a fitted dress, adorned with a gold brooch, plus her signature gold pen necklace, and a scarf in shades of (you guessed it) green.
A woman securing her financial future and climbing the ranks of a male-dominated industry should be celebrated, and Hendricks masterfully plays the role without any semblance of shame. However, it's hard to stomach the reality that Joan was presented with an unfair choice from the outset. She could either be responsible for the agency not landing Jaguar's business and still struggle to make ends meet herself (by this point in the show, she was the family breadwinner and a single mother) or sell her body, name her price, and be set for life.
Sure, she had choices. They weren't good choices, but they were choices. So, instead, she was pragmatic. That's how it is when men continually call the shots. In contesting Jim, though, Joan threw pragmatism out the window and stood up for her worth. Unfortunately, that effort, however noble and necessary, would only go so far in a patriarchal world that was hardly ready to accept women as equals. (And, let's be honest, still isn't ready.)
'I'm willing to give you 50 cents on the dollar to never see your face again,' Jim counteroffers, diminishing not only her monetary value but also notably insulting her beauty, the commodity that has curried her the most favor throughout her career, for better or worse.
Bryant brilliantly bookends these scenes with Joan outfitted in, yes, the color of cash but also the color of growth. Ultimately, her former boss and paramour Roger Sterling (John Slattery) convinces her to take the buyout, even though it wasn't what she was promised.
'It's plenty,' he tells her.
Is it? Once again, she's left with no good choices and must settle for the most palatable path forward, even if that means (literally) cutting her losses.
Jordin Althaus/AMC/Everett Collection
The Politics of Peggy
Few on-screen scenes leave such an impression that they are forever emblazoned on my brain, like when Peggy Olson (Elisabeth Moss) struts into the McCann offices after finally receiving her delayed office assignment.
Sporting a mod mixed-print minidress that has since been cemented in the Meme Hall of Fame, Peggy embraces the change in environment as best as she can. She enters this new phase of life with unabashed boldness, complete with dark sunglasses, a cigarette dangling from her mouth just so, and sexually explicit artwork in tow (
This now-iconic moment in television history exemplifies the manner in which Peggy must tiptoe along the gender line to advance her career. Her decidedly feminine frock, coupled with the art piece which centers female pleasure, juxtaposes the brooding, mysterious masculinity of the other accessories.
'You know I need to put men at ease,' Peggy tells Roger earlier in the episode when he gives her the Hokusai piece. Does she, though? Do any of us?
I'm reminded of the advice Bobbie Barrett (Melinda McGraw), one of Don's many flings, gives Peggy in season 2, shortly after she's plucked from secretarial obscurity and promoted to copywriter: 'No one will tell you this, but you can't be a man. Don't even try. Be a woman. It's a powerful business when done correctly.'
This idea resurfaces in season 5, episode 4, when Peggy stays late at work one night and discovers Don's secretary, Dawn Chambers (Teyonah Parris), sleeping at the office. She's afraid; racial tensions around Harlem are escalating following nationwide race riots in 1966. Peggy convinces Dawn to crash on her couch. The two share beers and discuss office politics.
'Do you think I act like a man?' Peggy, wearing an avocado-green dress layered over a short-sleeved white blouse, asks Dawn, who replies, 'I guess you have to, a little.' Peggy reveals to Dawn, whose appearance is more muted in a dark blue crosshatch-patterned dress, that she's unsure if she can keep it up, or if she wants to. Eventually, Peggy, tipsy and tired, heads to her bedroom, leaving Dawn to sleep on the sofa. But Peggy stares for a smidge too long at her green leather purse strewn atop the coffee table. It contains $400 she just received from Roger for taking on extra work, and her implicit bias is definitely showing.
Dawn notices Peggy noticing the purse and even though Peggy continues on her way to bed, there's no undoing the damage. Come morning, Dawn is out the door, with a thank-you note strategically placed on top of Peggy's purse.
In this moment, given
Mad Men
's frustrating lack of BIPOC characters, we get a rare glimpse into how gender dynamics take shape when they are racialized. It's one of the few instances in which a white woman's privilege is contextualized within the broader sociopolitical landscape of the volatile 1960s, and the costuming plays a key role in illustrating that. Yes, white women had limited choices and options. But women of color had—and continue to have—even fewer.
