
Report claims the 'mansion tax' stifles commercial development in L.A.
Depending on who you ask, Measure ULA has been a godsend or a disaster for L.A.'s real estate market. A new report suggests the latter.
A new analysis from UCLA's Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies authored by Michael Manville and Mott Smith claims that the so-called 'mansion tax' has slowed down sales, especially for commercial properties.
Measure ULA was passed in 2022 and took effect in April 2023, bringing a 4% charge to all L.A. property sales above $5 million and a 5.5% charge to sales above $10 million. The proceeds fund affordable housing and homelessness prevention initiatives; roughly two years in, the transfer tax has raised more than $632 million.
But the report — published Tuesday and titled 'The Unintended Consequences of Measure ULA' — suggests the tax has chilled a once-robust market in L.A., while sales above $5 million have remained steady in other markets across L.A. County not affected by the tax.
The study analyzed 338,000 property sales over the last five years and found that the drop is most acute on the commercial side. Under ULA, non-single family transactions fell 7-15% per month in L.A. ZIP Codes, a trend that compounded to 30-50% over the course of two years.
'The hardest-hit properties are not luxury homes, but multi-family, commercial and industrial buildings — the very types we need to support housing production and job growth,' Smith said.
A commercial decline hurts the city in two ways, the report argues. First, commercial properties often sell for significantly more than single-family homes, so even a slight decrease in sales leads to a large drop in tax revenue. In addition, commercial sales typically lead to new multi-family development, which the city desperately needs in the midst of a housing crisis.
Smith said the decline led to a $25-million annual loss in property tax revenue, and that loss will compound over the next few years. In a decade, the loss in revenue could exceed the funds brought in by the tax.
Property taxes are different from money brought in by ULA's transfer tax. Property taxes flow into the city's general budget, while ULA taxes are specifically earmarked for affordable housing and homelessness initiatives.
Smith and Manville suggested reforming the tax to only affect properties that haven't been reassessed in 20 years, which could exempt multi-family developers while still targeting luxury homeowners whose property values have soared over the years.
Joe Donlin, who serves as director of United to House L.A., the organization behind Measure ULA, said the tax is doing what it set out to do.
'On its second anniversary, Measure ULA is already producing hundreds of units of affordable housing, protecting tens of thousands of renters and creating thousands of construction jobs,' Donlin said. 'Its initial dip in revenue owes more to developers and the real estate lobby hoping to overturn it in court or at the ballot box — and losing.'
The tax has survived multiple legal challenges in the last few years from the luxury real estate community, who sought to declare the measure unconstitutional. In addition, revenue sputtered in the first year of the program as property owners either sold off homes in the days before the tax took effect or found loopholes to avoid paying it.
Revenue and sales have both increased year-over-year as legal challenges fade. The tax raised roughly $296 million in fiscal year 2024 and has raised $320 million so far in fiscal year 2025. But the numbers still fall well short of initial projections of $900 million per year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Vestis Corporation (VSTS) Investors Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation
BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of Vestis Corporation ('Vestis' or the 'Company') (NYSE: VSTS) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN VESTIS CORPORATION (VSTS), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@ by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at What Happened? On May 7, 2025, Vestis released its second quarter fiscal 2025 financial results and revised its prior growth and revenue guidance for 2025, providing guidance for the third quarter, falling significantly below market expectations. The Company explained that the poor results were partially due to 'lost business in excess of new business' but primarily on 'lower adds over stops, which is how [it] describe[s] volumes changes with [its] existing customers.' On this news, Vestis's stock price fell $3.27, or 37.5%, to close at $5.44 per share on May 7, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you purchased Vestis securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020, Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Email: howardsmith@ Visit our website at: This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.


Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) Investors Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation
BENSALEM, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of Sable Offshore Corp. ('Sable' or the 'Company') (NYSE: SOC) investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN SABLE OFFSHORE CORP. (SOC), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@ by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at What Happened? On May 19, 2025, Sable announced that it had resumed oil production from one of three offshore platforms related for its Las Flores pipelines ('Onshore Pipeline') in California. Then, on May 23, 2025, the California State Land Commission sent Sable a letter regarding its May 19th announcement, warning that it 'appears to mischaracterize the nature of recent activities, causing significant public confusion and raising questions regarding Sable's intentions,' and that Sable had conflated offshore well testing activities required by a federal regulatory agency with the restart of operations. Then, on May 28, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Superior Court approved a preliminary injunction from the California Coastal Commission regarding Sable's maintenance and repair work in the coastal zone related to the Onshore Pipeline. On this news, Sable's stock price fell $5.04, or 15.3%, to close at $27.89 per share on May 28, 2025, thereby injuring investors. Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: If you purchased Sable securities, have information or would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020, Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Email: howardsmith@ Visit our website at: This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alberta premier says province working on proposal for new crude oil pipeline to Port of Prince Rupert
By Amanda Stephenson CALGARY (Reuters) - Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Wednesday the province is working to present Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney with a proponent and route for a potential new crude pipeline from Alberta to the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia. Smith told reporters at an energy conference in Calgary that her government is in talks with Canada's major pipeline companies in the hope that a private sector proponent will take the lead on Alberta's vision of a new, 1-million-barrel-per-day crude oil conduit to B.C.'s northwest coast. She said Alberta aims to gauge private companies' interest in coming together as a consortium to build the pipeline. "Or if one (company) emerges as being a principal proponent, then we'll be interested in talking to them too," Smith said. Canada currently sends approximately 90 per cent of its oil exports to the U.S., but has been seeking to diversify due to trade tensions and tariff threats from President Donald Trump. Alberta, Canada's main oil-producing province, is keen to see construction of a new export pipeline, to give Canada's oil industry the ability to boost production long-term. No private company has publicly expressed interest in building such a project. Smith said she hopes Carney, who won a minority government in April, will make good on his pledge to speed permitting times for major infrastructure projects. Companies will not commit to building a pipeline, Smith said, without confidence in the federal government's intent to bring about regulatory reform. Alberta is proposing that a new oil pipeline be built in tandem with the Pathways Alliance's carbon capture and storage project, which has been proposed by a consortium of oil sands companies to reduce emissions from Canada's energy sector. The companies have not been successful in negotiating an agreement with both levels of government over funding support for the project. Smith said the Pathways project, which could cost between $10 billion and $20 billion to build, would be more likely to be green-lit by oil companies if they had the assurance of revenue growth that a new crude export pipeline would bring. Canada is the world's fourth-largest oil producer. The country achieved record oil production last year as the opening of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in May 2024 tripled the country's oil export capacity off the B.C. west coast to 890,000 barrels per day. However, construction of that project was marred by regulatory delays and costs soaring to more than four times the pipeline's original budget. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data