Exiled Afghan women visit SA in bid to end gender violence
A delegation of exiled Afghan women is in South Africa for a week-long visit, on a mission to share their stories, and to create a knowledge and insights-sharing platform in their search for solidarity to end gender apartheid.
Malala Fund, in partnership with End Gender Apartheid Campaign, the Civic Engagement Project and Lawyers for Human Rights, has hosted a series of roundtable dialogues and discussions with some of South Africa's leading human rights activists as well as members of the judiciary.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
At a roundtable hosted at the Nelson Mandela Foundation in Johannesburg, panellists included Professor Thuli Madonsela, Professor Farid Esack, Judge Margie Victor, and three Afghan women who are part of the delegation.
Escaping a forced child marriage. Suffering a broken nose for lifting a Burka in public. Shutting down beauty salons and schools. Keeping women and girl children 'in line' with physical punishment.
These were not sub-plots of a movie; instead, the horrifying truth of the lived experiences of the Afghan women in the room.
An activist and human rights defender for nearly 30 years, *Horia said she believes the Taliban's rule in Afghanistan is a silent tsunami: 'This is not our religion, this is not Islam, this is the Taliban. In Afghanistan, women who are found guilty of 'moral crimes' are subjected to 'honour violence', in the form of public beatings, torture and imprisonment.
Horia said that the delegation is in South Africa to draw on the experience of women who were subjugated under apartheid, and to learn more about the role the judiciary, civil society and the media could play in their fight for freedom.
Commenting on the voice of the judiciary, Judge Shehnaz Meer remarked: 'Judges generally don't have conversations. We talk through our judgements, in so doing be both apply and interpret the law, and it is open for us to do so in a humane manner and in a way that advances humankind. In a society like Afghanistan, where gender apartheid is legislated, there are no raw materials available for judges to converse about human rights through their judgments. This is reminiscent of a period in South Africa, post-apartheid, where judges had very few raw materials and were, by and large, state sympathisers.'
Meer went on to describe what she refers to as 'the activist judge', who is mindful of respecting the dignity of women in court, not shying away from intervening to protect their dignity in the case of gender-based violence or other. She also said that the activist judge does not preside as a silent arbiter, and ensures this standard is upheld at all times, without fear, favour or prejudice.
'This is the judicial voice that must be brought to bear in discourse on global gender apartheid. If the blueprint of judges in this country can be applied internationally, then judges would lend their voices in a meaningful and productive way to end the scourge that has resulted in women in Afghanistan being excluded from society and rendered invisible, in the workplace, education and (barred from) operating as human beings in society.'
Storyteller and activist *Gaisu said: 'The stories I've been collecting, women of Afghanistan as a grassroots movement have come together globally to unite, to use 'Gender Apartheid' as a tool or a framework for us, and serve as a reflection of what's happening in our country.'
Gaisu referenced the story of women in Afghanistan about the clothing she is required to wear, a black burka: 'What once felt elegant, now feels suffocating to me'. Another woman shared with Gauri that her life is marked by 'There is no laughter, I'm just trying to survive'. Her collection of stories offers a vivid picture of Taliban oppression, which arguably, mutilates the voices and the lives of women in her country.
Professor Thuli Madonsela says she has seen just how unsustainable injustice is: 'Ubuntu teaches us about our interconnectedness. It doesn't matter where you are, injustice catches up with you. So what is happening in Afghanistan will happen in another country, and another. What we tolerate, we are indirectly condoning.'
The delegation visited other countries before this trip to South Africa, where they were asked similar questions: 'What is South Africa saying about gender apartheid? Do you have their support?'
While the acceptance and universal adoption of 'gender apartheid' remains a subject for discussion and review, the Afghan women who participated in this exploratory visit to South Africa are clear: 'We want our stories to be told. We want to be heard. We want our mothers, sisters, and daughters to live in a free society that no longer oppresses or silences them.'
