EC begins process for vice-presidential election after Jagdeep Dhankar's resignation
The poll body said that it will announce the schedule for the election 'as soon as possible'.
The Election Commission said it has received the gazette notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs on Tuesday notifying the resignation.
Dhankar had tendered his resignation late on Monday night 'to prioritise health care and abide by medical advice'.
He had become the vice president on August 11, 2022 and his five-year term would have concluded in 2027.
The Election Commission, under Article 324 of the Constitution, is required to conduct the vice-presidential election. These elections are governed by the 1974 Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Rules.
The Election Commission said it has already started pre-announcement activities, including preparing the electoral college, which consists of elected as well as nominated members of Rajya Sabha as well as Lok Sabha, finalising the Returning Officer and Assistant Returning Officers and preparing and disseminating background material on all previous vice-presidential elections.
According to the 1974 rules, once the Election Commission announces the election schedule, the whole process must be completed in 30 to 32 days .
There are 14 days for candidates to apply, one day to check the applications, and two days for candidates to withdraw if they want. If a vote is needed, it has to happen at least 15 days after the withdrawal period ends.
The Vice-President is chosen by members of both Houses of Parliament, including nominated members. However, unlike in the president's election, state legislators do not vote.
Voting happens in the Parliament building in New Delhi by secret ballot. Members of Parliament rank the candidates in order of their choice.
Also read: Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation 'totally unexpected', more to it than meets the eye: Congress
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
President reference ‘misleading', wants SC to sit on appeal against its own verdict in TN Governor case: Kerala to SC
The State of Kerala on Monday (July 28, 2025) urged the Supreme Court to dismiss the Presidential Reference seeking clarity on whether judiciary can fix timelines for the President and State Governors to clear State Bills, saying it is a ruse to make the apex court sit in appeal of its own authoritative pronouncement in the Tamil Nadu Governor case. The Constitution, the State said, does not allow the apex court to sit in appeal of its own judgments, nor can the President vest appellate jurisdiction in the court through a Presidential Reference. The State said the Reference was 'misleading' and 'suppressed facts'. Kerala, represented by senior advocate K.K. Venugopal and C.K. Sasi, said the President can only refer questions to the Supreme Court under its advisory jurisdiction of Article 143 of the Constitution if they had not been decided by the apex court. Quoting judicial precedents, including the 1993 Reference in the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, the State said powers of the Governors and the President under Article 200 and 201 of the Constitution have been the subject of three separate authoritative judgments in the cases filed by the States of Telangana, Punjab and, finally, Tamil Nadu on April 8. 'When the Supreme Court in its adjudicatory jurisdiction pronounces its authoritative opinion on a question of law, it cannot be said that there is any doubt about the question of law or the same is res integra so as to require the President to know what the true position of law on the question is. The decision of this court on a question of law is binding on all courts and authorities. Hence, the President can refer a question of law only when this court has not decided it,' Kerala submitted. The State pointed out that the Tamil Nadu Governor case judgment authored by Justice J.B. Pardiwala on April 8 has already addressed in detail the questions raised in the Presidential Reference in May. If the government wanted to challenge the April 8 judgment, it should have filed a review or a curative petition in the apex court, and not take the route of Presidential Reference, Kerala said. The State argued the very fact the government has not sought a review of the April 8 judgment, establishing it as settled law. 'The Union of India has not filed any review or curative petition against the judgment delivered by the court in the Tamil Nadu case, and has thus accepted the judgment…The judgment, having not been assailed or set aside in any validly constituted proceedings, has attained finality and is binding on all concerned under Article 141, and cannot be challenged obliquely in collateral proceedings such as in the instant reference. The President and the Council of Ministers have to act in aid of the Supreme Court under Article 144 of the Constitution,' the State of Kerala reasoned. EOM
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mizoram: Factionalism, politics cripple Chakma autonomous development council
The Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC), headquartered in Kamalanagar, is facing a deepening political crisis, which has paralysed development plans for the community and eroded public trust. Established in 1972 under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, the CADC was envisioned as a grassroots body for tribal self-governance, meant to uplift the ethnic Chakma population. Instead, it has become a stage for factionalism, where power struggles routinely eclipse public service. The stasis in CADC has triggered frustration and resentment among those who are vested in the state's development. Parbesh Chakma, president of the Mizoram Chakma Students Union, for one, is strongly critical of the council. 'Chakma people are paying the price for our leaders' incompetence,' Parbesh says, his tone measured yet edged with frustration. 'We're ignored, used, and misled. Nepotism runs deep, and education is not even on their agenda,' Parbesh, who returned home after years of studying in New Delhi, said. His disillusionment is echoed by many young Chakmas who have grown up watching the very institution meant to safeguard their rights become a revolving door of unstable leadership. In just the last seven years, the CADC has seen seven chief executive members (CEMs) rise and fall, unseated through no-confidence motions and betrayals of party loyalty. That dysfunction returned to the spotlight again on June 16, when CEM Molin Kumar Chakma who had led the first-ever BJP executive in the CADC—was ousted through a no-confidence vote. Molin had only been in office since February. The power shift came after 12 BJP councillors defected to the Zoram People's Movement (ZPM), giving the party a clear majority of 16 members in the 20-member council. Despite the numbers, the ZPM was blocked from forming the new executive, as Mizoram Governor VK Singh stepped in and imposed Governor's Rule, citing 'political instability.' Juhnee Chakma, president of Chakma Mahila Samiti voiced her concerns. 'Successive governments have consistently failed to meet the expectations of the public, with widespread poverty, unemployment, and unfulfilled promises contributing to a growing sense of disenchantment,' she said. Juhnee attributed the crisis to endemic factionalism among political parties, where internal rivalries and the thirst for power take precedence over effective governance. 'This is compounded by a weak democratic culture, where voters' voices are ignored, council resources misused, and corruption normalised. The very foundations of democracy in the CADC are being eroded,' she added. In the current 11th Council term, only one member—BJP's Nirupam Chakma has remained loyal to his party. The remaining 19 councillors have shifted allegiances multiple times in pursuit of personal political gain. Political analyst Lalhruaitluanga Kawlni, based in Aizawl, noted that council member Santosh Chakma has switched parties seven times in just two years. 'Two others have changed allegiance six times, and four have done so five times,' he said. 'With such instability, forming a sustainable government is nearly impossible.' Repeated efforts by student organisations and civil society groups to restore order have so far been in vain. Delegations have met the Governor several times, appealing for action. 'We've urged the Governor to consider an anti-defection law tailored for Sixth Schedule councils,' said Jyoti Bikash Chakma, president of the Central Young Chakma Association. 'But it's a slow and complex process, and until something concrete is done, this instability will continue.' 'Without an anti-defection law, no council members wanted to sit in the opposition bench, they changed their political alignments once they got an opportunity,' Jyoti Bikash added. According to Parbesh, the political volatility has caused severe disruption in basic services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure—directly affecting the quality of life in Chakma villages. 'Just look at our education system—it's in shambles,' he said. 'For 82 villages, there's just one college offering only arts, and only one higher secondary school. Merit-based recruitment is non-existent. Deserving candidates are constantly overlooked. Even the healthcare system is hanging by a thread.' The administrative paralysis has also triggered a financial crisis. The council currently faces a salary backlog of five months for its employees. A senior CADC official, asking not to be named, said the instability has pushed decision-makers to prioritise political survival over fiscal responsibility which led to short-sighted borrowing and poor financial planning that is damaging the council's long-term stability. 'There's a growing tendency to resort to ad-hoc measures, which only deepen the crisis,' the official said. 'The result is a government too distracted by power games to focus on actual governance.' Juhnee Chakma believes that only a united political front can break the cycle. 'It's time for our leaders to rise above petty differences and work toward a common vision for the CADC. We need to replace the culture of opportunism with one of accountability and constitutional integrity.' A senior official on condition of anonymity said the president's political instability is harmful for not only the CADC, but also the entire community. 'We are fed up with the political changes in the CADC, whatever development we have is being stalled because of their whimsical agendas,' H Nutan Chakma, president of All Chakma Employees of CADC, said. Nutan is a fisheries development officer. The CADC's recent history is a picture of dysfunction. During the 9th Council, five CEMs came and went in rapid succession. The 10th Council, formed in 2018, saw an unusual BJP-Congress alliance that lasted barely five months before collapsing just ahead of the Mizoram assembly elections that year. The current 11th Council has already cycled through two CEMs. With BJP council members now defected to the ZPM, Lakkhan Chakma staked his claim to become the third. That was when Governor Singh stepped in and imposed Governor's Rule citing 'constant political instability.' The CADC, an autonomous administrative body in Mizoram, representing the ethnic Chakma population, is one of 10 such bodies under the Sixth Schedule, operating across Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Tripura. Established on April 29, 1972, under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, it functions as a regional government, exercising legislative, executive, and judicial powers over specific departments within its territory. In Mizoram, alongside the CADC, there are councils for the Lai and Mara communities.