Mike Yarish/AMC/Everett Collection
Wives in Blue
Marriage to Don Draper would likely leave anyone feeling a bit blue (what with all the adultery, gaslighting, and outright lies), so it's no wonder that his two wives, Betty (January Jones) and Megan (Jessica Paré), regularly reached for the color in their everyday wardrobes.
Perhaps one of Megan's most memorable sartorial moments was at the top of season 7. She picks up Don at the airport in Los Angeles, arriving in a sleek convertible. She steps out wearing a powder blue babydoll dress with sheer pleated sleeves and a giant bow affixed to the front. She's figuratively and literally in the driver's seat, at last in control of her budding acting career. Or so she thinks.
Fast-forward to later that season when Megan, estranged from and in the process of divorcing Don, can't find work and meets with Harry Crane (Rich Sommer) while sporting the same powder-blue number. She's hopeful he has legitimate leads, but really, he just wants to proposition her.
The trajectory of that single blue dress illustrates how suddenly fortunes shift. What was once a stylish symbol of possibility has morphed into a shell of itself, becoming something that was beautiful before the world got its hands on it.
Megan storms out, defeated and deflated, not carrying the same levity she had just months prior in L.A. It's not until she accepts a million-dollar check from Don as a divorce settlement that the spark in her eye starts to return, and perhaps rightly so. I wasn't necessarily #TeamMegan, but Don, unsurprisingly, treated her pretty terribly. I like to think she bought a groovy home in the Hollywood Hills, went on a massive shopping spree, and eventually found some steady acting work.
Mike Yarish/AMC/Everett Collection
January Jones as Betty Draper on
Mad Men.
First wife Betty, meanwhile, was almost always in blue, from dinner dates to running errands. Near the end, she makes clear that she, in fact, intends to spend all of eternity in blue. In the series' penultimate episode, she provides her daughter, Sally (Kiernan Shipka), with straightforward instructions for handling her posthumous wardrobe when she eventually dies from lung cancer. Specifically, she'd like to be buried in her blue chiffon dress from the 1968 Republican winter gala.
But that's not all she leaves with Sally. In the same note, she writes, 'I always worried about you because you marched to the beat of your own drum, but now I know that's good. I know your life will be an adventure.'
However flawed her mothering style may have been, it turns out the steely ice queen isn't entirely cold-hearted. With death looming, Betty lets her guard down with her children and her ex-husband. In season 7 episode 3, Don and Betty share a sweet, final moment of intimacy; when he stops by to visit Sally who isn't there, he offers a shoulder massage to Betty, who's reading 'Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria' by Sigmund Freud (likely an assignment from one of her psychology classes) and wearing a demure lilac dress.
Purple isn't seen in Betty's wardrobe as often as blue. Considering violet is the last color in the rainbow, her outfit in this moment suggests some kind of forward movement. Even with her terminal diagnosis, she's still willing herself to learn; to step out of her comfort zone. It's an admirable effort, especially from someone who was once as emotionally stunted as Betty (though, to be fair, so was Don).
Through its female characters and their costume design,
Mad Men
beautifully illustrates how one's style is both a means of expression and an exertion of personal choice. For women in particular, that feels like a significant reminder as we navigate an era of increasingly restricted rights.
We now live in a time that
Mad Men
wrapped in May 2015, a certain presidential contender hadn't even announced his candidacy yet. There was widespread hope for the first female president of the United States. We hadn't experienced global lockdowns, a deadly pandemic, or an insurrection.
The present moment just may be our defining moment. While it sometimes seems like the world's spinning into chaos and everything's out of control, the decision that no one can take away from us is how we choose to show up.
And, perhaps most importantly, whether we show up at all.
