Singapore shares fall amid mixed regional showing; STI down 0.2%
The benchmark Straits Times Index fell 0.2 per cent or 6.82 points to 3,875.60. PHOTO: ST FILE
SINGAPORE - Shares on the Singapore bourse ended lower on May 26, even as regional markets ended mixed.
The benchmark Straits Times Index (STI) fell 0.2 per cent or 6.82 points to 3,875.60.
Across the broader market, decliners edged out gainers 268 to 220, after 894.4 million securities worth $751.7 million were traded.
The top gainer on the index was in-flight caterer Sats, which rose 2.3 per cent or seven cen ts to $3.05.
The biggest blue-chip decliner was offshore and marine specialist Seatrium. The counter slid 1.4 per cent or three cents to $2.04.
Genting Singapore was the most actively traded counter by volume, with 30.3 million shares worth $21.3 million traded. The counter fell 1.4 per cent or one cent to $0.70.
Markets across the region ended mixed.
Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index fell 1.4 per cent while Australia's ASX 200 ended flat. South Korea's Kospi and Japan's Nikkei 225 gained 2 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively.
In view of the mixed Asian markets, Mr Paul Chew, head of research at Phillip Securities, said the US administration's 'constant flip-flops' in tariffs and policies will keep any business exposed to America hesitant to invest in inventories or capacity.
'The ever-present threat of tariffs only raises the risk premium of any manufacturer exposed to the US markets, especially semiconductor companies,' said Mr Chew. THE BUSINESS TIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trade tensions, political uncertainty dim air travel outlook; record traveller forecast trimmed
Iata said airline net profits are projected to be US$36 billion (S$46.4 billion) in 2025, up from US$32.4 billion in 2024. PHOTO: ST FILE NEW DELHI – Trade tensions and a decline in consumer confidence amid political and economic uncertainty have dented projected demand for air travel. While airlines are expected to carry a record 4.99 billion travellers in 2025 – 4 per cent more than in 2024 – this latest forecast falls short of the 5.22 billion projected by the International Airport Transport Association (Iata) in December 2024. Still, airlines are expected to turn in higher profits despite the headwinds. Iata, a global trade body represent ing more than 350 carriers, said airline net profits are projected to be US$36 billion (S$46.4 billion) in 2025, up from US$32.4 billion in 2024 but slightly below the earlier forecast of US$36.6 billion for 202 5. Net profit margins are also expected to rise to 3.7 per cent in 2025, up from 3.4 per cent in 2024. Iata director-general Willie Walsh said 2025 will be a better year for airlines, even with the significant uncertainties in global markets in the first half of the year. 'Considering the headwinds, it's a strong result that demonstrates the resilience that airlines have worked hard to fortify,' he added. The Asia-Pacific is the largest air travel market, Iata said, and passenger demand in the region is expected to be strong given the relaxation in visa requirements in several Asian countries such as China, Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand. However, the association noted economic challenges as gross domestic product forecasts for the region, especially for China, have been revised down wards . Mr Walsh said the biggest positive driver on the profitability front has been the 13 per cent fall in jet fuel prices. Strong employment and moderating inflation projections are also expected to keep air travel demand growing, even if not as fast as previously projected. An Iata poll in April found that a large majority of travellers expect to travel as much or more in the next 12 months. While 73 per cent of respondents expect to be personally affect ed by trade tensions, 65 per cent said this will not change their travel habits. Of the business travellers polled, 68 per cent expect to travel more to visit customers amid the trade tensions. Iata said passenger yields – a measure of how much airlines earn per passenger and a proxy for air fares – will fall 4 per cent in 2025, reflecting lower oil prices and strong competition within the industry. The average return airfare in 2025 is expected to be US$374, down from an earlier projection of US$380 and below the 2024 average of US$387. Supply chain issues that have plagued the airline industry since the pandemic are expected to persist in 2025, and could continue until the end of the decade, Iata said. It pointed to the backlog of aircraft deliveries, which have exceeded 17,000, implying a wait time of 14 years. This has had a negative impact on airlines, driving up aircraft leasing costs and reducing the efficiency of fleet usage. Iata also warned that moves to remove aircraft from tariff exemptions could aggravate supply chain constraints and production limits. Said Mr Walsh: 'Manufacturers continue to let their airline customers down. Every airline is frustrated that these problems have persisted so long.' Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Consumers, manufacturers key to enforcing EV battery recycling in Malaysia, say environmental groups
