What has the ‘pornification' of pop culture done to women?
Author and journalist Sophie Gilbert. Credit: Urszula Soltys
For me, there is a little too much about reality television, but it's a big part of the culture so there's no way of avoiding it, from Big Brother and An American Family . And Gilbert introduces me to one I'd never heard of before: Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire , which she describes as 'the beginning of reality TV's determination to view twenty-first century women through a nineteenth century frame: Jane Austen heroines who, deprived of agency or power of their own, could only compete to claim status and self-betterment through their looks, their alliances and their rivalries'. Pretty much.
Or, as Jerry Hall said in 1985, 'My mother said it was simple to keep a man, you must be a maid in the living room, a cook in the kitchen and a whore in the bedroom.' Hall updated it: 'I said I'd hire the other two and take care of the bedroom bit.'
But by far the most striking, most frightening, aspect of the book is the way in which Gilbert has both drawn on, and expanded, the work of philosopher Amia Srinivasan, The Right to Sex and Gail Dines' Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality. Porn trains us.
Porn trains us in how to be women. And worse, it trains men in how to treat women. 'It has trained a good amount of our popular culture ... to see women as objects, as things to silence, restrain, fetishise, or brutalise,' says Gilbert. The fleshed-out concept of pornography as a textbook for how women must be in their lives is terrifying. Now I've read Gilbert's persuasive arguments, I'm embarrassed I've ever been persuaded otherwise. I've never felt so wrong in my life. There is now, she argues, a 'pornification' of everything, including music.
We saw, in the 90s, a distinct shift from angry, abrasive and 'thrillingly powerful women' (Madonna, for example) who were suddenly replaced by, ah, girls. Soft, sweet, compliant. But what about when the anger, directed at women, appears in the lyrics of male artists?
After the 90s, there was a shift away from 'thrilling powerful women' such as Madonna. Credit: Associated Press
Gilbert cites a 2006 German study that revealed that those who listened to sexually violent and aggressive songs, including Eminem's Superman and The Offspring's Self Esteem , were more likely to have negative thoughts about women. Sure, it's fine to think what you want, but the men in these studies were also far more likely to have 'thoughts of vengeance' directed at women.
Pamela Anderson's sex tape was 'revenge porn before we even had a name for it'. Credit: Getty Images
What about when men go further than just thinking about vengeance? In 1995, an electrician fired from the home of Pamela Anderson and her first husband Tommy Lee broke into their home, stole a video of the couple having sex and spread it everywhere. It became the 'Pamela Anderson' sex tape, the first of its kind, revenge porn before we even had a name for it, says Gilbert.
Yes, appalling when Anderson's sex tapes were broadcast and sold for all to see. But now that kind of thing happens frequently. The victims aren't always famous, but they are just as stripped of agency as Anderson was all those years ago, but they don't have the same back-up. They wear their shame in private and maybe their parents aren't even convinced it wasn't the fault of the victim.
Gilbert explains how we got to the stage where exploitation is the fault of those who suffer it. And as she points out, 'The logical extension of objectification is dehumanisation.' Why would anyone care about the non-human?
Loading
Gilbert's book is bleak, well-argued and compelling. And unlike many in this genre, there are no real recipes for hope beyond small sites of forward lash. She writes: 'I have no idea what happens next. But history suggests that women will be much harder to sideline than the Trump‐Vance administration may anticipate.'