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sikh woman barred from exam over kirpan, Takht, SGPC fume
(Blurb) It's violation of Constitution, say Akal Takht, SGPC and SAD A Sikh woman candidate was reportedly not allowed to enter an examination hall in Rajasthan's Jaipur as she was allegedly asked to remove her religious articles, including a kirpan. The candidate, Gurpreet Kaur, a resident of Pheloke village in Tarn Taran district, had to appear in the Rajasthan Judicial Services examination. The episode has drawn condemnation from the Akal Takht, the SGPC and the SAD. The Akal Takht secretariat issued a video of Gurpreet Kaur in which she is seen protesting over being denied entry to the examination hall. She was seen asking the authorities to show the instructions regarding ban on the kakars (five articles of Sikh faith). In a statement, Akal Takht acting jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj termed the incident a grave violation of the Constitution and an act of discrimination. Questioning the BJP-led Rajasthan government, he said Amritdhari Sikhs wear kirpan as a mandatory article of faith. 'Similar instances occurred during the same recruitment process last year in Jaipur and Jodhpur. Despite a written communication from the SGPC and other Sikh bodies to the state government, the same episode has been repeated,' he mentioned. He referred to Article 25 (Explanation I) of the Constitution that affirms the right of Sikhs to wear the kirpan. 'While the country is commemorating the 350th martyrdom anniversary of Guru Teg Bahadar who sacrificed his life for religious freedom and human rights, the Sikh symbols are simultaneously being questioned,' Giani Gargaj pointed out. He directed the Shiromani Akali Dal and the SGPC to immediately form a high-level joint delegation to meet with the Prime Minister, home minister, Rajasthan chief minister and the registrar of the Rajasthan high court to register a strong protest and ensure a permanent resolution. If necessary, he added, the SGPC should consider filing a petition in the Rajasthan high court. An official of Akal Takht secretariat also shared details of the case with the ex-chairman of the National Commission for Minorities and senior BJP leader Iqbal Singh Lalpura. 'Lalpura, as a Sikh, has a primary duty of talking to the BJP leadership to ensure that no Sikh faces such discrimination in any part of the country. Lalpura shall hold meetings with the Prime Minister and the home minister and submit a detailed report of the efforts made for a permanent resolution to Sri Akal Takht Sahib,' the Akal Takht secretariat stated. SGPC president Harjinder Singh Dhami said strict action must be taken against the officials at the exam centre. He recalled that a similar incident had taken place in Rajasthan with some Sikh candidates last year. At that time, an SGPC delegation had met with the administration there and urged them to ensure such incidents do not recur in the future. Terming the Jaipur episode as a 'discrimination', Dhami said an SGPC delegation would soon be sent to meet with the Rajasthan government to demand strict action against the responsible individuals. Shiromani Akali Dal president Sukhbir Singh Badal sought the Prime Minister's intervention to ensure such events do not recur. 'It is shocking that rules, if any, are framed by lower authorities flouting the Constitution. The central government should issue or, if necessary, re-issue clear cut guidelines to all states and union territories about the exemption to the inseparable articles of faith,' said Badal in his letter to the PM. Sukhbir Badal also urged the Rajasthan high court to provide Gurpreet Kaur a special opportunity to appear for the RJS examination. He also asked Rajasthan CM Bhajan Lal to take strict action against the responsible officials. AAP MLA seeks special chance for candidate AAP MLA Dr Inderbir Singh Nijjar, who also heads the Chief Khalsa Diwan, said every individual has the right to live according to their religion and wear religious symbols. 'The incident is a direct violation of religious and constitutional rights,' he said. Seeking a chance for the student to reappear under special arrangements, he appealed to the central government to ensure that Sikh students are allowed to appear in examinations while wearing their religious symbols.
