‘What are you doing tonight, baby?': Romance scams are big business
Romance scams are sophisticated. There are entire networks of scammers, usually overseas, that treat scamming like a business. They find vulnerable people, manipulate them, and often get away with big money.
Do you have a consumer complaint or need help from Jeff Deal and Action 9? Click the banner below to submit a tip.
With more people looking for love online, criminals know it and they use that to prey on people.
Action 9 spoke with a central Florida woman whose mother fell victim to a romance scam that started online.
She said, 'I have seen texts on her phone that say, 'Hey, baby, how are you? What are you doing tonight, baby?''
'We about fell out of our seat': Elderly couple surprised by $55,000 timeshare bill
Her elderly mother had more than $600,000 in late 2022. She fell in love with someone online who claimed to be the face of Tesla and Space X, Elon Musk. The scammer used artificial intelligence to make it more believable.
'They hear that voice. They hear Elon Musk's voice, and they know it's his voice,' she explained.
'I just want to warn people': Consumer claims he lost $3K to Orlando business
First there were wire transfers with huge amounts of money going out. She showed Action 9, documents indicating one wire transfer topped $100,000. It was money her mother believed she was investing. There were daily ATM withdrawals of $3,000. Much of the cash went to buy gift cards for the scammers. In less than a year, her life savings was wiped out.
'You may have entered into the dating scene or a dating app looking for love, but scammers are out there looking for their next victim,' said Better Business Bureau President Holly Salmons.
She told Action 9, in these scams of the heart, the bad guys work to gain their victims' trust and then work to get their money.
Here are some red flags:
-The relationship moves quickly
-You never meet in person
-The love interest claims to be a celebrity or in the military
-They ask for money or try to draw you into an investment like cryptocurrency
Salmons said, 'Especially if this is not why you came to the dating app, right? Most people did not come to a dating app for investment advice.'
'They didn't protect my property': Woman's car stolen at off-site airport parking lot
Like many romance scams, for the woman Action 9 interviewed the scam meant devastation. Her mom now lives on Social Security, stress on the family mounted quickly and she wants to warn others before they lose everything in romance scam like her mom did.
She said, 'It's like you want to walk out of her house and scream or cry. It's so frustrating.'
If you fall victim to a romance scam, contact the FBI through its IC3 website(Home Page - Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)) and the Federal Trade Commission to file a complaint(ReportFraud.ftc.gov). Also, report it to the social media company where you met the scammer. Unfortunately, many times the victims still never get their money back.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
7 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump administration imposes fresh sanctions on ICC officials
The Trump administration announced fresh sanctions on International Criminal Court officials on Wednesday and accused the ICC of being a "national security threat" and "instrument for lawfare" against the U.S. and Israel. The big picture: The intergovernmental organization and international tribunal in a statement called the latest U.S. sanctions that affect two judges and two prosecutors "a flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution." Driving the news: Rubio said in a statement posted to the State Department's website that the sanctions were in response to the "ICC's Ongoing Threat to Americans and Israelis." The sanctioned officials "directly engaged" in ICC efforts "to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation." The latest penalties that effective freeze assets and bar officials from entering the U.S. affect ICC judges Kimberly Prost, of Canada, and Nicolas Guillou, of France, and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan, of Fiji, and Mame Mandiaye Niang, of Senegal, according to the statement. State of play: President Trump first imposed sanctions on ICC officials in a February executive order, some three months after the court that neither the U.S. nor Israel recognizes issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the war in Gaza. In June, Rubio announced sanctions on four ICC judges over the arrest warrants and also due to the court's investigation into alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. Zoom in: "Prost is being designated for ruling to authorize the ICC's investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan," per a State Department statement. Guillou was targeted for ruling to authorize the ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, while the statement said Shameem Khan and Niang were being designated "for continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against Israel." This included the upholding of the arrest warrants.
