US judge rules Apple must face antitrust trial over monopoly claims
District Judge Julien Neals of New Jersey ruled that the government had adequately demonstrated that Apple maintains monopoly power in smartphone markets and engages in anticompetitive conduct to maintain that dominance.
The lawsuit, filed in March 2024 by the US Department of Justice's antitrust division and 20 states, accuses Apple of illegally monopolizing smartphone markets through restrictions on app developers and device makers that limit competition and innovation.
According to the complaint, Apple controls 65 per cent of the broader US smartphone market and 70 per cent of the 'performance smartphone' market—a premium segment that excludes lower-end devices.
Judge Neals found these market share figures, combined with significant barriers to entry, sufficient to indicate Apple's monopoly power and warrant taking the case to trial.
The judge has yet to set a trial date, but the case is expected to take years.
'We believe this lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and we will continue to vigorously fight it in court,' an Apple spokesperson said in an email to AFP.
The government alleges Apple maintains this dominance by restricting five key technologies: 'super apps,' cloud-streaming apps, text messaging, smartwatches, and digital wallets.
The ruling highlighted internal Apple communications that allegedly show intent to maintain monopoly power, including statements from executives about preventing users from switching to competing devices.
Apple faces potential remedies ranging from changes to its business practices to orders requiring it to divest parts of its device and software empire if the government ultimately prevails at trial.
The case is among several major antitrust challenges facing Apple, which has also been accused for taking a significant cut of proceeds from outside apps on its devices.
The lawsuit is one of five major cases launched by the first Trump administration and Joe Biden's administration that also targeted Meta and Amazon.
In the two cases against Google, judges found the search engine giant guilty of running an illegal monopoly, and the company faces potential forced divestments of some of its businesses.— AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump says he will ‘take a look' at deporting Musk
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, was Donald Trump's biggest donor in the 2024 US election. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump said today he could consider deporting Elon Musk, after the South African-born billionaire slammed his flagship spending bill. Trump also said the department of government efficiency (DOGE) – which Musk headed before stepping down late May – may train its sights on the Tesla and SpaceX founder's government subsidies. 'I don't know. We'll have to take a look,' Trump told reporters at the White House when asked if he would consider deporting Musk. 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.' Trump doubled down on the threat when he said he believed Musk was attacking his so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because he was annoyed that it had dropped measures to support electric vehicles (EV). 'He's losing his EV mandate. He's very upset about things, but you know, he could lose a lot more than that, I can tell you right now. Elon can lose a lot more than that.' Trump made similar comments on his Truth Social network late yesterday, saying that 'without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa'. Musk, the world's richest person, was Trump's biggest donor in the 2024 election and initially maintained a near constant presence at the newly elected president's side. They had an acrimonious public falling out this month over the bill and the tycoon has reprised his criticisms in recent days, accusing Republicans of abandoning efforts to place the US at the front of the EV and clean energy revolution. Musk has also renewed his calls for the formation of a new political party called the 'America Party' if the bill passed.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Tax operations declared as "essential services" in Bangladesh
DHAKA, July 1 (Xinhua) -- The Bangladeshi interim government has declared tax operations as "essential services," in a bid to better safeguard local and foreign trade and commerce. Bangladesh's Ministry of Labor and Employment issued a gazette notification in this regard Tuesday. According to the notification, tax operations are declared as essential operations for meeting revenue collection targets of the government and for keeping the financial management of the government dynamics. The Bangladeshi interim government last month through an ordinance created two new divisions by abolishing the country's National Board of Revenue in an apparent move to modernize tax administration and boost revenue collection. The ordinance stated that the Revenue Policy Division will monitor the implementation of tax laws while the Revenue Management Division will mainly look into revenue collection. The restructuring reportedly followed a key condition set by the International Monetary Fund to separate tax policy from administration. The Washington-based lender has long pushed for tax reforms to raise Bangladesh's tax-to-GDP ratio, one of the lowest in Asia.
Free Malaysia Today
8 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump suggests DOGE look at subsidies for Musk's companies to save money
CEO Elon Musk has about US$22 billion in federal contracts through SpaceX. (Reuters pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump suggested today that the government efficiency department should take a look at the subsidies that Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies have received in order to save money. Trump's comments come after Musk, the world's richest man, renewed his criticism on Monday of Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, vowing to unseat lawmakers who backed it after campaigning on limiting government spending. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social, referring to the federal department of government efficiency. In response to Trump's post, Musk, on his own social media platform X, said 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' Trump previously threatened to cut Musk's government subsidies and contracts when their relationship dissolved into an all-out brawl on social media in early June over the bill, which non-partisan analysts have said would add about US$3 trillion to the US debt. Musk's businesses include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX, which has about US$22 billion in federal contracts, and its satellite unit Starlink. His rift with Trump also caused volatility for Tesla, with shares of the electric car company losing about US$150 billion of its market value on June 5, the largest single-day decline in the company's history, though it has since recovered. Tesla shares trading in Frankfurt tumbled 5% on Tuesday. After weeks of relative silence following his earlier feud with Trump over the legislation, Musk rejoined the debate on Saturday as the Senate took up the package, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on X. On Monday, he said lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill 'should hang their heads in shame!' 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk added. Musk called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated 'that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' Musk's criticism marked a dramatic shift after the tech billionaire spent nearly US$300 million on Trump's re-election campaign and led the administration's controversial DOGE cost-cutting initiative. Musk has argued that the legislation would greatly increase the national debt and erase the savings he says he achieved through DOGE. It remains unclear how much sway Musk has over congress or what effect his opinions might have on the bill's passage. But Republicans have expressed concern that his on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections.