I hope she's right. But will we ever really get to post-feminism? Sure, when we get to post-patriarchy. As Gilbert makes clear, we've got a long way to go, baby.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
10 hours ago
- 7NEWS
INSIDE MEDIA: Rick Astley passes 1 billion streams on Spotify
A video version of this article is available in the player above with vision of the interviews quoted. Rick Astley passes 1 billion If you've ever been 'Rickrolled' (and who of us hasn't), you might be interested to know the song behind the prank has reached 1 billion streams on Spotify. Never Gonna Give You Up was released in 1987 by renowned hitmakers Stock Aitken Waterman and was a number 1 hit in the UK, US and here in Australia. Around 2007, the song became something of a phenomenon when people started sending prank links to it on YouTube. A user would be told the link was for one thing, but ended up being 'Rickrolled', or taken to the song. There's no doubt the prank helped the song stay fresh in the minds of people, leading consumers to search for the song on Spotify, which eventually led to the 1 billion streams. 'So who would have believed, after all these years, Never Gonna Give You Up has had a billion streams on Spotify' Astley posted on his official TikTok account. 'How amazing. Thank you for listening and lots of love and I'll see you all soon, I hope.' What an amazing achievement. You can see his message in the video player above and, no, it won't take you to the song – I promise! Let the spin begin It's always funny when a company tries to discredit a story by trying to change the narrative. That's just what happened in regard to my exclusive story last week about I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here! facing major budget cuts and its plan to pre-record for the 2026 series. On Wednesday, Pedestrian published a hit job on my reporting without attributing the original article and without including the writer's byline. Instead, it credited The PR fluff piece had obviously been given to the outlet by Channel 10, who did not want to officially confirm my reporting, but rather change the narrative. According to the gushing story, the change from live to pre-recording has nothing to do with budget cuts (heaven forbid), but more to do with the availability of big names who do not want to do the show live. As per the article: 'This change is massive,' one network insider spilled to 'Live TV has always been the dealbreaker for certain 'celebs.' Now that it's pre-recorded, a whole bunch of big names who used to say 'nah' are suddenly very interested.' It continues: Basically, removing the live element means 'celebs' don't have to stress about getting cancelled in real time and producers can flex a bit more control over the chaos. Think better editing, bigger stunts, and (hopefully) fewer awkward silences when someone gets booted. But then comes the big one, squarely taking aim at my reporting this change was made for budgetary reasons: And before anyone starts screaming 'budget cuts!', our sources are insisting this has nothing to do with Network Ten's upcoming Big Brother reboot stealing all the coins. 'If anything, this frees up resources to chase even bigger names,' the insider said. 'Think, international guests and proper A-listers, not just someone who got kicked off The Bachelor six years ago.' Why, then, did Channel 10 pre-record the finale this year, shooting three different versions and sending the entire production team home early? Obviously, that had nothing to do with budget! I can't wait to see Tom Cruise, Scarlett Johansson and other top tier talent take to the jungle in the next season, rather than a tragic bunch of nobodies. If 10 wants to change the narrative, then why not go on the record, confirm my reporting (which is correct) and make an official statement, rather than leaking to an outlet. At least we know they've already confirmed that McKnight was right! Media Watch hits out at Today It was interesting watching the hit job done by the ABC's Media Watch on Monday night against Channel 9's Today Show. The publicly funded broadcaster took issue with the fact the breakfast show dared into a commercial deal with UAE. Host Linton Besser wasn't happy with the show showing the positive tourist attractions of the country, rather than focusing on the negatives. 'The UAE is a repressive nation-state governed by an absolute monarchy whose arbitrary and fickle approach to justice and the law can create frightening risks for those who move there for work, like 28-year-old Emirates Airlines flight attendant Tori Towey, an Irish citizen who in June last year was strip searched and charged with attempting suicide after fleeing domestic violence' Besser said. All of that is true. But even though Besser declared Today had failed in 'spectacular fashion' in journalistic terms, he did have to acknowledge Nine did not hide anything from viewers. 'Despite the entire outside broadcast being funded by UAE government-backed businesses, which Nine did disclose, a spokesman for the media company told us the 'event TV' project had not been vetted by the foreign government'. OK, so what exactly is the problem here? Breakfast shows have always been a mix of news and entertainment. Sunrise certainly turned the format on its head in the 2000s when it introduced 'newstainsment' and became the number one breakfast show – a position which is still in place today. Commercial arrangements are a part of breakfast TV and there is no issue as long as those deals are made clear to the audience. Media Watch did not challenge Nine's position that the deal with UAE was disclosed. Nine and Today have never been shy about reporting on the atrocities that have taken place in the region and I don't believe this short-term deal will change that. So, Media Watch – which does not rely on commercial deals thanks to the $1.1 billion of government funding the ABC receives each year from taxpayers – thinks the show should have refused the money or done a big expose. Let's live in the real world. Commercial broadcasters are doing it tough and deals like this help them to survive. If a big story about the UAE had broken and the Today Show hadn't covered it, then Media Watch should rightly call them out. But that didn't happen. Instead, what we have here is an elitist attitude from a government-funded entity that doesn't rely on revenue to survive.