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Vance tells Musk to stay 'loyal' to Trump's Republican Party amid third party speculation
Vice President JD Vance cautioned Elon Musk against forming a third political party in an exclusive interview on "The Ingraham Angle," saying the billionaire could wield more influence by staying "loyal" to the Republican Party and President Donald Trump's MAGA movement. "My advice to Elon would be to try to fix the Republican Party. Try to push it in your own way. Disagree with me all you want, disagree with the president of the United States, but don't pretend that you can make a big difference with a third party," Vance said Wednesday. "I think Elon would make a much bigger difference if he stayed loyal to President Trump's Republican Party, and if he had disagreements, express those disagreements from the inside as opposed from the outside." The former Ohio senator's comments came after The Wall Street Journal reported Musk is pausing plans to start the America Party to focus on his companies. Fox News parent Fox Corp. and The Wall Street Journal parent News Corp share common ownership. Musk announced in a post on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, in July that the America Party would be formed to give people their "freedom" back, amid criticism about the two-party system. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," he wrote. The former special government employee who served in an advisory role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) publicly split with Trump earlier in 2025 over his support for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." Musk argued the bill would add trillions to an already ballooning U.S. national debt and could undermine DOGE's work of cutting government spending. Musk's allies, according to the WSJ, said the SpaceX CEO hasn't officially ruled out creating the new party and could change his mind. "I do think that it would be a huge mistake for Elon to go forward with a third party, and my argument to him is whether you like it or not, you are now perceived by the far-Left as on the side of the American Right," Vance told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. "You believe in law and order, you believe in closed borders, you believe in economic growth and prosperity, you believe in making things in the United States of America. The idea that Elon is ever going to go back to being sort of in the middle, where Democrats and Republicans both like him, that's just not going to happen. He is perceived as being on the American Right." The vice president also denied talking to Musk or other donors about a potential 2028 presidential run amid reports that the world's richest man could financially back Vance. Reuters reported that Musk's America PAC spent nearly $300 million during the 2024 election in favor of Trump and other Republican candidates.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla shareholder group urges probe, ‘appropriate remedial action' from Nasdaq over Elon Musk's $29 billion pay package
In the latest twist in a long-running battle over Elon Musk's compensation at Tesla, the SOC Investment Group has requested that Nasdaq formally investigate 'and take appropriate remedial action' against Tesla for its recent $29 billion equity grant to the CEO. In a letter to Nasdaq, the group raised concerns about compliance with executive compensation rules and shareholder transparency. The SOC Group, formerly known as the CtW Investment Group, works with pension funds sponsored by a coalition of unions representing over 2 million members; many of those funds are Tesla investors. In a letter dated Aug. 19, 2025, addressed to Erik Wittman, deputy general counsel and head of enforcement at Nasdaq, SOC expressed 'serious concerns' about Musk's new compensation package. Specifically, SOC said it was concerned that Tesla's board circumvented Nasdaq listing rules when awarding Musk a '2025 CEO Interim Award,' disclosed earlier this month. The group claims this equity award should have required a shareholder vote, as stipulated under Nasdaq's rules, given that it materially amended compensation plans. Tesla's board approved Musk's new equity package under the company's 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, largely as compensation for his previously awarded—and overturned—$56 billion options package from 2018, known as the '2018 CEO Performance Award.' That older award was (twice) overturned by the Delaware Chancery Court owing to questions regarding board independence—a decision currently being appealed at the Delaware Supreme Court. Fortune's Shawn Tully reported that the new package will only apply if Musk and Tesla lose on appeal in Delaware. He also noted that unlike with the $56 billion award, the newer $29 billion award includes restrictions that protect shareholders: The shares vest on the second anniversary of the grant, or early August 2027, only if Musk serves for the entire period as CEO or chief of product development or operations. Musk can't sell any of those vested shares until five years later, or on Aug. 3, 2030. Fortune's Amanda Gerut reported that, such restrictions notwithstanding, the