Two men convicted of murder in the case of slain lecturer
Image: Supplied
IT WAS a bitter-sweet moment for the family of slain lecturer Chanlall Dwarika, after two men were found guilty of his murder in the Durban High Court on Wednesday.
Thobani Mhlongo, 23, and Kwanele Makhaye, 29, together with Siyabonga Mahaye, 35, were also found guilty for kidnapping and robbery with aggravating circumstances.
Mahaye was not charged with murder.
A fourth person, Sihle Mkhize, 23, was found not guilty on all three charges.
According to the indictment's summary of substantial facts, the State, represented by senior advocate Krishen Shah, said the 63-year-old electrical engineering lecturer at the Mangosuthu University of Technology (MUT), owned a house in Maynard Road, Sea Cow Lake.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He said Dwarika resided at another house with his wife in Verulam.
Shah said Dwarika was in the process of renovating the property as he intended on selling it to 'Pastor Miya'.
He said the renovations were being thwarted as the material bought were being continuously stolen.
Shah said sometime during 2022, at the suggestion of Miya, Mhlongo, Makhaye, and Mahaye were allowed to stay at the property on condition that they keep the house secure and assist with the renovations pending the sale of the house.
'In terms of this loose agreement, the assailants would not pay rent and the deceased would only pay them for renovations done and some spending money on a casual basis.'
Shah said despite the three men residing at the property, the theft continued.
He said Dwarika arrived and 'ejected them from his property" on May 26, 2023.
Shah said on May 28, Dwarika visited the property driving his black Honda SUV to effect certain repairs and install a security gate to secure the property.
He said Dwarika was accosted by the three men, who forced him into the rear seat of his vehicle and drove off with him.
Shah said Dwarika was forced to hand over his ATM card and pin code. He said the three men used his card to withdraw cash and make purchases at various places.
He said Mahaye retained Dwarika's card and parted ways with the other two men.
Shah said at some stage thereafter Mkhize joined Mhlongo and Makhaye, who held Dwarika captive in his vehicle.
'During this time further demands for monies were made of Dwarika and purchases made with his banking facilities. At some stage that night, they drove to a place in Inanda and they forced the deceased into a bushy area where he was forced to the ground and his throat was slit. They thereafter fled the area and the deceased's vehicle was subsequently disposed of by burning.'
Dwarika's body was found six days later on June 3.
According to the post-mortem, his cause of death was determined as 'slashing injury to the neck (partial decapitation)".
During the trial, various witnesses testified for the State.
Judge Khosi Hadebe, in handing down her judgment, said the State had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Ayuushi Dwarika-Rajbansi, Dwarika's daughter, said: 'We believe the judgment is fair. It was also because of the accused four's (Mkhize) help that we were able to find my dad after so many days. We believe he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. We are actually grateful to him.
'Having gone through the trial over the last year was quite draining and heartbreaking, especially having to hear what my father endured. There is not a day that we don't think about him and it is very difficult. However, this judgment gives us some comfort, especially knowing that the perpetrators will not go without due punishment,' she said.
Sentencing is expected today.
THE POST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Durban High Court hears evidence of discrepancies in waste collection audit in DSW matter
Former eThekwini mayor Zandile Gumede and second accused Mondli Michael Mthembu. Image: Nomonde Zondi During proceedings at the Durban High Court yesterday, it emerged that the number of houses requiring waste collection in December 2017 had doubled. Furthermore, the audit report supporting this figure may have been inaccurate. The Durban Solid Waste (DSW) tender fraud case involves former eThekwini Municipality mayor Zandile Gumede, who is one of the 21 accused. They face multiple charges, including fraud, racketeering, corruption, money laundering, and violations of the Municipal Finance Management Act and the Municipal Systems Act, all related to the R320 million DSW tender. A state witness, who worked at the solid waste unit in 2017, compared the number of households requiring waste services as reflected in the closed tender drafted in December 2017 with the number indicated in the audit report. She noticed a significant difference of 86,431 households between the tender and the audit report. Allan Robert Abbu, the fourth accused, was the deputy head of the Solid Waste Unit at that time. The witness, who cannot be named due to court instructions, stated that the number of households reflected in the tender's bid specifications was drawn from an audit report. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The audit report is compiled using various methods, including field sheets and aerial photographs of areas needing waste collection services. In her evidence-in-chief, the witness mentioned that she could not explain the source of the additional numbers. The defence challenged the State's assertion that Abbu dictated these additional numbers to a contract administrator who drafted the December tender document. Advocate Jay Naidoo SC, counsel for Abbu, pointed out that the contract administrator who testified did not support this claim. During his cross-examination, Naidoo, who also represents Gumede, examined the audit report with the witness. He read a page that included a declaration made by the auditors, highlighting a column labelled "Accuracy and Validity Risk." Naidoo quoted, "Data on the measurement/payment certificates indicating the percentage of households with access to a basic level of solid waste removal may be invalid or inaccurate." He then asked the witness what this meant. The witness confirmed that the report was compiled by the city's internal auditors and noted that the aerial photographs used were taken in 2011. The trial continues.