Perth Now
3 days ago
- Perth Now
What Timothée's ex really thinks of his new relationship
Timothée Chalamet's ex, Mexican actress and singer Eiza González, has reacted to his new romance with Kylie Jenner. The Baby Driver star gave a surprising response when asked about Chalamet's new relationship during Cosmopolitan's Cheap Shots segment. González read the question card she was given aloud: 'You made headlines for liking a photo of Timothée Chalamet and Kylie Jenner, what really went on between you and Timothée?' Instead of choosing to take a shot, the 35-year-old decided to answer. 'I did like it, they look so cute together, they look so in love and cute and I'm obsessed with them and I love Timmy,' she said. Eiza González during the 82nd annual Golden Globes on January 5, 2025, in Beverly Hills, California. Credit: Michael Buckner/GG2025 / Penske Media via Getty Images González and Chalamet had a romantic fling back in June 2020, when they were spotted kissing in Cabo by paparazzi. But, she kept the details of their tryst under wraps and instead heaped praise on his career success. 'I think he is the most talented, sweetest boy and I'm just so proud to see him thriving and doing great in his career, González continued. 'We're just good friends. I have nothing but amazing things to say about him.' González's kind-hearted words come just weeks after the headline-making couple made their red carpet debut at the 70th David Di Donatello awards. Timothee Chalamet and Kylie Jenner at the 70th David Di Donatello. Credit: Vittorio Zunino Celotto / Getty Images Jenner has accompanied her new beau to countless events in recent months but, the awards ceremony in Rome on May 8, was the first time the loved-up duo entered an event hand-in-hand. She wore a black Schiaparelli gown and Chalamet wore a black velvet Tom Ford suit as they posed affectionately for photographs. Chalamet received the award for Cinematic Excellence following his recent roles in the Bob Dylan biopic A Complete Unknown, as well as Dune: Part Two.


Perth Now
3 days ago
- Perth Now
'Absolutely head over heels': JoJo Siwa confirms relationship with Chris Hughes
JoJo Siwa is "absolutely head over heels" for Chris Hughes. The 'Bulletproof' singer sparked a connection with the 'Love Island' star when they appeared on 'Celebrity Big Brother' in the UK in April, and though the pair previously insisted they were just "platonic soulmates", she's admitted they are now more than friends and she couldn't be happier. Asked if their bond is platonic or romantic, she paused for some time before she told The Guardian newspaper: 'It's not platonic any more, and it's been a beautiful development, a beautiful connection, and I'm absolutely head over heels for him and he's the same way.' JoJo dismissed speculation her relationship with Chris is a "PR stunt". She said: 'Clearly, you've never been around us. I won't ever speak for him, but for me personally, the happiness in my life just radiates off of me right now. Literally yesterday, I was massaging my cheeks; I've never [before] been in pain from smiling so much.' But the former 'Dance Moms' star can understand why people are fascinated by her and 32-year-old Chris. She said: 'People can see our chemistry, and they got to see it develop. 'I think everyone's just curious, and I can't blame them.' The 22-year-old star admitted she feels happier than ever and hailed meeting Chris as the "best thing" to ever happen to her. She said of her newfound happiness: "Ever since 'Big Brother', genuinely. Even my family is like, 'What happened in there?' 'You know when you're alone, how you feel? You are your true, raw self. I've obviously felt like that before, but never around one single person.' Just a week before she entered the 'Big Brother' house, JoJo had an overwhelming feeling that the show would be transformative for her, she just hadn't expected the impact wouldn't have just been on her career. She told her mom and manager Jessalynn: 'Something feels different. I don't think I'm gonna win, but I think I'm gonna change.' She reflected: 'Little did I know it was going to change my personal life so much. By a landslide, it is the best thing that's ever happened to me.' JoJo was in a relationship with non-binary Kath Ebbs when she entered the house, but their relationship ended at the 'Celebrity Big Brother' wrap party and while she now identifies as "queer", she believes sexuality is fluid. She said: "Queer encompasses how I am, and who I am. 'There's a lot of different sexual identities. I think there's nothing more beautiful than somebody discovering themselves.'