Horia offered the first roundtable food for a little more than thought: 'We will remember the words of our enemies. We will remember the silence of our friends'.
Diane Naidoo is a freelance writer with 30 years of experience in PR and communications. She lends her voice to stories about social impact, climate action, and sustainability. While she led the advocacy and lobbying campaign for renewables in South Africa in 2010, she is also an avid cricket fan, working on the IPL and SA20, as she believes in the transformative and unifying power of sport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
09-06-2025
- The South African
Trump's new travel ban targeting 12 countries takes effect
A new travel ban signed by US President Donald Trump officially took effect today, Monday, 9 June. As reported by BBC , the travel ban essentially bars nationals from 12 countries from entering the US. These countries include: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Travellers from seven other countries – Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela – will also face partial restrictions. According to reports, the White House said the so-called 'common sense restrictions' was meant to protect national security and prevent 'dangerous foreign actors' from entering the US. This also marks the second time Trump has implemented a broad travel ban. A similar policy was signed in 2017 during his first term, sparking widespread legal battles and protests. While the order is sweeping, it does include several exemptions. The travel ban does not apply to: Lawful permanent US residents (green card holders) Immediate family members of US residents who hold immigrant visas US government employees with Special Immigrant Visas Children being adopted by US citizens Dual nationals when the individual is not travelling on a passport from one of the affected countries Afghan nationals with Special Immigrant Visas Holders of 'immigrant visas for ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran' Foreign nationals entering with specific non-immigrant visas Athletes, coaches, and support staff attending major sporting events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
06-06-2025
- Daily Maverick
EXPLAINER-What is the International Criminal Court?
THE HAGUE, June 5 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court, an unprecedented retaliation over the tribunal's work on issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here are some facts about the court: WHEN WAS THE ICC SET UP AND WHY? The court was established in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It can prosecute crimes committed by nationals of member states or on the territory of member states by other actors. It has 125 member states. The court's budget for 2025 is about 195 million euros ($202 million). WHAT IS THE ICC INVESTIGATING? The ICC is conducting investigations from the Palestinian territories to Ukraine and African states such as Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo and Kenya, to Venezuela in Latin America and Myanmar and the Philippines in Asia. It says there have been 32 cases before the court, with some having more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued at least 60 arrest warrants. HOW MANY PEOPLE HAS THE COURT CONVICTED? ICC judges have issued 11 convictions and four acquittals. Twenty-one people have been held in the ICC detention centre in The Hague and have appeared before the court, and 31 people remain at large. Charges have been dropped against seven people due to their deaths. Of the 11 convictions, only six have been for the court's core crimes of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The others were for crimes such as witness tampering. The six convicted men were all African militia leaders from Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali and Uganda. Terms ranged from nine to 30 years in prison. The maximum possible term is life imprisonment. WHO IS ON THE COURT'S ARREST WARRANT LIST? Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested on March 11 on a warrant from the ICC. Prosecutors accuse him of forming and arming death squads held responsible for the killing of thousands of perceived drug users and dealers during his rule. Duterte has said he takes full responsibility for the 'war on drugs' as he braces for the legal battle. Other notable ICC suspects are Netanyahu, who is accused of being criminally responsible for acts including murder, persecution and using starvation as a weapon of war in the Gaza conflict, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, accused of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Both Israel and Russia have repeatedly denied that their forces have committed atrocities in Gaza and Ukraine respectively and have argued the ICC has no jurisdiction over them. When it issued the warrant for Netanyahu, the ICC also issued a warrant for the arrest of Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, whose death was confirmed after the warrant was issued. The ICC prosecutor has also requested arrest warrants for senior Afghan and Myanmar leaders, but those have not been officially approved by judges. WHICH COUNTRIES ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE ICC? Although the court is supported by many United Nations members and the European Union, other countries such as the United States, China and Russia are not members, arguing the ICC could be used for politically motivated prosecutions. Myanmar is not a member of the court, but in 2018 and 2019 judges ruled the court had jurisdiction over alleged cross-border crimes that partially took place in neighbouring ICC member Bangladesh, such as deportation and persecution, and said prosecutors could open a formal investigation. Israel is not a member and does not recognise its jurisdiction, but the Palestinian territories were admitted as an ICC member state in 2015. This, together with a ruling by judges, means the court can look at potential war crimes carried out by Hamas fighters in Israel and by Israelis in the Gaza Strip. The Philippines is not currently a member of the ICC but was between 2011 and 2019, when the unilateral withdrawal by Duterte became final. Under the court's founding 1998 Rome Statute, even if a state withdraws as a member it retains jurisdiction over crimes within its jurisdiction committed during the membership period. In February 2025, Trump authorised economic and travel sanctions targeting people who work on International Criminal Court investigations of U.S. citizens or U.S. allies such as Israel. Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan has so far been the only ICC staff member targeted by sanctions, which are set to go into force on April 7.