Related Stories
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Breaking Bad' Creator Vince Gilligan Drops Teaser for New Series
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors Vince Gilligan might be having one of the most generational runs in the history of television. The creator released "Breaking Bad," which is arguably the best television show ever created, pulling in a staggering 16 Emmys during its tenure. More news: 'Peacemaker' Season 2 Early Reviews Are All Saying the Same Thing Gilligan then followed that up with the "Better Call Saul" prequel series, which follows sleazy lawyer Saul Goodman (Bob Odenkirk." The prequel followed in its predecessor's footsteps and was nominated for 53 Emmys. Now, Gilligan is back with his next series, which brings in a star from the "Better Call Saul" series, Rhea Seehorn. Seehorn portrayed Kim Wexler in the "Breaking Bad" prequel and instantly became a fan-favorite. Tony Dalton, Michael Mando, Rhea Seehorn, Peter Gould, Vince Gilligan, Patrick Fabian arrive for the Premiere Of AMC's "Better Call Saul" Season 5 held at ArcLight Cinemas on February 5, 2020 in Hollywood, California. Tony Dalton, Michael Mando, Rhea Seehorn, Peter Gould, Vince Gilligan, Patrick Fabian arrive for the Premiere Of AMC's "Better Call Saul" Season 5 held at ArcLight Cinemas on February 5, 2020 in Hollywood, California. Albert L. Ortega/Getty Seehorn returns to star in Gilligan's latest series, "Pluribus," which has finally dropped a teaser. Seehorn is shown walking through the teaser, as a message is emblazoned across the screen. The message states: "Hello, Carol. We'll put things right. Sorry about the blood." There is also a phone number displayed on screen that reads: "(202) 808-3981." Seehorn could be playing Carol, but that has not yet been confirmed or established. It would be believed that is the case, considering the mention of blood, and Seehorn's character walking with blood on her shirt. The IMDb synopsis for the series states: "Follows the most miserable person on Earth and the one who must save the world from happiness." Not much else is known about the new Gilligan series, but the series will debut officially on AppleTV+ on November 7. The streamer might also release a full-length trailer in the coming days and weeks. For now, fans can start speculating on what the series may entail. One thing is for sure: Gilligan continues to make incredible stories, and "Pluribus" might just be his third consecutive homerun. For more streaming and TV news, head to Newsweek TV.


Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
Joan Collins teases her next big career move while sizzling in white swimsuit at 92
Joan Collins is embracing the heat. On Saturday, the "Dynasty" star, 92, got playful on social media while teasing her next big career move. "The producer is thinking of making a sequel to Murder Between Friends," Collins captioned the Instagram post, which features her lounging poolside while wearing a white bathing suit. "I played Francesca Carlyle who is a tv star and also a private detective. ( like shades of Agatha Christie & Murder She Wrote ). Meanwhile, I'm relaxing in the South of France in 90° heat.🔥 Thinking of my next move or next movie!" The snapshot earned mixed reactions from fans on social media, with some accusing Collins of using heavy filters. "Gorgeous but heavily filtered. Let's be honest. Her skin in real life is not like this. Don't appreciate unrealistic expectations for someone in her decade," one user wrote. Others praised Collins. "True icon," one fan wrote. "So glamorous and chic!" "How do you pull this off…. Looking that great and keep looking younger every time," another added. "Must be love, happy family life and the love of your life and having fun!!" Earlier this year, Sharon Stone opened up about the advice Collins once gave her when it comes to aging. "A lot of people give up as they get older," the "Basic Instinct" actress, 67, told The Sunday Times in March. "They let go of their body because it's collapsing anyway, or it's like, 'I'm not defined by my body anymore.'" She continued, "But you still have to love that body. I joke that my underarms have pleats now. I think, 'Well, I had beautiful arms and now they're strong and painting [she is an artist] and like angel wings. So what if they have pleats? Maybe that's what makes them wonderful now.'" She said that she was once at the house of Joan's sister, romance novelist Jackie Collins, playing billiards when Joan jokingly told her two things to never do after turning 40. "Joan said: 'Let me give you a tip. After 40, never get on top and never wave goodbye.'" She added, "Joan once described a man to me as a 'bungalow — everything downstairs, nothing upstairs.' She's so funny."