Manufacturers must also be legally mandated to take responsibility for the safe disposal or recycling of EV batteries. PHOTO: ST FILE PETALING JAYA - The government's plans to push for the recycling of depleted electric vehicle (EV) batteries must be enforced among both manufacturers and consumers to be environmentally sustainable, say environmental groups. Sahabat Alam Malaysia president Meenakshi Raman said manufacturers or importers of EVs must be legally required to collect back the same number of EV batteries as the vehicles they sell or bring into Malaysia. 'Failure to do so should result in fines or legal penalties. Companies that design longer-lasting or easier-to-recycle batteries should be rewarded with tax incentives. 'There must also be clear guidelines, good enforcement and proper facilities in place because used batteries could end up being dumped or handled in unsafe ways, causing harm to the environment and public health. 'Only licensed certified companies should be allowed to handle used EV batteries,' said Ms Meenakshi. She also urged the government to invest in propping up local recycling facilities and the development of an EV battery passport initiative that would track key battery information such as composition, origin, usage history and recyclability. 'An EV battery passport system will allow for better resource management as this makes it easier to identify which batteries can be reused, repurposed or need to be safely dismantled. 'Grants or tax breaks should be given to companies that invest in recycling technology or use recycled materials. 'The government should also consider supporting second-life uses for EV batteries such as repurposing them for solar energy storage before they are fully recycled, extending each battery's life and reducing waste,' she added. Environment Protection Society of Malaysia vice-president Randolph Jeremiah said manufacturers must be legally mandated to take responsibility for the safe disposal or recycling of EV batteries. 'Manufacturers must be made to establish their own recycling facilities, either domestically or in their country of origin or partner with local specialised recyclers. 'Extra tax benefits could be offered for those that invest in their own local recycling infrastructure as it strengthens Malaysia's circular economy ecosystem, allowing for the prevention and better handling of other environmental issues in the long run. 'Consumers must also be legally mandated to return used batteries to designated collection points for a cost, creating a closed-loop ecosystem where fiscal and environmental responsibility is shared by both consumers and manufacturers. 'This model would ensure long-term economic and environmental viability while preventing potential crises from inadequate recycling capacity,' he added. EcoKnights president Amlir Ayat proposed that a dedicated task force be set up to oversee this issue, particularly related to the disposal of EV battery waste that cannot be recycled. 'Any policy on EV battery recycling must be concrete, with continuous monitoring and enforcement being diligently conducted to ensure there are no potential legal or management loopholes which could lead to toxic waste management under the guise of recycling. 'The critical part now is securing the commitment from all parties, particularly the producers and consumers, through clear communication to avoid any such risks which may lead to disastrous consequences,' he said. He also urged the ministry to continue gathering public feedback on the matter. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
11 hours ago
- Business Times
How the US market fell from 4th to 41st for returns – and what it means for stocks in 2025
NEARLY two months after US President Donald Trump roiled markets with his on-again, off-again 'reciprocal' tariffs and universal 10 per cent levy, uncertainty remains. My last column showed the illogic underpinning this – and counselled patience. Here is an update – and how to profit. Trump says America 'wins' through his tariffs, reclaiming 'lost' manufacturing jobs and cutting the trade deficit. No. Tariffs always hammer most the one who imposes them. Don't take my word for it. Look to the markets. For any good capitalist, this is step one. Markets are a lie detector, weighing talk, forecasts and opinions – and rendering verdicts. Non-US stocks were up 8.8 per cent this year to May 22. The Straits Times Index gained 4.9 per cent, a hair's breadth