New research could be 'overstating' link between Parkinson's and pesticides, neurologist says
Consultant Neurologist Professor Tim Lynch has said that recent research linking the increasing number of cases of Parkinson's Disease with pesticides could be 'overstating' the complex issue.
Speaking on RTÉ radio's Today with Claire Byrne show, Prof. Lynch said that while environmental factors could be a contributory factor, there were also genetic factors.
Advertisement
However, he acknowledged 'there is something' that is increasing the frequency of the disease. 'It's not just age, there's something else that's actually increasing the frequency of it. And the hypothesis is that there is something in the environment.
'Is it some of these solvents or could it be various things like pesticides, whether it's paraquat, whether rotenone or different pesticides used, that could increase the risk and hence the study is intriguing because pesticides are used by golf clubs for greens and for fairways, it's quite common.
'That's changed over time, obviously they're trying to use less toxins in relation to pesticides in sprays, but they may have been exposed 20, 30 years ago, they could still have an effect on the population.
'We know there are specific genes that can sometimes cause Parkinson's to go down through the generations or they get what we call autosomal recessive disease where you get a gene from mom and gene from dad and you get Parkinson's. So there's a certain percentage of Parkinson's, maybe 10 to 15 percent that have got a significant genetic component to it.'
Advertisement
Prof. Lynch outlined that the new research comes from a Rochester epidemiology study going back to 1991 involving just over 400 people which looked at where people lived – if it was near golf courses or vulnerable water areas.
'They were able to show about a double increased risk if you were living within a mile of a golf course or if you're living within a vulnerable water area. It's a small study, so you can't overly hang your hat on it'
While there is not a cure yet for neurodegenerative conditions like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, Prof Lynch said he was an optimist.
'If you're proactive about various things about your brain, you can certainly look after yourself. So keep yourself intellectually busy, sleep well, exercise, and have a good diet. Maintain social contacts and make sure your blood pressure and sugar levels are well controlled.
'There are a bunch of variables that keep your brain healthy so your hundred billion neurons remain intact but in particular that you generate those synapses, those connections from neurons to each other and that gets driven by education and very driven by reading.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New test for coeliac disease could increase diagnosis rates
A new blood test for gluten -specific T cells can detect coeliac disease even without gluten consumption, according to research published in Gastroenterology. The new blood test could increase diagnosis rates, identify those at risk of severe reactions, and detect silent coeliac disease. The test measures the immune marker interleukin 2 (IL-2), which spikes in the bloodstream of people with coeliac disease after gluten consumption. The study showed the test could detect coeliac disease with up to 90 per cent sensitivity and 97 per cent specificity, even in patients on a gluten -free diet. Researchers are collaborating with Novoviah Pharmaceuticals to confirm the test's accuracy across diverse populations and gather real-world data, potentially leading to faster and safer diagnoses. 'Game-changer' new blood test to detect prevalent autoimmune disease without nightmare side effects
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Britain morphing into ‘National Health State', says think tank
Britain is turning into a 'National Health State', a think tank has said after the Chancellor gave the NHS a major funding boost in her spending review. The health service was the big winner of Wednesday's spending review, receiving an extra £29 billion per year for day-to-day spending and more cash for capital investment. Overnight, the Resolution Foundation said Rachel Reeves's announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although the think tank's director Paul Johnson warned the money may not be enough. He said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
The NHS will receive £6bn in funding. Here's how it will be used
Rachel Reeves has pledged a £6bn investment to accelerate NHS tests and treatments, following substantial budget increases. The funding aims to provide new scanners, ambulances, and urgent treatment centres, delivering up to four million more tests and procedures in five years. This investment supports the government's goal of reducing NHS waiting lists in England, with Labour aiming for 92 per cent of routine operations to be carried out within 18 weeks. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the investment will generate millions more diagnostic tests, scans, and procedures, building on 3.6 million extra elective care appointments already delivered. Health leaders are sceptical, with Matthew Taylor of the NHS Confederation warning that the £29bn increase may not cover rising costs and guarantee waiting time targets, while Sarah Woolnough of the King's Fund questions how all NHS needs can be met with this settlement alone.