eNCA
04-06-2025
- eNCA
200,000 Afghans left Pakistan since deportations renewed
More than 200,000 Afghans have left Pakistan since the government renewed a deportation drive in April, with Iran also stepping up expulsions of Afghans. Generations of Afghans have fled to neighbouring Pakistan and Iran during decades of successive wars, seeking safety and better economic opportunities. Both governments have grown weary of large migrant populations and ordered millions to leave under the threat of arrest. Pakistan has launched a strict campaign to evict more than 800,000 Afghans who have had their residence permits cancelled, including some who were born in the country or lived there for decades. According to the interior ministry, more than 135,000 Afghans left Pakistan in April, while around 67,000 departed in May and more than 3,000 were sent back in the first two days of June. The number of returnees has slowed ahead of the Eid al-Adha holiday later this week, but some Afghans were still crossing the main border points from Pakistan on Wednesday. "We left behind our orchards" and livelihoods, 21-year-old farmer Mohammad Wali told AFP near the southern Spin Boldak crossing. "But we said to ourselves, 'If we stay, maybe one day we'll lose our dignity,' so it's better to return to our homeland now." The UN's International Organization for Migration (IOM) on Tuesday voiced concern over a surge in Afghan families being deported from Iran, recording 15,675 crossing in May, a more than two-fold increase from the previous month. AFP | Sanaullah SEIAM Iranian officials have ordered Afghans without documentation to leave by July 6. Nader Yarahmadi, from the Iranian interior ministry, said on state television that it would affect around four million of the more than six million Afghans who Iran says are in the country. The IOM said the influx across both borders threatens to strain Afghanistan's already "fragile reception and reintegration systems". It again called for "all countries to immediately suspend the forced return of Afghans, regardless of their immigration status, until safe, voluntary, and dignified return conditions are in place". - Rise in border violence - AFP | Sanaullah SEIAM Millions of Afghans have poured into Pakistan over the past several decades, fleeing successive wars, as well as hundreds of thousands who arrived after the return of the Taliban government in 2021. A campaign to evict them began in 2023, prompting hundreds of thousands to cross the border in a matter of weeks, fearing harassment or arrest. In total, more than one million Afghans have left Pakistan. Islamabad has labelled Afghans "terrorists and criminals", but analysts say the expulsions are designed to pressure neighbouring Afghanistan's Taliban authorities to control militancy in the border regions. Last year, Pakistan recorded the highest number of deaths from attacks in a decade. Pakistan's security forces are under enormous pressure along the border with Afghanistan, battling a growing insurgency by ethnic nationalists in Balochistan in the southwest, and the Pakistani Taliban and its affiliates in the northwest. The government frequently accuses Afghan nationals of taking part in attacks and blames Kabul for allowing militants to take refuge on its soil, a charge Taliban leaders deny. Some Pakistanis have grown weary of hosting a large Afghan population as security and economic woes deepen, and the deportation campaign has widespread support.