from all-time highs. China? Up 10 per cent. European stocks rose 13.7 per cent. Mexico, up 20.7 per cent. US stocks? Down 5.5 per cent – a striking lag. If we look at it another way: Of the 47 MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) nations, America was 41st in the ranking of countries by their year-to-date returns as at May 22. In the same period last year, America was fourth – with its 28.8 per cent return fully seven percentage points ahead of the ACWI. Why did US stocks go from No 4 to 41? The answer is No 47; the 47th president, that is. Trump's vacillations make funds flee America. Markets know that attempts to reduce the trade deficit are senseless. A trade deficit means a capital account surplus by definition – that capital is foreign investment in the US. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Why would reversing that be desirable? Why would the government intervening to favour American firms, instead of letting free markets sort out the most efficient use of capital, be considered positive? Why would policy that seemingly changes on a whim be considered good? Stocks are seeing through the smoke and mirrors. America's lag tells you those things are bad, not good. My last column noted how Trump justified his 90-day reciprocal tariff pause on Apr 9 on the grounds that some 75 nations sought deals. Many claimed that this revealed Trump's true aim. The president's fans could say that tariffs, confusion and uncertainty are solely a leverage to strike a flurry of deals – delivering even freer trade. However, the markets are looking at reality, not armchair psychobabble. Deals to make more deals Since Apr 9, just two tariff 'deals' have emerged – one with Britain and one with China. Both are fluff. Britain's is a one-year, non-binding agreement to mitigate tariffs until a full trade deal happens. A deal to make a deal. It affects only a handful of industries. Crucially, the 10 per cent universal levy remains on most UK goods, just like for those from Singapore. America's China deal looks bigger, but only because the bar was incredibly low. Yes, it cut 145 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent, while China dropped retaliatory levies from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. However, the 'deal' lasts only 90 days and effectively just buys time. Another deal to make a deal. Plus, tariffs on China remain 30 percentage points higher than in January. Both countries are worse off, but especially America. Who wins from this? Maybe Singapore, via re-exporting. On May 16, Trump flip-flopped again. Boasting that 150 nations now seek 'deals', he said that there isn't time to negotiate them all. His 'solution'? Telling nations what rates they will pay – and offering chances to appeal. Didn't he already do that on 'Liberation Day' on Apr 2? How will it work? Will rates be higher, lower or the same as those on Apr 2? He did not say, further fanning uncertainty. Then, days later, he threatened the European Union with new 50 per cent tariffs – and 25 per cent on Apple products. More uncertainty. Meanwhile, legal challenges to Trump's tariffs progress. Maybe real deals will come that will actually lower trade barriers and uncertainty – a huge potential upside. Then again, maybe not. But as my last column said, even if all tariffs return, the pain will be less than feared – which will be bullish for markets. Importers can readily skirt America's understaffed, overwhelmed tariff-collecting Customs and Border Protection staff via both illegal and legal means. The latter include 'tariff splitting' – stripping out services-related costs such as marketing to reduce goods' values – or storing imports in bonded warehouses. Or, shipping in goods that are valued to be under US$800. And myriad illegal ways such as misclassifying and undervaluing goods. Or, as mentioned, exporters can 'tranship' or re-export via lower-tariff nations – such as Singapore. This is why China's April exports didn't tank despite shipments to America tumbling 21 per cent. South-east Asia gobbled up the difference – and shipped them on. It drove Singapore's huge, 113 per cent year-on-year spike in April re-exports to America. Vietnam and Taiwan are seeing similar surges. Shippers could further tap Canada or Mexico, gaming the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement's tariff exemption. Hence, while April's total tariff collections rose, they missed administration forecasts by 75 per cent. That will persist. Happily, fear exceeds the negative effects, especially outside America. For investors, that is a recipe for a bull market – with non-US stocks continuing to lead. The writer is the founder, executive chairman and co-chief investment officer of Fisher Investments, an independent investment adviser serving both individual and institutional investors globally