Business Insider
16 hours ago
- Business Insider
Options Trade Targets Statistical Oddity in AMC and Cinemark (CNK) Stocks
While it's never pleasant to discuss flailing industries, it's safe to say that the box office is undergoing a dramatic — and painful — paradigm shift. It really comes down to the signs of the times. With shopping malls fading into obscurity across America, the cineplex operators that once provided a marquee anchor are likewise struggling. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. To be fair, both AMC Entertainment (AMC) and Cinemark Holdings (CNK) have worked wonders to stay afloat in an increasingly competitive environment for the content entertainment industry. Unfortunately, the stats don't look particularly inviting. According to BoxOfficeMojo, the U.S. box office last year grossed $8.57 billion. A decade prior, the total gross was nearly $10.37 billion. And ten years before that, the figure was a very respectable $9.35 billion. In other words, the trend is rather flat and refusing to move in the right direction — and that's probably not something that either AMC or Cinemark can fix by themselves. Frankly, the nature of entertainment has changed. People have so many choices these days, and there's no reason to spend so much money when a similar experience (albeit on a much smaller scale) could be had for much less. Still, from a quantitative perspective, there's one ticker among the cineplex giants that could be intriguing. Establishing the Statistical Framework for AMC and CNK In the past few months, I've shifted my forecasting methodology from traditional fundamental and technical analysis to 'discrete-event' analysis, focusing on statistical and quantitative modeling of recent events. The main difference between the two is that the latter promotes epistemological continuity, where the input and output variables reside in the same domain of reality. Such continuity is especially critical when assessing different securities, even if they're positioned in the same industry, as is the case with AMC Entertainment and Cinemark. Under traditional methodologies, the primary measurement metrics are continuous scalar signals, meaning that they're unbounded. However, the inconsistency arises when discrete labels — such as 'good price' or 'bad earnings' — are directly extracted from these unbounded signals. Ultimately, what really matters is whether the market is a net buyer or a net seller. From this universal principle, we can compare multiple stocks on the same epistemological grounds. In the case of AMC stock, in the past 10 weeks, the market voted to buy the security four times and sell six times. During this period, the security experienced a downward trajectory. For brevity, we can label this sequence as 4-6-D. Before we get into the trading setup, let's consider the baseline odds of AMC stock. On any given week, the chance that a long position will rise is only 43.06%, meaning that AMC suffers from a worrying negative bias. So, the mission is simple: any bullish setup must be able to beat the baseline or else there would be no point. Unfortunately, this is the problem for AMC stock. Because it's flashing a 4-6-D sequence, the chance that it will see upside in the following week is only 38.46%. The caveat is that it's possible that AMC could see a considerable spike upward over the next two weeks. However, in both the positive and negative scenarios, AMC is likely to tumble based on past analogs. Empirically, I see too much risk here, which is why I can't wholeheartedly endorse the idea. CNK Stock May Offer a Temporary Reprieve Interestingly, CNK stock has also printed the same 4-6-D sequence as AMC: four up weeks, six down weeks, negative trajectory. While both securities present high risks due to the fading relevance of the box office, Cinemark is a different animal. Therefore, if you had to pick between the two, CNK makes for a superior empirical argument. As a baseline, the chance that a long position in CNK stock will rise on any given week is 51.16%. That's nothing to write home about, but it is an upward bias. This also puts some pressure on the bulls because any trading setup must beat the baseline on paper. Thankfully for the bulls, when the 4-6-D sequence flashes, there's a 58.7% chance that the following week's price action results in upside, with a median return of 3.87%. With CNK stock closing at $25.62 on Friday, there's a possibility that it could reach $26.61. Of course, if the market gods smile on Cinemark, CNK could in theory reach $27 due to the psychological effect of whole numbers. Unfortunately, Cinemark cannot escape the fundamental flaws of its industry. Based on past analogs, CNK stock is looking at a gradual deflation of its equity value. Subsequently, there appears to be only one rational trade available: the 25/27 bull call spread expiring September 19th. The above transaction involves buying the $25 call and simultaneously selling the $27 call, for a net debit paid of $105 (the maximum possible loss). Should CNK stock rise through the short strike price of $27 at expiration, the maximum profit is $95, a payout of over 90%. Here, the breakeven price is $26.05, so CNK doesn't need to hit $27 on September 19th to be at least somewhat profitable. Is CNK a Buy, Sell, or Hold? Turning to Wall Street, CNK stock carries a Strong Buy consensus rating based on eight Buys, one Hold, and zero Sell ratings over the past three months. CNK's average stock price target is $34.44, implying 32% upside potential over the next twelve months. Why CNK Stock is the Best House in the Worst Block The movie theater industry has faced years of decline, with no clear fundamental turnaround on the horizon. Both AMC Entertainment and Cinemark remain high-risk plays. That said, if forced to choose between the two, CNK stock looks like the slightly better option. Viewed through the same analytical lens, Cinemark edges out AMC—though only by a narrow margin.