package lacks hard performance targets for Musk. Brian Dunn, director of the Institute for Compensation Studies at Cornell University, told Fortune that experts sometimes refer to these as 'fog-the-mirror grants.' In other words: 'If you're around and have enough breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them.' The objections lobbied by SOC Investment Group in its letter have nothing to do with either feature of the grants. The group argues that the Tesla board dodged shareholder approval for the package, in contravention of Nasdaq listing policy. Tejal Patel, executive director of the SOC Investment Group, told Fortune in an interview that the 'real issue is the fact that the original plan … was pretty clear in the disclosures that the company did not intend to include Elon Musk in that plan.' Acknowledging that such issues are usually raised with the Securities and Exchange Commission, she added: 'Admittedly, this is the first time I've flagged something like this to Nasdaq, [and that's] because it was a very specific listing standard.' Her understanding of the Nasdaq standard is that 'this is exactly what it was designed to avoid.' Shareholders likely 'did not believe' they were voting to approve a new Musk package The SOC Investment Group emphasizes that when Tesla shareholders approved the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, company disclosures explicitly excluded Musk from eligibility, stating that his compensation would be exclusively tied to the extraordinary 2018 award. 'When shareholders voted on the 2019 Plan it is likely that, based on the available disclosures and research, they did not believe they were voting on an equity plan that would cover compensation to Mr. Musk,' the SOC letter notes, 'precisely because of the 'truly extraordinary' nature of the 2018 CEO Performance Award.' The SOC letter also notes that Tesla's 2019 proxy statement repeated multiple times that the 2019 plan was not intended to cover awards to Musk. Furthermore, the letter mentions that major proxy advisory firms indicated that the 2018 CEO Performance Award was 'intended to be the sole means of compensation for Mr. Musk, relying on the Company's disclosures.' Therefore, SOC writes, the 2025 CEO Interim Award 'appears to expand the class of participants under the 2019 Plan in manner that would be sufficiently material to require a separate shareholder vote.' The letter also warns that Tesla's board has indicated further interim awards could follow, potentially bypassing shareholder votes while the Delaware case, the so-called Tornetta litigation, is pending. The SOC letter urges Nasdaq to act to 'restore 'the rightful balance between shareholder and management's interests,'' prevent dilution, and ensure executive compensation transparency. SOC has 'real concerns over director independence,' Patel told Fortune. 'This is sort of the outcome of having a board that is not independent.' She said her group is concerned with issues over a lack of director independence and the juggling of responsibilities by Elon Musk, and matters have 'come to a head in the last several months.' This timeline overlaps with Musk's brief engagement as a special advisor to the White House, including extensive involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The new compensation plan, if anything, 'was an opportunity for the board to get Musk to focus on Tesla, and instead' they've arrived at this package, she said. She also noted that the conditions under which Musk would receive the same pay, even if he was a chief of product development or operations, is 'pretty unheard-of.' A vocal, active shareholder SOC Investment Group has a long and active history of engagement with Tesla, focusing on issues such as executive compensation, governance, board independence, and labor rights. The group has repeatedly opposed large pay packages for Musk—including leading campaigns to encourage shareholders to vote against Musk's $56 billion option award and calling for votes against related awards, especially when it believed proper shareholder approval procedures were circumvented or governance standards were not met. The group has also urged Tesla shareholders to vote against the reelection of certain directors, such as Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch, citing concerns about lack of board independence from Elon Musk and alignment with shareholders' interests. Similar to its current letter to Nasdaq, it has requested investigations by regulators into Tesla's governance practices, arguing that the company's board favors Musk's interests over those of public shareholders. For example, the group asked the SEC to probe Tesla's plan to shrink its board in 2022. The group has also joined with other investors in co-filing shareholder resolutions calling for Tesla to adopt comprehensive labor rights policies, including noninterference with worker organizing and compliance with global labor standards. SOC has been involved in webinars and resolutions highlighting risks related to Tesla's approach to unions and labor issues across several countries. Tesla has not publicly responded to the letter and did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
